This is a discussion board & I am very interested in various responses from you guys. I understand opinions are opinions but I did not join this board to argue or respond to negative responses. When I ask questions (for discussion purposes), I just want the ANSWERS, not negative comments (that are irrelevant to the question) or ignorant remarks. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, THAT'S FINE, BUT KEEP IT MOVING and act like the adults we're ALL supposed to be. Alot of people click on my posts because they are interested in seeing the thoughts discussed regarding the question, NOT to see pointless arguements from other childish members. If you feel like my posts are useless to you, then the solution is SIMPLE: Don't click on them! But if you do, I'd appreciate the feedback. With that being said, here is the question of the Day for Cancers:
QUESTION OF THE DAY (For Cancers): Do you think it is WORSE to be with someone who is lazy, and poor, yet the most amazing lover in the world (in other areas) or to be with someone who is quite wealthy (spoils you), but doesn't have a communicative connection with you?
At this point in my life I'd take the wealthy man. I absolutely HATE a lazy man! If he can't take care of me I can't help but think he's not a real man. A huge part of being an amazing lover is the ability to provide,
I couldn't see myself being with either of those types of men. I NEED good communication. I dispise laziness. I'm independant and don't need a man to 'take care of me'. I don't mind being spoiled, but I don't expect it. I can't say which is worse. It depends on the person and the situation. However, for me, I'm looking for a man who will enhance my life...not make it.
You're right. Both of these choses are completely unacceptable & undesirable for me. But if I had to chose, I'd have to chose the the lazy man who may not be as wealthy because social status can change quickly with the luck of a lottery ticket 🙂
and even though finding a potential partner is about more than just the financial/money factor, I still believe now-a-days anyone who will treat you right & actually maintain loyalty to their partner is something I don't think anyone would want to give up. Laziness can be something that is always embedded in someone OR it can be a trait that someone possess during a certain phase in their life. When I was in highschool, I was lazy, because my parents were always wealthy & I had it made for me. But once I got into the real world & realized I have to become my own keeper, that laziness trait disappeared into thin air. Now, I'm involved in so much I can't even stand or won't accept to be included in the "lazy pile" or category.
So I think there's a better chance of an actual relationship remaining if the person treats me like a queen, without necessarily having the ability to spoil me like a queen gets spoiled. If I was married to a rich man who bought me all of the nice fansy cars & clothes, but NEVER was there for me at the end of the night, naturally, I'd go crazy. The clothes & the jewelry and the cars only last for so long, but once your in love those butterflies, and that "ride or die" never goes away.
Well I've had the butterflies but they soon went away because the guy did not have any $ $ . Love doesn't pay the bills. Yes I need someone to 'take care of me' because I'm a cancer...I will be taking care of him as well. My needs have to be met. And you wont be able to meet my needs if you are broke. Even if I have $ $ I am going to feel a certain way about paying for everything. It's just not manly in my eyesight. So yes...I would hate to choose but I'd prefer the wealthy guy...I'd probably cheat on him with the guy that gives me butterflies. Or vice versa. Either way I'd be sneaking off with one of them to supplement the lack.
I'm not a cancer, but I say neither guy. It is about balance and give and take. Things happen and people have set backs and all but I wouldn't want a relationship with someone where they were mooching off of me or I was mooching off of them. No thanks - sets up a weird power and control situation.
I agree I too think it is better to be a wealthy man than to be with a lazy man that has nothing to offer but affection. I mean if you really want to know you can find love with someone else if he can not give it to you. Money can sometimes make you happy, but I don't think I could take care of someone else, because that is what they are going to want you to do. Cancers are go getters so there is no reason if this person is a cancer for him to be broke. I am also going to tell you if he is a cancer than he probably is great in the bed. LOL.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
QUESTION OF THE DAY (For Cancers):
Do you think it is WORSE to be with someone who is lazy, and poor, yet the most amazing lover in the world (in other areas) or to be with someone who is quite wealthy (spoils you), but doesn't have a communicative connection with you?