Do you punish people?

My aqua friend told me he's "testing" our other friend, they had an argument (she was annoyed he wasn't taking her seriously, because he's a joker). He said " now I'm only showing her my serious side, that's what she wanted.. I want to see how she act

The user who posted this message has hidden it.

Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.


Well, the conversation she was having with him was a serious conversation, to do with personal issues. Now he is ONLY being serious with her, even when the topic of conversation isn't serious, no matter her efforts to joke with him, he shuts it down.

So it's not really similar to your army story. It's more like, somebody wants to join the army, the other person screams at them and makes them do push ups while they're trying to eat their breakfast


which could be seen as a natural part of the training/conditoning process of a soldier.

but nitpicking aside.
thats why i said there must be more to it for both sides.
both sides might still have emotional entaglements or projections going on.
maybe he was/felt hurt by her rejection of him trying to lighten the mood or they have history when it comes to this discussion and he just got annoyed by her.
in either case one of the point i already mentiond would be present and such a behaviour might be petty and pointless but thats what humans do.
sure it isn't helpful regarding the situation but it isn't evil, just human.
aquas are humans too and can feel hurt and act irrationally like everybody else.
maybe she should just aks him what went wrong and if she might have offended him in some way.



You seem to have a taken me calling aquas evil seriously, that was a joke.

Anyway, yeah he was offended for sure, that was obvious as soon as he started explaining the issue. Imo, he needed to be told, and she told him, he didn't like it and decided to punish her.
I was speaking to him again recently and he said " don't worry, I'm going to stop before Christmas, I don't want to leave on bad terms"

I just shook my head at him.


you can rest assured. i didn't take it seriously but thanks for clarifying anyways.
my digression on the problematic use of moral trems in such cases was more of an general musing because i had that kind of discussion for a few times now and just wanted to make myself as clear as possible.

thats what i thought. sure, such an behaviour is somewhat pointless but it is quite possible both learn from that incident and act better and more cool-headed next time.


You're right, I think they will both learn something. But I think he'll learn he can get his own way. He got the reaction he wanted, he's pleased with himself. He successfully taught her a lesson.
I just don't think I agree with that lol.
He just laughs everytime I argue against it though, so meh.
click to expand


doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't agree with you.
pride can be a huge obstacle.
depending on the circumstance he might have lost something that weighs more heavily on his mind than his feeling of "accomplishment" and just doesn't want to show that.
Smidge
ASC~cancer | SUN~aries | MOON~virgo
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.


Well, the conversation she was having with him was a serious conversation, to do with personal issues. Now he is ONLY being serious with her, even when the topic of conversation isn't serious, no matter her efforts to joke with him, he shuts it down.

So it's not really similar to your army story. It's more like, somebody wants to join the army, the other person screams at them and makes them do push ups while they're trying to eat their breakfast


which could be seen as a natural part of the training/conditoning process of a soldier.

but nitpicking aside.
thats why i said there must be more to it for both sides.
both sides might still have emotional entaglements or projections going on.
maybe he was/felt hurt by her rejection of him trying to lighten the mood or they have history when it comes to this discussion and he just got annoyed by her.
in either case one of the point i already mentiond would be present and such a behaviour might be petty and pointless but thats what humans do.
sure it isn't helpful regarding the situation but it isn't evil, just human.
aquas are humans too and can feel hurt and act irrationally like everybody else.
maybe she should just aks him what went wrong and if she might have offended him in some way.



You seem to have a taken me calling aquas evil seriously, that was a joke.

Anyway, yeah he was offended for sure, that was obvious as soon as he started explaining the issue. Imo, he needed to be told, and she told him, he didn't like it and decided to punish her.
I was speaking to him again recently and he said " don't worry, I'm going to stop before Christmas, I don't want to leave on bad terms"

I just shook my head at him.


you can rest assured. i didn't take it seriously but thanks for clarifying anyways.
my digression on the problematic use of moral trems in such cases was more of an general musing because i had that kind of discussion for a few times now and just wanted to make myself as clear as possible.

thats what i thought. sure, such an behaviour is somewhat pointless but it is quite possible both learn from that incident and act better and more cool-headed next time.
click to expand


You're right, I think they will both learn something. But I think he'll learn he can get his own way. He got the reaction he wanted, he's pleased with himself. He successfully taught her a lesson.
I just don't think I agree with that lol.
He just laughs everytime I argue against it though, so meh.
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.


Well, the conversation she was having with him was a serious conversation, to do with personal issues. Now he is ONLY being serious with her, even when the topic of conversation isn't serious, no matter her efforts to joke with him, he shuts it down.

So it's not really similar to your army story. It's more like, somebody wants to join the army, the other person screams at them and makes them do push ups while they're trying to eat their breakfast


which could be seen as a natural part of the training/conditoning process of a soldier.

but nitpicking aside.
thats why i said there must be more to it for both sides.
both sides might still have emotional entaglements or projections going on.
maybe he was/felt hurt by her rejection of him trying to lighten the mood or they have history when it comes to this discussion and he just got annoyed by her.
in either case one of the point i already mentiond would be present and such a behaviour might be petty and pointless but thats what humans do.
sure it isn't helpful regarding the situation but it isn't evil, just human.
aquas are humans too and can feel hurt and act irrationally like everybody else.
maybe she should just aks him what went wrong and if she might have offended him in some way.



You seem to have a taken me calling aquas evil seriously, that was a joke.

Anyway, yeah he was offended for sure, that was obvious as soon as he started explaining the issue. Imo, he needed to be told, and she told him, he didn't like it and decided to punish her.
I was speaking to him again recently and he said " don't worry, I'm going to stop before Christmas, I don't want to leave on bad terms"

I just shook my head at him.
click to expand


you can rest assured. i didn't take it seriously but thanks for clarifying anyways.
my digression on the problematic use of moral trems in such cases was more of an general musing because i had that kind of discussion for a few times now and just wanted to make myself as clear as possible.

thats what i thought. sure, such an behaviour is somewhat pointless but it is quite possible both learn from that incident and act better and more cool-headed next time.
Smidge
ASC~cancer | SUN~aries | MOON~virgo
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.


Well, the conversation she was having with him was a serious conversation, to do with personal issues. Now he is ONLY being serious with her, even when the topic of conversation isn't serious, no matter her efforts to joke with him, he shuts it down.

So it's not really similar to your army story. It's more like, somebody wants to join the army, the other person screams at them and makes them do push ups while they're trying to eat their breakfast


which could be seen as a natural part of the training/conditoning process of a soldier.

but nitpicking aside.
thats why i said there must be more to it for both sides.
both sides might still have emotional entaglements or projections going on.
maybe he was/felt hurt by her rejection of him trying to lighten the mood or they have history when it comes to this discussion and he just got annoyed by her.
in either case one of the point i already mentiond would be present and such a behaviour might be petty and pointless but thats what humans do.
sure it isn't helpful regarding the situation but it isn't evil, just human.
aquas are humans too and can feel hurt and act irrationally like everybody else.
maybe she should just aks him what went wrong and if she might have offended him in some way.

click to expand


You seem to have a taken me calling aquas evil seriously, that was a joke.

Anyway, yeah he was offended for sure, that was obvious as soon as he started explaining the issue. Imo, he needed to be told, and she told him, he didn't like it and decided to punish her.
I was speaking to him again recently and he said " don't worry, I'm going to stop before Christmas, I don't want to leave on bad terms"

I just shook my head at him.
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.


Well, the conversation she was having with him was a serious conversation, to do with personal issues. Now he is ONLY being serious with her, even when the topic of conversation isn't serious, no matter her efforts to joke with him, he shuts it down.

So it's not really similar to your army story. It's more like, somebody wants to join the army, the other person screams at them and makes them do push ups while they're trying to eat their breakfast
click to expand


which could be seen as a natural part of the training/conditoning process of a soldier.

but nitpicking aside.
thats why i said there must be more to it for both sides.
both sides might still have emotional entaglements or projections going on.
maybe he was/felt hurt by her rejection of him trying to lighten the mood or they have history when it comes to this discussion and he just got annoyed by her.
in either case one of the point i already mentiond would be present and such a behaviour might be petty and pointless but thats what humans do.
sure it isn't helpful regarding the situation but it isn't evil, just human.
aquas are humans too and can feel hurt and act irrationally like everybody else.
maybe she should just aks him what went wrong and if she might have offended him in some way.

Smidge
ASC~cancer | SUN~aries | MOON~virgo
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.
click to expand


Well, the conversation she was having with him was a serious conversation, to do with personal issues. Now he is ONLY being serious with her, even when the topic of conversation isn't serious, no matter her efforts to joke with him, he shuts it down.

So it's not really similar to your army story. It's more like, somebody wants to join the army, the other person screams at them and makes them do push ups while they're trying to eat their breakfast
Posted by Smidge
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.
click to expand


i might be wrong but you appear to be emotionally biased.
therefore i try to be more clear.

1. i stated explicitly that this a kind dodging mechanism. everybody and every sign has some of those kinds. some get angry, some start to argue and others try to pull the joker of morality to mask their egoistical motives. it happens. it is neither good or bad. it is, in essence, just our natur as human beings.

2.if a projection fails and the person is deprived of what she instinctively tried to achieve the projection is bound to bounce back sooner or later. it is nothing the other person is actively doing. this is also completly unrelated to aquarians.

3. us helping people who have realized or recognized their projections has nothing to do with arrogance as you appear to be insinuating here. btw. by helping i mean talking with them about it which i wouldn't call a specific aquarian trait but more one of a normal decent human being.

as for the example you used in your opening statement.
he didn't take her seriously.
she got upset about it.
now he only and exclusively shows/treats her seriously. a.k.a. her gave her what she wanted.
which appears to have upset her, again.

i get why the word punished was used but i think it is misleading in this context.
example:
1. someone wants to join the army.
2. another person doesn't allow this or prevents this a.k.a doesn't take this request completly serious.
3. the person who wants to join insists and makes a scene.
4. the so far preventing person gives in and gives that person what she wants.
5. that person joins the army and gets killed in battle.
this is the order and logic of the case you presented.

the question now is: did the person who allowed the other to join the army punish said person?
i'm inclined to say no because it was just a consistent consequence of what the person wished for.

he gave her what she wanted and now she is mad at him because she got what she asked for.
i fail to see how this can be considered evil or maniplutive.
this could only be the case if the case has hidden parameters you didn't tell us or are oblivious about.
Smidge
ASC~cancer | SUN~aries | MOON~virgo
Posted by AerialView
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


If we are evil than other signs must be evilllllllllllllllllllllll
click to expand


Nah mate.
AerialView
male from Arlong Park
Wing Chun enthusiast💨
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


If we are evil than other signs must be evilllllllllllllllllllllll
Smidge
ASC~cancer | SUN~aries | MOON~virgo
Posted by Seleukos
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.
click to expand


Oh well, in that case, thank you so much for helping us overcome our "problems" almighty aquarius. Please continue punishing us, we need to change.

Mhm. Yup.
Capmercury87
27 years old female
Aquari-ass
Posted by saweetz1988
Posted by Capmercury87
Posted by saweetz1988
Posted by Capmercury87
Haha totally an aqua thing.
I play with people the same way but its not because I want results its because I'm bored of them being crappy friends so I might as well leave laughing.
I as an aqua enjoy being happy around those "friends" that thought they could make me jealous, then they end up getting jealous because I'm happy...they end up miserable and I go home happy.
I only do this to people I have lost respect for, so you have to have lost my respect, my friendship and my whole heart to get this treatment.
Or if they hate my humor ill get everyone of their friends in on my humor because I know the more people are happier, laughing and having a good time it kills the person.
I feel all in all based on how crappy the friend is, they would act childish about it anyways whether or not its deliberate so really what's going on is we are painting your picture for you with your own true nasty colors.
You dug that hole yourself.

WHAT The hell is ur moon. lol u sound like a Scorpio IMAo

I have a Pisces moon.
I avoid Scorpios like the plague


I thought Pisces mooners are nice it’s ok I get you. 1 year dealing with one, enough for me to know how water mooners r like. Hehe
click to expand

We are nice, but if your gonna play games we will encourage your loss at your own game.
Posted by Smidge
My aqua friend told me he's "testing" our other friend, they had an argument (she was annoyed he wasn't taking her seriously, because he's a joker).

He said " now I'm only showing her my serious side, that's what she wanted.. I want to see how she acts now" (something along those lines)
I replied " you're punishing her", he pondered that and then agreed.
The other friend is really upset, and he knows this, but it's almost like he's happy about that.

Tha fack!
Is this a common tactic for you guys? It's awful


You have a choice to cause damage which eventually backfire. It's your decision but definitely not wise. If can't be pleasant don't be unpleasant. Showing off power is sign of weakness
Posted by Smidge
So we came to the conclusion aquas are evil, right?


No.
Protecting ourselves and/or dodging emotional projections isn't evil.
It's mere self-respect and self-preservation.
It can be harsh for the other person but in the end it's a possibility for them to reflect upon themselves.
We are also, mostly, there for them if those people want work on those things and willing to help if we can.
Except they crossed our personal rubicon or hurt us. Then we put them in the purgatory for a while.
At least the ones i know.
Not liking to see other people happy is f up though. Seriously, what’s wrong with people these days lol
More pages:

Recent Topics

https://i.imgur.com/TAp6sdt.jpg?1 START DAY AND TIME MONDAY, 1/15/18 7PM PST (10PM EST) Roles will be distributed 15 minutes prior to game start. You will receive 2 PM's from me, the second will be your role. NIGHT: 8PM PST (11PM EST) to 8AM P
all the women being confused by caps https://youtu.be/H64QG4UsrGI 😂
if so, what do you snack on? I like them nature box snacks but I can't trust myself w/ snacks often so I opt out usually yogurt is also good tho, I like coconut noosa
I was doing so well and 4 weeks later he messages me telling me that I’m beautiful and he just felt like letting me know. So we spoke, and of course didn’t last long — I’m convinced it’s not me now because I’m not doing ANYTHING wrong for him to keep ru
Help a girl out.. had a couple dates already and he seems pretty phenomenal.. positive, successful, funny, cute, romantic, smart... He did admit he had a drinking problem at one point so he doesn’t drink at all anymore, hasn’t in 10 years...but doesn’t
Period underwear.. https://www.shethinx.com/pages/it-works I'm super confused as to how it works. Even after reading the "how it works" section. But I'm also kind of intrigued... Thoughts?
Ppl hate hella hard But I'm sure every one of us Leo moons have followers on dxp and real life So it makes me curious to see ppl hating on Leo moons like we bring nothing to the table yet being all over our ass otherwise
What up with the 12 dollar subscription to dxpnet The page get changing to that page No refunds lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tmqenxY8KI The game is simple: *I give a real life scenario (examples: award shows, stock market, sports games, tv ratings etc) *1 or 2 people take a guess and must take opposite answers to the scenario going agains
i know two happy couples who are Leo and Cancer. i kind of understand why it works esp leo men and cancer women. Leo needs encouraging love , support and loyalty , and nurturing at all times and i see cancer giving them that..alot... which makes
Anyone here have it? Can anyone tell me about this aspect? Any experiences with this aspect? I have this aspect very tightly conjunct, in the 12th house. It's my tightest aspect. From what Ive read and heard from people who look at my chart they sa
Hi Everyone, Please be kind to me, I'm completely new to this. I really need some advice... Leo Men, do you guys admit fault? Do you always only see things from your perspective or are you open to hearing another person out? My Leo man and I got into