
Xin
@Xin
14 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 267 · Posts: 3037 · Topics: 43




Posted by sunshine222
I don't think it does...
I was just reading some quotes from "real men on the street" whom were interviewed and they said, "Play it too cool and evasive and we'll think you are not interested and we won't call"
That's it, it can come off as "not interested"



Posted by Xin
Actually we never were together 🙂
It's just I'm too available for him. I like him, but I think I'm around too much.

Posted by RealTalkPosted by Xin
Actually we never were together 🙂
It's just I'm too available for him. I like him, but I think I'm around too much.
You should NEVER, I repeat NEVER be toooooo available for a guy. Even if you are head over fucking heels in love. He'd never respect you. You should always make him wonder about you.click to expand

Posted by GemsRaGalsBestPal
I think that this is difficult with all the modern technology that MAKES us always reachable. I always get upset when I see a guy friend will sit with his phone next to his plate at dinner and then tell me.... I'm not going to text her back right away, I wanna leave her hanging for a little while.
I'm always thinking..... ummn, she knows you are CONSTANTLY on your phone too. Idiot.
Being available by text and phone (with the invention of cell phones) kinda happens. I mean... you ARE always available.
However, making sure you are not to available to a guy is where not jumping and running to see him comes in. I don't agree to last minute dates. I don't want to be your after thought.



Posted by nimbuePosted by RealTalkPosted by Xin
Actually we never were together 🙂
It's just I'm too available for him. I like him, but I think I'm around too much.
You should NEVER, I repeat NEVER be toooooo available for a guy. Even if you are head over fucking heels in love. He'd never respect you. You should always make him wonder about you.
i agree. it's not like i believe in dating rules but this is common sense. most people place a higher value on what's hard to obtain. kinda superficial, but true. look at all those colossal waiting lists for new products out. people generally like what's exclusive.
and not too far the other way, either. you don't have to sit there screening calls and having a 2hr-textback-rule. when you're honest about your intentions, everything gets clearer. if you entertain or secretly like 'the chase', then by all means carry on. just don't complain when they're not dancing to your tune 😉click to expand

Posted by P-Angel
Interesting to see who all the manipulators are .... they play the man to seek attention.




Posted by everevolvingepithetPosted by RealTalkPosted by nimbuePosted by RealTalkPosted by Xin
Actually we never were together 🙂
It's just I'm too available for him. I like him, but I think I'm around too much.
You should NEVER, I repeat NEVER be toooooo available for a guy. Even if you are head over fucking heels in love. He'd never respect you. You should always make him wonder about you.
i agree. it's not like i believe in dating rules but this is common sense. most people place a higher value on what's hard to obtain. kinda superficial, but true. look at all those colossal waiting lists for new products out. people generally like what's exclusive.
and not too far the other way, either. you don't have to sit there screening calls and having a 2hr-textback-rule. when you're honest about your intentions, everything gets clearer. if you entertain or secretly like 'the chase', then by all means carry on. just don't complain when they're not dancing to your tune 😉
No, that 2hr text shit is ridiculous. If I want to text back right away I will, & if I'm busy I'll respond later or just honestly forget to, & respond the next day. Please, I don't give a damn what people want to call it. Manipulation, games, bullshit, hell I'll own that. AND? It is COMMON SENSE. You should never give yourself away like that to ANY man. Hmph, it's a sure way to become a doormat & a fool.
You contradict your quoted post somewhat with this one though ?
In one you say play a guy so he's on his toes and in the other you say you respond dutifully unless busy.
I agree on common sense though.click to expand

Posted by nimbue
@realtalk err, i already said it was common sense. and i was agreeing with you. maybe it didn't come off that way

Posted by nimbue
hence the words 'i agree'.
read before you go foaming at the mouth.




Posted by everevolvingepithet
No. I didn't contradict myself. Where in my posts did I say play a guy? I said DO NOT be so available to a guy.
That's what I stated. Yes I am busy usually & don't have time to respond to his text & or calls right away. I'm speaking of jumping to go out with him the minute he calls, being a 2nd, 3rd or even 4th after thought for a date, never having a life of your own while he manages the relationship on his terms only, canceling your plans just to be wit
The "Don't be tttoooooooooooooooooo available. Make him wonder or he'll walk on you" part. 🙂click to expand

Posted by everevolvingepithet
That's cool, but you do seem to like the 'play the game so you don't get played' approach.
I could go find some oldish posts to back that up but I only really like that if someone else does it 🙂.
I think it's better to just be honest even if it comes across as blunt, kwim ?
By that I don't mean offload on someone because one is having a bad day or has baggage, just be straight up with a person ?
To me, anything else would = play time. 🙂
Most of the time anyways.


Posted by GemsRaGalsBestPal
Dear Lord, can quit arguing and just answer the girl's question?
1. Waiting to text or call back for days or even extensive hours (I'm saying more than 8 hrs, a typical work shift) is ridiculous because EVERYONE knows EVERYBODY typically has their cell phones right next to them 24 hours a day.
2. Don't text or call right back within the same minute unless you guys have plans, are making plans, etc. Take a little time and think about a cute response.... for texts.
3. Do not accept last minute dates, think.... I'm calling you on Friday to take you out tonight or Sat night.... and definitely not when they are already out and about and want you to come join. MAke your own plans! Get busy girl, you'll fixate on him much less!!
4. Be polite and sweet even when you have to tell him you can't talk or hang out. Never come across haughty or proud of your ability to blow him off or even annoyed he's asking last minute, it comes across super bitchy. Flies, honey.... that whole thing.
5. Don't let P-Angel ruffle you.

Posted by everevolvingepithetPosted by RealTalkPosted by everevolvingepithet
That's cool, but you do seem to like the 'play the game so you don't get played' approach.
I could go find some oldish posts to back that up but I only really like that if someone else does it 🙂.
I think it's better to just be honest even if it comes across as blunt, kwim ?
By that I don't mean offload on someone because one is having a bad day or has baggage, just be straight up with a person ?
To me, anything else would = play time. 🙂
Most of the time anyways.
Do what you see fit. It's not playing a game so I won't get played. It's called don't be fucking stupid for a man. Again, COMMON SENSE. I don't talk about shit I haven't been through myself, & I don't have a problem being honest with myself or with others. When I was younger I made some dumb ass mistakes, I've learned from them. That's all I'm saying. You're right, I concur that it will be play time. That is why I do keep it real most of the time. Remember the thread I created before about trying to start a relationship when you're in love with someone else, & you commented on? You said then don't, & I didn't. I told him the truth.
Okidoke. I just can't be bothered with the 'wait for this, don't do that but do this, make them think they're doing that while you doing this'. It's all too much like hard work lol. If I get a message I'll answer it, if I get another one I'll answer that too. If I have a query or whatevs I'll ask. It's such a complex state of affairs you see. 🙂
I don't remember that thread but I'm sure it was awesome.click to expand





Posted by blueribbonsyep.. true true. whew glad I haven't had many training issues though. I'm trying to think of one issue he hasn't "gotten" on his own.. maybe I just lucked out. idk. ohhh wait yeah I can think of one. haha I won't get into it though..click to expand

Posted by Xin
Hey look first off P, every post I've seen coming from you has either been 1. hidden or 2. something negative to say. It's not about manipulation its about making things fair. Men do this all the time. So I am personally coming out and asking a question, it's not about who is manipulating who. If that is your idea then so be it, but Id prefer not to make my posts about negativity.



Posted by piranhaparadiise
So in short...there will be times we text back and forth all day one minute after another or we will have hours pass that we don't...

Posted by everevolvingepithetPosted by RealTalk
It's just like a dog. Would you just let your dog shit, piss everywhere & tear up your shoes, furniture, your house? Allow him to hump everything in sight? Hell 2 da no. If you keep allowing the dog to fuck up your shit, he'll think it's ok. You have to train the dog how to behave, how to RESPECT your home & your belongings. The dog will learn that it cannot do whatever it wants.
lmao. That's nothing like anything relative to this but really made me laugh. 🙂click to expand

Posted by everevolvingepithet
Although with the tables turned, is it ok to treat a woman like this rt ?🙂


Posted by Xin
Does the no contact rule actually work? If we all the sudden mysteriously disappear, wait a good amount of time before we text or call you back, or even not pick up. I've been hearing that this does work, especially for us girls that are always available and we suddenly are gone.
Guys - Has this ever worked on you?
Girls - Have you used this and it actually worked?
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Guys - Has this ever worked on you?
Girls - Have you used this and it actually worked?