In my experiences with Leo's..... if there is still communication, there is still heart in it. A Leo will stay in an on-off relationship for YEARS! But, if they've committed to ACTUALLY being done, they aren't coming back in any form.
I wouldn't mess with this. Leo's are loyal, and I don't think the loyalty is to you. If it were they wouldn't even entertain the ex. Just my two cents. When a Leo is riding FOR you, no questions. Its their best quality actually.
However, a Leo who is hurting will entertain other women while licking their wounds. They are not going to shy away from attention. But that loyalty is to one.
I'm a Libra and I back this message. Aint no lie when I spit fire... because I've also weighed out any accountability or influence ive had in the situation. Ive probably initially blamed myself because god knows I want to see all sides, and tried to fix it from all angles prior. So, I'm coming in HOT with straight facts, receipts, depositions.....
Posted by Antiphates Just a guess, but I'd say aspects to the ascendant add or colour the rising theme of how you come across and relate to others while 1st house placements would shape your ego and the core of who you are.
So, if 1st house placements shape the core of who you are, it'd be understandable that I relate more to that description. And, maybe how others perceive me would be more the Ascendant, so it wouldn't necessarily be FELT by me, as its an external representation of presence?
So, I have a Libra Ascendant, but I have Pluto in Scorpio 1st house, which is apparently "on the ascendant". I relate a lot more to the description of the 1st house placement, than I do the description of my Ascendant.
What is the difference? What is more potent? Does its degrees/ aspects matter? Do the below aspects suggest one to be felt/ seen stronger?