
ariesvirgo123
@ariesvirgo123
10 Years
Comments: 0 · Posts: 48 · Topics: 9




Posted by ariesvirgo123
What are aries opinion on sexual monogamy in a relationship? How much importance do you place on this?
Is it merely a physical act? Something in which to rejuvenate yourself? Do you place more emphasis on how strong the emotional connection you have with the other person is versus if both individuals have messed up occasionally in the past? Random topic I'm pondering lol
Posted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.

Posted by Twodrinkminimum
You can't change the definition of monogamy to suit you.
I agree perhaps if you need a conventional classification I am in a 'open relationship'. But, on the other hand concepts can and are definitely adapted to different circumstances, else we would not even have a language. Someone came up with the word monogamy and gave them the meaning that suited them in the first place, even monogamy itself is a social creation - you had the romans with the bacanals, the tribes before Moses doing pagan acts, etc. Same goes with cheating, for some, even thinking of/looking other people is cheating, so if you have done so in their eyes you are not monogamous.
Posted by Twodrinkminimum
You can't change the definition of monogamy to suit you.
I agree perhaps if you need a conventional classification I am in a 'open relationship'. But, on the other hand concepts can and are definitely adapted to different circumstances, else we would not even have a language. Someone came up with the word monogamy and gave them the meaning that suited them in the first place, even monogamy itself is a social creation - you had the romans with the bacanals, the tribes before Moses doing pagan acts, etc. Same goes with cheating, for some, even thinking of/looking other people is cheating, so if you have done so in their eyes you are not monogamous.
Posted by Twodrinkminimum
You can't change the definition of monogamy to suit you.
I agree perhaps if you need a conventional classification I am in a 'open relationship'. But, on the other hand concepts can and are definitely adapted to different circumstances, else we would not even have a language. Someone came up with the word monogamy and gave them the meaning that suited them in the first place, even monogamy itself is a social creation - you had the romans with the bacanals, the tribes before Moses doing pagan acts, etc. Same goes with cheating, for some, even thinking of/looking other people is cheating, so if you have done so in their eyes you are not monogamous.
Posted by Twodrinkminimum
You can't change the definition of monogamy to suit you.
I agree perhaps if you need a conventional classification I am in a 'open relationship'. But, on the other hand concepts can and are definitely adapted to different circumstances, else we would not even have a language. Someone came up with the word monogamy and gave them the meaning that suited them in the first place, even monogamy itself is a social creation - you had the romans with the bacanals, the tribes before Moses doing pagan acts, etc. Same goes with cheating, for some, even thinking of/looking other people is cheating, so if you have done so in their eyes you are not monogamous.
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by CherryForeverPosted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.
The explanation of the serial killer didn't exactly work for me, like saying the child of a gay couple could become gay. But I agree, people can stick to the values they wish, and love does not last forever.
.click to expand
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by CherryForeverPosted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.
The explanation of the serial killer didn't exactly work for me, like saying the child of a gay couple could become gay. But I agree, people can stick to the values they wish, and love does not last forever.
.click to expand
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by CherryForeverPosted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.
The explanation of the serial killer didn't exactly work for me, like saying the child of a gay couple could become gay. But I agree, people can stick to the values they wish, and love does not last forever.
.click to expand
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by CherryForeverPosted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.
The explanation of the serial killer didn't exactly work for me, like saying the child of a gay couple could become gay. But I agree, people can stick to the values they wish, and love does not last forever.
.click to expand
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by CherryForeverPosted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.
The explanation of the serial killer didn't exactly work for me, like saying the child of a gay couple could become gay. But I agree, people can stick to the values they wish, and love does not last forever.
.click to expand
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by CherryForeverPosted by Twodrinkminimum
If I don't respect someone enough to not cheat, they're not for me.
The explanation of the serial killer didn't exactly work for me, like saying the child of a gay couple could become gay. But I agree, people can stick to the values they wish, and love does not last forever.
.click to expand

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Is it merely a physical act? Something in which to rejuvenate yourself? Do you place more emphasis on how strong the emotional connection you have with the other person is versus if both individuals have messed up occasionally in the past? Random topic I'm pondering lol