mervyn conn four more females allege assault

greetings, mervin conn is very famous in china also, but word has reached us of his 1989 conviction, we were all told in his book he won the appeal. ho wi have read the appeal also i must say he wronged us by not saying he was guilty on appeal. he also wronged margaret malloy his victim aged 19 a second time
the cases left on file in 1989 MUST now be reopened, it is only fair on margaret malloy and the other unnamed lady left on file at that time.
so in 1989 there are THREE more indecent assaults in margaret malloy and one on another lady which must be investigated.
in august this year mervyn conn was then arrested for allegedly raping a 15 year old at THREE locations.
now we find that another THREE females have come forward since then ALL of which allege they were seriously sexually assaulted.
that makes a total SO FAR of :
4 serious sexual assaults on margaret malloy ( 1 conviction in 1989 and 3 on her left on file)
1 serious sexual assault on an unnamed lady kept on file by judge laurie in 1989
3 alleged rapes of a 15 year old child (the locations are westminster, his old house 32 burghley road wimbledon, and wembley arena) for which he was cuffed on board a plane at gatwick airport.
the police car pulled up on the tarmac to get him off the plane.
3 alleged serious sexual assaults on ladies who have come forward SINCE AUGUST
so the total number of alleged serious sexual assaults by mervin harold conn stands at 11 so far.
under rules of similar fact evidence, mervin conn's conviction in 1989 IS ADMISSIBLE as evidence of his guilt in the alleged rape fo teh 15 year old, the test being that it is more probative than prejudicial, and so similar in nature that it should not be excluded.
what this basically means is that the court should be allowed to draw an inference from the fact that he has been found GUILTY of seriously assaulting margaret malloy who was 19, that he would do the same to a 15 year old. his attack on margaret malloy only stopped because he was interrupted by his accountant who walked into his covent garden office
as a fimal point, when other accusations are left on file (in this case in 1989), it is USUAL that they be reopened when more accusations follow, and the great british public DEMAND nothing less.
when one looks at the number of assaults and the compensation these ladies will be entitled to if he is convicted, it makes the bill cosby case in the united states look by comparison minor.

then there is the question of

...non-disdclosure of his 1989 conviction to the us authorities which is required by the visa waiver programme. it allowed him business trips of under 90 days without obtaining a visa.

his non-disclosure gives him the following us exposure to imprisonment:

The Immigration and Nationality Act — Sec. 275.[8 U.S.C. 1325]— Entry of alien at improper time or place; misrepresentation and concealment of facts — Maximum 2 years in prison

2. U.S. Code Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 75, Section 1546 — Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents — Maximum 10 years in prison

thanks barr