Forgive me if this has been discussed before. I have never posted on here and didn't see that it had.
ANYWAY...My birthdate is August 26th, 1971. I have always been told that I am a Virgo on the "cusp" of Leo, or just a plain Virgo.
The thing is, I was 3 1/2 weeks overdue when I was born. Is there any theories that your sign begins at conception?
Every single thing I have EVER read about Virgos is not me in any way...seriously.
Every single thing I have ever read on LEO is TOTALLY me...so much that it's scary.
Does anyone else have this issue? I mean I totally follow signs for people and I follow my horoscope etc. and it is usually pretty correct, if I follow the LEO one for me. The Virgo one is always light years off.
I am Virgo % 100 which means no cusps while I don't live with the descriptions been told by the astrologers. I feel different and I see things in different lights and perspective and act accordingly due to my feelings.
ANYWAY...My birthdate is August 26th, 1971. I have always been told that I am a Virgo on the "cusp" of Leo, or just a plain Virgo.
The thing is, I was 3 1/2 weeks overdue when I was born. Is there any theories that your sign begins at conception?
Every single thing I have EVER read about Virgos is not me in any way...seriously.
Every single thing I have ever read on LEO is TOTALLY me...so much that it's scary.
Does anyone else have this issue? I mean I totally follow signs for people and I follow my horoscope etc. and it is usually pretty correct, if I follow the LEO one for me. The Virgo one is always light years off.
Anyone?