heliumfiasco
@heliumfiasco
13 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 872 · Posts: 3486 · Topics: 236
Can anyone explain Quantum Computing to me like i'm 5 y/o?
"Quantum computing takes advantage of the strange ability of subatomic particles to exist in more than one state at any time. Due to the way the tiniest of particles behave, operations can be done much more quickly and use less energy than classical computers."
"These systems rely on the "spooky" properties of quantum physics, as Einstein put it, and their operation is radically different from how today's computers work. "What you're basically doing is you're replacing the notion of bits with something called qubits," Sutor said. "Ultimately when you measure a qubit it's zero or one, but before that there's a realm of freedom of what that can actually be. It's not zero and one at the same time or anything like this, it just takes on values from a much, much larger mathematical space."
I guess I get it? I just dont understand how it actually works.
"These systems rely on the "spooky" properties of quantum physics, as Einstein put it, and their operation is radically different from how today's computers work. "What you're basically doing is you're replacing the notion of bits with something called qubits," Sutor said. "Ultimately when you measure a qubit it's zero or one, but before that there's a realm of freedom of what that can actually be. It's not zero and one at the same time or anything like this, it just takes on values from a much, much larger mathematical space."
I guess I get it? I just dont understand how it actually works.
So, its not 2 dimensional?
If we are in a simulation from another life source (god) then there is no reason to assume physics from this consciousness apply outside of it. The entire thing is a mind fuck. But at the same time makes more sense than anything else.
It's just how my brain works. I wish I could shut it off. Constantly going. lol
I think I grasp it now, as much as someone with minimum coding/computer knowledge can. Very interesting.
Posted by nanoNo, Elon Musk strikes me as a nut. I was going off some points made by George Smoot the Nobel Prize winner for Physics in 2006. Its just very interesting.
Oh and that's really just how the computer works from a computer engineering standpoint ^^^
I don't care to go into metaphysics on the site, I'm not a religious person and rejected the concept of God when I was a child.
Are you getting these thoughts from Elon Musk? He's genius but kind of crazy. Proceed with caution.
Posted by heliumfiasco
Anyways- the probability of us being in a simulation is very high. However, two physicists accidentally proved we couldn't be a computer simulation while studying quantum Hall effect. They found that just storing information about a couple of hundred electrons would require a computer memory that would physically require more atoms than exist in the universe.
If we were a computer simulation then that very universe would be a part of that simulation. Said psychisist couldn't have PROVED butter if they ultimately too are a part of the simulation. I don't get how all you nutcases don't see the flaws in your own crackpot theories? I mean doesn't a theory lose its appeal once you realize most things speak against it?
But sure we could be a computer simulation. We could might aswell only be existing in a dog's dream too but there isn't hell of a lot to support that claim
Posted by enfant_terribleApparently you didn't take the time to read the part where I stated that physics in our perceived universe wouldn't hold weight outside of such a scenario. You're right it could be anything. Which is fun to ponder and hypothesize. Hence the back and forth banter here... I'm very aware we arent solving the mysteries of the universe on DXP mate.Posted by heliumfiasco
Anyways- the probability of us being in a simulation is very high. However, two physicists accidentally proved we couldn't be a computer simulation while studying quantum Hall effect. They found that just storing information about a couple of hundred electrons would require a computer memory that would physically require more atoms than exist in the universe.
If we were a computer simulation then that very universe would be a part of that simulation. Said psychisist couldn't have PROVED butter if they ultimately too are a part of the simulation. I don't get how all you nutcases don't see the flaws in your own crackpot theories? I mean doesn't a theory lose its appeal once you realize most things speak against it?
But sure we could be a computer simulation. We could might aswell only be existing in a dog's dream too but there isn't hell of a lot to support that claim click to expandclick to expand
Posted by heliumfiascoHAY DUXE YOU NEEDS TO PROVE YOU AINT A HOMO!!! LMAO
So, I'm always looking to explain spirituality and the Universe logically (Like we all do). The quest for solving intuitions and explaining existence is always on my mind.
Anyways- the probability of us being in a simulation is very high. However, two physicists accidentally proved we couldn't be a computer simulation while studying quantum Hall effect. They found that just storing information about a couple of hundred electrons would require a computer memory that would physically require more atoms than exist in the universe.
However, they cant prove that it wouldn't be possible with a quantum computer?
Another thing is- if our universe is a simulation, there is no reason that the laws of physics would apply outside it.
Thoughts? I don't exactly understand quantum computing. Its uses particles instead of 1-0 coding?
Posted by heliumfiascoPosted by enfant_terriblePosted by heliumfiasco
Anyways- the probability of us being in a simulation is very high. However, two physicists accidentally proved we couldn't be a computer simulation while studying quantum Hall effect. They found that just storing information about a couple of hundred electrons would require a computer memory that would physically require more atoms than exist in the universe.
If we were a computer simulation then that very universe would be a part of that simulation. Said psychisist couldn't have PROVED butter if they ultimately too are a part of the simulation. I don't get how all you nutcases don't see the flaws in your own crackpot theories? I mean doesn't a theory lose its appeal once you realize most things speak against it?
But sure we could be a computer simulation. We could might aswell only be existing in a dog's dream too but there isn't hell of a lot to support that claim click to expand
Apparently you didn't take the time to read the part where I stated that physics in our perceived universe wouldn't hold weight outside of such a scenario. You're right it could be anything. Which is fun to ponder and hypothesize. Hence the back and forth banter here... I'm very aware we arent solving the mysteries of the universe on DXP mate. click to expandclick to expand
YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF FUCKING IDIOTSL>
and it really has been a pleasure.
Posted by Squishy_MarshmallowPosted by heliumfiasco
So, I'm always looking to explain spirituality and the Universe logically (Like we all do). The quest for solving intuitions and explaining existence is always on my mind.
Anyways- the probability of us being in a simulation is very high. However, two physicists accidentally proved we couldn't be a computer simulation while studying quantum Hall effect. They found that just storing information about a couple of hundred electrons would require a computer memory that would physically require more atoms than exist in the universe.
However, they cant prove that it wouldn't be possible with a quantum computer?
Another thing is- if our universe is a simulation, there is no reason that the laws of physics would apply outside it.
Thoughts? I don't exactly understand quantum computing. Its uses particles instead of 1-0 coding?click to expand
What do you mean by there is no reason that the laws of physics would apply outside our universe?
Is this your way of saying we are taking away external interference inorder to create and maintain a quantum computer?
click to expand
No, I just wanted to understand quantum computers. I read an article written by a popular astrophysicist about trying to prove if we were possibly living in a simulation. However, it was disproved by two other physicists trying to prove a different theory. Anyways in this article they stated that computers as we currently know them could not ever produce a simulation on this scale, but others argued quantum computers could potentially. However, it’s kind of a catch-22 because if we were in fact in a simulation our physics would be like the programming behind a game, which would be irrelevant outside of our perceived “universe”.
The article made me want to know about how quantum computing works.... then a bunch of idiots chimed in to call me an idiot for being curious about how that specific technology works.
Either way I have no idea what our Universe is, nor does anyone on this site. Some very intelligent astrophysicists, one of which one the Nobel prize in his field thinks we very well could be in a simulation/ Matrix of sorts. It’s just interesting to ponder. In order for me to fully understand the article I needed to grasp quantum computations. 🙂
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
....Come Out Of A Black Hole For The First Time Ever:
http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2018/03/nasa-saw-something-come-out-of-black.html?m=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9aGFPY0Du0
1. @Scruffles
2. @xoxflute
3. @squishy_marshmallow
4. @DeleterNerd
5. @UnusualVaginalDischarge
6. @Fortuna
7. @wolfinramsclothing
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsP0RjfHN8I
https://i.imgur.com/pe4q1gn.jpg
Gentle Scorp in Ur-anus
@PhoenixRising
@Ram416
Vs.
https://i.imgur.com/9Kl7cjC.jpg
Gemini Mars Mischief Makers
@xoxflute
@LethalFantasia
Since posts & threads come and go, I think it's an appropriate time to catch the Vageenka up on the comings & goings. Feel free to contribute anything I might've missed.
So without further ado in no particular order: https://i.imgur.
I propose after what happened in ridiculous case of Bill Cosby...
I propose that any woman found in men’s hotel apartment, house or anywhere - has no rights to claim sexual assault of any sort!
That ‘beauty’ that he drugged and raped makes me want to
Hypothetically
If I were pregnant
Anyone want to guess if I would I be having a boy or girl based on my chart ?
What do you need to know ?
without her knowing that i'm a lawyer
does that mean she likes me?
I will reveal mine after about ten replies.
Find me a bf.
Please and thank you.
Mine is Sag!
Weeeeeeeee!!!!
(D)
Anyways- the probability of us being in a simulation is very high. However, two physicists accidentally proved we couldn't be a computer simulation while studying quantum Hall effect. They found that just storing information about a couple of hundred electrons would require a computer memory that would physically require more atoms than exist in the universe.
However, they cant prove that it wouldn't be possible with a quantum computer?
Another thing is- if our universe is a simulation, there is no reason that the laws of physics would apply outside it.
Thoughts? I don't exactly understand quantum computing. Its uses particles instead of 1-0 coding?