Demonstrating Absurdity By Being Absurd

Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
As you may be aware, the current social climate in the US brings our attention to Gays in the Boy Scouts, which,
at the time of this writing is being considered by the organization on it's own, for the first time.
The organization has been supported by contributions of major corporations for many years. But social re-education
and psychological conditioning has been deployed over the past 100 years. It is not surprising that sooner or
later the once mighty Boy Scouts are being coerced into accepting a life style they have traditionally disagreed with.

I suggested there be a "GBLT Scouts" that would compliment the "Boy Scouts" and the "Girl Scouts".
I was met with hostile foolishness.

There IS an organization called North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) This organization is exactly
what it sounds like - A Pedophile organization. In their "about us" page, they proclaim that they are against
"age of consent" laws. When that in mind, we understand that "Man/Boy" love is sexually physical/emotional relations
between a man and an underage boy. At the time of this writing, such a life style is forbidden by law.
However, how long will it be, before laws will be changed in like manner? What other life style s will emerge?

Shall there emerge a new sub-culture on the sociopolitical stage following Homosexuality with introduction
of Bestisexuals and Necrosexuals?
Will the day come when society will allow open to these obscene sexual orientations as well?

that said, what is the difference between gays wanting to "fit in" and not fear the opposition of their orientation
and the fear of gays trying to change the heterosexual orientation?
Gays don't like being told they're wrong, but at the same time, they want to tell the Boy Scouts, that THEY are wrong.
Sounds hypocritical to me.
What do you think?




Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Now, you have heard of interacial marriages and sexual relations. I am a product of such relations.

But my thoughts now turn to the idea of inter-paranormal sexuality. or sexual relations with demon spirits.
This is currently another sub-culture phenomenon. I don't know if there is a proper name for a person
chooses this sexual life style so at this point, I will call such a person a Paranormasexual or perhaps a Parasexual.

I suppose if such wanted to be in the Boy Scouts, they should start a new organization called "Para Scout".

Suppose there was another sub-group that was a treehugger and wanted to have sexual relations with a tree?
Perhaps "Arborsexual" would be the fitting classification and therefore, a young Arborsexual would join the
"Arbor Scouts". They go out into the woods drill a hole and... well... you know.

Those that find machinery sexually appealing would be "Mechasexuals" and therefore, "Mech Scouts".

Does this make sense? Is it fair for Homosexuals to get what they want but Cookiesexuals are totally ignored?
Don't you think there should be a "Cookie Scouts of America", too?




Profile picture of EvilTurtle
EvilTurtle
@EvilTurtle
13 YearsAquarius

Comments: 45 · Posts: 456 · Topics: 2
wow funny stuff! I see both sides of the scout issue. If i were gay and not allowed to be a scout or scout i would have issue. Same if ran the scouts and was told i had to allow gays in. This debate is mute as they changed thier policy. As a parent i see no issue in a homosexal scout master. Why arent thier gay teachers, parents, students, even priest that they deal with on a daily basis. As a parent i have to be diligent with all incounters that my child might have. An openly gay man doesnt scare me as much as the married neighbor that is secretly a pedaphile. I refuse to not allow from doing the things that make them happy. Isnt that what america is all about? Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I am wrong? The scouts didnt have to change thier rules parents dont have to allow thier child to join. Sense when is freedom of choice a bad thing?
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by EvilTurtle
wow funny stuff! I see both sides of the scout issue. If i were gay and not allowed to be a scout or scout i would have issue. Same if ran the scouts and was told i had to allow gays in. This debate is mute as they changed thier policy. As a parent i see no issue in a homosexal scout master. Why arent thier gay teachers, parents, students, even priest that they deal with on a daily basis. As a parent i have to be diligent with all incounters that my child might have. An openly gay man doesnt scare me as much as the married neighbor that is secretly a pedaphile. I refuse to not allow from doing the things that make them happy. Isnt that what america is all about? Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I am wrong? The scouts didnt have to change thier rules parents dont have to allow thier child to join. Sense when is freedom of choice a bad thing?



From what I have read, the BIG corporations have withdrawn funding the scouts.
I actually see a marked decline in the scouts once ruling has been made.
Pedophilia exists no matter the sexual orientation. That's a fact.
Add to that fact, a neighbor, employer, close friend or member of your family could
molest your child. But you wouldn't know it until you found out, however way you found out.
So... it's not just institutions or religious organizations, it's all over and those predators
hide their intents very well. It's a pretty sick world!!!!

Moving right along, I now turn to another group of people who would demand equality but do
not get it.
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
The Olympics.

We all know that the Olympics has been open to young people between 15-25+ years of age.
Both male and female are welcomed, as are GBLTs and people of diverse religious, ethnic, and racial, etc., backgrounds.

What might surprise you though, is that people in the Special Olympics are not allowed to compete in the regular
Olympics. I think that needs to change. Also, to be fair, the Special Olympics should be required
to allow regular Olympians to compete in their games as well. It's not fair and discriminatory on both sides.
It "Divides" the people and prevents them from obtaining the ultimate goal of collectivism through
annihilation of individualism. Yes, Those young Special Olympians are NOT competing fairly!!!

But... I am pleased to report that the schools will now be required to allow people in wheel chairs on the varsity
football teams. They have to let the disabled without legs be the kicker as well.

Oh yes, age restrictions for geriatric people to compete in both Special Olympics, and Regular Olympics should be lifted
as well. It'll be a great victory for Grandmas and Grandpas everywhere!

I also believe that there is a movement to allow the legally blind to drive a car. A person should not have to be
dependent upon another simply because they cannot see.

And the deaf and hard of hearing people should be allowed to play their music loud, too. We simply cannot discriminate
against them and they need to be accommodated too.

Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Anyone remember Mary Winkler? that Tennessee preacher's wife who shot him in the back and ultimately got off, scott free??
There something wrong with that!

I think it's time to bring to the table a healthy debate over the long overdue inequality against men.
IF a woman can shoot her husband in the back and get off the hook, then a man ought to be able to shoot his
wife in the back, and get off the hook too.

How far down the road do we want to go—

What would happen if we legalized murder— I mean, you'd think Mary Winkler was a murderer.
If a truck driver can run over a bicyclist, then a bicyclist should be able to run over a truck driver! That's Fair!

Seriously! What do you think about the idea of legalizing murder— It's against the law. But did you know it's
against religious laws too— Murderers are people too, just like Homosexuals and Heterosexuals, men, women and children
disabled or healthy, the elderly, the smart and the dumb, the good the bad and the ugly, too.

Speaking of ugly.... I believe the news and film media owes a lot of less endowed men and women reparations for
the psychological insanity caused by penis size and beauty deficiency anxiety brought on by popular media stereotypes.

Hair Club For Men... now whatever happened to that club?? Were they biased against homosexuals— I mean, really,
what happened to the Bald Scouts? You know.... there was an advertisement for hair coloring - it was really just
spray paint they sprayed on the bald areas of their scalp. Of course it came several different colors.
I pitied their color-blind customers.

Financial Equality
A Doctor shouldn't be paid any more than the ditch digger that digs his grave.
IF everybody were paid the same, there wouldn't be any class warfare.
An idiot would be paid just the same as a genius.
That way it would be up to every individual to save their money and live and purchase according
to their means.
Then again, maybe that's another bad idea.

Just thought I'd throw that meat out for the dogs to chew on.













Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by LetltB
FB...remember some of the infamous news casts about legal fights for girls to play on high school football teams?
What if girls want to join boyscouts or boys want to join girl scouts? Also fair, and shouldn't be a problem.



I do recall something on that order. I think that was in the 1990s. The memory is extremely vague but I do
remember hearing something along those lines. anyway...
Your comparison with the girls on the football team hits the nail on the head with a perfect blow.

Oh..... Regarding those Big Corp and the cessation of contributions to the Scouts.
Turns out, that's already been happening.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/look-which-companies-dumping-boy-scouts/


There IS something else in the back of my mind.... "Hitler's Youth".
Ask yourself, why would big business be interested in the Scouts—
Subtle social engineering?
The changing of core beliefs?
Tomorrow's customers?
Why— Why pull money out instead of promoting a third Scout?

You would think such an organization would survive on fees charged to
the parents.

Whatever the case turns out to be, I think it's just a psycho/emotional mess waiting to happen
for many a child and parent, somewhere down the line.

They might end up saying.. no more boy scout, no more girl scout, no more gay scout... it's just plain "Stupid Scouts".

There it's perfect, gender neutral, sex orientation neutral and Stupid to boot! lol.








Profile picture of LetltB
LetltB
@LetltB
12 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 1 · Posts: 9186 · Topics: 179
FB..the latest today:

"The Boy Scouts of America has decided to delay its vote on a proposal to allow local troops to decide whether to allow openly gay members and leaders. The organization said it needs more time to get input from its members. The vote will now be held in May.

"After careful consideration and extensive dialogue within the Scouting family, along with comments from those outside the organization, the volunteer officers of the Boy Scouts of America??s National Executive Board concluded that due to the complexity of this issue, the organization needs time for a more deliberate review of its membership policy," the Scouts said in a statement.

Until a vote is taken, it appears the organization will continue its ban on gay Scouts and Scout leaders."



We already know what the "input" is, however ^^defined here I would guess input is $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (?)
..and just wth is a "deliberate review"?
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by LetltB
FB..the latest today:

"The Boy Scouts of America has decided to delay its vote on a proposal to allow local troops to decide whether to allow openly gay members and leaders. The organization said it needs more time to get input from its members. The vote will now be held in May.

"After careful consideration and extensive dialogue within the Scouting family, along with comments from those outside the organization, the volunteer officers of the Boy Scouts of America??s National Executive Board concluded that due to the complexity of this issue, the organization needs time for a more deliberate review of its membership policy," the Scouts said in a statement.

Until a vote is taken, it appears the organization will continue its ban on gay Scouts and Scout leaders."



We already know what the "input" is, however ^^defined here I would guess input is $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (?)
..and just wth is a "deliberate review"?



No kidding, regarding " $ $ $ ". As in how much are you willing to pay us— Oops that smells like greedy politics.

To be perfectly honest, I think something stinks to the core.
All those corporations funding (now withdrawing contributions) the Scouts.

"More Deliberate Review"

On the surface it sounds like it's saying a "more serious review" - the Scouts Exec Board may be feeling the
squeeze from both sides - the BIG Corporations that support GBLT and are exercising financial leveraging control,
and the parents and members who are opposed to the changing of the rules.
"Maybe" the Exec Board weighing the $ $ $ offers. IMHO, wherever big money plays, corruption resides.
To put off the vote until May is interesting, to say the least.

Remember, the wheel that squeals the loudest, gets the grease.

In the end, I think the GBLTs will ultimately get what they want. Once in, having broken the Scout's will, they will probably usher other groups such as the Atheists to tear down the "God" business.

I believe the GBLT should be required to allow bigoted Homophobes into their organizations.

Time for an all out brawl!