goddessofthesun
@goddessofthesun
Comments: 262 Ā· Posts: 103 Ā· Topics: 5
Agree/disagree and explanations
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
Posted by FuelAirPropellant
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
So if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?
Posted by goddessofthesunPosted by FuelAirPropellant
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
So if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?click to expand
Yes. I mean being in a relationship usually means some sort of shared resources imo. My Venus is in Capricorn.
Posted by FuelAirPropellantPosted by goddessofthesunPosted by FuelAirPropellantSo if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
click to expand
Yes. I mean being in a relationship usually means some sort of shared resources imo. My Venus is in Capricorn.click to expand
What do you mean by a one-day relationship? Like just a one-time fuck? Lol.
Posted by TarvosTrigaranosPosted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1) yes. Within reason. High body count just indicates a lack if stability to me.
2) I've honestly never had a long term relationship with someone who I havent slept with on the first date. I get bored and move on to the next. Thats not saying im only looking for sex, like I said, every long term relationship started that way.
3) Not always. A lot of women who dress slutty just want attention but, the women with no bra on, sweatpants with stains on the knees and a hair tie in her pocket are the ones to watch.. they're either in a relationship and aren't trying to impress, or they're ready to get dirty.
4) No. Whoever asked for the date and or planned it should pay. Thats like making her pay for her own flowers. Now, if the other person offers to pay part, and they should (remember that and judge accordingly), you should allow them.click to expand
Name your high body counts by age group. And what are your Venus and Mars placements? Just out of curiosity. Lol
Posted by berrieslove
these are my opinions
1. dont think this should matter; they didnt know the other person before they started dating
2. i mean the sexual attraction is there, so the relationship material value goes up right?
3. ppl can dress how they want, and damn i wish i were that confident
4. yes to splitting the bill. since its a date not commitment
Well yes, I think being sexually compatible is super important for a relationship to be able to work well long-term. Personally for me, if the sex doesn't satisfy me, I know the relationship won't work. My primary love language is physical touch. This is a huge reason I will never want to put up with a long-distance relationship. The main reason I made this thread was because there's a man I had a ONS with and we vibed really well and liked each other as people, so I'm just fantasizing about the likelihood of us getting together in the future lmaooo
I agree with everything else. š«
Posted by goddessofthesunPosted by FuelAirPropellantPosted by goddessofthesunYes. I mean being in a relationship usually means some sort of shared resources imo. My Venus is in Capricorn.Posted by FuelAirPropellantSo if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
click to expand
click to expand
What do you mean by a one-day relationship? Like just a one-time fuck? Lol.click to expand
Yeah. One good fuck can define many things. It's better than just dating with no fucking imo.
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. Not necessarily but typically agree & think itās a sign of not wanting to settle down.
2. Agree. In my experience, thereās a lot of guys who are attracted and want sex, not necessarily more. Itās hard to tell so I like to wait til itās feeling more like we know each other better, show me respect and itās going towards a relationship. ( Cap mars & Venus)
3. Agree, but then again the younger generation seems more into cleavage. I personally am not feeling the need to do that. More like try to get them to look in my eyes then at my cleavage.
4. No. I tend to go off what the guy wants to do. In the beginning, some guys want to pay, and whether thatās my age IDK but itās more a generous thing & showing me they can. Which I appreciate since I want someone who can hang with me financially & in the past Iāve had to be the breadwinner. But long term it should be shared. Itās more a partnership then.
Current boyfriend is trying to pay for everything lol but I started saying Iāll pay for this or that.
Posted by goddessofthesunPosted by berrieslove
these are my opinions
1. dont think this should matter; they didnt know the other person before they started dating
2. i mean the sexual attraction is there, so the relationship material value goes up right?
3. ppl can dress how they want, and damn i wish i were that confident
4. yes to splitting the bill. since its a date not commitment
Well yes, I think being sexually compatible is super important for a relationship to be able to work well long-term. Personally for me, if the sex doesn't satisfy me, I know the relationship won't work. My primary love language is physical touch. This is a huge reason I will never want to put up with a long-distance relationship. The main reason I made this thread was because there's a man I had a ONS with and we vibed really well and liked each other as people, so I'm just fantasizing about the likelihood of us getting together in the future lmaooo
I agree with everything else. š«click to expand
I had a LDR kinda while knowing the sexual compatibility was there. We became official when we met for the first time and the compatibility was indeed there. In pretty much every single way. But I do agree that they for sure make it way harder to sus that out, if you DO have one. It's gotta be like a lotta talking, establishing what you both like and don't so you "know."
Reach out and say that you liked your sexual compatibility and are interested in what other compatibility there is? Idk
Yes to everything except whoever asked for the date should pay. (not for all dates, just however works for the couple)
Body count doesn't always signify poor relationship potential- some people go through difficult times in their younger years, rack their body count up to 60 in validation seeking efforts (I'm thinking of a girl I know)- not counting people who prostituted themselves or were trafficked-, then do the work mentally, emotionally and physically to maintain a secure relationship. or maybe some are hoes when single but faithful by principle when committed. that's assumed of many young men. or, they could partake in ENM. but a super high body count, extroversion, flirtatiousness, conquest drive can indicate personality disorders and difficulty sustaining stable relationships. esp combined with dishonesty, manipulativeness, sadism
I think if you already have a friendship and sexual tension building before the first date maybe the relationship could be serious. even then, I feel like men have a huge stigma against women who don't wait 3 months at least. they also sometimes punish you after the fact if you reject them a few times before saying yes. difficult to please in that regard. I think generally its a better idea to wait, but a lot depends on his/her investment and attraction and their dynamic (calculable using my sevenreflections method)
Frumpy people can be the biggest hoes bc they're insecure, seeking validation or trying to prove something, but unfortunately reality TV and social media has taught me that there are attractive women who wear revealing clothes and sleep around quite a bit. Doubt the source as much as you want, I was shocked when I seent it with my own eyes and I believe those types are out there. Alt dressing people who are hot, perhaps nonbinary don't dress like sex workers but might have lots of sex with various people because they are sexually liberated, it's part of their rave + molly culture. lots of gen z-ers like that. think Tara Yummy
Body count doesn't always signify poor relationship potential- some people go through difficult times in their younger years, rack their body count up to 60 in validation seeking efforts (I'm thinking of a girl I know)- not counting people who prostituted themselves or were trafficked-, then do the work mentally, emotionally and physically to maintain a secure relationship. or maybe some are hoes when single but faithful by principle when committed. that's assumed of many young men. or, they could partake in ENM. but a super high body count, extroversion, flirtatiousness, conquest drive can indicate personality disorders and difficulty sustaining stable relationships. esp combined with dishonesty, manipulativeness, sadism
I think if you already have a friendship and sexual tension building before the first date maybe the relationship could be serious. even then, I feel like men have a huge stigma against women who don't wait 3 months at least. they also sometimes punish you after the fact if you reject them a few times before saying yes. difficult to please in that regard. I think generally its a better idea to wait, but a lot depends on his/her investment and attraction and their dynamic (calculable using my sevenreflections method)
Frumpy people can be the biggest hoes bc they're insecure, seeking validation or trying to prove something, but unfortunately reality TV and social media has taught me that there are attractive women who wear revealing clothes and sleep around quite a bit. Doubt the source as much as you want, I was shocked when I seent it with my own eyes and I believe those types are out there. Alt dressing people who are hot, perhaps nonbinary don't dress like sex workers but might have lots of sex with various people because they are sexually liberated, it's part of their rave + molly culture. lots of gen z-ers like that. think Tara Yummy
here's one- does having an OnlyFans equate to the person being promiscuous, in your mind?
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. Disagree.
2. Doesn't matter to me.
3. It could possibly. I guess there's a bigger chance for a person to be what they market themselves to be than not, but it's not a slam dunk in any way.
4. I don't like there to be such a rule at all. I would pay for my half if it was me (unless the other person seemed to be taking it really badly), but we're all different.
Posted by FuelAirPropellantPosted by goddessofthesunPosted by FuelAirPropellantWhat do you mean by a one-day relationship? Like just a one-time fuck? Lol.Posted by goddessofthesunYes. I mean being in a relationship usually means some sort of shared resources imo. My Venus is in Capricorn.Posted by FuelAirPropellantSo if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
Yeah. One good fuck can define many things. It's better than just dating with no fucking imo.click to expand
I agree... I'd never agree to be in a relationship where there would barely be any sex.
1. No one with any class asks about ānumbers.ā Itās pointless and says more about the person asking than the one answering.
2. A first-night connection doesnāt make it less genuine. If the chemistry is strong, it can still turn into something lasting.
3. The way someone dresses doesnāt define their character. I just appreciate elegance and confidence.
4. The man pays. Thatās simply part of showing respect - at least in my culture.
2. A first-night connection doesnāt make it less genuine. If the chemistry is strong, it can still turn into something lasting.
3. The way someone dresses doesnāt define their character. I just appreciate elegance and confidence.
4. The man pays. Thatās simply part of showing respect - at least in my culture.
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
"1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner. "
= Disagree, ive seen/been with females that the World would label as Complete Trash.
Yet with me, they're like Perfect Girlfriends
(Borderline look @ me as their Savior)
"2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically."
= 50-50, i dont do ONS, i literally adopt ladies.
"3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe"
= Disagree, women are generally Perfect, as in : They're females, the Opposite of Males.. hence why - in theory, opposites Attract.
(Men are the Main Problem tbh, mfkers Straight Goofys.
if i was a woman, seeing the dating-pool options , id either turn Lesbian , or Kill myself)
"4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date"
= this is 1 of those weirdo Society-programming.
Im primal asf by nature, & self-sufficent as a mfkers, ill pay for almost whatever, cos i know How to get money, if we ever leave the bed that is.
Self-note : i should honestly consider getting a girlfriend(s). Because reasons
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. Under some circumstances. Depends on her psychological profile and the reasons behind her bodycount, that goes for both high and low. I have my reservations about both ends of the spectrum but I've also successfully met and dated both types with no complaints. Also huge difference if she's 20 or 40.
2. Disagree. It's a meeting between two people whose paths crossed and pant(ie)s dropped and until you learn exactly who they are or where they're coming from (see no. 1), there's no way of saying where you're headed next and if you're going there together. Personally I never had a ONS that didn't turn into FWB situationship.... well except there's this one time recently that I met someone on my last night abroad so that wasn't by choice, and afterwards we both felt it sucked we didn't run into eachother earlier. Still drop eachother a line every now and then.
3. Nah. I assume you mean dressing too revealing... I don't think that necesserily means she's open for business, just means she's open to being eye-candy. On the other hand, depending on the circumstance and what she's wearing, she could just have no sense of how she comes off, or poor taste. I say let her freak frag fly lol.
4. Disagree. I mean logically yes, if we both have jobs (and the gender wage gap is a myth anyway lol), we should split. But then, at that point, it shouldn't be a game of logic (yawn!)
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner - Somewhat agree. Might mean you have issues maintaining meaningful relationships or don't have much discernment. If you spread your energy around too much, it dissipates and has little value. Quality over quantity all day.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramaticallly - It's either the sign of a really good connection or one that won't last past that night.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe - I'll defer to Chappelle on this one: 'The way you dress doesn't necessarily make you a hoe, but you are wearing the hoe's costume.'
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date - First date? A woman has never paid for any meal or date ever with me or any entertainment we went to. I don't mind though. I don't consider it a big deal or even think about it. I like doing nice things for people I care about.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramaticallly - It's either the sign of a really good connection or one that won't last past that night.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe - I'll defer to Chappelle on this one: 'The way you dress doesn't necessarily make you a hoe, but you are wearing the hoe's costume.'
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date - First date? A woman has never paid for any meal or date ever with me or any entertainment we went to. I don't mind though. I don't consider it a big deal or even think about it. I like doing nice things for people I care about.
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1 yes
2 yes
3 no
4 depends who initiated the idea of the date
Posted by MidAtBest
here's one- does having an OnlyFans equate to the person being promiscuous, in your mind?
No.
Posted by berrieslovePosted by goddessofthesunPosted by berriesloveWell yes, I think being sexually compatible is super important for a relationship to be able to work well long-term. Personally for me, if the sex doesn't satisfy me, I know the relationship won't work. My primary love language is physical touch. This is a huge reason I will never want to put up with a long-distance relationship. The main reason I made this thread was because there's a man I had a ONS with and we vibed really well and liked each other as people, so I'm just fantasizing about the likelihood of us getting together in the future lmaooo
these are my opinions
1. dont think this should matter; they didnt know the other person before they started dating
2. i mean the sexual attraction is there, so the relationship material value goes up right?
3. ppl can dress how they want, and damn i wish i were that confident
4. yes to splitting the bill. since its a date not commitment
I agree with everything else. š«
click to expand
do u share any synastry aspects with this person? sexual attraction is important in general but for long term tho, i think the other things like communication and trust begins to matter so much more and thats why some relationships fall apart. since the only thing keeping them together was the sex but not the other partsclick to expand
From me to him:
Moon opp Saturn
DC conjunct Saturn in my 7H
Venus opp Mars
Moon sextile Sun
Sun trine Venus
NN trine Sun
Chiron square Saturn
Saturn conjunct Vesta
Pallas conjunct Saturn
Vesta conjunct Psyche
Saturn trine Moon
Mars sextile Moon
I'm tired lol this was all I could get before getting irritated at looking at the synastry chart
Posted by TarvosTrigaranosPosted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1) yes. Within reason. High body count just indicates a lack if stability to me.
2) I've honestly never had a long term relationship with someone who I havent slept with on the first date. I get bored and move on to the next. Thats not saying im only looking for sex, like I said, every long term relationship started that way.
3) Not always. A lot of women who dress slutty just want attention but, the women with no bra on, sweatpants with stains on the knees and a hair tie in her pocket are the ones to watch.. they're either in a relationship and aren't trying to impress, or they're ready to get dirty.
4) No. Whoever asked for the date and or planned it should pay. Thats like making her pay for her own flowers. Now, if the other person offers to pay part, and they should (remember that and judge accordingly), you should allow them.click to expand
Pretty sure I agree with all of this. Maybe just not the 3rd one lol but the rest, yeah.
Okay for y'all who said yes to the first question: Explain how a woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner. I'm curious to see what y'all say.
Posted by ScalesAndDaggers
1. No one with any class asks about ānumbers.ā Itās pointless and says more about the person asking than the one answering.
2. A first-night connection doesnāt make it less genuine. If the chemistry is strong, it can still turn into something lasting.
3. The way someone dresses doesnāt define their character. I just appreciate elegance and confidence.
4. The man pays. Thatās simply part of showing respect - at least in my culture.
What's your ethnicity?
Posted by FuelAirPropellantPosted by goddessofthesunPosted by FuelAirPropellantWhat do you mean by a one-day relationship? Like just a one-time fuck? Lol.Posted by goddessofthesunYes. I mean being in a relationship usually means some sort of shared resources imo. My Venus is in Capricorn.Posted by FuelAirPropellantSo if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
Yeah. One good fuck can define many things. It's better than just dating with no fucking imo.click to expand
What exactly can it define?
Posted by ThatWomanPosted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. Agree. Experience
2. Agree. Men needs to show tangible efforts to measure their level of force in getting the woman.
3. Maybe. Women use make up, fashion, and their physical beauty to express themself better to create relationships, when it comes to sexing, it is ultimately her own libido showing.
4. Disagree. Men should pay to show their worth. If they don't show it, then friendship zone should be ensued.click to expand
What do you mean by your first answer?
Posted by ScalesAndDaggers
1. No one with any class asks about ānumbers.ā Itās pointless and says more about the person asking than the one answering.
No, it doesn't "say more about the person asking", in fact it has nothing to do with the question. Asking says one thing about you; her bodycount says another thing about her. Two seperate topics.
1)yes. but i would never outright ask for someoneās body count. i would ask other character-revealing questions instead.
some personality traits people may associate with promiscuity (applies to both men and women. thereās no such thing as āmen can get away with doing xyz and women canātā):
lack of self control, lack of discernment, inability to maintain a healthy long-term stable relationship with another human being, inability to pair bond, a highly hedonistic nature that may not exactly be wife/husband material, higher likelihood of cheating in a relationship/marriage (people with higher sex drives have been proven to cheat more than people with lower or average sex drives) etc
if anyone reads this and gets offended, all you gotta do is simply choose someone who doesnāt care about your promiscuous past or lie about your past and pray that no one ever finds out.
thereās no use arguing with random strangers online about it. itās a waste of time.
2)no. if some dude wrote a woman off just cuz she had a one night stand with him, that really makes no sense cuz he also participated in that one night stand so who tf is he to judge? š like, why is he acting like he wasnāt there with her? š
3)no. i literally know someone (a good friend) who dresses sexy but is super guarded. she only dresses revealing so men will tip her more. sheās been with the same man for a really long time. sheās works at a bar. but i think a woman should also know when and where to dress proper. like for example, she shouldnāt dress revealing at a friendās baby shower or at an orchestra etc.
4)no. the man pays.
some personality traits people may associate with promiscuity (applies to both men and women. thereās no such thing as āmen can get away with doing xyz and women canātā):
lack of self control, lack of discernment, inability to maintain a healthy long-term stable relationship with another human being, inability to pair bond, a highly hedonistic nature that may not exactly be wife/husband material, higher likelihood of cheating in a relationship/marriage (people with higher sex drives have been proven to cheat more than people with lower or average sex drives) etc
if anyone reads this and gets offended, all you gotta do is simply choose someone who doesnāt care about your promiscuous past or lie about your past and pray that no one ever finds out.
thereās no use arguing with random strangers online about it. itās a waste of time.
2)no. if some dude wrote a woman off just cuz she had a one night stand with him, that really makes no sense cuz he also participated in that one night stand so who tf is he to judge? š like, why is he acting like he wasnāt there with her? š
3)no. i literally know someone (a good friend) who dresses sexy but is super guarded. she only dresses revealing so men will tip her more. sheās been with the same man for a really long time. sheās works at a bar. but i think a woman should also know when and where to dress proper. like for example, she shouldnāt dress revealing at a friendās baby shower or at an orchestra etc.
4)no. the man pays.
Posted by goddessofthesunPosted by ScalesAndDaggers
1. No one with any class asks about ānumbers.ā Itās pointless and says more about the person asking than the one answering.
2. A first-night connection doesnāt make it less genuine. If the chemistry is strong, it can still turn into something lasting.
3. The way someone dresses doesnāt define their character. I just appreciate elegance and confidence.
4. The man pays. Thatās simply part of showing respect - at least in my culture.
What's your ethnicity?click to expand
Croatian.
Posted by goddessofthesunPosted by FuelAirPropellantPosted by goddessofthesunYeah. One good fuck can define many things. It's better than just dating with no fucking imo.Posted by FuelAirPropellantWhat do you mean by a one-day relationship? Like just a one-time fuck? Lol.Posted by goddessofthesunYes. I mean being in a relationship usually means some sort of shared resources imo. My Venus is in Capricorn.Posted by FuelAirPropellantSo if both people are equally yoked financially, they should split the bill in half?
1. Disagree. Romance is fucked like that. Even pimps can't help falling in love.
2.if sex is quick it's probably a good relationship. Even a One day relationship.
3. This one's tricky. I would say no cause I've seen vastly different cultural and generational attitudes.
4.Whoever has more disposable income should pay. I've always gone by that rule.
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
What exactly can it define?click to expand
Wether it's gonna be sexual/emotionally binding on a certain level. Sex is emotional to me so it's important and probably more feminine but it is what it is.
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
Yes, definitely. More mileage, more potential for emotional baggage.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
Not necessarily, but it's not my first choice. I don't put hands on ladies like that until at least the second date. I need to know if you're fucking crazy or not. Think of it as an interview process.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
I would argue that while you may not be a prostitute, you're wearing the uniform of one - if you're not careful enough.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
I'm a firm believer that whoever does the inviting, pays the bill. But I am flexible if she's very insistent. It's going to be my job to figure out the real reasoning why. Part of the romantic interview process.
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. No. Virgin or 5 billion people (China fakes its census numbers)-not a factor in and of itself.
2. I don't see this question from your perspective...ONS is not a relationship by definition. $ We either do or we don't.
3.No-stupid. Halloween. And OnlyFans. Does a gold chain make one a hoe? No.
4. No. Not "should." That's your opinion. I actually had a girlfriend insist on splitting and it felt off. Taurus is always right-but this ex was a Leo. I already put enough money down for Taurus. Now if she gives me breadcrumbs its fine.
Taurus is always right.
1. Disagree. There's healthy sex for pleasure only, and there is dating with romantic intend to build. Open communication is what you're looking for here.
2. Disagree. Everyone is different. It depends on the people at that point in time with THEIR state of mind. Anyone can change their mind, just don't go hoping for it or entertain a ONS if you really want commitment.
3. That's ridiculous. I care about situational dressing. Dress properly at religious events, fancy restaurant etc. For the rest I don't care how you dress, you can come to my dinner party in a sexy bunny outfit.
4. No. It really depends on the people and their values and circumstances.
2. Disagree. Everyone is different. It depends on the people at that point in time with THEIR state of mind. Anyone can change their mind, just don't go hoping for it or entertain a ONS if you really want commitment.
3. That's ridiculous. I care about situational dressing. Dress properly at religious events, fancy restaurant etc. For the rest I don't care how you dress, you can come to my dinner party in a sexy bunny outfit.
4. No. It really depends on the people and their values and circumstances.
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1- No. She might find the love and great sex combo she is looking for on date number 500, who is to stop people from looking for love or satisfaction. Who is to say 'the one' must be among just the first 10 or 20 guys she dated. With dating apps etc people have hundreds of options.
2- No. However, it's good to go slow because getting to know a person a little first is a good idea. What if their personality is horrible, or you just don't like each other that much. You cannot understand that in one date, even if you spend time at home. It takes maybe meeting up like every week for a month to have an idea.
3-No. However, having a good fashion sense or good taste in clothes is a plus for everyone.
4-could be, I suggest this when I'm not that interested in the guy, I might not even meet them again, so don't want them to feel bad for paying someone's drink that they chatted with for half an hour and won't ever see them again š
1. It does but not in the way that most people are probably gonna think of right away. Instead of it being about numbers, people should be asking the questions that get down to the actual reason for such behavior- that's for low and high numbers.
2. Not necessarily.. maturity level plays a large role. Also I think circumstances and at what point in life they are make a difference. Personal tidbit- Sir Sag and I slept together the first day we met and that was like 6 years ago.
3. It shouldn't.. people need to use some common sense. Dressing for a night out shouldn't be the same as a job interview, etc.
4. Whoever initiated should pay, unless the other person insists and then I think they can compromise.
2. Not necessarily.. maturity level plays a large role. Also I think circumstances and at what point in life they are make a difference. Personal tidbit- Sir Sag and I slept together the first day we met and that was like 6 years ago.
3. It shouldn't.. people need to use some common sense. Dressing for a night out shouldn't be the same as a job interview, etc.
4. Whoever initiated should pay, unless the other person insists and then I think they can compromise.
1. Body count means nothing in relation to a potential relationship with them. If anything it may mean the woman is selective and careful about who she chooses for a long term relationship. I donāt see this as a red flag but more of an indication that itās important enough to get to get it right.
2. That depends on both. If two people consent to sex that soon in a relationship itās neither persons fault if the relationship goes south. Is it an indicator that it will? That again depends on both as more often than not the sex was probably used as a stop gap for the loneliness they both felt at the time. Truth be told that unless the relationship was like true love at first sight and both want the long term relationship right away, itās more likely that the two people will go separate ways.
3. I would say most definitely. But again that depends on what she thinks will attract the guy. Some guys like that and some women think if they have it they will show it. I prefer a little more class myself as it indicates a woman can look after herself and wants her personality to show through and keep a little mystery going in the relationship.
4. Iām old fashioned. I believe if you want the lady to feel like she is a lady you buy her dinner. If she refuses that is different. Itās called respect. As a guy, you shouldnāt go out on a date with a woman thinking you are going Dutch. Thatās just plain rude.
2. That depends on both. If two people consent to sex that soon in a relationship itās neither persons fault if the relationship goes south. Is it an indicator that it will? That again depends on both as more often than not the sex was probably used as a stop gap for the loneliness they both felt at the time. Truth be told that unless the relationship was like true love at first sight and both want the long term relationship right away, itās more likely that the two people will go separate ways.
3. I would say most definitely. But again that depends on what she thinks will attract the guy. Some guys like that and some women think if they have it they will show it. I prefer a little more class myself as it indicates a woman can look after herself and wants her personality to show through and keep a little mystery going in the relationship.
4. Iām old fashioned. I believe if you want the lady to feel like she is a lady you buy her dinner. If she refuses that is different. Itās called respect. As a guy, you shouldnāt go out on a date with a woman thinking you are going Dutch. Thatās just plain rude.
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. It's a big world - some judge this aspect harshly (virgin would be perfect - but if he's really into it and old enough - 1 past relationship is still acceptable), others don't care much about the past (and prefer the past to stay in the past - so they'd rather not talk about it, ever), while others are somewhere in the middle (if she has promiscuous past - that can be a huge turn off/red flag).
2. That's highly situational, meaning... if they spend all day together, sometimes things just lean in that direction - naturally... so it can be the start of a beautiful friendship/relationship (so called: hit it off). Or, it could be just mutual physical attraction - and once they start to get to know each-other - realize they're more like.... fighting material - than relationship material. Then again, some spend years if not decades - in a toxic relationship - where fighting becomes the usual (always was: it's usually - the childhood trauma - what triggered their attraction in one another - finding each-other "familiar..."). Also and as mentioned above - some are simply promiscuous (they just wanna get it on - sex being their main interest). It's a big world - with all kinds of people.
3. It can, sometimes quite literally (be it professionally o promiscuous) - other times - a attention hoe (sex off the table - plays really hard to get - but is obsessed with attention so dresses rather provocative - even while in a romantic relationship). But i also met women - who were simply... desperate to find a partner - so they're simply playing all the provocative cards. Till they actually found one, cause then they tone it down like... wearing a braw (or modern nipple hiding accessories) or buying even loose clothes - not just tight body fit. Hoe is one of those words that's easy to throw around (if judging a book by its cover).
4. Maybe even more than ONS - this can really show if one's your type or not (a deal beaker or what you're looking for). More often than not - women who expect men to cover the costs of going on a date (food & transportation) - are looking for a man than can sustain them financially while in a relationship. Even if they have a job (or a successful career) - that's their personal money - they still expect the guy to cover the rent (or to own a house) - and the household bills/maintenance. Might pay for food once in awhile - but that's about it. And that's ok, my point is - that's simple a type of women and there's fitting type of men for them out there (tho, the demand seems rather high - so there's probably only 1 man for 100 or 1000 women this days - cause in the 60s the number seemed rather even - or probably - more men than women - since "house wise" used to be a common thing back then).
Side Note: Gotta love the irony of this particular debate - as i found out - there's also men who expect sex while paying for the date. Which is ironic - cause historical evidence shows that in the 19th century - respectable women were actually discouraged from dining in public spaces, and restaurants were sometimes associated with sex workers. Times changed, but some things remain the same (old school expectations - both from boys and girls / seems rather inaccurate to call them men and women).
I'm more or less a modern man in this regard - so i believe in equality, but am also whiling to pay - if it's my treat (making arrangements for a special night out). So hey, i don't mind paying if it's my idea - i just don't like the idea of this being the usual (as if it's my duty as man and other BS like that). That just wouldn't work for me - while interested in a relationship/partnership - not whiling to fill the spot of a caretaker - as if replacing her dad and taking care of her as if she's just a kid (a spoiled brat even). That's way to immature for my standards. But again, some men are into that (looking for childish girls - to act as their father figure).
Last but not least - first dates seem more fitting for grabbing a coffee and get to know each-other. If there's chemistry & common interests - sure, the date could evolve. If not - both can go their way. Going on a first date - to a restaurant (where eating is the main interest/focus) - seems counter-intuitive dating wise (even if both are paying). Might help - to see if she/he's a messy eater - but that's about it. I get that some girls - want to gain something from a date (free cooked food and a ride) even if they don't like that guy (more like - especially) - but those girls are not that different than boys who expect sex - while covering the date bills. Their reasoning can be so cringe and self-centered - like claiming "that man get to enjoy their company" - while in reality - men can't even enjoy the food properly on a first date (while masking - trying to impress), so if the date is a failure - and they end-up covering all the bills - it's just loss for them.
Posted by neves
Going on a first date - to a restaurant (where eating is the main interest/focus) - seems counter-intuitive dating wise (even if both are paying). Might help - to see if she/he's a messy eater - but that's about it. I get that some girls - want to gain something from a date (free cooked food and a ride) even if they don't like that guy (more like - especially) - but those girls are not that different than boys who expect sex - while covering the date bills. Their reasoning can be so cringe and self-centered - like claiming "that man get to enjoy their company" - while in reality - men can't even enjoy the food properly on a first date (while masking - trying to impress), so if the date is a failure - and they end-up covering all the bills - it's just loss for them.
Real. Who likes eating while facing people? That always makes me uncomfortable unless its immediate family. Plus talking while eating doesn't work at all. Whenever I go out to eat with someone and they ask questions my food gets cold from trying to politely answer. Eating out alone is the way to do it. Unless maybe if the first date was 2 athletes working out intensively together then cooling off and having something small afterward, by then there's more of an established bond and youre a bit too dead to be self conscious
That's just it - food can be enjoyed properly only while completely relaxed - be it by yourself or around familiar people. While a date - with someone you meet for the first time (quite literally - a stranger) - turns the food in background noise (the mind is focused or even slightly stressed - with ones behavior and the stranger in front). That's simply the natural state of every human being (to assess strangers - to behave in a way which makes a good impression - so called "masking"). People are never themselves in a public setting with people they meet for the first time - despite of all the Social Media BS spread allover the internet: "Just be natural, just be yourself!š¤”" Which is pure an utter BS ("so called advice"š¤¦). Since it's actually "natural" for people to be cautions even slightly anxious, assessing the potential mate and one's behavior - around strangers and in public places. Unless one has a mental condition - like down syndrome: which implies altered serotonin metabolism in the brain and same goes for oxytocin and vasopressin (thus, their overly friendly relaxed states) + genetic changes influence brain development - like the prefrontal cortex (decision-making, social inhibition), the amygdala (emotion) & the hippocampus (memory and social context).
Or... if on drugs - like MDMA (main ingredient in Ecstasy) - which forces a very high/unnatural release of Serotonin levels in the brain (which contributes to its mood-elevating and euphoric effects) and Oxytocin (triggering strong feelings of love and protection - out of the blue). That being said, if both are popping a pill of Ecstasy - while on a date a techno/rave event - they can be unnaturally friendly (acting usually "like themselves around a complete stranger") - for at least 2 hours. Unless one of the parties is struggling with depression - cause then - when the effects of the drug are gone (and serotonin & Oxytocin is depleted) - depressive feelings can hit hard. Or, if they formed a strong bond with the one in question - it can have the opposite effect (actually helping with depression). It's why this drug - proved to be like a miracle help - in therapy (making years of progress in just one session) - tho, still illegal in some Countries (like USA). On the other hand... if the one their dating - is rather cold (not the empathic or hugging type) - depression can get worst. Yet, if both people are mentally healthy (so to speak - if depression is not among their concerns) - they can have a great time even if incompatible (as if they know each-other for decades).
Just my 2 cents. š
Or... if on drugs - like MDMA (main ingredient in Ecstasy) - which forces a very high/unnatural release of Serotonin levels in the brain (which contributes to its mood-elevating and euphoric effects) and Oxytocin (triggering strong feelings of love and protection - out of the blue). That being said, if both are popping a pill of Ecstasy - while on a date a techno/rave event - they can be unnaturally friendly (acting usually "like themselves around a complete stranger") - for at least 2 hours. Unless one of the parties is struggling with depression - cause then - when the effects of the drug are gone (and serotonin & Oxytocin is depleted) - depressive feelings can hit hard. Or, if they formed a strong bond with the one in question - it can have the opposite effect (actually helping with depression). It's why this drug - proved to be like a miracle help - in therapy (making years of progress in just one session) - tho, still illegal in some Countries (like USA). On the other hand... if the one their dating - is rather cold (not the empathic or hugging type) - depression can get worst. Yet, if both people are mentally healthy (so to speak - if depression is not among their concerns) - they can have a great time even if incompatible (as if they know each-other for decades).
Just my 2 cents. š
Posted by MidAtBestPosted by neves
Going on a first date - to a restaurant (where eating is the main interest/focus) - seems counter-intuitive dating wise (even if both are paying). Might help - to see if she/he's a messy eater - but that's about it. I get that some girls - want to gain something from a date (free cooked food and a ride) even if they don't like that guy (more like - especially) - but those girls are not that different than boys who expect sex - while covering the date bills. Their reasoning can be so cringe and self-centered - like claiming "that man get to enjoy their company" - while in reality - men can't even enjoy the food properly on a first date (while masking - trying to impress), so if the date is a failure - and they end-up covering all the bills - it's just loss for them.
Real. Who likes eating while facing people? That always makes me uncomfortable unless its immediate family. Plus talking while eating doesn't work at all. Whenever I go out to eat with someone and they ask questions my food gets cold from trying to politely answer. Eating out alone is the way to do it. Unless maybe if the first date was 2 athletes working out intensively together then cooling off and having something small afterward, by then there's more of an established bond and youre a bit too dead to be self consciousclick to expand
That's just it - food can be enjoyed properly only while completely relaxed - be it by yourself or around familiar people. While a date - with someone you meet for the first time (quite literally - a stranger) - turns the food in background noise (the mind is focused or even slightly stressed - with ones behavior and the stranger in front). That's simply the natural state of every human being (to assess strangers - to behave in a way which makes a good impression - so called "masking"). People are never themselves in a public setting with people they meet for the first time - despite of all the Social Media BS spread allover the internet: "Just be natural, just be yourself!š¤”" Which is pure an utter BS ("so called advice"š¤¦). Since it's actually "natural" for people to be cautions even slightly anxious, assessing the potential mate and one's behavior - around strangers and in public places. Unless one has a mental condition - like down syndrome: which implies altered serotonin metabolism in the brain and same goes for oxytocin and vasopressin (thus, their overly friendly relaxed states) + genetic changes influence brain development - like the prefrontal cortex (decision-making, social inhibition), the amygdala (emotion) & the hippocampus (memory and social context).
Or... if on drugs - like MDMA (main ingredient in Ecstasy) - which forces a very high/unnatural release of Serotonin levels in the brain (which contributes to its mood-elevating and euphoric effects) and Oxytocin (triggering strong feelings of love and protection - out of the blue). That being said, if both are popping a pill of Ecstasy - while on a date a techno/rave event - they can be unnaturally friendly (acting usually "like themselves around a complete stranger") - for at least 2 hours. Unless one of the parties is struggling with depression - cause then - when the effects of the drug are gone (and serotonin & Oxytocin is depleted) - depressive feelings can hit hard. Or, if they formed a strong bond with the one in question - it can have the opposite effect (actually helping with depression). It's why this drug - proved to be like a miracle help - in therapy (making years of progress in just one session) - tho, still illegal in some Countries (like USA). On the other hand... if the one their dating - is rather cold (not the empathic or hugging type) - depression can get worst. Yet, if both people are mentally healthy (so to speak - if depression is not among their concerns) - they can have a great time even if incompatible (as if they know each-other for decades).
Just my 2 cents. š
1. Body count as far as serious relationship potential, doesn't matter. A aspect that is effected by high body count for everyone, bonding on a deeper level takes longer and harder to achieve.
2. ONS does not decrease the likely hood of developing a real relationship.Unless the ONS is a one off between strangers purely physical and don't like each other as individuals. Even then, please refer to answer one. You are mixing energies, having no personal relationship or connection does make it easier to shake that off. It still happens on some level.
3. No, for a few reasons. First, dressing like a hoe is very subjective culturally.
style and esthetics in a woman can tell you about her personality and intentions. I absolutely love woman who aren't afraid of showing some skin, as a form of self expression. It's intentions, which she will let you know which it is. Situation and context matter.
Case and point, Thier are beautiful dress that show off and enhance the female form exquisitely, especially shear. You find her attractive anyway and she is dressing to enhance, that might as well be lingerie.
Secondly, some of my best memories of intimacy wasn't sex itself, it was how comfortable she was with me. Showing me and being with me at her most vulnerable. I've got great memories laying bed with my ex walking around with nothing on but a long shirt nearly covering down to her butt cheeks. Another wearing nothing but a loose fitting open to robe. Another a shear gown where I could see EVERYTHING but not clearlyš. A woman bring Vulnerable with me is intamcy.
4. Based of disposable income levels and situation.
Ex. I'm dating a millionaire woman, she wants to go to her restaurant....I'm no where near that level. She is picking up the check. I'll put in what I expected to pay at a normal restaurant..... Millionaire and I go out for ice cream on a walk....I'm paying. Not to be macho, stereotypes, or pride. it's because I want to do things for her. Let me say that again... BECAUSE I WANT TO!
BECAUSE I CAN AND WANT TOO!
That should be everyone's moto when it comes to love and relationships.
2. ONS does not decrease the likely hood of developing a real relationship.Unless the ONS is a one off between strangers purely physical and don't like each other as individuals. Even then, please refer to answer one. You are mixing energies, having no personal relationship or connection does make it easier to shake that off. It still happens on some level.
3. No, for a few reasons. First, dressing like a hoe is very subjective culturally.
style and esthetics in a woman can tell you about her personality and intentions. I absolutely love woman who aren't afraid of showing some skin, as a form of self expression. It's intentions, which she will let you know which it is. Situation and context matter.
Case and point, Thier are beautiful dress that show off and enhance the female form exquisitely, especially shear. You find her attractive anyway and she is dressing to enhance, that might as well be lingerie.
Secondly, some of my best memories of intimacy wasn't sex itself, it was how comfortable she was with me. Showing me and being with me at her most vulnerable. I've got great memories laying bed with my ex walking around with nothing on but a long shirt nearly covering down to her butt cheeks. Another wearing nothing but a loose fitting open to robe. Another a shear gown where I could see EVERYTHING but not clearlyš. A woman bring Vulnerable with me is intamcy.
4. Based of disposable income levels and situation.
Ex. I'm dating a millionaire woman, she wants to go to her restaurant....I'm no where near that level. She is picking up the check. I'll put in what I expected to pay at a normal restaurant..... Millionaire and I go out for ice cream on a walk....I'm paying. Not to be macho, stereotypes, or pride. it's because I want to do things for her. Let me say that again... BECAUSE I WANT TO!
BECAUSE I CAN AND WANT TOO!
That should be everyone's moto when it comes to love and relationships.
Posted by goddessofthesunPosted by berrieslove
these are my opinions
1. dont think this should matter; they didnt know the other person before they started dating
2. i mean the sexual attraction is there, so the relationship material value goes up right?
3. ppl can dress how they want, and damn i wish i were that confident
4. yes to splitting the bill. since its a date not commitment
Well yes, I think being sexually compatible is super important for a relationship to be able to work well long-term. Personally for me, if the sex doesn't satisfy me, I know the relationship won't work. My primary love language is physical touch. This is a huge reason I will never want to put up with a long-distance relationship. The main reason I made this thread was because there's a man I had a ONS with and we vibed really well and liked each other as people, so I'm just fantasizing about the likelihood of us getting together in the future lmaooo
I agree with everything else. š«click to expand
When it comes to receiving Physical touch is my primary love language as a man. I totally get where you are coming from. Key word being love language. We are more adapt to Bond though physical intimacy.... because it's our love language. If you felt or curious there might be potential there that's something to explore and.... recognize that aspect of yourself. On the brightside we are easily to pleaseš¤£
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. No I donāt think so. They could have had bad luck in relationships, it doesnāt necessarily mean they donāt have potential as a romantic partner. As long as they didnāt cheat.
2. Yes. Even if the sexual attraction is there, the ppl donāt know eachother well. Itās too impulsive. Not only that but men are less likely to take you serious because some are asshole jerks who canāt keep it in their pants and lose interest as soon as they get what they want. I know from the experience of my friend. She has gotten friendzoned from so many guys because she is too impulsive and doesnāt wait to feel the guy out.
If the chemistry is there, doesnāt waiting make it that much more special?
3. No. But I do think that regardless of a man or woman, the way they dress says something about them. So it definitely will say something about her, but it didnāt mean sheās a hoe. It could show that she is bold, confident and doesnāt care what ppl think, sheās confident of the opposite of that, insecure and seeks validation from others or from men specifically. In my opinion it can mean many things, but it doesnāt mean sheās easy.
4. No. I donāt think both āshouldā split it on the first date but I think it depends on how both ppl feel about it. For me, I think I would feel a bit dumbfounded if a guy didnāt offer to pay for me. Not anything to do with money, but more like it shows how much courtesy he has.
Posted by TarvosTrigaranosPosted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1) yes. Within reason. High body count just indicates a lack if stability to me.
2) I've honestly never had a long term relationship with someone who I havent slept with on the first date. I get bored and move on to the next. Thats not saying im only looking for sex, like I said, every long term relationship started that way.
3) Not always. A lot of women who dress slutty just want attention but, the women with no bra on, sweatpants with stains on the knees and a hair tie in her pocket are the ones to watch.. they're either in a relationship and aren't trying to impress, or they're ready to get dirty.
4) No. Whoever asked for the date and or planned it should pay. Thats like making her pay for her own flowers. Now, if the other person offers to pay part, and they should (remember that and judge accordingly), you should allow them.click to expand
Thatās crazy we have the same Venus/mars sign. I really canāt relate to your answer for number 2 š
Posted by TarvosTrigaranosPosted by BlackPearlPosted by TarvosTrigaranosThatās crazy we have the same Venus/mars sign. I really canāt relate to your answer for number 2 šPosted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1) yes. Within reason. High body count just indicates a lack if stability to me.
2) I've honestly never had a long term relationship with someone who I havent slept with on the first date. I get bored and move on to the next. Thats not saying im only looking for sex, like I said, every long term relationship started that way.
3) Not always. A lot of women who dress slutty just want attention but, the women with no bra on, sweatpants with stains on the knees and a hair tie in her pocket are the ones to watch.. they're either in a relationship and aren't trying to impress, or they're ready to get dirty.
4) No. Whoever asked for the date and or planned it should pay. Thats like making her pay for her own flowers. Now, if the other person offers to pay part, and they should (remember that and judge accordingly), you should allow them.
click to expand
click to expand
Really? Pisces Venus virgo mars? Same houses?
Im glad you cant relate to that. I think there's a huge difference between men a nd women in that. I do hope you find someone that you have enough chemistry with that the thought at least crosses your mind, even if you dont act on it. And, if you do act on it I hope the other person was authentic and not just playing games.click to expand
Pisces Venus in the 1st house and 0Ā° Libra mars (very close to Virgo) in the 7th house
I donāt think itās a gender thing, my female friends has done it. After all, you said that happened to you so the with women that had to be willing to also do it on the first date right?
I definitely have felt that chemistry before, so much so I felt it under my skin. He has Scorpio Venus , Pisces mars. And actually heās also one to have sex the first date either. I figured it was the Pisces placements , but now not sure..
Thatās why it was surprised me you said you would do it on the first date. I thought that was more a fire or air sign thing.
I honestly donāt feel like how soon you have sex determines how much chemistry is there. Itās not about not feeling it, but acting on it is much different. Even with that chemistry I couldnāt do it on the first date. Even more so if the chemistry is there, I would value that moment too much to rush into it. The feelings would pile up and it would be more special.
But also I have a stellium in the 12th house so maybe thatās why. Iām very slow to open up, and being that intimate with someone I donāt take lightly
But thereās nothing wrong with two consenting adults wanting to do it the first night. Everyone is different! I was just a bit surprised because we had the same Venus and mars. But its probably the overall chart not just the Venus and mars ~
Posted by goddessofthesun
Say if you agree or disagree to these statements and explain:
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.
1. Yes. But loosely. Women who are virgins past a certain age (probably mid 20s at the latest) are either religious, have something about them that men don't like, or are likely asexual. At the high end, they are likely to have children or contracted a disease.
2. If you have a ONS then by definition there is no future relationship. That's what makes it a ONS.
3. Yeah. Nothing against a ho, but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck? It's either a duck or something trying to be a duck.
4. No. Whoever invites has the obligation to pay, or at least offer to. I'm too sexist to allow a woman to pay for the first date unless it was something I both couldn't afford but also couldn't say no to. But do as I say, not as I do. If you plan the date, you plan how it's going to be financed.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account āRelated Topics
I was playing a videogame, minding my own business, just standing there (the character I was playing at the moment was black) in some corner, checking my inventory, and there it was. Some idiot sent me that message.
Look, I know there are ignorant people
I made my move and I've been getting good vibes from some of her posts on the internet, but I haven't had any sort of direct feedback yet like a message from her or anything.
Taurus boards say to wait, and I feel like waiting is good at the moment, but a
@HereforTaurusAgain
Joined: Aug 11, 2025 Ā· Topics: 23 Ā· Posts: 209
I would say Sagittarius moon as it seems that motivated people really can thrive with this moon. i believe it's more powerful to have this as a moon over having it as a sun. I would say barn none it's the best to be gifted with.
I would say the tricky mo
Me and casey anthony have the same mars (sag mars) and pisces rising. We also both have water moons. Ive seen alot of comments that she has dead eyes. Lol
I promise you our eyes just look like that cause its a pisces rising thing.
I still think shes a hid
Im over thinking things because my mans sure but not absokutely sure of his time of birth. The time in which is says is in the area, is an area in which sag rising turns into cap rising.
I use comparisons of people I know in my life with both rising signs
What if you know your date of birth, your birth place, but only that it's some time between 7 and 8pm. I don't get the same sun sign, depending on when it was. Anyone here with that experience? What did you do?
I think I'm more like a sagittarius than a
@Memme
Joined: Feb 11, 2025 Ā· Topics: 1 Ā· Posts: 18
I attract a lot of Sagittarius women in a serious way. It like I feel as if I match better with Sagittarius and it is crazy since I am a Cancer. Here is the problem, I never try to get into a relationship with a Sagittarius due to their nature of wanting
Aww my thread got deleted cuz of certain members with sensitie balls who can't agree to disagree?! Only a bunch of white people being offended on the account of others š
So the disease finally spread here too. I remember a few years back when this was t
just a silly, light-hearted thread about busting myths and revealing/confirming facts about signs or placements lol
examples of busting a myth might be,
"i'm a taurus but i have no profound interest in food or taking naps."
"i'm a sagittarius but i h
Is it possible to fall in love with someone youāve never met in person?
For example, you are both dxp members and exchange some private messages, messages get longer and more private, you feel some sort of bond, you talk on the phone, you Skype and boom
This weekend I got a random wrong number text from someone in New York asking if I was home. I didn't recognize the number but I like messing with wrong numbers so I replied "no, why" to see what they say. Well the person messaging me called me Anna (not
10 likes and Iāll post the link to dxp
Hi good afternoon just reaching out to see if anyone on here has an OnlyFans or Fansly and wants to do a follow for follow. If you are interested private message me. Iām so while we are at it what has been your experience with either of these sites?
Iāve been really working on my New Yearās resolution to stop waiting and start moving.
Iāve been to Bogota, Freeport and now Panama so far this year.
Iāve made some great friends while in Panama. People from all over the world. Really stretching my Sagi
I just started texting with this sag,there was day where we would text for days like 24/7 and yesterday all of a sudden like literaly all of a suden he said: please dont text me stuff like this anymore if you want to text me please do it only professional
Do you have any planets conjunct your sun and if so how do they influence your personality? I usually work with an 8Ā° orb.
Iāve āļøconj Venus, Jupiter and Neptune which gives the chart a strong Libra, Sag and Pisces feel and theyāre all in the 7th lol ā¦ š
Lasagna
Iāve been messaging with a guy for a while. Weāre long distance but we had already seen each other face to face in the past. I think he likes me because he always finds excuses to talk to me.
I decided to be bold and confess my feelings for him, so I wr
Hey guys! Just a quick question:
Do you expect your (best) friends to ALWAYS agree with you? Do you expect them to support you, no matter what? Do you believe your friend can both support you and disagree with you at the same time? What would that mean
ā¦if Virgo knows about me communicating with an Ariesā¦
Here is how it goes.
I am admiring Aries for many qualities he possessing including being an amazing father to his boy, loyal friend, standing up for himself to his crazy family (whom I KNOWā¦they ARE
1. A woman's body count indicates her potential as a romantic partner.
2. If you have a ONS with somebody you meet on the first day, the likelihood of y'all seeing each other as serious relationship material from that point on decreases dramatically.
3. How a woman dresses indicates whether or not she's a hoe.
4. Both people should split the bill evenly on the first date.