Europol Report: All Terrorists are Muslims??_Except the 99.6% that Aren't
Islamophobes have been popularizing the claim that —not all Muslims are terrorists, but (nearly) all terrorists are Muslims.?? Despite this idea becoming axiomatic in some circles, it is quite simply not factual. In my previous article entitled —All Terrorists are Muslims??_Except the 94% that Aren't??, I used official FBI records to show that only 6% of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005 were carried out by Islamic extremists. The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups).
But what about across the pond? The data gathered by Europol strengthens my argument even further. (hat tip: Koppe) Europol publishes an annual report entitled EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. On their official website, you can access the reports from 2007, 2008, and 2009. (If anyone can find the reports from earlier than that, please let me know so we can include those as well.)
The results are stark, and prove decisively that not all terrorists are Muslims. In fact, a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam. Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups. Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2007 to 2009 could be attributed to extremist Muslims.
Here are the official tables provided in the reports??_
It is to bad that facts and insight are seen as having such little value to so many people. But hey, if you want to vilify some group, acknowledging them as actually human isn't the way to go, now is it.
Usually the American (Zionist owned media) create the image of what —we can call it as the agenda??, then force it to the minds of —uneducated people??.
Stop polluting your innocent mind from the poisons of the MSM. Educate yourself.
It is not about ??who?? is right or wrong it's about ??what?? is right or wrong.
What about all other groups? Why the hell they have so much power to sue and pursue all others?
From wiki
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is an international non-governmental organization based in the United States. Describing itself as "the nation's premier civil rights/human relations agency"
While their main body Israhell, killing the Semites and working on to defame people of the Palestine constantly?
And the fucking Americans (constantly) support their murderous acts..?
Founded in 1913 by The Independent Order of B'nai B'rith, a Jewish service organization in the United States, its original mission statement was "to stop, by appeals to reason and conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people. Its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens."
See the double standards..??
The ADL has 29 offices in the United States and three offices in other countries, with its headquarters located in New York City. Since 1987, Abraham Foxman has been the national director in the United States. The national chairman in the United States is Robert Sugarman.
Can you say something against their double standards without being sued and ultimately put in to jail? Where were these organizations when the Blacks were treated as SHIT? Now the Muslims.
That's why people around the GLOBE dislike the Americans??_!
80% is pure lies and the rest is not even close to lies (more fiction if you ask me). Do you ever mention that these bullshits come from U.S of EH propaganda machines..?
Like I said it before.. You are a sick fuck bastard, mentally disturbed and should be placed in asylum asap if you ask me. You and your fucking government inflicting/supporting the terror networks as long as it is outside of the freaking fuck US borders and religious belief.
Suck it??_??what goes around, comes around?? ever heard of karma..??
Alright you two, sharpen your knives on each others mental flesh. I'll just sit here with my hands folded in my lap and look pleasant. But seriously *raising myself up to full height* DOES HALF OR EVEN 3/4 OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC KNOW WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON?! *gently clearing throat* Excuse me please, off to make a cake.
ie, a black man walking on the streets of Los Angeles during the late 1960s with a shotgun was deemed a "terrorist act/threat." never mind that it was legal to do so, never mind that it was pre-civil rights, never mind that there was police brutality, racism, separation, degradation and oppression. the mere sight of a black man carrying a gun made him a terrorist.
a white man, in a state of power, sees a black man with a gun and deems him a terrorist.
a black man, in a state of oppression, sees a white man with power and seeks protection.
my point is, the stats you quoted said that 42% of US terrorism was committed by Latinos. I find that stat interesting give the racial climate at this time. i have to wonder if it were pre-civil rights if that 42% would be attributed to blacks?
TERRORISM: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
now maybe they're attributing this stat to gang violence? if so, i can dig it but i do think there is a distinction. gangs destroy the neighborhoods of their enemies and effectively depress their own. foreign terrorists desire to destroy whole nations and nation states. where the former represents a real, everyday threat to some poeple, the latter is far more terrorizing to the human psyche as a whole. for the foreign terrorist, there is no true aim beyond the wholesale eradication of the enemy...genocide.
thus, by definition are all terrorists muslims? no. but by definition, all niggers aint black. munch on that a bit.
ie, if i was a white and grew up in some suburb or on a farm in nebraska where the closest i'd ever come to a non-white person is on tv, how could a latino gang "terrorize?" they can't. but muslim terrorists...?
It's a marble urn you dried up soulless cunt, get it straight. If you are going to continue speaking to me like you know me, get your damned facts right, shall we?
SWEET! I'm back in grade school! I so missed the smell of crayons and chalkboards. Thank you woundedbird, oh THANK YOU. And this is me...VB..being an adult, and giving you madam ( or sir...or perhaps Cerberus would be more accurate.. ) zero information, again. Ta-ta!
You think so Tate? I thought she was warm for my form. Or he, the multi-headed Hydra, or Medusa, Cousin It, Thing from the Addams Family, really the options are infentesimal.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Islamophobes have been popularizing the claim that —not all Muslims are terrorists, but (nearly) all terrorists are Muslims.?? Despite this idea becoming axiomatic in some circles, it is quite simply not factual. In my previous article entitled —All Terrorists are Muslims??_Except the 94% that Aren't??, I used official FBI records to show that only 6% of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from 1980 to 2005 were carried out by Islamic extremists. The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups).
But what about across the pond? The data gathered by Europol strengthens my argument even further. (hat tip: Koppe) Europol publishes an annual report entitled EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. On their official website, you can access the reports from 2007, 2008, and 2009. (If anyone can find the reports from earlier than that, please let me know so we can include those as well.)
The results are stark, and prove decisively that not all terrorists are Muslims. In fact, a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam. Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups. Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2007 to 2009 could be attributed to extremist Muslims.
Here are the official tables provided in the reports??_
Rest at source with graphs and detailed info:
http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/