seraph

Posted by Superman77

Posted by seraph

Posted by Superman77

Posted by seraph

Posted by Superman77

Posted by seraph
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/

+

https://m.facebook.com/pg/truepunditnews/about/?ref=page_internal&mt_nav=0

About
#TruePundit is a Philadelphia based conservative news organization generating original content & aggregating the best stories of the day

“Original content”, as in totally made up.

So you’re saying the story isn’t true?

Yessir. This one doesn’t quite pass the nose test.

We will see how this comes to fruition

Usually anything to do with “Clintons” and “child rape” and “murder” in the same breath is not a hot trail to follow.

The Clintons are the object of intense, almost psychotic vilification by political extremists and especially conspiracy theorists. I don’t care about the Clintons either way but some stuff out there is just too much.

A good rule of thumb is to just a) ignore all of them and thereby lighten your politically opinionated load, or b) consider the source very carefully. Non-mainstream, obviously ideological “sources” usually tend to throw up red flags.

Why hasn’t it been debunked yet?

click to expand

Probably has, but most people won’t take pains to debunk what by all appearances is a non-story.

Posted by Superman77

Posted by seraph

Posted by Superman77

Posted by seraph
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/

+

https://m.facebook.com/pg/truepunditnews/about/?ref=page_internal&mt_nav=0

About
#TruePundit is a Philadelphia based conservative news organization generating original content & aggregating the best stories of the day

“Original content”, as in totally made up.

So you’re saying the story isn’t true?

Yessir. This one doesn’t quite pass the nose test.

We will see how this comes to fruition

click to expand

Usually anything to do with “Clintons” and “child rape” and “murder” in the same breath is not a hot trail to follow.

The Clintons are the object of intense, almost psychotic vilification by political extremists and especially conspiracy theorists. I don’t care about the Clintons either way but some stuff out there is just too much.

A good rule of thumb is to just a) ignore all of them and thereby lighten your politically opinionated load, or b) consider the source very carefully. Non-mainstream, obviously ideological “sources” usually tend to throw up red flags.

Posted by Superman77

Posted by seraph
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/

+

https://m.facebook.com/pg/truepunditnews/about/?ref=page_internal&mt_nav=0

About
#TruePundit is a Philadelphia based conservative news organization generating original content & aggregating the best stories of the day

“Original content”, as in totally made up.

So you’re saying the story isn’t true?

click to expand

Yessir. This one doesn’t quite pass the nose test.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/

+

https://m.facebook.com/pg/truepunditnews/about/?ref=page_internal&mt_nav=0

About
#TruePundit is a Philadelphia based conservative news organization generating original content & aggregating the best stories of the day

“Original content”, as in totally made up.

Posted by rejuvenatedheart

Posted by seraph
So glad to hear you’re on the mend! Wishing you continued strength throughout your healing, rejuvenatedheart.

Thank you, Seraph.

click to expand

No worries, hang in there. 👍

So glad to hear you’re on the mend! Wishing you continued strength throughout your healing, rejuvenatedheart.

Meanwhile back at the farm, Matilda stumbled upon her innate love of the handmade while sewing duffle bags to sell at the farmer’s market to support her favourite pastime - horses.

Posted by nanobot

Posted by seraph
She’s got a great friend in you.

Keep the communication up with her while she’s gone but try your best to also get settled with the idea that much of what she’ll do is out of your control, no matter where she is and with whom. It’s tough, but all you can do is your best.

It’s those feelings of concern and possibly guilt that are hard to file in their proper place.

Yea I can't even think of what I will do if something happened to her. Selfishly, I've thought.... how does this make me look? What was the right thing to do? She is technically an adult but damn... she is a naive one. Maybe she's just dumb. Who knows. And I told her, this is so so stupid lol. Yea, well. She feels a bit better about it all today and she is supposed to keep checking in.

You know what is gonna be messed up? If things end up okay, and she's so glad she did this. Lol then she will go on in her ignorant bliss and maybe get herself into another, worse scenario.

click to expand

Good point on that last part - broken clocks right twice a day, etc. You’ll probably emphasize this with her when you two get a chance to talk at length.

At least for the moment she’s safe and has at least agreed to check in with you. Hang in there!

She’s got a great friend in you.

Keep the communication up with her while she’s gone but try your best to also get settled with the idea that much of what she’ll do is out of your control, no matter where she is and with whom. It’s tough, but all you can do is your best.

It’s those feelings of concern and possibly guilt that are hard to file in their proper place.

Bunny gets drafted to go to Nam.

Gets mistaken for a VC on his way back from the latrine at 3am.

🤷🏻‍♂️

Relationship goals are not life goals. Things over which you have little to no control are to be enjoyed as fortune would have it. The Lord’s Prayer indicates Thy will be done, not your own. This is not exclusively religious; it is evident everywhere and at all times. A little will is apportioned to you for your own pleasure, and the rest is reserved for Life.

You are always exactly where you need to be, like it or not.

And nicely done, dmv!

You told him your intention is to separate because you’ll end up cheating on him so you’d rather just leave him.

He said you aren’t allowed to cheat and said something about consequences.

He calls you a slut and tells you to go out and get it.

You say how offended you are and how you do everything for him, etc.

“I don't know what to do because he doesn't want to get separated.”






Your problem doesn’t appear to be the sex, or whether you’re with someone or whom they are.

You’ve obviously put a lot of work into training yourself to be a better partner (potential, anyway) and so on.

But do you actually need a relationship of this kind? If you’ll be putting so much energy into something, it’s helpful to determine whether you even require the whole thing in the first place.

Besides that, don’t try to change anyone or “get” anyone to be a certain way. You’re not going to teach anyone anything. Either accept them exactly as they are or keep it moving. Whatever “communication” you’ll get from someone is usually what you’re going to get and that’s basically it until one of you either dies or decides they’ve had enough.

Posted by TheRabbit
Too much worry about "muh free speech" and not enough worry about NOT being a raging little cookiemonster dickhead to people.

Yep.

Any freedoms established in a free and just society, without specific provision to ensure they are exercised in a manner which respects the gravity and breadth of those freedoms, are as much instruments of abuse as they are freedoms.

Total freedom, without reasonable restrictions that are supported by legislation, is untenable, and is demonstrably a social evil. We all have a responsibility to exercise a duty of care in our interactions. Living among others involves a set of transactions where at certain times we put the welfare of others before our own. Restrictions exist not to limit our enjoyment of freedom, but to ensure that everyone remain mindful of the fact that at some times we need to function in a group, during which time we are responsible to others and not just to ourselves.

What are reasonable restrictions? That’s a loaded question, and each society needs to find the mix of freedom and limits thereto that are right for them. There are indeed countries today that are managing this with more success than not, however, so it’s very workable.

Posted by Mujer_latina

Posted by seraph

Posted by Mujer_latina

Posted by seraph
Best in Aries?

Nope.

Manual says Gemini and Virgo.

Besides that it comes down to “best” for a particular chart.

And really, on their own all of them are serviceable in some way.

i know what the manual says and we're all like "ok so these are facts. we stand corrected"

but then reality kicks in. let's see

Albert Einstein = aries merc
Leonardo da Vinci = aries merc
William Shakespeare = aries merc

like i dare you to top these massive 3 with a gemini / virgo / even aqua mercury

This isn’t any kind of “reality.” You cherry-picked three people from the billions since their birth up until now.

And all judgments about “massive” are entirely subjective. There have been, for instance, Vedic thinkers from the time of Adi Shankara and even well before whom can make your three examples look like high school science flunkees.

Additionally, your examples aren’t even any sort of cultural cross-section; they’re all western/European examples from around the Renaissance.

Another issue is that you’ve actually got only two fellas there: the DOB for Shakespeare is unclear. We have a baptism date and an estimate of a birthdate typically (but not exclusively) three days prior.

The whole exercise is at best subjective, and at worst totally pointless - and even ridiculous, depending on one’s level of commitment to the totally pointless.

well, ok. but how are Einstein & da Vinci a matter of subjectivity? i wanna know

click to expand

Because it’s statistically indefensible.

You picked two popular ones.

Additionally, it only means something if you can find at least several hundred thousand more Einsteins and Da Vincis with an Aries Merc. In terms of your choices they’re just a statistical anomaly.

It’s fun to think about and play with, for sure. But I’d be really wary of drawing any conclusions from your findings.

Posted by Mujer_latina

Posted by seraph
Best in Aries?

Nope.

Manual says Gemini and Virgo.

Besides that it comes down to “best” for a particular chart.

And really, on their own all of them are serviceable in some way.

i know what the manual says and we're all like "ok so these are facts. we stand corrected"

but then reality kicks in. let's see

Albert Einstein = aries merc
Leonardo da Vinci = aries merc
William Shakespeare = aries merc

like i dare you to top these massive 3 with a gemini / virgo / even aqua mercury

click to expand

This isn’t any kind of “reality.” You cherry-picked three people from the billions since their birth up until now.

And all judgments about “massive” are entirely subjective. There have been, for instance, Vedic thinkers from the time of Adi Shankara and even well before whom can make your three examples look like high school science flunkees.

Additionally, your examples aren’t even any sort of cultural cross-section; they’re all western/European examples from around the Renaissance.

Another issue is that you’ve actually got only two fellas there: the DOB for Shakespeare is unclear. We have a baptism date and an estimate of a birthdate typically (but not exclusively) three days prior.

The whole exercise is at best subjective, and at worst totally pointless - and even ridiculous, depending on one’s level of commitment to the totally pointless.