
I think it's far worse than Nuclear and Chemical warfare. It has the ability to affect all life around it whether it's living or dead. It effects are especially long term just from one canister of an airborne contaminant like Anthrax or a Chimera virus. Just one pop of those airborne contaminants, you might just infect the entire continent with a deadly virus. Far worse than nuclear or chemical warfare whose effects and be controlled to a local region or city. Though Fallout from nukes does seem to be a bit of an issue. We've seen Nuclear warfare used in WWII with subsequent nuclear tests following afterwards. We've Chemical weapons be used recently with Syria. Bio weapons were used in a terrorist attack September 18th, 2001. 7 days after 9/11 when Several mailmen carrying letters filled with Anthrax were delivered to Democratic senators. 5 people died and 17 others were infected. In these days and times we might just see someone try to use a Bio weapon again. I wanted to know what you guys thought on the subject and if you thought it were far worse than the other weapons. So what do you think?









