Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco
Absolutely not! As long as you arent dishing out sexual favors, I dont see the issue. If someone is persuaded by your looks, that has nothing to do with your actual work value, and everything to do with where THEY place value. You'd be dumb to not use it if you could.

In my personal opinion, this kind of thinking is why the world is in the butterter and Trump is president.

I can see that. It is okay to have differing opinions on this people. Duality is so outdated.
You cannot deny the fact that human beings operate from a visual stand-point a lot of the time; mostly initially. The beauty industry is BOOMING, and looks have always sold and been the foundation of advertising (even self-advertising, interviews, applying for loans, dating, etc). How you dress, carry, and represent yourself heavily impacts how you are viewed in the business world. Its why CEO's wear power suits to work and not jeans. How you look is a representation of how one assumes you operate/ feel about yourself, etc, before being able to see your skill sets fully (in terms of new opportunity). How you are viewed can open doors, but it will not sustain you without any substance. . Using sex to get what you want (from a certain perspective) can be considered lacking sufficient substance and is NOT the same. Lets not confuse the two. You can think that your looks dont impact peoples view of you, if you like, but youre denying a deeply ingrained societal trait that derives from a primal instinct.

The OP was asking about using the promise of sex, so I assumed that was how you were answering. I'm not confusing anything.

The first line of my response was "as long as you arent dishing out sexual favors". I never saw sex mentioned in the initial post. Has it been edited?

It was from the rest of her posts in the thread, especially the first two. We all have to dress the part for our jobs, and I have no issue with that. I just misunderstood what you meant because I was assuming you were agreeing with what she's doing.

ahhh, I see. Sorry love, I didnt realize that what is being said.

I'm sorry I associated you with Trump. lol
Yours was the latest post in the thread, so I grabbed it.

click to expand

I was like well damnnnnnn. haha treetrunk trump on the highest levels!

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco
Absolutely not! As long as you arent dishing out sexual favors, I dont see the issue. If someone is persuaded by your looks, that has nothing to do with your actual work value, and everything to do with where THEY place value. You'd be dumb to not use it if you could.

In my personal opinion, this kind of thinking is why the world is in the butterter and Trump is president.

I can see that. It is okay to have differing opinions on this people. Duality is so outdated.
You cannot deny the fact that human beings operate from a visual stand-point a lot of the time; mostly initially. The beauty industry is BOOMING, and looks have always sold and been the foundation of advertising (even self-advertising, interviews, applying for loans, dating, etc). How you dress, carry, and represent yourself heavily impacts how you are viewed in the business world. Its why CEO's wear power suits to work and not jeans. How you look is a representation of how one assumes you operate/ feel about yourself, etc, before being able to see your skill sets fully (in terms of new opportunity). How you are viewed can open doors, but it will not sustain you without any substance. . Using sex to get what you want (from a certain perspective) can be considered lacking sufficient substance and is NOT the same. Lets not confuse the two. You can think that your looks dont impact peoples view of you, if you like, but youre denying a deeply ingrained societal trait that derives from a primal instinct.

The OP was asking about using the promise of sex, so I assumed that was how you were answering. I'm not confusing anything.

The first line of my response was "as long as you arent dishing out sexual favors". I never saw sex mentioned in the initial post. Has it been edited?

It was from the rest of her posts in the thread, especially the first two. We all have to dress the part for our jobs, and I have no issue with that. I just misunderstood what you meant because I was assuming you were agreeing with what she's doing.

click to expand

ahhh, I see. Sorry love, I didnt realize that what is being said.

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco
Absolutely not! As long as you arent dishing out sexual favors, I dont see the issue. If someone is persuaded by your looks, that has nothing to do with your actual work value, and everything to do with where THEY place value. You'd be dumb to not use it if you could.

In my personal opinion, this kind of thinking is why the world is in the butterter and Trump is president.

I can see that. It is okay to have differing opinions on this people. Duality is so outdated.
You cannot deny the fact that human beings operate from a visual stand-point a lot of the time; mostly initially. The beauty industry is BOOMING, and looks have always sold and been the foundation of advertising (even self-advertising, interviews, applying for loans, dating, etc). How you dress, carry, and represent yourself heavily impacts how you are viewed in the business world. Its why CEO's wear power suits to work and not jeans. How you look is a representation of how one assumes you operate/ feel about yourself, etc, before being able to see your skill sets fully (in terms of new opportunity). How you are viewed can open doors, but it will not sustain you without any substance. . Using sex to get what you want (from a certain perspective) can be considered lacking sufficient substance and is NOT the same. Lets not confuse the two. You can think that your looks dont impact peoples view of you, if you like, but youre denying a deeply ingrained societal trait that derives from a primal instinct.

The OP was asking about using the promise of sex, so I assumed that was how you were answering. I'm not confusing anything.

click to expand

The first line of my response was "as long as you arent dishing out sexual favors". I never saw sex mentioned in the initial post. Has it been edited?

Posted by Phantom_Limbo

Posted by heliumfiasco
Absolutely not! As long as you arent dishing out sexual favors, I dont see the issue. If someone is persuaded by your looks, that has nothing to do with your actual work value, and everything to do with where THEY place value. You'd be dumb to not use it if you could.

In my personal opinion, this kind of thinking is why the world is in the butterter and Trump is president.

click to expand

I can see that. It is okay to have differing opinions on this people. Duality is so outdated.
You cannot deny the fact that human beings operate from a visual stand-point a lot of the time; mostly initially. The beauty industry is BOOMING, and looks have always sold and been the foundation of advertising (even self-advertising, interviews, applying for loans, dating, etc). How you dress, carry, and represent yourself heavily impacts how you are viewed in the business world. Its why CEO's wear power suits to work and not jeans. How you look is a representation of how one assumes you operate/ feel about yourself, etc, before being able to see your skill sets fully (in terms of new opportunity). How you are viewed can open doors, but it will not sustain you without any substance. . Using sex to get what you want (from a certain perspective) can be considered lacking sufficient substance and is NOT the same. Lets not confuse the two. You can think that your looks dont impact peoples view of you, if you like, but youre denying a deeply ingrained societal trait that derives from a primal instinct.

Posted by LostinmyMind11
With Pluto in the 1st, you're going to come off like a Scorp ascendant. Same with when you have your moon aspected to Pluto...it's considered a Hades moon and will be more like a Scorp moon...same with how your moon is in your 8th house...it's gonna give that Scorp flavor.

Like I have Jupiter and Uranus in my first house even tho I'm a scorp asc....the planets just add a little bit into the 1st house mix.

I could be totally off but that's my interpretation.

Makes sense.
Also, I STAY feeling that 8th house moon. In Gemini...what a trip, an emotional roller coaster of confusion and chaos. Let me kill things, to have them reborn just so I can feel the intensity, and analyze my reaction and everyone elses!!!!! treetrunk. Its an issue.

Posted by LethalFantasia

Posted by heliumfiasco

Posted by LethalFantasia
You could still be a Libra Ascendant and have Pluto in the 1st House. #britneyspearsplacementz

You can be any Ascendant and have like multiple other planets in the 1st House.

Or do you mean you think you're a Scorp Rising with Pluto in the 1st as well?

P.S - I see the Scorpio on your ascendant/1st house for sure

Yeah, I always thought for sure I was a Libra Ascendant with Pluto in the First. But, then I was going more in-depth looking at other sites last night and it was listing me as a Scorpio Asc. Unless I was reading something wrong. I just redid my chart on Astrodienst and Grupovenus....it states Libra Asc. So, Ill go with that! haha

Weird. You could be a Scorpio Asc. But the inconvenient thing about this situation is that you're a Libra Sun, so now have fun trying to pinpoint if it's your Libra sun energy or you rlly do have a Libra Ascendant as well! lolz x

click to expand

I just ran my info through about 6 sites. Def Libra Ascendant. IDK what was going on with astrocafe last night. haha Scorpio in 1st in both Pluto and Saturn.....but is not my Ascendant. False alarm!

I do relate very much with my Pluto in Scorpio 1st house description, though. I feel it really is more what people INITIALLY see. I do find the description of peoples reaction to that placement very accurate.

Posted by LethalFantasia
You could still be a Libra Ascendant and have Pluto in the 1st House. #britneyspearsplacementz

You can be any Ascendant and have like multiple other planets in the 1st House.

Or do you mean you think you're a Scorp Rising with Pluto in the 1st as well?

P.S - I see the Scorpio on your ascendant/1st house for sure

Yeah, I always thought for sure I was a Libra Ascendant with Pluto in the First. But, then I was going more in-depth looking at other sites last night and it was listing me as a Scorpio Asc. Unless I was reading something wrong. I just redid my chart on Astrodienst and Grupovenus....it states Libra Asc. So, Ill go with that! haha

So, I've always thought I had a Libra Asc. However, on two other websites it lists that its in Scorpio because its in my First house on the ascendant. Astro Cafe chart doesn't even list my Libra ascendant. Now I'm confused.

To be quite honest the description of a Scorpio Asc really reads more true for me.

Absolutely not! As long as you arent dishing out sexual favors, I dont see the issue. If someone is persuaded by your looks, that has nothing to do with your actual work value, and everything to do with where THEY place value. You'd be dumb to not use it if you could.

I'm a Libra with Virgo Mars/Venus. I can become obsessive about repairing things initially, but once im over it, it's like it never happened. I've also found that it takes a lot to get me into a relationship, but once i'm in one, I'm dedicated AF to making it work.
If I've left, it wont ever be the same if I return, and i'd guarantee it wont be long until I realize I only returned because of the familiarity.

Cancer or Pisces.

Well WTF..... my man has Venus in Leo in 8th house! This sounds awful!

Weird thing is, he has only dated Libra women with Virgo Venus's EVER! His mom also has that combo... Every single one of those relationships was several years with them cheating on him constantly and him staying with them. Which for a Leo dom chart sounds weird to me.

Aries Sun
Sag Moon
Gemini Merc
Leo venus
Cap Mars