Why are blacks a threat, but not Asians

Are we talking about fancy Asians or jungle Asians? I’m half of each

Posted by Ram416

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18
I'm going to generalise based on the Asians I know. They don't compare themselves or envy others or put other races or people down to raise themselves up. They are intelligent and educated or at least business minded, so they are focused on work and family and less on the politics and affairs of others. They aren't trying to compete with anyone so they aren't a threat. They're just living their lives, doing their thing and making something of themselves while everyone else is trying to step on somebody else or cry about how they're a victim of something instead of holding themselves accountable for their own life and future.

When people pay more attention to their own behaviour, their own education, their own future and their own decisions, they will make something of themselves. But if they're in constant competition, feeling sorry for themselves and blaming others for their own state of being, they will continue to be in this loop of hate and comparison with others.

Are you Asian?

Nope. I'm half Lebanese half Palestinian so it's not based on bias.

Lmao you are so far off. You can't generalize people of a skin color or culture that isn't your own.

Why not? I'm allowed to have an opinion, aren't I?

The fact that you have to ask why you can't say what Asian people are like as a group of people that isn't your own goes to show how ignorant you are.

Your opinion is unsolicited and nobody asked for you to lump people under your generalizations when they're not your people. You don't know how Asian culture is because you're not Asian. Your opinion of us is trash.

There are several problems with this logic and/or behaviour.

1. Generalization is always dumb. Regardless of the fact that someone is or isn't part of that group.
2. Linking the allowance to do or not to do x to a race is racist logic. You don't have to like it. You can have different opinions or you can simply think that this person is dumb but by saying you are not allowed to say anything on this just on the basis of race opens a lot of hellholes.
3. Racism and races aside (what a novelty): it's just a lazy way to shut out different opinions and to not have to present actual counterarguments.
4. With that logic the majority of this sites population would have no right to say anything about the (evil) white man. Completly regardless of whether what they say is true or not.


Are the emotions that fuel those behaviours understandable? Yes, and we are all guilty of having them or doing similiar mistakes at some point, but I think that, if we truly want to have an egalitarian world where everyone has the same rights and is judged on who he is and what he does/did and not on his race or social background or culture, we have to let got or rather overcome those notions at some point. As long as we refuse to to this we'll have the risk that, even if we would get rid of racism at some point of the future, that it can easily return.
Overall I don't think we can ever defeat racism by just destroying it but that we have to built an alternative at the same time which rquires from us that we work on ourselve as much as we fight against racist notions and behaviours wherever we encouter them.

No.

No to what?
No to equality or no to having to argue again on something that is pretty much a waste of time?

No to everything you wrote. I don't have time to lay it out for yet another ignorant person on this site.

Nah. Ignorance is when you tell someone she can't speak for Asians because she isn't Asian, when she actually is (albeit West Asian, but still Asian).

By that logic, if West Asians cannot speak for other Asians, then East Asians cannot speak for South Asians and Southeast Asians and vice versa.

Also by that logic, I could call you a racist for trying to shut up someone whose forefathers happen to come from a part of Asia that isn't yours. But I'd rather forgive you for your ignorance.

click to expand

She denied that she's Asian even though she claims to be half Lebanese. She needs to stick to one story about her identity.

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18
I'm going to generalise based on the Asians I know. They don't compare themselves or envy others or put other races or people down to raise themselves up. They are intelligent and educated or at least business minded, so they are focused on work and family and less on the politics and affairs of others. They aren't trying to compete with anyone so they aren't a threat. They're just living their lives, doing their thing and making something of themselves while everyone else is trying to step on somebody else or cry about how they're a victim of something instead of holding themselves accountable for their own life and future.

When people pay more attention to their own behaviour, their own education, their own future and their own decisions, they will make something of themselves. But if they're in constant competition, feeling sorry for themselves and blaming others for their own state of being, they will continue to be in this loop of hate and comparison with others.

Are you Asian?

Nope. I'm half Lebanese half Palestinian so it's not based on bias.

Lmao you are so far off. You can't generalize people of a skin color or culture that isn't your own.

Why not? I'm allowed to have an opinion, aren't I?

The fact that you have to ask why you can't say what Asian people are like as a group of people that isn't your own goes to show how ignorant you are.

Your opinion is unsolicited and nobody asked for you to lump people under your generalizations when they're not your people. You don't know how Asian culture is because you're not Asian. Your opinion of us is trash.

There are several problems with this logic and/or behaviour.

1. Generalization is always dumb. Regardless of the fact that someone is or isn't part of that group.
2. Linking the allowance to do or not to do x to a race is racist logic. You don't have to like it. You can have different opinions or you can simply think that this person is dumb but by saying you are not allowed to say anything on this just on the basis of race opens a lot of hellholes.
3. Racism and races aside (what a novelty): it's just a lazy way to shut out different opinions and to not have to present actual counterarguments.
4. With that logic the majority of this sites population would have no right to say anything about the (evil) white man. Completly regardless of whether what they say is true or not.


Are the emotions that fuel those behaviours understandable? Yes, and we are all guilty of having them or doing similiar mistakes at some point, but I think that, if we truly want to have an egalitarian world where everyone has the same rights and is judged on who he is and what he does/did and not on his race or social background or culture, we have to let got or rather overcome those notions at some point. As long as we refuse to to this we'll have the risk that, even if we would get rid of racism at some point of the future, that it can easily return.
Overall I don't think we can ever defeat racism by just destroying it but that we have to built an alternative at the same time which rquires from us that we work on ourselve as much as we fight against racist notions and behaviours wherever we encouter them.

No.

No to what?
No to equality or no to having to argue again on something that is pretty much a waste of time?

No to everything you wrote. I don't have time to lay it out for yet another ignorant person on this site.

click to expand

Nah. Ignorance is when you tell someone she can't speak for Asians because she isn't Asian, when she actually is (albeit West Asian, but still Asian).

By that logic, if West Asians cannot speak for other Asians, then East Asians cannot speak for South Asians and Southeast Asians and vice versa.

Also by that logic, I could call you a racist for trying to shut up someone whose forefathers happen to come from a part of Asia that isn't yours. But I'd rather forgive you for your ignorance.

Posted by DonJohnson2

Posted by swampy1

Posted by DonJohnson2
i'd say it's almost better to be hated(black males) than disregarded(asian males). being hated gives them a more underdog status, like the evil black men. women get turned on that that still.

being disregarded has brought the chinaman to almost 40% inceldom rate in the west. something like 50% of young japanese men are incel in their own country.

soy done nuked his test levels.

the asian females at the same time have become more hypergamous than ever. look at the asian females on this forum, running after white dick even if the men are of low genetic quality, deathly ill or missing a chromosome.

Look at it this way, if 50% of Japanese young men are incels it means either 50% of Japanese females are incels too or the other 50 percent of Japanese males/other races get more “choices”.

So you’re the legendary don Johnson... I heard you’re over 30 but the way you look at stuff is unwise.

smh

have you heard of the term hypergamy? start there then go to pareto principle.

lol the peasants here. l o l

i only debate my equals. the rest i teach.

click to expand

Weird, I have to come to your profile to see your reply, it doesn’t show on the thread.

Yes hypergamy is based on resources on a higher level thinking.

Pareto principle is just being efficient with your decisions in life.

Have you heard of the term proximity?

I was judging the way you look at stuff negatively. Everyone who is a useful member of society is a peasant because they work.

Now I know why ands had something against you lol.

The stereotypes that surround Black people and our general appearance intimidates them.


Also, white and Black people don't exactly have the best history between them.


Slavery and segregation wasn't that long ago. They know they treetrunked up and that's also why there's tension there.


It's like when someone's in an elevator and they see someone else running to make it in, but they press the close door button. Yet somehow the person makes it in just in time and now they're both standing there with that awkward tension.


White people tried to close the door on us, but we made it in anyway.

Posted by UrsaMediocre

Posted by Black-Mamba

Posted by UrsaMediocre
DJ has me on block? I don't even remember talking to him ever lol.

why are you asking? most likely not

Just lurkin the topics & I noticed I don't see his posts, just replies to them.

click to expand

ppl are going to his profile page and responding from there. lol

Posted by Black-Mamba

Posted by UrsaMediocre
DJ has me on block? I don't even remember talking to him ever lol.

why are you asking? most likely not

click to expand

Just lurkin the topics & I noticed I don't see his posts, just replies to them.

Posted by UrsaMediocre
DJ has me on block? I don't even remember talking to him ever lol.

why are you asking? most likely not

DJ has me on block? I don't even remember talking to him ever lol.

Posted by DonJohnson2
i'd say it's almost better to be hated(black males) than disregarded(asian males). being hated gives them a more underdog status, like the evil black men. women get turned on that that still.

being disregarded has brought the chinaman to almost 40% inceldom rate in the west. something like 50% of young japanese men are incel in their own country.

soy done nuked his test levels.

the asian females at the same time have become more hypergamous than ever. look at the asian females on this forum, running after white dick even if the men are of low genetic quality, deathly ill or missing a chromosome.

Look at it this way, if 50% of Japanese young men are incels it means either 50% of Japanese females are incels too or the other 50 percent of Japanese males/other races get more “choices”.

So you’re the legendary don Johnson... I heard you’re over 30 but the way you look at stuff is unwise.

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18
I'm going to generalise based on the Asians I know. They don't compare themselves or envy others or put other races or people down to raise themselves up. They are intelligent and educated or at least business minded, so they are focused on work and family and less on the politics and affairs of others. They aren't trying to compete with anyone so they aren't a threat. They're just living their lives, doing their thing and making something of themselves while everyone else is trying to step on somebody else or cry about how they're a victim of something instead of holding themselves accountable for their own life and future.

When people pay more attention to their own behaviour, their own education, their own future and their own decisions, they will make something of themselves. But if they're in constant competition, feeling sorry for themselves and blaming others for their own state of being, they will continue to be in this loop of hate and comparison with others.

Are you Asian?

Nope. I'm half Lebanese half Palestinian so it's not based on bias.

Lmao you are so far off. You can't generalize people of a skin color or culture that isn't your own.

Why not? I'm allowed to have an opinion, aren't I?

The fact that you have to ask why you can't say what Asian people are like as a group of people that isn't your own goes to show how ignorant you are.

Your opinion is unsolicited and nobody asked for you to lump people under your generalizations when they're not your people. You don't know how Asian culture is because you're not Asian. Your opinion of us is trash.

There are several problems with this logic and/or behaviour.

1. Generalization is always dumb. Regardless of the fact that someone is or isn't part of that group.
2. Linking the allowance to do or not to do x to a race is racist logic. You don't have to like it. You can have different opinions or you can simply think that this person is dumb but by saying you are not allowed to say anything on this just on the basis of race opens a lot of hellholes.
3. Racism and races aside (what a novelty): it's just a lazy way to shut out different opinions and to not have to present actual counterarguments.
4. With that logic the majority of this sites population would have no right to say anything about the (evil) white man. Completly regardless of whether what they say is true or not.


Are the emotions that fuel those behaviours understandable? Yes, and we are all guilty of having them or doing similiar mistakes at some point, but I think that, if we truly want to have an egalitarian world where everyone has the same rights and is judged on who he is and what he does/did and not on his race or social background or culture, we have to let got or rather overcome those notions at some point. As long as we refuse to to this we'll have the risk that, even if we would get rid of racism at some point of the future, that it can easily return.
Overall I don't think we can ever defeat racism by just destroying it but that we have to built an alternative at the same time which rquires from us that we work on ourselve as much as we fight against racist notions and behaviours wherever we encouter them.

click to expand

Yes

Posted by earlorg16
It's cause the US owes China 1.15 trillion dollars (which continues to grow btw).

yeah that's just nuts

It's cause the US owes China 1.15 trillion dollars (which continues to grow btw).

i feel like its a compliment to blacks. imagine, they think highly enough of blacks to feel like its a threat. They dont fear asians coz they think we are lower and can never be at par with them lol but then again, i think asians have a bigger priority than be considered the number one race. we just care about the money lol

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Antiochus

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by Elissar18
I'm going to generalise based on the Asians I know. They don't compare themselves or envy others or put other races or people down to raise themselves up. They are intelligent and educated or at least business minded, so they are focused on work and family and less on the politics and affairs of others. They aren't trying to compete with anyone so they aren't a threat. They're just living their lives, doing their thing and making something of themselves while everyone else is trying to step on somebody else or cry about how they're a victim of something instead of holding themselves accountable for their own life and future.

When people pay more attention to their own behaviour, their own education, their own future and their own decisions, they will make something of themselves. But if they're in constant competition, feeling sorry for themselves and blaming others for their own state of being, they will continue to be in this loop of hate and comparison with others.

Are you Asian?

Nope. I'm half Lebanese half Palestinian so it's not based on bias.

Lmao you are so far off. You can't generalize people of a skin color or culture that isn't your own.

Why not? I'm allowed to have an opinion, aren't I?

The fact that you have to ask why you can't say what Asian people are like as a group of people that isn't your own goes to show how ignorant you are.

Your opinion is unsolicited and nobody asked for you to lump people under your generalizations when they're not your people. You don't know how Asian culture is because you're not Asian. Your opinion of us is trash.

There are several problems with this logic and/or behaviour.

1. Generalization is always dumb. Regardless of the fact that someone is or isn't part of that group.
2. Linking the allowance to do or not to do x to a race is racist logic. You don't have to like it. You can have different opinions or you can simply think that this person is dumb but by saying you are not allowed to say anything on this just on the basis of race opens a lot of hellholes.
3. Racism and races aside (what a novelty): it's just a lazy way to shut out different opinions and to not have to present actual counterarguments.
4. With that logic the majority of this sites population would have no right to say anything about the (evil) white man. Completly regardless of whether what they say is true or not.


Are the emotions that fuel those behaviours understandable? Yes, and we are all guilty of having them or doing similiar mistakes at some point, but I think that, if we truly want to have an egalitarian world where everyone has the same rights and is judged on who he is and what he does/did and not on his race or social background or culture, we have to let got or rather overcome those notions at some point. As long as we refuse to to this we'll have the risk that, even if we would get rid of racism at some point of the future, that it can easily return.
Overall I don't think we can ever defeat racism by just destroying it but that we have to built an alternative at the same time which rquires from us that we work on ourselve as much as we fight against racist notions and behaviours wherever we encouter them.

No.

No to what?
No to equality or no to having to argue again on something that is pretty much a waste of time?

No to everything you wrote. I don't have time to lay it out for yet another ignorant person on this site.

click to expand

In that case it is to assume that you are against equality which would make your line of thought somewhat consistent again.
I can respect that.