@LittleFairy
9 Years1,000+ Posts
Am I conventionally attractive? (Page 3)
You are on page out of 3 | Reverse Order
i wouldn't rate anyone with a stupid number
you have your own unique beauty! conventional beauty is just boring lol
btw, you posted a picture or two dressing up with boots and stuff w/ more makeup one time. was that you in the pictures?
Your a beauty. Eat more please.
Posted by LittleFairy
Succumbing to group think is not useful ..it shows mental weakness think for yourself.
Ok, but then why ask for validation. 'Think for yourself'...right?
Posted by PVJamz
So what's the end game for this thread. What do you hope to gain from it?She said it was more about her obsession with gwyneth Paltrow
Nah I don't think so. She has been begging Don Johnson to drag her for months, and despite being the most self admittedly superficial man here, even he had the decency to ignore her requests. This is something deeper.
Alicia I think that's her name said the same thing. And yes I feel it's deeper also. I'm curious what it is?
Wanting people to validate her, the way she see's herself maybe? A million posters can tell her she's beautiful, but the one voice who calls her ugly is the only one she will hear. She doesn't believe she's attractive.
click to expand
+1000000
This thread breaks my heart for that exact reason.
Not conventionally attractive - at least at the current moments standards - though there was a time this look was hot
You look very unhealthy to me personally
Take care of yourself ??
No.
Posted by PossessionSt
I'm on page 8 and drunkBut I think you look hotter than Gwyneth
You have wider thigh gap
Thanks ! 😛
If you like ghost looking faces...you are 10
Of course i want people to validate me ..validate my parking DX 😛
Posted by Gemitati
If you like ghost looking faces...you are 10
I don't personally think i look like a ghost but you do so that's ok that's your opinions 🙂
That is what I look like to some people. I like it though. I wish people got that I like my skin!
I mean i could change it easily and do spray if i wanted so i must like it.
Posted by ScorpionKnight
A few years back i made the mistake of having my picture rated on a dating site...they brutalized me...lol...i got some pretty low ratings...i will definitely never do that again...
DTF??
you remind me of Karen Carpenter in a way. she has Leo moon. and you have Leo venus.
and weirdly she has gemini mars like you.
Cancer rising too. she had an eating disorder sadly.
https://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Karen_Carpenter
she doesnt have any capricorn but she is a dominant 10th houser.
she also has strong aquarius,
Born: March 2, 1950, 11:45 AM
In: New Haven (CT) (United States)
Sun: 11°33' Pisces AS: 0°35' Cancer
Moon: 18°26' Leo MC: 6°29' Pisces
Dominants: Cancer, Pisces, Leo
Uranus, Sun, Moon
Houses 3, 10, 9 / Water, Air / Fixed
edit really lovely lady, too.
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?
One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
Posted by ScorpionKnight
A few years back i made the mistake of having my picture rated on a dating site...they brutalized me...lol...i got some pretty low ratings...i will definitely never do that again...please don't take this as a brag because I hate bragging. my girl posted my pic on her Facebook page for all to see after I specifically told her don't do it and surprisingly got damn near 200 likes for my picture. I just don't want to post my picture here. never once in my life been on a dating site. I see no purpose for that.
Because you're a coward.
coward for what? because I don't want to post my picture here? no, not coward...shy. I already got a creep (a Scorpio rising one at that) creeping up on me on this site as it is and I ain't even got no picture of me up.
I'm shy and I have posted pictures of myself on here. In fact, I have another profile with my pictures on it. You're just a coward making excuses. Why do you talk negatively about Alicia? You seem obsessed with her, but at the same time... Projecting.
I really don't want to get back into that. you should know by now she screenshots and saves my posts for evidence. she does it all the time like she has nothing better to do with her sorry life. and it's not only her we have other creeps that post people's profile picture all across the boards. I like to stay unnotice. I'm the center of attraction. if I post my picture someone here might even notice me. so there you have it. that's why. it has nothing to do with being a coward. see you're an Aries. you suppose to be fearless. that's why you not shy to post your picture.
click to expand
rocky is an aries and she doesn't post her photos.
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
click to expand
What's conventionally attractive?
I don't know.
I'm fugly
Gwen is one of the most basic beckys out there. She's not ugg she's not pretty just basic.
Posted by ScorpionKnight
A few years back i made the mistake of having my picture rated on a dating site...they brutalized me...lol...i got some pretty low ratings...i will definitely never do that again...please don't take this as a brag because I hate bragging. my girl posted my pic on her Facebook page for all to see after I specifically told her don't do it and surprisingly got damn near 200 likes for my picture. I just don't want to post my picture here. never once in my life been on a dating site. I see no purpose for that.
Because you're a coward.
coward for what? because I don't want to post my picture here? no, not coward...shy. I already got a creep (a Scorpio rising one at that) creeping up on me on this site as it is and I ain't even got no picture of me up.
I'm shy and I have posted pictures of myself on here. In fact, I have another profile with my pictures on it. You're just a coward making excuses. Why do you talk negatively about Alicia? You seem obsessed with her, but at the same time... Projecting.
I really don't want to get back into that. you should know by now she screenshots and saves my posts for evidence. she does it all the time like she has nothing better to do with her sorry life. and it's not only her we have other creeps that post people's profile picture all across the boards. I like to stay unnotice. I'm the center of attraction. if I post my picture someone here might even notice me. so there you have it. that's why. it has nothing to do with being a coward. see you're an Aries. you suppose to be fearless. that's why you not shy to post your picture.
rocky is an aries and she doesn't post her photos.
but I bet she's still fearless. somehow i just know she wouldn't have a problem posting her picture there's not a single shyness to her. the problem lies with her is she don't want to post her picture cus she feels she doesn't have to.
click to expand
i think it's more, she dont'give a fuck if you want to see her or not.
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
click to expand
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
You remind of phoebe lol and i generally find attractiveness on how people present and express themselves like talking and all so i can't really say anything.... 😢
I need a full body photo... your face only tells a 5 percent story.
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
click to expand
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
click to expand
Again that's a gross oversimplification. Beauty is a complex concept as is our perception of it in others, i.e. physical attractiveness. Human beings desire a particular physiology based on our own standards as a species in addition to what we find advantangeous individually. For example practically all humans would agree an attractive partner should have two eyes. This desire is both conscious and sub conscious, so we can't always control what we may find attractive.
Here's an oddly superficial example. People naturally gravitate toward partners who appear healthy. If for example a person approaches you and is missing a part of their ear, your mind will quickly take note of that. It will not discard that information automatically because your subconscious mind knows something is amiss. However this information still needs to be processed by your conscious mind. As you get more acquainted, you may completely forget that they are missing a piece of their ear. The person may be charming, which will then make them seem more attractive to you. So much so that the person's ear becomes a non factor in your attraction to them altogether. In this case symmetry does not define attraction.
Human beings do also crave variety and diversity in our mates in order to provide our offspring with more advantageous traits. A person with a "beauty mark", freckles, or different colored eyes may be deemed beautiful due to their uniqueness. They may not necessarily have symmetrical features, but they are not considered phyiscally unattractive either. In this same manner symmetrical features could be considered unattractive as well. A person may have symmetry, but their eyes may be too close together, their nose too bulbous, their ears to big ,etc. These features may not make sense to your mind, so you may not find that person physically attractive.
Another key factor in attractivenes is our own perception of favorable proportions. You may come from a family where everyone has big eyes and thin lips. As a result you may on a subconscious level find those traits attractive because they are familiar. However the society you live in may favor people with fuller lips, so you may also find that attractive as well. Our environment and culture can also play a role in what we find beautiful.
Attractivness (a person's overall phyiscal beauty) therefore derives from our need to find the most physically advantageous partner along with our preconceived notions of beauty that are rooted in our individual biases and the environment in which we live.
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
Again that's a gross oversimplification. Beauty is a complex concept as is our perception of it in others, i.e. physical attractiveness. Human beings desire a particular physiology based on our own standards as a species in addition to what we find advantangeous individually. For example practically all humans would agree an attractive partner should have two eyes. This desire is both conscious and sub conscious, so we can't always control what we may find attractive.
Here's an oddly superficial example. People naturally gravitate toward partners who appear healthy. If for example a person approaches you and is missing a part of their ear, your mind will quickly take note of that. It will not discard that information automatically because your subconscious mind knows something is amiss. However this information still needs to be processed by your conscious mind. As you get more acquainted, you may completely forget that they are missing a piece of their ear. The person may be charming, which will then make them seem more attractive to you. So much so that the person's ear becomes a non factor in your attraction to them altogether. In this case symmetry does not define attraction.
Human beings do also crave variety and diversity in our mates in order to provide our offspring with more advantageous traits. A person with a "beauty mark", freckles, or different colored eyes may be deemed beautiful due to their uniqueness. They may not necessarily have symmetrical features, but they are not considered phyiscally unattractive either. In this same manner symmetrical features could be considered unattractive as well. A person may have symmetry, but their eyes may be too close together, their nose too bulbous, their ears to big ,etc. These features may not make sense to your mind, so you may not find that person physically attractive.
Another key factor in attractivenes is our own perception of favorable proportions. You may come from a family where everyone has big eyes and thin lips. As a result you may on a subconscious level find those traits attractive because they are familiar. However the society you live in may favor people with fuller lips, so you may also find that attractive as well. Our environment and culture can also play a role in what we find beautiful.
Attractivness (a person's overall phyiscal beauty) therefore derives from our need to find the most physically advantageous partner along with our preconceived notions of beauty that are rooted in our individual biases and the environment in which we live.
click to expand
Well...despite your much appreciated effort I am still having no idea what OPeansmwjen she asking if she is CONVENTIONALLY attractive?
How is it different from being attractive?
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
Again that's a gross oversimplification. Beauty is a complex concept as is our perception of it in others, i.e. physical attractiveness. Human beings desire a particular physiology based on our own standards as a species in addition to what we find advantangeous individually. For example practically all humans would agree an attractive partner should have two eyes. This desire is both conscious and sub conscious, so we can't always control what we may find attractive.
Here's an oddly superficial example. People naturally gravitate toward partners who appear healthy. If for example a person approaches you and is missing a part of their ear, your mind will quickly take note of that. It will not discard that information automatically because your subconscious mind knows something is amiss. However this information still needs to be processed by your conscious mind. As you get more acquainted, you may completely forget that they are missing a piece of their ear. The person may be charming, which will then make them seem more attractive to you. So much so that the person's ear becomes a non factor in your attraction to them altogether. In this case symmetry does not define attraction.
Human beings do also crave variety and diversity in our mates in order to provide our offspring with more advantageous traits. A person with a "beauty mark", freckles, or different colored eyes may be deemed beautiful due to their uniqueness. They may not necessarily have symmetrical features, but they are not considered phyiscally unattractive either. In this same manner symmetrical features could be considered unattractive as well. A person may have symmetry, but their eyes may be too close together, their nose too bulbous, their ears to big ,etc. These features may not make sense to your mind, so you may not find that person physically attractive.
Another key factor in attractivenes is our own perception of favorable proportions. You may come from a family where everyone has big eyes and thin lips. As a result you may on a subconscious level find those traits attractive because they are familiar. However the society you live in may favor people with fuller lips, so you may also find that attractive as well. Our environment and culture can also play a role in what we find beautiful.
Attractivness (a person's overall phyiscal beauty) therefore derives from our need to find the most physically advantageous partner along with our preconceived notions of beauty that are rooted in our individual biases and the environment in which we live.
Well...despite your much appreciated effort I am still having no idea what OPeansmwjen she asking if she is CONVENTIONALLY attractive?
How is it different from being attractive?
click to expand
It basically the same thing. "Conventionally" in this case just means by majority or "societal standards" would she be considered attractive. She's not so much asking "Do you personally find me attractive?" but more so asking, "Would I be in any way considered physically unattractive?" Therefore I think it's easy to say that OP would be considered attractive.
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
Again that's a gross oversimplification. Beauty is a complex concept as is our perception of it in others, i.e. physical attractiveness. Human beings desire a particular physiology based on our own standards as a species in addition to what we find advantangeous individually. For example practically all humans would agree an attractive partner should have two eyes. This desire is both conscious and sub conscious, so we can't always control what we may find attractive.
Here's an oddly superficial example. People naturally gravitate toward partners who appear healthy. If for example a person approaches you and is missing a part of their ear, your mind will quickly take note of that. It will not discard that information automatically because your subconscious mind knows something is amiss. However this information still needs to be processed by your conscious mind. As you get more acquainted, you may completely forget that they are missing a piece of their ear. The person may be charming, which will then make them seem more attractive to you. So much so that the person's ear becomes a non factor in your attraction to them altogether. In this case symmetry does not define attraction.
Human beings do also crave variety and diversity in our mates in order to provide our offspring with more advantageous traits. A person with a "beauty mark", freckles, or different colored eyes may be deemed beautiful due to their uniqueness. They may not necessarily have symmetrical features, but they are not considered phyiscally unattractive either. In this same manner symmetrical features could be considered unattractive as well. A person may have symmetry, but their eyes may be too close together, their nose too bulbous, their ears to big ,etc. These features may not make sense to your mind, so you may not find that person physically attractive.
Another key factor in attractivenes is our own perception of favorable proportions. You may come from a family where everyone has big eyes and thin lips. As a result you may on a subconscious level find those traits attractive because they are familiar. However the society you live in may favor people with fuller lips, so you may also find that attractive as well. Our environment and culture can also play a role in what we find beautiful.
Attractivness (a person's overall phyiscal beauty) therefore derives from our need to find the most physically advantageous partner along with our preconceived notions of beauty that are rooted in our individual biases and the environment in which we live.
Well...despite your much appreciated effort I am still having no idea what OPeansmwjen she asking if she is CONVENTIONALLY attractive?
How is it different from being attractive?
It basically the same thing. "Conventionally" in this case just means by majority or "societal standards" would she be considered attractive. She's not so much asking "Do you personally find me attractive?" but more so asking, "Would I be in any way considered physically unattractive?" Therefore I think it's easy to say that OP would be considered attractive.
click to expand
If you into ghosts...
And thanks! So instead of pulling this conventional bullbutter - she could just be normal and ask 'do you find me attractive'? Geeeeee
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
Again that's a gross oversimplification. Beauty is a complex concept as is our perception of it in others, i.e. physical attractiveness. Human beings desire a particular physiology based on our own standards as a species in addition to what we find advantangeous individually. For example practically all humans would agree an attractive partner should have two eyes. This desire is both conscious and sub conscious, so we can't always control what we may find attractive.
Here's an oddly superficial example. People naturally gravitate toward partners who appear healthy. If for example a person approaches you and is missing a part of their ear, your mind will quickly take note of that. It will not discard that information automatically because your subconscious mind knows something is amiss. However this information still needs to be processed by your conscious mind. As you get more acquainted, you may completely forget that they are missing a piece of their ear. The person may be charming, which will then make them seem more attractive to you. So much so that the person's ear becomes a non factor in your attraction to them altogether. In this case symmetry does not define attraction.
Human beings do also crave variety and diversity in our mates in order to provide our offspring with more advantageous traits. A person with a "beauty mark", freckles, or different colored eyes may be deemed beautiful due to their uniqueness. They may not necessarily have symmetrical features, but they are not considered phyiscally unattractive either. In this same manner symmetrical features could be considered unattractive as well. A person may have symmetry, but their eyes may be too close together, their nose too bulbous, their ears to big ,etc. These features may not make sense to your mind, so you may not find that person physically attractive.
Another key factor in attractivenes is our own perception of favorable proportions. You may come from a family where everyone has big eyes and thin lips. As a result you may on a subconscious level find those traits attractive because they are familiar. However the society you live in may favor people with fuller lips, so you may also find that attractive as well. Our environment and culture can also play a role in what we find beautiful.
Attractivness (a person's overall phyiscal beauty) therefore derives from our need to find the most physically advantageous partner along with our preconceived notions of beauty that are rooted in our individual biases and the environment in which we live.
Well...despite your much appreciated effort I am still having no idea what OPeansmwjen she asking if she is CONVENTIONALLY attractive?
How is it different from being attractive?
It basically the same thing. "Conventionally" in this case just means by majority or "societal standards" would she be considered attractive. She's not so much asking "Do you personally find me attractive?" but more so asking, "Would I be in any way considered physically unattractive?" Therefore I think it's easy to say that OP would be considered attractive.
If you into ghosts...
And thanks! So instead of pulling this conventional bullbutter - she could just be normal and ask 'do you find me attractive'? Geeeeee
click to expand
Sorry this is what i meant do you fine me attractive ...sorry imma lil slow 😛
Posted by LittleFairy
Out of ten what am i?One million! What an interesting question, of course you are conventionally attractive. The better question is how do YOU feel?
What's conventionally attractive?
Well this is a gross oversimplification, but qualities we as humans would consider favorable and easy to visually process. These are also features we may find suitable to mate with in order to bear more advantageous offspring. Humans typically seek out symmetrical features in order to deduce beauty or attractiveness.
That being said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's no one rule for attractiveness. However on a base level human beings tend to favor visual patterns and symmetry when gauging physical beauty (i.e. favorable physical proportions).
So being conventionally attractive means being proportional/symmetrical?
Thanks but I am still conFused.
Cams symmetrical being unattractive?
Again that's a gross oversimplification. Beauty is a complex concept as is our perception of it in others, i.e. physical attractiveness. Human beings desire a particular physiology based on our own standards as a species in addition to what we find advantangeous individually. For example practically all humans would agree an attractive partner should have two eyes. This desire is both conscious and sub conscious, so we can't always control what we may find attractive.
Here's an oddly superficial example. People naturally gravitate toward partners who appear healthy. If for example a person approaches you and is missing a part of their ear, your mind will quickly take note of that. It will not discard that information automatically because your subconscious mind knows something is amiss. However this information still needs to be processed by your conscious mind. As you get more acquainted, you may completely forget that they are missing a piece of their ear. The person may be charming, which will then make them seem more attractive to you. So much so that the person's ear becomes a non factor in your attraction to them altogether. In this case symmetry does not define attraction.
Human beings do also crave variety and diversity in our mates in order to provide our offspring with more advantageous traits. A person with a "beauty mark", freckles, or different colored eyes may be deemed beautiful due to their uniqueness. They may not necessarily have symmetrical features, but they are not considered phyiscally unattractive either. In this same manner symmetrical features could be considered unattractive as well. A person may have symmetry, but their eyes may be too close together, their nose too bulbous, their ears to big ,etc. These features may not make sense to your mind, so you may not find that person physically attractive.
Another key factor in attractivenes is our own perception of favorable proportions. You may come from a family where everyone has big eyes and thin lips. As a result you may on a subconscious level find those traits attractive because they are familiar. However the society you live in may favor people with fuller lips, so you may also find that attractive as well. Our environment and culture can also play a role in what we find beautiful.
Attractivness (a person's overall phyiscal beauty) therefore derives from our need to find the most physically advantageous partner along with our preconceived notions of beauty that are rooted in our individual biases and the environment in which we live.
Well...despite your much appreciated effort I am still having no idea what OPeansmwjen she asking if she is CONVENTIONALLY attractive?
How is it different from being attractive?
It basically the same thing. "Conventionally" in this case just means by majority or "societal standards" would she be considered attractive. She's not so much asking "Do you personally find me attractive?" but more so asking, "Would I be in any way considered physically unattractive?" Therefore I think it's easy to say that OP would be considered attractive.
If you into ghosts...
And thanks! So instead of pulling this conventional bullbutter - she could just be normal and ask 'do you find me attractive'? Geeeeee
Sorry this is what i meant do you fine me attractive ...sorry imma lil slow 😛
click to expand
It's ok. Because of your smart asseness I found out a lot of good info I've never thought about.
I think you're conventionally attractive. You just need to put on more weights. 🙂
I'll be honest. As I said you need to change hair color and style definitely.. and gain some wight
Did this help you understand your situation?
dxpnet has hosted real conversations like this since 2000. If you value independent communities, you can support the site below.
Every contribution helps keep dxpnet independent and ad-light.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Awh thanks ..it has to be fake though...my skin is not suitable for sun bathing ...like 20 mins a day i let it hit my skin just for vit d ...but Dr says no ...if I tan the damage is already done ..
So from a bottle it is 😛