
krysrenee7
@krysrenee7
17 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 0 · Posts: 8735 · Topics: 522




Posted by pigeonpie
I agree with small tasteful for women, following curves etc or complimenting parts of their body, but I also think sleeves or large designs look smoking hot too. But for those a person has to be really patient and be willing to do their homework on their artist of choice, aswell as throw down a considerable amount more money for that level of work, like paying more for attention to line work, shading and colouring as shitty/too thick lines (outside of it being done stylistically) and bad depth/quality on the shading, or balancing of colours can make a good tattoo look shit.






























Posted by pigeonpiePosted by AsleepPosted by Mistery
Tattoos are too conformist now for me to appreciate. Especially on women who get the tramp stamp on their lower back or the ladybug/butterfly/flower on their ankle, shoulder. So predictable. A mindless robot following a trend.
Unless if they're quite old, then I know they got it because they liked tats & weren't being trendy.
What a dumb statement, and I have to assume that your personality is fairly boring. You need physical additions/clothes, etc to make you 'non-conformist'?
Here is something for you to chew on, in regards to tattoos. The more people that have tattoos, the less that society deems them as inappropriate and therefore judges those of us that DO have tattoos and want more as 'bad' people. I hope your way of thinking is isolated.
I WOULD NOT have said anything if you said simply, people that get nautical stars, butterflies, etc follow a mainstream trend. That isn't what you said however, so either STFU or learn how to properly word your thoughts to convey what you actually think.
I think Mistery's attitude has already past it's sell by date to some extent, as I bet they'd make exceptions if someone came along who put a twinkle in their eye.click to expand



Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
From a MAN'S point of view (ladies too), I'd like to know if you find women with tattoes MORE OR LESS attractive?
1. Does it depend on how MANY tattoes she has?
2. Or does the deal breaker depend on WHERE the tattoo is?
3. Or does it matter if her tattooes are actually hidden or not?
4. Even better, does it matter WHAT kind of tattoes she has? (For example: A woman with a skeleton tattoo vs. a woman with a butterfly tattoo)
We've all heard the term, "Tramp stamp" (women with tattoes on their LOWER backs) & I have always wondered if this term actually comes to mind when a man 1st meets/gets to know a woman who has a "tramp stamp?"
I've heard it ALL.. from men NOT liking women with tattoes b/c they see all that ink as too MUCH masculinity. Some men don't like the "edge" tattoes give to certain women & then I've talked to men who absolutely LOVE a woman with tattoes, especially if certain tattoo meanings/markings make way for him to learn more about her character/background.
Guys, does a woman having tattoes or even body piercings play a crucial part/role in how you pre-judge/determine a woman's character? Can her having them change your personal viewpoint/impression of her even before getting to know her?
We already know that potential/future employers base a part of their 1st impressions on appearance & tattoes can make/break a deal in the job field when it comes to tattoes. I wonder if it's the same for dating. Give me some feedback!