Posted by raven29
Actually I get along great with my Libra. We will be married for 25 years this August! He is a very kind, thoughtful and loving man.
Posted by FemmeScorpion
Some ppl just love arguments,not every post warrant a fight. Have been on various other forums and you post a topic-everyone discusses it. Not around here thou.
Libras may not like games,but that doesnt mean they dont play it. I think they get bored more easily because they like things to be easy,far too laid back to put up a fight.
Am amazed how little some of you know about me and the libra,yet one is so eager to pass judgement.
From my experience with libra male-they see you, want you,pursue non stop,do their best to charm the pants off you.
Mmmm this guy wont give up,he's handsome too,girl start liking libra. Libra likes that, he up his antics some more,giving her special treatment,confiding in her,introducing her to his family and friends.
All is good they laugh,make time for each other,he tells her how happy he feels when she shows up,she tells him he makes her smile.
Its obvious to both now that they like/have feelings for each other.People around them notices and start commenting on their chemistry.
I could go on and on. However the main issues i find are, libra gets very hot for the scorpio at the beginning. Scorp take his/ her time to warm to the libra. Then scorp start falling,libra loves freedom-like to have his space to charm. Scorps hate this,scorps are known to be possesive and jealous. So scorp start to use emotions on libra,libra still like scorp but even emotions will not stop his flirting. Then silly games begins. Scorps will try to get the libra jealous-from my experience libra falls for it. Mainly because libra loves attention and a sexy scorp removing that attention his a no no.
Then libra ignore scorp(from what i learnt this is class as going cold)scorps hate this,start giving libra attention. Libra is happy again,they both back on good terms.
The problem is, this becomes a cycle,has both knows what annoys the other. Then it becomes boring,mainly to the libra. Scorps will never get bored of using emotional blackmail/games,its part of our DNA.
Scorps up the games,libra becomes puzzled how can such a sweet caring person say/do these things.
Libra hates that the scorp makes him bewildered and at times angry. He seeks balance,to gain back his composer he needs time to think readjust. Libra can only do what he knows best,he goes cold,minimal to no contact.
Scorps hate this,why his he been like this? Scorps try harder to get the libra
Posted by curious visitorPosted by ewashington7000
Excellent point. Just one small problem. From what are you logically inferring that I don't believe in astrology?
I have only argued that the metaphysics that informs your astrology is confused (i.e., bad); for it reverses the relationship between truth semantics (i.e., truth and its descriptions.)
Plus, skepticism?! With some of the comments that I have read on this board, I argue that some of you faithful adherents to modern-day astrology probably possess more 'skepticism' about your very own astrological beliefs than actual skeptics do of astrology!
In short, nevertheless, what I aim to point out is that astrology is actually based off of the science of astronomy. The zodiac is an actual belt of constellations the appears to border the apparent course of the Sun across the year. Having said this, influencing phenomena may correspond to where or when a human is born (as this statistically seems to be the case), similar to how, gravitationally, lunar tides may correspond to where or when the moon is on its orbit.
i think you got cut off.
1. i don't care if you do or don't believe in astrology. i think you're on an astrology forum (not only an astrology forum, but one dedicated to one of 12 astrological signs) arguing the validity of astrology. whether it's true or not doesn't matter. the internet is filled with message boards on all sorts of subjects. people tend to find message boards and forums that are relevant to their interests.
if you logically want to debate logically over whether astrology is logically valid, start a topic of your own about that. don't hijack one that already exists. that's troll behavior. it's simple netiquette.
and actually, once upon a time, astronomy and astrology were basically the same thing. thousands and thousands of years ago, court astrologers were gathering when a royal consort went into labor so they could predict what sort of life their next ruler would have. great generals kept astrologers to tell them if it was an auspicious time to attack.
i believe in astrology, but that whole gravitational influence thing is bunk. i'm not sure if you were going that way with your overly academic rhetoric, but if you are, i agree with you.
i used to know this then-law student who could argue just aboclick to expand
Posted by spica
As curious visitor said, maybe you can go into pseudoscientific forums and have other awesome statisicians diss astrology together with you. If it pleases you. To argue about astrology's validity in an astrology forum is irritating to say the least. It's like YOU being in a heterosexual forum (acknowledging you're straight) and having a knw-it-all bisexual coming to disprove your gender.
Posted by spica
Thus, metaphysically, to argue that astrology dictates a person's life is equivalent to arguing that a statistically true description dictates the thing it describes . In other words, the statistically true description does NOT cause the fact that most monkeys give birth to only monkeys. Arguing as such is logical nonsense; for the semantic truth-making relationship is in the reverse order. Most monkeys giving birth to only monkeys causes the statistical descriptionn that'most monkeys give birth to only monkeys' to be true.
From your paragraph above (I have gotten rid of the parentheses). Can you tell me if you can read & understand it, please?
To successfully argue your case, you must be proficient in the subjects of which you speak. But your understanding is superficial, the way you only see oil and canvas in Dali's painting.
Posted by curious visitor
anytime one person, regardless of their sign, plays games and won't be open about liking the libra (especially if they are in a relationship already and say that they're just toying with the libra for fun), it won't work out.
no matter how stubborn and strong you think you are, you can't overpower the libra without making them feel like they matter to you. libras like what is easy. if you want to overpower them, you wrap them around your finger first. then you overpower them. duh.
many libras have told you that libras don't like games.
and this is the reason libra and scorp can't work. libra hates games and scorpio will play all the games they have to in order to not make themselves vulnerable, even though vulnerability is just about the most powerful libraphrodesiac (do you like this word?) there is. other neighbors can work out. it depends what their strengths and weaknesses are. with libra and scorpio, the compatibility is scant. (i've seen it happen, but i've never seen it last)
ewashington...if you don't believe in astrology, don't post. most people in general don't believe in astrology. everyone who does is aware that most people don't believe. we know that we're in the minority. we've heard all the arguments. so go find some skepticism message board and post among people who agree with you. thanks.
Posted by spica
Seriously, I respectfully need to query the validity of your statement, especially this one:
"That is, that which dictates (i.e., determines) a certain statistically true description (e.g., most monkeys give birth only to monkeys) is the fact that the actual world is as such that most of the time, this certain true description is the case (e.g., that the majority of monkeys birth only monkeys). Similarly, that which dictates (i.e., determines) astrology is the fact that persons who live in the actual world can be statistically divided into several groups differing mostly by behaviors within a certain periods of time, corresponding to the apparent path of the Sun across the sky over the course of the year (i.e., the zodiacs). "
I understand you're scientific minded, but what do you mean by dictates (ie determines)? Is the word in the bracket absolutely necessary? You have not only confused the reader (i.e.: me), I think you have confused the writer (i.e.: you). First, you didn't tie up your story of monkeys (i.e: experiments) properly into how the sun flashes across the sky in a streak of lightning (i.e.: astrology).
I take the notion that you, follow this theory: "If you can't win, confuse".
Your statement (ie: paragraph) here makes as much sense as monkeys flying to ophiuchus in a spaceship (i.e.: redundant).
So, again, respectfully, at least learn 1 chapter of astrology before you act like you know what you're talking about, (which obviously you're trying to smoke with useless jargon that are not well placed, nor incite any meaning).
Thanks (i.e: goodbye).