SassyKiwi

SassyKiwi joined November 05, 2015

Un petit pamplemousse

Profile Comments Photos Posts Topics

Message Board Posts

SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by firebunny
Posted by SassyKiwi
I would sign but apparently cookiemonsteres keep pm'ing him to stay so can we just kick out the cookiemonsteres

no no it was this guy who pm-ed me.

http://url.dxpnet.com/?f=http://i65.tinypic.com/207q32c.jpg
click to expand

Unless he sent you n00dz to share with us, you should have some leo moon integrity and keep to your word on leaving.
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by libralotus
Posted by SassyKiwi
Lol conjunctions going on within ALL 5 of his personal planets.

I'd run and never turn back.

Late advice :p
click to expand

Murder him and sell his organs.

You can advertise his chart with the parts. Juice out mo' money.
Has anyone seen this before?!
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Lol conjunctions going on within ALL 5 of his personal planets.

I'd run and never turn back.
Has anyone seen this before?!
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
I would sign but apparently cookiemonsteres keep pm'ing him to stay so can we just kick out the cookiemonsteres
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by gengbenghiskhan
maybe it's the nordic version of the cheating wife getting it on with the latino pool boy.

the norwegian and swedish wives will cheat with syrian sauna boys.

I can see this truly happening
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by DonJohnson
Posted by Scruffles
lmao

Looks like it was the wife's idea..

the one thing you can't take away from the soy drenched chinaman is that he is still the king of his house. LMAO @ wife telling a chinaman there's gonna be a refugee moving in. the entire family trees from both sides will beat her ass.
click to expand

That's because Asians are low key more racist than Caucasians in the grand scheme of things tbh
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Imagine locking these dxpers in a windowless room until there is only one left standing:
- P-Angel
- DonJohnson
- Ands
- firebunny
- hollyhock
- Stihl46
- rockyroadicecream

They would receive limited food and drink supplies and would be left to decide among themselves on how to ration them.

Who would be the first to die?
Who would be the last one standing alive?
In what order do you think they would go?

I'm positive Stihl would be all over hollyhock's 8th house Pluto energy unf
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Lol this kind of reminds me of a HONY story:

Contractors smh
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
I remember when I edited a wiki page like that back in middle school during school. Something about them being pedobears and Satan's spawns on the Care Bears wiki page. It was a little scary actually. 10 minutes after the edit, I refreshed the page, the edit was gone ): and there was this red "1 message notification - click here" left for me on the page (I wasn't logged in or anything), it said my edit violated their TOU or whatever and how they're going to report my activity to the administrator of the IP. I was like ok come @ me. Glad to see middle-aged women have similar tactics. They better have gotten that same warning tho or else hierarchy discrimination
The Messiness of the Beyhive
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by starlover
...and afterwards, we would spend our honeymoon here......

YES!! If the guy I end up marrying doesn't want something like this... hopefully the door hits them on their way out :p

I'd even love building something like this!!
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by Palerio
Could an overabundance of feminine placements, once you manage to deal satisfactorily with them, turn you into someone very masculine at the end of the process?

Astrologically, no.

Personally I see astrological masculinity and femininity in a different light. Those with heavy or significant water placements can be ruled by emotions. Those with earth placements are more sensual and level-headed, and sensuality can be associated more with femininity. Then there's air that's associated with detachment, logic, and intelligence. And fire that's associated with leadership, aggression, and freedom. I think men with heavy water placements will always be astrologically feminine and regardless of how they decide to "turn" that energy to compliment society's perceptions won't change the fact that they're ruled by emotions. That they're sensitive even with their tough exterior. It's one thing to accept and embrace one's energy, but I don't believe you can change it (as it's an internal programming), you can only make it appear that way. As for women who are ruled by masculine energy, they're very quirky and confident. They are achievers. Not saying those ruled by emotions don't strive like that but it's just more natural and easier for those with masculine energy because they don't let emotions get in the way as easily. You see this reflect all the time in the corporate world. Those who are ruthless and less emotionally driven lead. Their way of approaching things around them is more systematic and linear. And that dominant quality is associated with masculinity. Whereas emotions and sensuality can easily sway one's direction if they're not balanced in their natal chart.

This test is a little skewed but for the most part those who got their results I'm not surprised by. You can still be emotionally ruled and radiate masculine energy depending on your placements. That's why I called out stelliums lol.

TL;DR if you process things through emotions (feminine), you won't suddenly wake up one day processing things systematically and linear (masculine). You can apply that, but one's energy is internal, you can't change it. That's why opposites and squares can be incompatible or complementary.
Are you more Astrologically Feminine or Masculine?
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
The user who posted this message has hidden it.
what is your type physically?
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Where are the scorpio stellium men at

Are you more Astrologically Feminine or Masculine?
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
You guys scared him away. He can pretend to be macho all he wants, he'll forever still be a crab.
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by GetMisted
Posted by SassyKiwi
Posted by GetMisted
Posted by SassyKiwi
Posted by GetMisted
I smack my sack every now and then for a bit of pain/pleasure. *shrugs*

That's just being a plain masochist tbh

I'm a bit of a masochist. I'm not interested in a S/M relationship though. Needles, wax, and floggers are fine with me.. but rarely.

S/M is the area where things can get too intense and violent. Idk why people make dom/sub look like the worse thing ever. It's just consensual exchange of powers with some creativity! Many have probably done it unintentionally. People make things more complicated than it needs to be.

I'm aware.

I'm more interested in a D/S relationship. I don't mind a bit of S/M play, but it's not a regular thing for me. The Aries and I got a bit extreme with the punching and choking sometimes, but again.. that's a rare desire for me.
click to expand

Oi. Play safe, my friend.
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by GetMisted
Posted by SassyKiwi
Posted by GetMisted
I smack my sack every now and then for a bit of pain/pleasure. *shrugs*

That's just being a plain masochist tbh

I'm a bit of a masochist. I'm not interested in a S/M relationship though. Needles, wax, and floggers are fine with me.. but rarely.
click to expand

S/M is the area where things can get too intense and violent. Idk why people make dom/sub look like the worse thing ever. It's just consensual exchange of powers with some creativity! Many have probably done it unintentionally. People make things more complicated than it needs to be.
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by GetMisted
I smack my sack every now and then for a bit of pain/pleasure. *shrugs*

That's just being a plain masochist tbh
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by whatthecrab
Posted by BG2
Posted by whatthecrab
Posted by BG2
I am not even going to delve into rape fantasies. I'll keep my views on that to myself

We already know you have them

Haha. I guess, but why I like them, what scenarios I would love to play out...no one knows.

And...no one has spoken about the other side of the coin? What about the one fantasizing about 'raping' and not the one being the 'victim'? Hmmmm...

Scenario: you're both sleeping, it's the middle of the night, you wake up and see your lover off in dreamland and decide to take advantage of their state of 'helplessness'. You decide to tie them up and go to town on them. Would you (anyone) object to it? I'm curious.

That's rape because I'm not awake to give him that consent. Unless we've discussed it before and both wouldn't mind.
click to expand

This is true. Consent is always important, even when you're married. There have been cases where married couples have reported their spouse of rape because sex with zero boundaries isn't a given due to some marriage certificate.
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by AriesLove
Posted by whatthecrab
Posted by AriesLove
This article is so far from playing hard to get in my opinion. More like playing a dead person.

Playing hard to get does not mean no talking, laughing, going out, having fun, being down to earth etc. Simply means you are moving slow by choice. Slow into intimacy, slow into knowing all about you: where you stay, your family, your whole life.

Allowing yourself or the other person to find out more about you. To be intriguing to each other. If you know everything right away, do everything right away most people become bored right away. I myself am one of those persons.

It's not about getting a jerk, getting married or getting anything at all. It's about making decisions that you will not regret or you will feel good about. And allowing yourself to decide if this is someone you want to deal with. It's ultimately your choice.

Im not competing for best head game, sex game, fun game or whatever. There is always someone better than you. I wouldn't want to be labeled any of those from anyone but my significant other. No contest here.

I agree with your post. The article is sexist and has a nasty underlying tone that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. But I understand what he's trying to say. I don't get close to people easily and I have heard a lot of times that I'm hard to read or a hard nut to crack. But I don't think the article meant people who by nature are slow to intimacy. The writer talks about people(women only, as if men don't do this) who feel the need to play hard to get and act uninterested in order to keep people interested. Just for the sake of appearing elusive. It's true that it is an ironic approach to try maintain interest. To me it seems people play these games because relationships are hard to keep. And it's probably more of an defense mechanism or playing into the idea of hard to get=hard to leave than it is solely a strategy to attract men, like the article appears it to be. For most people it's easier to front with their feelings, because they don't know how to deal with rejection.

I agree....also some people need to realize it's not always "playing hard to get", some people may not be as interested in you as you think. That might be hard for some people to accept (men). So they label it as playing "hard to get".
click to expand

This. I'd love to hear what the writer of the article has to say on how he differentiates girls who play hard to get from girls who genuinely weren't interested in him.
Playing hard to get
SassyKiwi
Un petit pamplemousse
Joined dxpnet on November 05, 2015.
Posted by starlover
Posted by BG2
It is much safer to play out a fantasy than cross the line into reality. For instance, I would rather see someone with a blood fetish use fake blood than actually hacking someone up and getting off from that.

As with everything there are different levels, different depths people are willing to go. There are extremes - and one into the BDSM lifestyle isn't necessarily open to everything within it, imo - and I do agree with you starlove that, pertaining to those extremes, one needs to know why they do what they do.

****
My sag sister, in a relationship with a taurus man, calls him Daddy and he calls her baby girl. But there is nothing about their relationship that would entail anything remotely close to an incestuous kinda deal. He doesn't treat her like a child or his child and she definitely does not think of him as a father. The power exchange is reminiscent of a father/child relationship, yes, but that's as far as it goes.

I would want to know why i had the need to call a man that wasn't my father daddy....it also screams of someone that is resistant to growing up. If i found out my son was calling any gfs he has *mammy*, tbh i would be treetrunking mortified .....

Maybe some people don't want to know?

click to expand

Society's kind of twisted the whole "daddy/baby girl" exchange when it comes to relationships. I mean that's why we have terms like "pimp daddy" and guys endearingly calling their lovers "baby girl." It's more for that comforting protective/protection association to them. At least that's how I believe most people see it. You see some men refer to women as "mama" but more differentiated in common terms like "lil mama" or "mamacita" lol. I can see how it makes people think it gives them a personal ownership to each other in a relationship which a lot of people enjoy. "You are mine, I am yours."

Previous Next

Browse by page: