Posted by xiongmao

Posted by Gobbie

Posted by xiongmao

Posted by Hypnotoad

Posted by Ixi

Posted by Hypnotoad
The only thing I have against it is how everyone put their eggs in the Vax basket which kinda killed allot of people and has put allot of countrys into trouble who can't afford all the vaccines.

1.) What people are you saying have been killed?

2.) Are you suggesting the Vaccine killed em?

3.) Are you suggesting that COVID vaccine's shouldn't be widely used because other nations don't have as much access to the vaccine once produced? If so, how does that work? If not, can you please clarify?

1. Deaths from covid across the world
2. Covid killed them, many could have been prevented with lockdown/mask but instead everyone thought treetrunk it we have a vaccine coming let's just live.
3. No, I'm suggesting that putting all the eggs in vaccine basket by wealthy nations has caused covid to hang around and do more damage to poor nations who will never be able to vaccine on the same level as wealthy nations.

None of which have anything to do with vaccines themselves but more the selfish quick fix nature of people.

You know, I actually wish we could either all put eggs in the vaccine or all put eggs in masks + lockdown, cuz then maybe we could actually make progress against covid. But no, it's all this half-assing cuz humans as a collective can't seem to agree on a solution. I absolutely agree on the last part tho.

Individuality, my dear, individuality. You can't expect people to act like a brainwashed herd one minute and individuals the next.

I also find it laughable that so many are blaming 'anti-vaxxers' for spreading the virus. You do realise that it lurks everywhere - in the air, on surfaces, even in domesticated pets that you all love posting cute pictures of.

Btw, how often do you pro-vaxxers clean your smartphones, huh? Yeah, I thought as much. You all act so self-righteous about spreading the virus but you're still exposing yourself (and others) via an electronic device that has the potential to be seven times filthier than a toilet!

LMAO!!!

Nah Gobbie, I dont believe most are brainwashed. If you believe that, that may be more of you not really understanding the reasons and motivations of those who dont agree with you in terms of the vaccines. But with all these finger pointing, maybe the lack of understanding is mutual. This divide is what I was saying to hypnotoad...that for all to put 100% in both (vaccine + masks/lockdown) is probably not possible at all.

Also for the record, I sanitize very often. I even sanitize vehicles from the steering wheel to the car door.

click to expand

When these vaccines have undergone long-term testing and monitoring then we'll talk.

Posted by Wizardz

Posted by Gobbie

Posted by xiongmao

Posted by Hypnotoad

Posted by Ixi

Posted by Hypnotoad
The only thing I have against it is how everyone put their eggs in the Vax basket which kinda killed allot of people and has put allot of countrys into trouble who can't afford all the vaccines.

1.) What people are you saying have been killed?

2.) Are you suggesting the Vaccine killed em?

3.) Are you suggesting that COVID vaccine's shouldn't be widely used because other nations don't have as much access to the vaccine once produced? If so, how does that work? If not, can you please clarify?

1. Deaths from covid across the world
2. Covid killed them, many could have been prevented with lockdown/mask but instead everyone thought treetrunk it we have a vaccine coming let's just live.
3. No, I'm suggesting that putting all the eggs in vaccine basket by wealthy nations has caused covid to hang around and do more damage to poor nations who will never be able to vaccine on the same level as wealthy nations.

None of which have anything to do with vaccines themselves but more the selfish quick fix nature of people.

You know, I actually wish we could either all put eggs in the vaccine or all put eggs in masks + lockdown, cuz then maybe we could actually make progress against covid. But no, it's all this half-assing cuz humans as a collective can't seem to agree on a solution. I absolutely agree on the last part tho.

Individuality, my dear, individuality. You can't expect people to act like a brainwashed herd one minute and individuals the next.

I also find it laughable that so many are blaming 'anti-vaxxers' for spreading the virus. You do realise that it lurks everywhere - in the air, on surfaces, even in domesticated pets that you all love posting cute pictures of.

Btw, how often do you pro-vaxxers clean your smartphones, huh? Yeah, I thought as much. You all act so self-righteous about spreading the virus but you're still exposing yourself (and others) via an electronic device that has the potential to be seven times filthier than a toilet!

LMAO!!!

It's spread by people not objects. A person who has covid virus breathes onto his phone then sure the phone will be contaminated but ultimately it comes from the person
The reason you don't have to worry about catching polio these days is because the vaccination program has eradicated it from the population and therefore from the objects, air and space around us

click to expand

Sorry but I'm not buying that.

Sorry, I just saw a grey wall.

Posted by Ixi

Posted by Gobbie

Posted by xiongmao

Posted by Hypnotoad

Posted by Ixi

Posted by Hypnotoad
The only thing I have against it is how everyone put their eggs in the Vax basket which kinda killed allot of people and has put allot of countrys into trouble who can't afford all the vaccines.

1.) What people are you saying have been killed?

2.) Are you suggesting the Vaccine killed em?

3.) Are you suggesting that COVID vaccine's shouldn't be widely used because other nations don't have as much access to the vaccine once produced? If so, how does that work? If not, can you please clarify?

1. Deaths from covid across the world
2. Covid killed them, many could have been prevented with lockdown/mask but instead everyone thought treetrunk it we have a vaccine coming let's just live.
3. No, I'm suggesting that putting all the eggs in vaccine basket by wealthy nations has caused covid to hang around and do more damage to poor nations who will never be able to vaccine on the same level as wealthy nations.

None of which have anything to do with vaccines themselves but more the selfish quick fix nature of people.

You know, I actually wish we could either all put eggs in the vaccine or all put eggs in masks + lockdown, cuz then maybe we could actually make progress against covid. But no, it's all this half-assing cuz humans as a collective can't seem to agree on a solution. I absolutely agree on the last part tho.

Individuality, my dear, individuality. You can't expect people to act like a brainwashed herd one minute and individuals the next.

I also find it laughable that so many are blaming 'anti-vaxxers' for spreading the virus. You do realise that it lurks everywhere - in the air, on surfaces, even in domesticated pets that you all love posting cute pictures of.

Btw, how often do you pro-vaxxers clean your smartphones, huh? Yeah, I thought as much. You all act so self-righteous about spreading the virus but you're still exposing yourself (and others) via an electronic device that has the potential to be seven times filthier than a toilet!

LMAO!!!

Appeal to Rugged Individualism or the Authority of the Select Few: and I quote:

"If it is a bad idea to accept a position merely because it is popular, it is an even worse idea to accept a position merely because it is unpopular. Yet Americans (at least) are strongly attracted to this pattern of reasoning, and advertisers are happy to exploit our attraction. Psychologically, the fallacy plays upon the desire to be above the crowd, better than others, a leader rather than a follower, or, in the case of the phrase "politically correct" someone who eschews a dominant orthodoxy.

People who pride themselves on being rational are much more likely to fall into this fallacy than they are to fall into its opposite, the Appeal to Popularity. The reason is not just that people who try to be rational have a stronger desire to be individualists (although this may be true). The reason is, rather, that being "rational" requires thinking arguments through for oneself. Thinking things through for yourself may lead you to unique insights. It may give you things to say about a subject other than what everyone else is saying. Hence it is often a good indication that someone has thought a position through when he takes a view that is not just like the mainstream view.

However, because it is true that people who take unusual positions have often thought deeply about the matter, a person who has not thought a position through may appear to be more thoughtful merely my holding positions that are unusual, eccentric, and "not politically correct." That is, holding unusual and alarming positions may create the illusion that you have thought things through, even if you have not.

The fallacy of Appeal to Rugged Individualism is always ironically self-limiting. We attempt to persuade in order to get others to agree with our opinions. Imagine everyone adopting a certain position on the grounds that it was unpopular...only to discover that everyone else has also adopted the view for the same reason! I am certain that this is the dynamic that drives the fashion industry: a style is fashionable only as long as only a select few are wearing it. Once it becomes popular, it ceases to be fashionable and a new style must be found. Fortunately, truth does not operate by the rules of fashion. Thinking things through for yourself does not mean holding unpopular beliefs; it means hold whatever beliefs reason leads you to, whether they are popular or not."

It's beautiful how it lines up in a way.

Also, an Appeal to Hypocrisy however that was covered earlier though so I won't repeat.

click to expand

And the masses, in ancient civilisation, believed that the world was flat.

Many ideas, by famous inventors, were considered crazy by the general public.

White people originally considered black people to be savages, barely any different from monkeys.

Now, you take your highly flawed and pretentious quote and shove it where the sun doesn't shine.

Posted by xiongmao

Posted by Hypnotoad

Posted by Ixi

Posted by Hypnotoad
The only thing I have against it is how everyone put their eggs in the Vax basket which kinda killed allot of people and has put allot of countrys into trouble who can't afford all the vaccines.

1.) What people are you saying have been killed?

2.) Are you suggesting the Vaccine killed em?

3.) Are you suggesting that COVID vaccine's shouldn't be widely used because other nations don't have as much access to the vaccine once produced? If so, how does that work? If not, can you please clarify?

1. Deaths from covid across the world
2. Covid killed them, many could have been prevented with lockdown/mask but instead everyone thought treetrunk it we have a vaccine coming let's just live.
3. No, I'm suggesting that putting all the eggs in vaccine basket by wealthy nations has caused covid to hang around and do more damage to poor nations who will never be able to vaccine on the same level as wealthy nations.

None of which have anything to do with vaccines themselves but more the selfish quick fix nature of people.

You know, I actually wish we could either all put eggs in the vaccine or all put eggs in masks + lockdown, cuz then maybe we could actually make progress against covid. But no, it's all this half-assing cuz humans as a collective can't seem to agree on a solution. I absolutely agree on the last part tho.

click to expand

Individuality, my dear, individuality. You can't expect people to act like a brainwashed herd one minute and individuals the next.

I also find it laughable that so many are blaming 'anti-vaxxers' for spreading the virus. You do realise that it lurks everywhere - in the air, on surfaces, even in domesticated pets that you all love posting cute pictures of.

Btw, how often do you pro-vaxxers clean your smartphones, huh? Yeah, I thought as much. You all act so self-righteous about spreading the virus but you're still exposing yourself (and others) via an electronic device that has the potential to be seven times filthier than a toilet!

LMAO!!!

Posted by saggurl88

Posted by Gobbie

Posted by saggurl88

Posted by DMV

Posted by saggurl88
19 years later and it was just like yesterday.

I ❤️ to see it.

I love it all.

Me too! Maybe he will stay out of strip clubs now that he has her back! lol

I also love that he was still able to pull hot young girls too, but it didn't work out. So now he is with a hot woman his age and she doesn't feel like she's settling for him.
Both of them are holding their own.

Most Leo men are ageist when it comes to dating. Many cannot imagine themselves dating someone above a certain age.

It's largely due to their ego, superficial nature and incessant desire to make others jealous.

The ones I know date older women in secret and want relationships with their age or younger.
I don't get it. They settle for sex with anyone who will have them in private and don't have many standards at all.
Even the good looking ones. It's like they don't know how good they look and all attention is good attention. Which is funny, because then they end up getting ignored anyways.

click to expand

That's because they're attention just like mes. Period.

Posted by saggurl88

Posted by DMV

Posted by saggurl88
19 years later and it was just like yesterday.

I ❤️ to see it.

I love it all.

Me too! Maybe he will stay out of strip clubs now that he has her back! lol

I also love that he was still able to pull hot young girls too, but it didn't work out. So now he is with a hot woman his age and she doesn't feel like she's settling for him.
Both of them are holding their own.

click to expand

Most Leo men are ageist when it comes to dating. Many cannot imagine themselves dating someone above a certain age.

It's largely due to their ego, superficial nature and incessant desire to make others jealous.

It's bad enough two Leo suns are dating each other but two Scorpio mooners? Methinks their second break-up will be messier than the first.

Posted by saggurl88

Posted by Gobbie

Posted by saggurl88

Posted by jaywalker
Thank you

I just realized that I have no idea if you are a man or a women. Sorry if I got it wrong but hopefully your friend will unblock you.

Post history, lazy bones.

I actually got caught up in that purple yam thing on the post history and ended up googling that instead It looked delicious!

click to expand

Typical...

Posted by saggurl88

Posted by jaywalker
Thank you

I just realized that I have no idea if you are a man or a women. Sorry if I got it wrong but hopefully your friend will unblock you.

click to expand

Post history, lazy bones.

Something firm, nutritious and satisfying that I can wrap my lips around.

Old. What a steaming turd!

I'm not really a fan of M. Shyamalan. He's basically a one-trick pony, whose best early releases starred Bruce Willis (IMHO). Since then, his movie releases have been gradually getting worse and Old really takes the biscuit.

Everything about it is awful - the poorly written script; the contrived, clunky and cringe-worthy dialogue; the stilted acting; the blurry camerawork; the incessant need to pack in as many shocks as possible (instead of just telling a coherent story)...

And what's with modern movies always giving the impression that the production team are on an extremely tight filming schedule? New movies all feel so rushed now, with half-baked scenes and questionable editing. Seriously, the 'new generation' working in Hollywood need to go back to frigging film school!

Without giving too much away, there are so many things wrong with this movie. I'll point out three of them:

1) No skeletons anywhere. Yes, bones do decay, but it would take centuries for the bones to decay and meld with the sand. Going by the indication that another group of tourists was soon due to visit the secluded beach, and based on the rate of ageing, not enough time would have elapsed for human bones to fully decay.

2) The brother is younger than the sister, right? Then why is it, at one point, he was evidently much older than his sister (and let's not forget the sudden and mysterious appearance of his tanned complexion)? I was waiting for a plausible explanation but got nothing. Even the characters overlooked the obvious. Probably in a rush to wrap-up filming, Shyamalan lost track of which actors should have been in the which scenes.

3) The final line of dialogue at the end of the movie. No, you are not! Think about it, dummy! To think that the movie started and ended with atrocious dialogue, from a well-established filmmaker, is absolutely shocking.

I only gave this movie a chance because of Gael García Bernal but even his (underused) presence wasn't enough.

*facepalm*