Tale of the Fire Crab and the Scorching Mermaid

Profile picture of Artemis
Artemis
@Artemis
13 Years

Comments: 0 · Posts: 199 · Topics: 13
I met the most interesting Pisces guy recently. He fits the typical type of being an intriguing, die-hard artist and as a Cancer girl, I was naturally attracted to him.
What's sort of odd about or chemistry is that we're both made up of fire signs and are compatible in THAT sense, but our risings and moons totally butt heads.

Here's his chart :



And here's mine :



I had examined our charts a while back and even though its blatantly obvious that any sort of emotional chemistry would be null and void, I am RIDICULOUSLY attracted to him and this is just something that I can't shake off. He told me that he isn't the type of guy that'll be romantic or emotionally engaging with his partner, because that's just not who he is. Basing on his rising, I think that my time with him has confirmed that he's more of the type who'll show his appreciation with his actions and his desire to actually keep someone around. So at the moment, we're building a friendship and I'm not holding any expectations. I just know that this might be another occasion where I sacrifice my need for security and stability (moon in cancer, juno in capricorn, house of attraction in taurus) for a guy that satisfies the needs of my Leo for excitement and unpredictability.

I don't know. What do you think? I'm willing to admit that its completely farfetched.
Profile picture of Artemis
Artemis
@Artemis
13 Years

Comments: 0 · Posts: 199 · Topics: 13
Posted by Nemesis
basically is what you are trying to convey in this thread or hoping to hear - that if you are persistent enough, he will notice your attraction to him which will lead him to change his mind/heart about becoming committed and involved?


"He told me that he isn't the type of guy that'll be romantic or emotionally engaging with his partner, because that's just not who he is!" original, but still bullshit. this is just a nice way of saying "not interested".





I honestly never really thought of it that way. When we went on a couple of dates, he seemed very excited to be around me and there was a touch of romance there. Then he suddenly changed and it felt as if he friendzoned me, but still wanted to be around me. It happened so suddenly that I didn't know how to interpret that. When I looked at his chart, I thought that his mixture of planets sort of justified that.

I guess not?
Profile picture of Artemis
Artemis
@Artemis
13 Years

Comments: 0 · Posts: 199 · Topics: 13
Posted by Nemesis
idk. go back to that moment where he put you in "friendzone" - what happened?



I had met him on this dating site back in early February. Chemistry fizzled all over the place and we went on two dates. About a week and a half later, he wasn't responding to me with as much enthusiasm, but we were still talking to each other. Our communication started happening in spurts before it turned into us regularly speaking to each other every other day, with him taking the initiative to contact me each time. We actually hung out just the other day and when I asked when he could hang out again, he phrased his answer by asking when -- I -- could hang out again. As a result of that, we're going to hang out again on Sunday. Hell, he also sort of implied that he might've taken me along with him to hang out with his friends for St. Patty's Day if I was 21 (he JUST turned 21, whereas my birthday's in July).

That's why I was wondering if there was still a chance of developing anything with him considering that his entire chart bleeds inconsistency.