Gaurav_Aries
@Gaurav_Aries
19 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 0 · Posts: 6167 · Topics: 146
Critical Review
Don't know ...Americans would know better.
He should stick to being an environmentalist, screw him being a presidential candidate.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
What do you women find that turns you on the most. I wanna be mean to my GF and turn her on during class heh.
They would not remember the simple rules their friends had taught them: such as that a red hot poker will burn you if yo
hi, im new!!! im a sagittarius, and have been fascinated with aries people both male and female since i can remember. my
Always been a question to me.Was he an Aries or a Taurus? Different sources have different ideas.What u think?
Went on a date with my ex (aries). Now he constantly calls me, and wants to meet up with me all the time. It's getting r
i have a scorpio moon and my sun sing is aries from the middle of the sign im determined to conquer a woman and have se
i want to be the very best im adventure battle energy power victory win courage challenge
Libra jumps to mind.
Observation 1 : Many people today have a poor opinion of politicians as a class. Not only do people often disagree with
signs? which ones do you like? prefer? etc.
"Joe Conason, in a May 22, 2007 review for the Los Angeles Times, wrote:
"In 'The Assault on Reason,' [Gore] lingers over those well-worn topics and others, employing the same didactic method that used to provoke irritation or even ridicule during his hotly contested presidential campaign. Yet Gore's professorial style , with its touches of sarcasm, omniscient tone, erudite asides, and yes, its occasional exasperated sighs, elicits a different response today than it did seven years ago. Many of the same publications that once poured scorn on him now offer up paragraph after paragraph of admiring prose. "
"Alan Ehrenhalt, in a May 27, 2007 review for The Washington Post, wrote:
"The Assault on Reason is a serious work by an intelligent man with an incurable habit of calling more attention to himself than to the ideas he wishes to communicate. It is worth reading, but it is maddening. In one respect, however, it is entirely satisfying: Unlike virtually all other books bearing the names of prominent politicians, this one raises no serious questions about its authorship. Only Al Gore could possibly have written it.""
"Gore's imperviousness to reality is not the most striking feature of the book. It's the chilliness and sterility of his worldview. Gore is laying out a comprehensive theory of social development, but it allows almost no role for family, friendship, neighborhood or just face-to-face contact. He sees society the way you might see it from a speaking podium ? as a public mass exercise with little allowance for intimacy or private life. He envisions a sort of Vulcan Utopia, in which dispassionate individuals exchange facts and arrive at logical conclusions. This, in turn, grows out of a bizarre view of human nature. Gore seems to have come up with a theory that the upper, logical mind sits on top of, and should master, the primitive and more emotional mind below. He thinks this can be done through a technical process that minimizes information flow to the lower brain and maximizes information flow to the higher brain." "