Composite or Davison chart?

Profile picture of TaurusinTexas
TaurusinTexas
@TaurusinTexas
10 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 0 · Posts: 3254 · Topics: 48
Posted by tiziani
Posted by clippityclop
Posted by tiziani
I'd say the latter definition is synastry. But I don't know about Davison.

I prefer composite and I stay away from synastry.
Why do you prefer the composite over synastry?
It's safer. It has less influence over a relationship and it gives answers for why someone would be repeatedly attracted to a certain type of relationship rather than a specific person, so it's easier for them to see where they can work on their side of things.
click to expand

Where would you see, that you attract a certain type of relationship in the chart? I could use some self evaluation these days.
Profile picture of clippityclop
clippityclop
@clippityclop
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 169 · Posts: 1728 · Topics: 38
Posted by tiziani
Posted by TaurusinTexas
Posted by tiziani
Posted by clippityclop
Posted by tiziani
I'd say the latter definition is synastry. But I don't know about Davison.

I prefer composite and I stay away from synastry.
Why do you prefer the composite over synastry?
It's safer. It has less influence over a relationship and it gives answers for why someone would be repeatedly attracted to a certain type of relationship rather than a specific person, so it's easier for them to see where they can work on their side of things.
Where would you see, that you attract a certain type of relationship in the chart? I could use some self evaluation these days.
Take your chart, and all your exes/affairs - draw up a composite with each of them, and if you see the same planetary pattern then you have something there. Otherwise it can be a smaller pattern, like a common aspect or common planet in a sign or house that keeps popping up.
click to expand


I'm going to do this with composites!

I noticed with Davison I have 7th house water relationships
Profile picture of clippityclop
clippityclop
@clippityclop
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 169 · Posts: 1728 · Topics: 38
Posted by tiziani
Posted by clippityclop
Posted by tiziani
Posted by TaurusinTexas
Posted by tiziani
Posted by clippityclop
Posted by tiziani
I'd say the latter definition is synastry. But I don't know about Davison.

I prefer composite and I stay away from synastry.
Why do you prefer the composite over synastry?
It's safer. It has less influence over a relationship and it gives answers for why someone would be repeatedly attracted to a certain type of relationship rather than a specific person, so it's easier for them to see where they can work on their side of things.
Where would you see, that you attract a certain type of relationship in the chart? I could use some self evaluation these days.
Take your chart, and all your exes/affairs - draw up a composite with each of them, and if you see the same planetary pattern then you have something there. Otherwise it can be a smaller pattern, like a common aspect or common planet in a sign or house that keeps popping up.

I'm going to do this with composites!

I noticed with Davison I have 7th house water relationships


I don't know anything about Davison, you have to school me

click to expand


The composite takes the midpoints between each of the planets and doesn't actually exist in time or space. Where as the Davison chart is the midpoint between the birth chart information. So the argument is that the Davison is real because it's actually existed in time and space. But to be honest I don't really care about that. I just noticed that I feel my Davison charts are more accurate than my composite charts in my pairings. So I'm just wondering if people checked them both out, what people think makes more sense to them.