Role Reversal - Has a man ever made you wait?
message boards
- Astrology
- Aries
- Taurus
- Gemini
- Cancer
- Leo
- Virgo
- Libra
- Scorpio
- Sagittarius
- Capricorn
- Aquarius
- Pisces
- Ascendants
- Astrology Houses
- Chart Interpretation
- Chinese Horoscopes
- Moon Signs
- Relationships & Astrology
- Zodiac Cusps
- Books
- Games
- Movies
- Music
- Television
- Celebrities
- Current Events
- Politics
- Sports
- Dreams
- Ghosts
- Numerology
- Paranormal
- UFOs & Aliens
- Education & School
- Fashion & Beauty
- Food & Drink
- Green Living & The Environment
- Health
- Home Improvements & DIY
- Internet
- Jokes
- Metaphysical
- Miscellaneous
- Parenting
- Personality Types
- Pets
- Relationships
- Workplace & Career
- The Arts
- History
- Travel
- Religion
- Science & Technology
- Writing
Posted by thezone This is a very decent man right there. do you have a brother? |
| Agree thezone. If we're not gonna be having sex we better damn well talk about it and agree cuz as far as I'm concerned healthy people do crave sex. And if you're not craving it, then something's the matter....and that something may just shatter those months of hard work. So ya better speak up! |
Posted by thezone that is not what he said. or maybe he did and needs to elaborate. it was the BEGINNING of the relationship. four months to be precise. so four months....no sex....waiting for sex to be introduced. is the first four months of the relationship a committed relationship? To many men it is not. So is there a double standard for women? I have to wait around for four months to get a commitment (apparantly sex is the definition for the commitment)....but you do not? I'm just trying to figure out the logic. yeah, four months in with sex and then two months without....and someone cheats...that's an issue. but that is NOT what we are talking about. |
Posted by domanb Domanb, What if after waiting so long, you found out that the sex was the worse you've had...completely no good. Would that have been a dealbreaker? Wouldnt you've been really mad at youself for investing and wasting so much time? |
| Maybe we should consider what the old lady is saying though... I mean at some point in your life you stop having sex all together so should it really be a factor in who you choose as your partner? I still say treetrunk yeah....haha *shrugs* |
Posted by thezone I understand it from this POV, ie IF you are already in a relationship. This would indicate that the 2 would have talked about the no sex issue and was ok with it. But to wait for sex from a guy who's stringing you along, meaning, as the woman you have no clue where you are with this guy, then, no, totally unacceptable. He'd better know I'll be getting it from someone else. |
| sexual chemistry is an important factor in a long lasting romantic relationship. Be in denial all you want, it's true. |
| I just don't get it. Why is sex so important like this? do people really not realize that sex doesn't have anything to do with love? A person could live their entire life without sex and be in mad love .... a person could have a fantastic sex life of everyday orgasms each being better than the first and never experience being in love. So, why do people intentionally make it even harder to love by making sex conditional? I really don't get it. |
| no. not duh. i really am curious. I'm trying to see a mans point of view on this. See, if a woman makes a man wait and a man gets it somewhere else, the excuse is because she made him wait. sex is sex. sex is not love nor has anything to do with commitment, not really. i mean...yeah, i have a really hard time detaching the two for myself....but you have to respect people who are able to do that. I really envy them. |
Posted by domanb Interesting. So, let me ask you another question. While you were making her "wait"...would you have had a problem with her getting it from somewhere else until you were ready to give it to her? |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ but, why does sex have to be such a huge condition in determining the relationship? For two people to have a great sexual connection doesn't mean they have to lose sight of the other factors they are looking for, and suddenly become so out-of-control over the sexual connection that this becomes the only reason to relate. I just cannot fathom what you said ... " .. only to discover a year later .." Where were you, exactly, for that year? lost? If you allow yourselves to get that lost inside of lust, then don't you think that the issue is you and not time? |
| I've made a girl wait. I wanted to develop a lasting relationship with her. I made her wait over 4 months, and after I shot her down the first time (within the first month), I told her the reason, and she accepted it. I want to settle down soon, and not be hunting for a partner when I'm older. The thought doesn't appeal to me. I don't want to be in another relationship filled with sex so early on, only to discover a year later when the honeymoon phase is over that we have nothing in common and can barely stand to live with each other. That's why. |
| I AM NOT WAITING 6 MONTHS TO GET IT GOING!! HELL NO WAY!! If I'm going for sex early it's because that is what I am about; so if it's not happening, see ya! But even with a guy I'm interested in; to wait 6 months is just too much. That guy has some serious psychological and/or physical issues to be addressed! And I say that without apology! Even if he's getting it elsewhere, come on now; am I not appealing enough? |


