rockyroadicecream

Posted by bae

Posted by topes
Sextile signs aren't instant connections like trines. They need effort to work or they fail.

Unlike trines, sextiles can move mountains together. But not without facing realities first.

Soulmates and twin flames and past life hoohaa are for the gullible and narcissists out there.

that's nice.

click to expand

"I'm a silly bleep who's delusional and is shrugging off logic to seek validation for my tardo thought process that doesn't reside in reality."

Posted by Nightcap-The so-called 'fat guy' lineman at 300lbs can outrun any soccer players not to mention the running backs, receivers, defensive backs, and linebackers.

Sorry, but that would be false. Cardio in soccer > cardio in football any day. DGAF about the argument generally, but the training for both sports is so incredibly different and football does NOT focus on cardio as much as soccer does. I've been behind the scenes for both, so it's lol that you generalize that a linebacker could outrun a soccer player. It also tells me how little you know about the topic generally. Many people in this thread have no idea what the hell they're talking about, tbh. It's nothing but a dick waving contest at this point, which isn't surprising given how macho and stupid our sports culture is. Thank god that's changing.

Posted by SoftMachine

Posted by ValleysofNeptune

Meh, basketball really isn’t. Especially compared to how it used to be. There’s far less physical contact allowed these days. Basically none. I wouldn’t consider a sport where you aren’t allowed to touch a player trying to score “aggressive” lol

Injuries like these are becoming more common in the NBA, annoying refs and ill intent aside, there is still a lot of aggressive contact.

There's more behind it than the aggression. Diet has a lot to play in it. Athletes are notorious for eating like garbage, especially in the NBA and NFL. Recently, the NBA started heavily focusing on diet and offering healthier alternatives by hiring RDs and nutritionists and making healthier food more readily available.

Another culprit is specializing in one sport early on in life. Everyone wants their kid to be a pro, so they start playing heavily at a young age. College football and basketball have schedules and promotion as heavy as pro, vs what it used to be back in the day. Pair that with butterty training, and you're bound to see over use injuries and a slew of fractures in the process. All of that has been so common in the last 20 years, it's why we're now seeing more injuries than we used to- people are just not taking care of themselves and focusing on money.


In regard to the OP, soccer here has been gaining slow momentum and is leaps ahead of where it was two decades ago. The women's national team here helped with an uptick of that in the '99 World Cup, as well as the men's team in Korea in '02. The MLS has expanded quite a bit and with the funding there from USSF, it's been able to advertise more and appeal to the masses. The uprise of youth soccer also helps lead to larger fan bases because most fans have played at some point in their life. Overall, soccer is just too "intellectual" compared to some other sports too. There's a lot more strategy similar to that of chess. Pair that with low scores and long gaps between goals, our culture is just too ADD and derpy to really see it picking up to the masses.

But that's okay. Sports like baseball and football have been struggling over the years with viewership and they're on the way downward a bit while other sports are getting more popular. It's a generational thing. I wouldn't be surprised if given a few more decades, soccer, or other less popular sports end up becoming more popular in the long run.

I could also get into the socioeconomic reasons for all this, but meh.

Personally, I played for 14 years and was involved in youth soccer with a previous job that I had. I agree that soccer can be a sport that's more fun played than watched. Not as bad as golf, but I can see why that bit doesn't appeal to the masses. Whenever I watch games, I'm usually doing something while watching/listening to the game, which can be easy to do given the long gaps between goals sometimes.

But then there are games like these where you can't not pay attention haha.

Posted by LadyNeptune
I say this ironically cause we owe the native americans for inventing this and other sports.
We repay them by racially insensitive mascots which mock them. YAY AMERICA!!

click to expand

Soccer has roots in China, Europe, and South America when it comes to who invented it.

Unless you're referring to football, then nvm.

All I see is someone who clearly has feelings for someone else and is digging for trivial butter to see if he's interested back.

..don't do that. It's stupid and will drive you nuts.

It really depends on the area, tbh. Everyone's saying it's in the minority, but I live in an area where there are huge pockets of stay at home moms like whoa.

The topic in itself- to each their own AND if it works for them, hooray, nothing wrong with it.

But there are three types of stay at home moms I've witnessed over the years-

First one is one who went into it, knowing what it entailed, knowing that's what she wanted, and she's happy. Kids are well adjusted, everyone's good to go. It was a well thought out choice and decision for all involved.

Second one is the one who went into it, not realizing what it entailed, gave up all her life goals and dreams, and ends up a miserable person because society bred her into believing THIS was the goal in life that would ultimately make her happy. It hasn't. She loves her kids, but she's miserable as hell and has a butter ton of regrets.

Third one is the gold digging type. She got married and promptly decided to quit working and focus on the kids- aka allow herself to be lazy and live off of someone else. Her kids aren't exactly well adjusted or happy, the marriage is miserable, and it's an overall toxic environment for all because she went into it with selfish intentions and now everyone suffers.

The latter is what I see the most of, followed by the second one. This is why I generally have a blah mindset about the concept and it makes me gag when I see women give up their hopes and dreams because a dude came along, then the kids, and before she realizes it, her life isn't what she thought it would be. It's so sad how often this happens and our society encourages it.

Overall, not a fan if it creates misery for all involved. Dgaf about it if everyone's good, to each their own.

This butter is hilarious. All these stupid cookiemonsteres telling you fairy tale bullbutter.

He's not into you. Period. He's jerking you around because he knows he can and your silly ass will stick around and buy into his bullbutter.

He's not into you. If he was, he wouldn't be doing any of this butter. A man who is into you does not "confuse" you.

Also, you? "I'm confused" translates to "I refuse to see logic and am so hung up on this dick that I'm just going to make a million and one excuses as to why I should wait it out. I REFUSE to accept the fact that sometimes butter doesn't work and someone may not be into me."

What the hell is wrong with your self esteem that you think THIS guy is THE one? I had a Libra that I connected with amazingly, but in the long haul, nada. Worked out better for me in the long run and he's still a miserable butter. So you can sit here, be a fairy tale wench about how you want to frill up his bullbutter, but at the end of the day, that's all it is- bullbutter.

This is classic Libra dude who wants to let you down easily, yet keep you around as an option. He keeps bringing up these bullbutter talks because he feels guilty and has to constantly rehash this over and over for HIM, not you. All of this crap is about him and treetrunk all about you. He does it to reassure himself. He frills up his bullbutter to make HIM feel better. If he truly meant what he said, he'd have dropped you and gone no contact. Not strung you along like he has been.

That's all this is- stringing you along and you're falling for it like some sad sap. And of course, in typical fixed sign fashion, you're stuck on stupid and you won't learn until your life, self esteem, and any views on a healthy relationship are destroyed in the process.

And if you so choose to stupidly stick around with loser, you forfeit any right to create the oncoming 2758934578493 threads about your so called "confusion" as your being stuck on stupid is your problem and nobody else's. You're the only one who can fix it sweetheart because all I'm seeing is your wanting validation for your moronic, lust filled thought processes, not actual advice that'll improve things for you.

Drop the douche. No woman deserves this dogbutter.

The perception that we need to shower daily, or even twice for some godforsaken reason, is something perpetuated by the beauty industry and it started back in the early 1900s when personal cleaning products were advertised. You NEED to take a shower daily and use our soaps! Why? Using more product and buying more product. This is why shampoo directions say rinse and repeat. It's there for the dum dums of the world to blow through more product so you buy more. Moar monies lining those companies' pockets!

It's a capitalist driven mindset that has been drilled into our heads for almost 100 years now and people just blindly follow and THINK they need to do this butter. It's all insanely psychological.

Everyone has their needs. Some people have to shower more often because their body chemistry just doesn't allow for longer lapses between bathing. Others can go longer between showers than others. It's all really an "as needed" basis, tbh. If you got all sweaty and gross and need one, fine. If you can go a day or two and haven't gotten sweaty, gross, and don't smell gross, why the eff bother? The medical community will tell anyone time and time again that daily showers are excessive and unnecessary. We have created a society of germophobes who have bought into all the lies the benefiting industries have been perpetuating for decades.

Posted by ViRGoV123
Does he only care about looks?

Yes.

Stop trying to force something to happen because YOU have the lady boner for the dude. If you can't figure out where a dude stands in the interest territory, then he's not into you. Move on and stop being so damned desperate. You got a tiny grain of attention from a random and you're off practically asking the internet if he's potentially your future husband, ffs.

Stahp.

An insecure douche will have a problem with it and a well adjusted dude will respect it.

...run from the former, they're not worth the headache.