HermesVirgo
@HermesVirgo
8 Years
Comments: 0 · Posts: 128 · Topics: 21
Fixed Stars in Natal Chart
i have Antares conjunct Uranus and Jupiter.
Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
Posted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
click to expand
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Posted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
click to expand
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Posted by tizianitrue. i was born in southern hemisphire near equator line, but still south of it. sometimes i don't want believe in House, because of my 12th house placement 😛Posted by AerialViewYeah but the thing is, people may not realise they're talking about fixed stars but they really are sometimes lolPosted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Plus fixed star astrology really helped me to separate signs and houses. They don't mean the same thing, but they're often written about online as if they do, as if Gemini is the same thing as someone with a placement in third house. And I think that eventually only confuses people more when you get a lot of contradictions in there.
As for houses, I had a real problem believing in them this year. There are contradictions there in the house system. The house interpretations are written as though everyone is born in the northern hemisphere but we're not. It's a problem, honestly.
click to expand
astrologiking.com authors are mainly Australian based.
Posted by tizianiPosted by AerialViewYeah but the thing is, people may not realise they're talking about fixed stars but they really are sometimes lolPosted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Plus fixed star astrology really helped me to separate signs and houses. They don't mean the same thing, but they're often written about online as if they do, as if Gemini is the same thing as someone with a placement in third house. And I think that eventually only confuses people more when you get a lot of contradictions in there.
As for houses, I had a real problem believing in them this year. There are contradictions there in the house system. The house interpretations are written as though everyone is born in the northern hemisphere but we're not. It's a problem, honestly.
click to expand
----
Do you know a site or link explaining well that difference between sign-planet-house (I don't want to bother you)?
I've read Vehlow house system as a way to correct the hemisphere issue, though I don't really know what to choose, there are many and I'm not that advanced.
Posted by tizianiintrovert and moody, just like the "astrologers" here lolPosted by AerialViewYeah I remember he works out of Australia, can't remember if he's actually Aussie? But that's as good as reason as any for him to not believe in houses. I reached out to Darkstar by email at one time because she is in London, I was in London, but never got a reply back. Wouldn't be the first time. Astrologers are all introverts lolPosted by tizianitrue. i was born in southern hemisphire near equator line, but still south of it. sometimes i don't want believe in House, because of my 12th house placement 😛Posted by AerialViewYeah but the thing is, people may not realise they're talking about fixed stars but they really are sometimes lolPosted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Plus fixed star astrology really helped me to separate signs and houses. They don't mean the same thing, but they're often written about online as if they do, as if Gemini is the same thing as someone with a placement in third house. And I think that eventually only confuses people more when you get a lot of contradictions in there.
As for houses, I had a real problem believing in them this year. There are contradictions there in the house system. The house interpretations are written as though everyone is born in the northern hemisphere but we're not. It's a problem, honestly.
astrologiking.com authors are mainly Australian based.
click to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by BlackburnNone come to mind off the top of my head.Posted by tizianiPosted by AerialViewYeah but the thing is, people may not realise they're talking about fixed stars but they really are sometimes lolPosted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Plus fixed star astrology really helped me to separate signs and houses. They don't mean the same thing, but they're often written about online as if they do, as if Gemini is the same thing as someone with a placement in third house. And I think that eventually only confuses people more when you get a lot of contradictions in there.
As for houses, I had a real problem believing in them this year. There are contradictions there in the house system. The house interpretations are written as though everyone is born in the northern hemisphere but we're not. It's a problem, honestly.
----
Do you know a site or link explaining well that difference between sign-planet-house (I don't want to bother you)?
I've read Vehlow house system as a way to correct the hemisphere issue, though I don't really know what to choose, there are many and I'm not that advanced.
I always remember the very brief explanation on astro.com
Planet - What
Sign - How
House - Where
In brief when you're dealing with "how" questions in signs, you're dealing with the degree in which that planet sits in that sign. And that degree will usually correspond to a fixed star. Then there's the question of whether the planet receives energy well in that sign, from that star.
That's the simplest way I can put it. But that's how to be more detailed about dealing with the question of how and what, when you're looking at a chart. Whereas houses always answer where specifically in someone's life those details are taking place, and the answer is always 1 of 12 general areas.
click to expand
----
Less is more. So the description is the same (Mercury/Gemini-Virgo/3rd = Communication...) but it doesn't affect in the same way as they are different concepts.
Since you told me some months ago about degrees I pay more attention to them, things get really complex, is addictive :/
Thanks for explaining!
Posted by tizianiPosted by BlackburnAnd I will have to look at the Vehlow house system, thank you. Because it was a real shock to my whole belief system this year.Posted by tizianiPosted by AerialViewYeah but the thing is, people may not realise they're talking about fixed stars but they really are sometimes lolPosted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Plus fixed star astrology really helped me to separate signs and houses. They don't mean the same thing, but they're often written about online as if they do, as if Gemini is the same thing as someone with a placement in third house. And I think that eventually only confuses people more when you get a lot of contradictions in there.
As for houses, I had a real problem believing in them this year. There are contradictions there in the house system. The house interpretations are written as though everyone is born in the northern hemisphere but we're not. It's a problem, honestly.
----
Do you know a site or link explaining well that difference between sign-planet-house (I don't want to bother you)?
I've read Vehlow house system as a way to correct the hemisphere issue, though I don't really know what to choose, there are many and I'm not that advanced.
click to expand
----
You're welcome : ), the cusp is the centre of the house and houses' length are equal, I find it more accurate than whole sign/whole house. I've also used Koch but it changed some things I couldn't relate to.
Hope it gives you something to believe in, keep us posted.
@Tiziani, one last thing, what's the orb for fixed star's aspects?
Posted by tizianiPosted by BlackburnPosted by tizianiPosted by BlackburnNone come to mind off the top of my head.Posted by tizianiPosted by AerialViewYeah but the thing is, people may not realise they're talking about fixed stars but they really are sometimes lolPosted by tizianilol they are quite fanatic. i've read the comments there, the authors there didn't even use House system, just Planets and the Stars.Posted by AerialViewPosted by tizianibut yeah Sirius is probably the brightest or second brightest star out there.Posted by AerialViewActually you're right, my mistake. Mentally I always think of Sirius as one of the big four. I guess because it always comes up in readings in a big way, whereas Aldebaran less so. But my bad.Posted by tizianii thought the big four are Aldebaran, Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut?
Yes they are.
Though, by definition, everyone has Fixed Stars in their chart. They are part of the zodiac wheel itself, and planets collect their energy from stars.
In a completely non-abstract way of saying it: your planets are passing through stars every year, and events in your life will be (whether directly or indirectly) interpreted from the influence of the stars. Especially one of the big four royal stars like Sirius where, with the right planet conjunct, I've been able to look back in someone's past and able to predict the year they were engaged without them prompting me or telling me. Fomalhaut is another one of the big four that tends to have very consistent meaning on a yearly basis for people.
i used to read them fixed stars in astrologyking.com
maybe you want to check it Tiz 🙂
Cheers, yes, you're right about that blog. I have AstrologyKing and his ex-partner DarkstarAstrology both bookmarked. They are probably the best two modern points of reference out there for fixed star astrology, I agree. They both read the books Robson wrote in the 1920s and that's pretty much the biggest book on the subject anyone has.
There's also constellation of words. That's a fun site.
those sites are almost forgotten by me because people here rarely talk about Fixed Stars.
Plus fixed star astrology really helped me to separate signs and houses. They don't mean the same thing, but they're often written about online as if they do, as if Gemini is the same thing as someone with a placement in third house. And I think that eventually only confuses people more when you get a lot of contradictions in there.
As for houses, I had a real problem believing in them this year. There are contradictions there in the house system. The house interpretations are written as though everyone is born in the northern hemisphere but we're not. It's a problem, honestly.
----
Do you know a site or link explaining well that difference between sign-planet-house (I don't want to bother you)?
I've read Vehlow house system as a way to correct the hemisphere issue, though I don't really know what to choose, there are many and I'm not that advanced.
I always remember the very brief explanation on astro.com
Planet - What
Sign - How
House - Where
In brief when you're dealing with "how" questions in signs, you're dealing with the degree in which that planet sits in that sign. And that degree will usually correspond to a fixed star. Then there's the question of whether the planet receives energy well in that sign, from that star.
That's the simplest way I can put it. But that's how to be more detailed about dealing with the question of how and what, when you're looking at a chart. Whereas houses always answer where specifically in someone's life those details are taking place, and the answer is always 1 of 12 general areas.
----
Less is more. So the description is the same (Mercury/Gemini-Virgo/3rd = Communication...) but it doesn't affect in the same way as they are different concepts.
Since you told me some months ago about degrees I pay more attention to them, things get really complex, is addictive :/
Thanks for explaining!
You think so? For me, it did get more complex at first. Like a period where I was just drowning in it.
Then you come out the other side, somehow washed up on an island somewhere in your mind and it gets really simple from having going through the whole process and drowning in the research of it all.
That's how it was for me anyway.
3rd House is communication. Also, neighbours, physically close relationships, any means of communication that involves a copy (written, recorded). So yeah over time Gemini got diluted with that meaning, as the natural ruler of 3rd, and it got watered down to mean that Gemini planets or people are "copies" or "fakes".
Cue all the artcles about Gemini Venus being disloyal in relationships.
But when you make that separation between the two again, and see that the actual degrees of Gemini (all with their own separate interpretations) have little to do with communication, over time hopefully it gets a lot simpler and clearer than it ever was before.
click to expand
----
I started with Astrology in HS like, oh, there's more than Sun sign...
I was studying, as I'm now, so I didn't have so much time but I got hooked, and honestly is nearly the only subject that keeps my interest, I bore easily. The more I learn the more complicated it gets for me (more things to consider) but I feel the advances. I guess I still have to get to the point where things appear simple in my mind...
Yeah, well, I feel most signs are misinterpreted, simplified, maybe marketing?
I didn't know all that about Gemini, physically close relationships or copies... really interesting, I've never felt it as a fake sign; or Cancer, I've never met a weak crybaby Cancer, the ones I know are pretty defensive and tough on the outside and sensitive on the inside.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Can you make something out of it?
This date's ephemeris
The ephemeris positions for this birth date are:
Sidereal time: Sidereal time: 03:47:12 UTC
Ephemeris sun Sun was in Scorpio at 25° 25'.
Ephemeris moon Moon in Pisces at 28° 07'.
Ephemeris m
I'm having a very very hard time finding myself...And with my love life..Could my chart be showing something? Thank you
[IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/34quryq.png[/IMG]
Can anyone tell me if you see something great in this synastry? I'm the Gemini
Thank you
[IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/35hgxms.png[/IMG]
Go ahead and test your skills here!!
[IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/671fma.jpg[/IMG]
I hope DXPers from the scorpio forum dont see this lol but ive been a lil obsessed by this..My sun and moon are supposed to be opposites, but my sun and moon dont form an aspect..I tried to google some info on this and I found nothing..Anyone else out the
My question is since we have some kind of sun/moon conjunction, Is that enough to make us an ideal couple?
Recently we had a little bit of an argument and he told me that lately we barely agree on anything and that we are somehow opposites. Even though I
My birthtime may is spot on, her birthtime may be a bit off but the moon and ascendant are the same no matter the time of day, here are the charts as is, we're very drawn to each other and I'm thinking: wife, and she's thinking: kids. The relationship is
Hello, all! I am new to this forum, and have studied astrology for over 5 years. I do readings semi-professionally, and I'd make it a full time job if I could! The Heavens are certainly my greatest passion.
Although I know quite a bit about our planet
if you were bored and had found that the internet search engines bring his name with the word autistic together and you had had actually the impression that he could be enjoying kind of Firey or Uranian unrest? Like "actally I prefered to be horse riding
According to the below synastry, is there hope for us to be together someday?
I know we have a connection, but it's been difficult. Yet, I don't want to remove him from my life for some reason. Usually, as a Scorpio woman, I have no problem removing so
Do fixed stars play a major factor in your chart? For example, Regulus in Leo or a Sirius placement, etc or even having ALL the fixed stars in your chart.