
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/12/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane/









Posted by LetltB
I'm glued to this story. The amount of time that's passed and the efforts they are making to no avail has got me hooked...




Posted by djbuck1
This reminds me of the loss of TWA Flight 800 back in 1996, which was never adequately explained. However, that aircraft went down off Long island, and its loss was immediately known and substantial parts of the fuselage were recovered.











Posted by seraph
Before all the conspiracy wingnuts invade this thread, until the actual plane is found, *no one* can speak in absolutes. This is obvious. But we all know *exactly* what the data from Inmarsat and the AAIB means: the plane ended up in the drink.
HOW do we know this?

Posted by seraph
You can either go with the easy, obvious explanation, advanced by professionals who have actually worked with all the data, or you can keep doubting, and entertaining convoluted bullshit based on suspicion and paranoia gone wild.
Thinking "outside the box" doesn't mean you have to stop using your head.



Posted by seraph
Obviously. It is STANDARD to use that language when discussing any data.
You can take it as conclusive. Otherwise you wouldn't have heard Inmarsat, the AAIB, and the Malaysian PM announce it together. You usually need to have your act together in order to come forward in such a manner.


Posted by seraphPosted by LetltB
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE. PERIOD. NONE, NADA, ZILCH...
Suck it up and gather the stupid sheep up fella with your extraordinary horseshit.
The evidence is based on the acknowledged high integrity of Inmarsat's evaluation of the satellite data in collaboration with the AAIB, which places the aircraft in the water, and which was strong enough for both Inmarsat and the AAIB to put their names to it publicly.
THAT is why all those search assets are focusing their efforts in the ocean. Because there is strong (and extremity credible) evidence (you can call it "hamburger" or "pickle" - it won't change what it is) that that is where the flight ended up.
Doesn't matter how outrageously suspicious and paranoid you are, because THAT is the state of the data. If that isn't to your liking, then provide better data.
Here, knock yerself out:
http://www.defence.gov.au/footer/contacts.htm
click to expand



Posted by seraph
Of course, you can always pretend that the satellite data doesn't exist, that Inmarsat and the AAIB never analyzed any data, that even the most absurd scenarios are actually in play, and that everyone is lying.
For my part, though, I prefer to *not* wage war against sanity and common sense.

Posted by seraph
Of course China will demand satellite data. If they didn't, the Chinese families would be accusing them of not doing enough. Of all the participating counties, China has spent more time pointing fingers at Malaysia (economic rivals) than doing actual searching.
This is part of how China operates in geopolitical affairs. Nothing new here.
Notwithstanding that, asking to see the data is a fair request. But thinking that it's bogus is pretty retarded, unless the folks over at Inmarsat and the AAIB are bluffing or making shit up: which is about as likely as me finding the wreckage in my backyard.

Posted by SanchoElMejorPosted by LetltB
I thought only 3/65 passengers were American?click to expand
Yea what about it?
Please re-read..this is what I wrote:
"If the majority of passengers were American,...."

Posted by SanchoElMejor
Ah, my bad....
Yeah, what I said was completely stupid. Apparently, now they're saying there was 239 passengers on the plane.

Posted by LetltB
Look at the water depth..not deep at all!
Avg of 100' deep! Skip in the park for the SEALs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/q-and-a-on-the-disappearance-of-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370.html?_r=0


Posted by XXMR2NICEXXPosted by LetltB
Look at the water depth..not deep at all!
Avg of 100' deep! Skip in the park for the SEALs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/q-and-a-on-the-disappearance-of-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370.html?_r=0
23.000ft to be exact.click to expand

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
So supposedly they know what happened to the plane?

Posted by LetltBPosted by XXMR2NICEXXPosted by LetltB
Look at the water depth..not deep at all!
Avg of 100' deep! Skip in the park for the SEALs.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/q-and-a-on-the-disappearance-of-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370.html?_r=0
23.000ft to be exact.
Look at the date I posted that jackass. That was the area of their first "i dunno" theory.click to expand

Posted by XXMR2NICEXX
Look at the date I posted that jackass. That was the area of their first "i dunno" theory.

Posted by LetltBPosted by XXMR2NICEXX
Look at the date I posted that jackass. That was the area of their first "i dunno" theory.
Jackass is your middle name right?

Posted by seraphPosted by LetltB
Einstein would be laughing his ass off.
Because?
Tell us why Inmarsat and the AAIB's data is wrong.
(instead of bringing the batshit hardcore.)
The method of analysis has already been explained several times.
Tell us what *your* tracking method shows.
And no, in the absence of wreckage, NO ONE can speak in absolutes - not because they are not certain, but because you simply can't use that kind of language in such a circumstance.click to expand




Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →