Posted by lisabethur8I don't agree that the dark is /safe/. There is a reason it incites a constant sense of imminent danger in most people.
they say that light is attracted to the darkness and vice versa,
the darkness needs the light.
Many love the darkness and stay there because it's "safe"... and light likes to see the where the light is shining in everyone.
those with light, they see potential, to bring light to the darkness. and the darkness needs the light to see. But not too much....the darkness needs to feel safe see??
to see things they can't see in themselves.
Posted by hanslaudeI am gonna stop you there. Did you ever stop to consider that the actual reason you "forgot", is because whatever it was you /thought/ was love before you forgot... wasn't actually Love to begin with?
Theres a guy whos separated from her lover for so many year, so long that he forgot how it feel to be in love.
Actually that person is me years ago.
Posted by hanslaudePretty certain that what you are calling love here, what you think love is... isnt love. It is just you being retarded, sooo... maybe experience real love and then get back to me.
You could replace love with another love when you forget about how it feel to be in love like the first one, so when you meet another love you gonna feels like its the first time you fell in love all over again.
For example, you got an amnesia and forgot about your love back then, then theres someone that make you in love again, but because you already forgot about how it feels to be in love, you gonna feel that second love like a first love, because you did not remember any other love like that love because you forget about it.
Posted by LadyNeptuneRiiiight, triggered. In this heartless shell of a man.
Lol I like how your trying to make that a thing. Mega triggered lulz. Gotta tone down your sensitivity a bit bro, or you'll never make it in these virtual streets.
Posted by LadyNeptuneFirst off you shouldve just said this first, instead of making it seem like you were denying her guilt/the evidence in and of itself.
And you may have a leg to stand on with that if you were beyond reproach with your own actions. But that's not the case. You treetrunked another girl before ending things with her. Now you can cite bad service, or whatever excuse you want. Point is your guilty of the very thing you 'suspect' her of. So at best your both guilty of being selfish fakes. See, doesn't really help you save face if all your doing is trying to drag her down to your level.
Just let it go. Cause your constant need to bring it up and re-hash and bicker means either a) your not over meena, or b) your feeling guilty. Either way, not a good look.Or c)She has not changed at all, so it isn't in the past. Dealing with psychotic narcissitic bleeps that deflect and avoid any kind of Self-Reflection and change as much as is humanly possible, is kinda my thing. I know it so well, I know when a person is just saying "yeah whatever" to simply keep going about the same old butter.click to expand
Posted by hanslaudeEXACTLY. In fact the literal definition of hate in a dictionary is "Extreme Dislike, Disgust, etc". Hate and Love are just the words we use to describe the extreme ends of the duality of Like/Dislike and Disgust/Attraction, etc.
Perhaps that is quite correct.
It need hate, disgust and betrayal for me to make me think "enough is enough".
Posted by hanslaudeOr any Water Sun woman apparently, just look at LadyNeptune Pisces Sun over there taking Mena's side despite the undeniable facts LMAO
You wont get a logical debate with scorpio woman. Trust me.
Posted by hanslaudeBruh if you accept that Hate and Love are opposites and that Apathy is in the middle. Then it is logical inevitability.
But i still disagree. "Hate" is the reason you leave "love". Not the reason for apathy. To reach apathy you need to find something that make you forget entirely both love or hate.
Posted by SheeverYes it does because it means even the article you are posting says that in action, love is the will of good fortune. It says it is about building "positive connections".
I am sorry, but it proves nothing.
I haven't said any specific chemicals are exclusive.Okay but yet the ONLY chemical mentioned in the article, and in fact the only chemical anyone ever tries to say is an ingredient in love. Is Oxytocin. It is the only chemical known to man that fits the bill. It is a bonding chemical that makes your brain physiologically wired to be psychologically "attached" to the other person.
All I said is love is to do with chemical processes and involves mirror neurons.And that ceases to mean anything when you arent speaking of specific chemicals because you actually know jack butter about Neurophysiology. You cant just come up with a half-assed explanation saying "I am sure there are chemicals there to explain it, but I dont know of any specific chemicals to prove it". You cant just wave your hands in the air and say "it must just be chemicals"... herpderp.
Especially less to zero to do with philosophical interpretation.Except that is where you are wrong most of all. No other species on the face of the planet actually exhibits love. The behaviors and actions that people do, that they associate with this mysterious sentiment they call Love... no other animal does. You see gorillas nurture their babies, but they don't really exhibit any sort of special motive to protect another adult ape. Not even the baby when it grows up. Only to protect their self, and the young. The later of which is more akin to Parental Instincts, which have nothing to do with Love in and of itself.
Robert Sapolsky is pretty good on human behavioural biology see his stanford lectures on YouTube.Except the whole point is that the default for scientists is to not believe in Metaphysical things. He already from the onset has the bias that if Love exists, it is purely a mindless physical process.
The above mentioned chemical influences well know involved,hence the article.The above mentioned chemical doesn't exist within Men. So you would be saying Men are incapable of Love if you want to say that Oxytocin is an ingredient in love.click to expand
Posted by hanslaudeWrong, this happening can only mean a couple of things:
All you have to do is find another love which is greater or find something that make you forget entirely about that love.
Posted by AneemA04LMAO so telling him the address and saying "SURE, COME ON OVER". Is ignoring him, and totally wouldn't automatically mean that he inevitably DID come to your work that day if nothing else was said.
While you keep accusing me cheating on you just by talking to an ex and not denying his request to visit me (which I was basically ignoring him back then).
Posted by AneemA04This seems rather neither here nor there, what does superiority/inferiority have to do with love, or what makes it incompatible with it per sey?
You always put people down, think others are less than superior to you yet you expect ppl to actually believe you are capable to love someone.
Is it love or is it just desire, how many times did you actually think about what's going on in Melody's pov or much less important to you.Her POV was to use me for sex, and she didn't actually love me? Because I was like nothing compared to her 6 yesr relationship. Not only do I know her POV, but I am completely confused as to why I am supposed to respect someone disrespecting me. That is just retarded. Love involves desire, specifically when you love someone you want to be with them and want then to be exclusive with you because you want them to reciprocate and love you back. Your own POV matters in your Love too, because you have to love yourself as well.
my pov when we were still online dating, you couldn't treetrunking care less as you always think within your perceptions on things and decide and act on those.Your POV? That seems rather funny here when the only thing you seemed to want was to be a total infidelous just like me in the long run, and so you saying that suggests like I was supposed to just be okay with that because I "loved" you. Herpderp. It doesnt get more retarded than that.
If it's not one selfish attitude to act, than i don't know what that is.It is called Self Love, the thing that you lack that makes you devoid of any real sense of Morality or boundaries. As well as what makes you think you "love" a little dick fat man that sees everything about you that I said above and just right from the onset gets involved with you only to tell you to change.
Also, your behaviour of putting people's opinions down simply because they're different than yours really makes me distrust your capability to love someone.Again, nothin to do with love. So yeah, you opened your donkey mouth, so what?
There, I said it.click to expand
Posted by AneemA04That is the sad part. I am younger than you and yet I know it and you dont.
And you are telling me you actually loved someone for real? Gtfo, you're much younger than I am, your perception of love is close to monkey love or .. Obsession.
Posted by AneemA04Lol you arent one to talk considering you have never actually loved anybody for real yet.
I don't think there is any use of putting philosophy into love and hate, really. They're obvious feels, you don't think about them, you simply feel them.
But, to think of the reasons why you love and hate someone or something, it may be more useful.. or not.
Posted by LadyNeptuneI still can't get over this. After DJ, and then Me. You fall head over heals for the total worthless jackass because you think his words actually match butter that matters.
So that’s a yes @awesomeyo
Posted by SheeverNo what you are saying is nonsense. If you are mirroring the other person and vice versa, then your brains would be releasing the same exact signals and chemicals, by extension.
It's nonsense. You experience your chemical processes not the other physically right?
So you quote some half-retarded article made by a psuedo-intelligent nobody? Can't say I am surprised considering you obviously aren't all that smart yourself.
Anyway you can find plenty information about the subjects and chemicals involved, produced and mirror neuron involvement
click to expand
Posted by m3hLolno, you are flagrantly seeing what I said in my own topic, at work here. I aint supposed to be responding to other peoples topics but I will make an exception just once. It is obvious that Sierra and her man were complete opposites starting out, they became like each other because opposites do that.
It's incredible how a person you love can influence you.
He's probably turning into you and doing things like you would, because he found qualities in you that he admires.
Aha. Do you guys happen to have opposite Mercury as well?
Everything you explained is very relatable.
Posted by sierra_I think it just means you have to do the reasoning and judgement first, and first discern that we can trust engaging a person in that manner. Like assessing how far the fall is, before you leap.
i think it's funny how the cerebral cortex (responsible for judgement and reasoning) shuts down when you love someone... but it only partly shuts down when you're in hate mode... which means you're even more irrational when you're in love than when you're in a blind rage..
very thin line really... while the people that we hate can easily become the people that we love, the things that we love about them often become the things that we also can’t stand lol