Penis Logic

Let me start this off by saying, this post does not go out to all men. I am a lover of all gentlemen, who live their lives with honor and dignity. I only use this term because it was said to me by my son (who is 24), who told me that there are two types of men, ones with penis logic (barbarians)and ones with rational logic (modern man). He is very wise for his age and he said that penis logic comes from the "old days" when men and women weren't equal and the men with this logic can't get past the fact that they are no longer superior. Frightening thought in my mind here: If this is logic as it should be, then perhaps this type of person would also feel that there is superiority of one over another race and religion, as well. This kind of logic certainly speaks volumes, doesn't it? No wonder our country struggles to get past our tragic history.

This post goes out to ONE man in particular and he knows who he is. Everything in here is directed towards him, so I will apologize ahead of time if I offend the gentlemen in the world, who comprehend that decentcy and honor in your woman comes from your treatment of her. How you develop your relationship through trust and devotion with her will determine how she treats you back.

My son explained to me the flaw in penis logic and why it should never be told to women EVER. That by anyone saying this "unspoken rule" in the vacinity of any female, is tearing away the fibers of the woven ploy that is called, "Game". The more girls realize this, the harder it is for men to play the game, so explaining penis logic to girls, destroyes every mans chances of getting "Lucky" in whole. It's a cascading effect that trickles down to every male on the planet, whether they have rational logic or penis logic.

Stupidity, as my son explains, is a man who will openly say this to females, for that man gets no game. Since I'm female, I'm left open and the rule doesn't apply to me, so I will speak it out loud.


Definitions

Woman: She is strong, has a job, makes decisions, takes control of her area of expertise, and most importantly, she is a loyal companion to her mate, who takes care of his needs, like laundry, cooking, a shoulder to lean on. A wife, as it were. A woman will want to have a relationship and be sentimental. She will work at trying to secure her mans future and might even have heated discussions with him if provoked. She provides a safe haven to him, raises his children and takes on all duties that are necessary for the continuity of a good life.
She has a brain

Female: She is submissive. Still does the laundry and cooking, and maybe even has a job (if it's approved by her man). But, most importantly, she never tells her man what to do and always opens her legs and fills him with praise and never talks about commitiment or any serious emotions. This female is the one (many, as men hope to be) who will lay on top of him anytime he desires, and then let him walk away, with no strings attached.
She only has a vagina - brains not necessary

In terms that most people use: lady vs. slut

Keep in mind here, it is the opinion of this man who has penis logic that the woman is to be disrespected (though she is taking care of your everyday needs) and the female is to be respected (she is taking care of your ego). Because, afterall, respect is earned, not just given - so, in this logic, since the female is respecting your desire to be free and bang as many b..ches as you desire without complaint, she certainly earns that respect from you. Respect is not given to the woman because she does not allow you to womanize the females.

Penis Logic - phew!

There are numerous flaws in this logic that only the rational mind can comprehend, and to name a few:

1. The female, the one who will sleep with this man with no strings attached, is a slut. Ok, so, obviously that's ok for the

its not a logic...........

shall I post "vagina" logic::?? damn thing get 500 pages............... or perhaps more

Isn't it funny - he knew who he was

If the shoe fits, wear it!

I didnt........WHO he was..??...care to explain..??

P-angel

Wow! lol you just laid it all out! Thank you for that post as a "woman" I agree!!

Greeneyedgemini,

You are welcome. It needed to be said, for us women, and also, for men like my husband and the other gentlemen in the world, who know HOW to love a woman.

P-Angel

Pointless stupid topic. Have fun.

Just a women who seeks approval from men is just vented here.

see.... haffo

only WOMEN can see "stupid things" as funny...!!

word of knowledge.........

If you laugh at stupid things.,... then you must be stupid too.....!!!

That POST has been made.............

BY a WOMAN?....HAVE FUN WITH THAT "DICK"................. you deserve it?!

But don?t EVER dare to call yourself a FEMALE??!!


NEXT.......!

Qbone you want a "female" (in your definition: one who is loving, caring, etc...) without working for it. If you want a "female" you would have to show respect to earn respect, if not, you will turn that "female" into a "woman" (in your definition: hard worker, self centered, "materialistic creature").

Not every woman or female is always nice as you think. Even a gentelman can become victim of WOMAN. Example: A man who is actually gentelman become victim by woman who treats him good, but have other goals being with him (money, place to live, drugs etc). Not tell me, where is "work for it" here?

Ok, here you a hint for all your rest lifetime:

There is no such think like WOMAN or PENIS LOGIC. There is only human nature. There are same numbers of assh*les on both side. Regardless it is female or male. Sexual abusion is present on both sides. Now, since we know that this is actually a human nature, i guess you will stop thinking about men with stupid ideas (or Penis logic as you refer to it) and WOMAN concept which is adressed to females.

P-Angel... I wasn't going to comment, but I changed my mind :-)

WELL SAID!!

I think it takes a strong, "manly man" to really "get this"... and not come back in retaliation... It's not stupid, it's true. Ego is a strange, strange thing... men are robbed of intimacy at birth. They are not allowed to cry... they are not allowed dolls, etc. as they are encouraged to be "men". A different kind of man knows these "truths" so to speak...

:-)

To Everybody Who Chooses To Read,

I am the crucifier and always have been - just in my nature, I guess. But, I don't see this as a bad thing necessarily. For many years I have witnessed people who are so into being "nice", no matter the cost. But, some people don't deserve a kind gesture given to them - that's where I come in - it's my job. People would say, just be sweet and overlook another's bad qualities, just let people think and do as they want and don't rock any boats. Well . . .

These are the people who would turn thier heads while watcing a child, or wife get beat, justifying it their heads as being, "It's none of thier business". They would not be the one to call Social Services and allow a disgrace to happen because they just want to all get along and be merry. That's great in theory, but it doesn't work that way.

I won't turn my head away in ignorance. Perhaps I can overcome my inherent traits to be polemic. If I know my faults are there then shouldn't I want to be a better person? But, I don't see how this would be better, I don't see how ignorance to a travesty makes one a better person. I believe it's the people in the world who look the other way and continue to allow people like the one the original post was directed to, to continue to abuse women, as being the ones who are worse off than me. At least I have the balls to make a stand.

I've spent the last week hashing over my original post and trying to decide whether I was hasty or not, whether I was just kidding myself and my words were misguided - but, after further thought - my post stands as written as being the right course of action. I will not, in any shape or form, be the one to turn my head away and dismiss someone being abused - any, or all of you can let people behave this way, if you choose.

I'd rather be persecuted for holding someone responsible for thier actions, then being loved because of my indifference and ignorance.

I actually have family members who believe the way most people in here and in the real world behave for fear of being rejected, or not liked - and my young nephew was beaten to death at four years old because of people who would not only allow others to be abusive, but also encourage that person and stroke thier ego's and tell them that everything is ok because they don't feel that way about him. Look at the damage that 's actually caused by overlooking this kind of thing, it perpetuates into . . . a woman who literally beat her own son to DEATH because everyone around was so into themselves and how they would go to any lengths to get "good attention" and have people like them. Disgusting !!!!!!

In my eyes, it's the people who are forgiving of a person like this that are the human rejects. I'm not afraid to be the one to protect the innocent. But, the rest of you may do as you please and stroke the ego's - when he lifts a hand to strike you, then you'll be glad I am the way I am because I will step up, instead of cower in the name of amicableness. For, one day, someone is going to hurt you, all of you who believe that it is better to keep your mouths shut to an abusive person, and when you look around for someone to help you and you can't find anyone who would "get involved" just because you need it - look in the mirror! - there you will find the culprit, the one who would turn their heads away because they only want to be loved and adored and have everyone like them, NO MATTER THE COST - even someone's life!!!!!!!

Ignorance on abusion is lack of quality that called "public support". When public support seize being existing then there is no public concept at all.

People choose to live together long time ago, but many people who born in this world, dont know what does "live together" mean. Some think that living together means "to have more job opportunities" some think it means "to be able to have alot of girlfriends, because many women available", but very few of them thinks about security.

Many people think that security is matter of govermnet (police, military etc). Excuse me, but police and military cannot be everywhere in every second. People have to defend themself against internal or external threats by themself to some extent. If people are lacking this quality, then police have litle power to change anything.

I also found that lack of "public support" is more seen in countries of "haters". What does "haters" mean? It means that people living in one country hates, unfrendly or hostile towards other people in same country. I also found that, as more education levels decreases the more haters in countries are exist. Also some mixed educated countries (educated people and dumba $ $ peoeple live together) who live without any interest for advancement have some problems.

Every change in this world is based on people who has balls to stand up and defend their points. Unfortunately, it's very sad to see that many countries discourages that......

Haffo,

I appreciate your understanding that I'm candid and didn't take offense. I agree with you, change only comes from accepting and acknowledging that something is wrong and needs to be repaired, revamped, or reconstructured. I know that most people probably see me as a "hater", but I'm not. I love most people in this world. Maybe it's just because of a child in my family who fell prey to "closed-eyes", I am now a person who cannot allow myself to sit idle and let abuse continue. But, I just can't see for the life of me how people cannot get involved when another person is at risk. Maybe, it's just a self-absorbed nature, maybe people can only see things if it effects only them directly. Public Support is essential in maintaining everyone's quality to life. Perhaps, I am a little aggressive in my attitude, but, so far, it has worked out for the people in my life, for they know that I will not yield and in the end, they are not victimized - I just wish I had been around when my sister-in-law was beating my nephew - she would have had eternal hell to pay.

I want add something here.

Lets divide inside family ignorance and violence from public made ones. Since we are also a part of a family on our own, we have alot more power to influence people actions inside family rather than in public. Also, it is much more easier to influence family ignorance and violence rather public made. Why? Because being as a family member, you have very litle probability of retaliation than on public ones. But when you try to interfere public made violence, the people you trying to opposie may show you less compassion and sympathy than you expect from family.

Being a family member as a man, gives you more power to argue because of your physical standing and defence capabilites and maybe some preconceptions. But you as a women, may not have as same influence power as a man has. I believe you trying to do very noble action as being women, for what I congratule you and appretiate you behaviours.

In my personal family, I am barrier of such actions. I'm never letting anyone to abuse, ignore or assault anyone other inside of their personal power. For that reason I believe I do my part (and I do it well).

I also agree that some people really dont answear to distress calls. I really dont understand them. I guess this is because of their cruel perception of their enviroument. Or maybe this is just ignorance, I dont know. Also I dont care for such people, because they have no use for anyone in public. They dont know how what does "help" mean.

I guess I need to pay more attention to what goes on around here.

I think your both right one being defending others and the other defending yourself.But back to the original topic I don't really see how those two desciptions are very different its just the social aspects that are descirbed and I don't fall into either catagory and generally don't hang out with either type of women.The "good" wife types are fake and are actually treated like crap,in the sense that they turn thier heads away from being cheated on,getting beat.The "bad" sluts generally arent that smart if you were to straight out tell the woman she was a slut she'd throw back that comment is sexist because guys are studs when they sleep around.While in reality she just made a sexest comment herself being as guys get reticuled for it but if a girl said it about a guy the guys a punk and guys are usually lying anyways about how many girls they've been with for every five women they were with it's really only one.So where as it's liberating for a girl to be with 60 guys a guys a slut if he's been with ten.Theres usually only one guy who actually falls into the slut and uses a double standard on women to every hundred or more guys.There is a double standard but it's usually not where it's supposedly at.

Don't ask where that came from I know way off topic but reading it just made me think of that point.

Hey Tiamat...

You got my point.. I will kneel before you?!