Report Webpage

  • User Submitted Image
    Blessed be the fruit
    Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
    Posted by starlover
    Posted by BG2
    It is much safer to play out a fantasy than cross the line into reality. For instance, I would rather see someone with a blood fetish use fake blood than actually hacking someone up and getting off from that.

    As with everything there are different levels, different depths people are willing to go. There are extremes - and one into the BDSM lifestyle isn't necessarily open to everything within it, imo - and I do agree with you starlove that, pertaining to those extremes, one needs to know why they do what they do.

    ****
    My sag sister, in a relationship with a taurus man, calls him Daddy and he calls her baby girl. But there is nothing about their relationship that would entail anything remotely close to an incestuous kinda deal. He doesn't treat her like a child or his child and she definitely does not think of him as a father. The power exchange is reminiscent of a father/child relationship, yes, but that's as far as it goes.

    I would want to know why i had the need to call a man that wasn't my father daddy....it also screams of someone that is resistant to growing up. If i found out my son was calling any gfs he has *mammy*, tbh i would be fucking mortified .....

    Maybe some people don't want to know?


    click to expand

    Society's kind of twisted the whole "daddy/baby girl" exchange when it comes to relationships. I mean that's why we have terms like "pimp daddy" and guys endearingly calling their lovers "baby girl." It's more for that comforting protective/protection association to them. At least that's how I believe most people see it. You see some men refer to women as "mama" but more differentiated in common terms like "lil mama" or "mamacita" lol. I can see how it makes people think it gives them a personal ownership to each other in a relationship which a lot of people enjoy. "You are mine, I am yours."