Report Webpage

  • User Submitted Image
    43 years old from Compton, Californina, US
    Joined dxpnet on July 15, 2010.
    Posted by curious visitor
    Posted by ewashington7000

    Excellent point. Just one small problem. From what are you logically inferring that I don't believe in astrology?
    I have only argued that the metaphysics that informs your astrology is confused (i.e., bad); for it reverses the relationship between truth semantics (i.e., truth and its descriptions.)
    Plus, skepticism?! With some of the comments that I have read on this board, I argue that some of you faithful adherents to modern-day astrology probably possess more 'skepticism' about your very own astrological beliefs than actual skeptics do of astrology!

    In short, nevertheless, what I aim to point out is that astrology is actually based off of the science of astronomy. The zodiac is an actual belt of constellations the appears to border the apparent course of the Sun across the year. Having said this, influencing phenomena may correspond to where or when a human is born (as this statistically seems to be the case), similar to how, gravitationally, lunar tides may correspond to where or when the moon is on its orbit.


    i think you got cut off.
    1. i don't care if you do or don't believe in astrology. i think you're on an astrology forum (not only an astrology forum, but one dedicated to one of 12 astrological signs) arguing the validity of astrology. whether it's true or not doesn't matter. the internet is filled with message boards on all sorts of subjects. people tend to find message boards and forums that are relevant to their interests.
    if you logically want to debate logically over whether astrology is logically valid, start a topic of your own about that. don't hijack one that already exists. that's troll behavior. it's simple netiquette.
    and actually, once upon a time, astronomy and astrology were basically the same thing. thousands and thousands of years ago, court astrologers were gathering when a royal consort went into labor so they could predict what sort of life their next ruler would have. great generals kept astrologers to tell them if it was an auspicious time to attack.
    i believe in astrology, but that whole gravitational influence thing is bunk. i'm not sure if you were going that way with your overly academic rhetoric, but if you are, i agree with you.
    i used to know this then-law student who could argue just abo
    click to expand