Uranus, Neptune & Pluto ??

A Few professional Western astrologers do not use Uranus, Neptune or Pluto when casting a client's natal chart.They insist it makes no difference because those planets are to slow moving to have an impact. How do you feel about this? Are the presence of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto important to your interpretation of charts?

I like the presence of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto in my chart. It provides me with more information I think, than I would have without those planets present and offers reasons for behaviors we in people where those planets are dominant, Uranian, Neptunian, and Plutonian. So yes, I do use and value these outer planets. If you're the sort who likes as much information as possible when casting a chart you probably like them too??

Interesting that ppl don't use them, I find neptune in my 1st, explains A LOT about me.

I think it makes sense not to use them in synastry w/others of your generation but in natal if there are aspects to those outer three planets especially with small orb, it has a big significance

Posted by Instantkarma


I would use them in Synastry and in natal, the reason being an outer planet conjunct an angle or a vertex can't be disregarded in Synastry. Also the other person may have a major aspect from a personal to an outer planet,eg - moon- Pluto, Uranus conjunct asc, Saturn on the desc or an outer maybe a part of an energy pattern(like a trine) in a natal chart and they bring that energy to the Synastry. Also when we consider house rulerships, we can read the charts better when we have outer planets.

You are right, I cant argue with that.

Posted by Instantkarma
I edited to add IMO, lol

:-)

Hmmm I think so too. I dont have a lot of experience with vertexes but they seem to work.

Posted by Instantkarma
Yes, I agree.

Vertex play a very prominent role in Synastry.

I really enjoy looking at synastry, even if supposedly composites are better.

Posted by Instantkarma
Do you read composites? If yes, have you been reading them for a long time?

I have started to pick up on composites. They make sense but I love Synastry more.

I would if i had more time and resources. It's easier to go through a lot of synastry charts fast and correlate attractions, etc but with composites, it takes a lot of work to get the same info compare and see the life and duration of the relationships.

Posted by Instantkarma

Posted by rabidtalker

Posted by Instantkarma
Do you read composites? If yes, have you been reading them for a long time?

I have started to pick up on composites. They make sense but I love Synastry more.

I would if i had more time and resources. It's easier to go through a lot of synastry charts fast and correlate attractions, etc but with composites, it takes a lot of work to get the same info compare and see the life and duration of the relationships.

Composites are a bit difficult to read. I'm trying to learn but need time!😡

Synastry, idk. They aren't all that easy either.

What do you consider important in a good Synastry?

click to expand

well i'm self-centered, but i like moon, mars, venus then binding aspects like saturn/pluto/nodes, then feel good aspects like jup/neptune. you?

something new i've been trying to look at is aspect configurations, like t-squares that complete each other, that type of thing, not much info on it though.

i'm not into asteroids but i'll look at it in a chart if i'm bored.

if it is a non-romantic synastry, then i'll remove mars/venus