@aquariuslove14
12 Years500+ Posts
DXP Survivor 2014 Part I (Page 11)
You are on page out of 13 | Reverse Order
Posted by GetMisted
Why can't you just admit that you suck at debating?
Why can't you lose humbly ^.^?
Why don't you have manners?
Why don't you get over it already?
Why do I have to accept someone talking about me wrongly? Why should I accept you being rude? I mean obviously you have the free will to do whatever the hell you want. But, so do I and I'll be here all day.
😄
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
I defined liberty... You serious that I have to present you with some sort of source for every single thought of mine even if the thought is solely mine....This debate was a very philosophical type of debate. He said we could use empirical evidence and thats what I chose to use. If you think we shouldn't be able to use that you should have not agreed to play or found fault with the rules from the onset.
How do you debate without solid evidence? "I'm right because I say so". Really? Is that was wins a debate? I'm going to try that in the next one.
Once again, it leaves the game open to bias on the judges part.
click to expand
Once, again another lie.
I never said "its a right because I say so"
Stop lying.
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
Why can't you just admit that you suck at debating?Why can't you lose humbly ^.^?
Define "humbly".
Why don't you have manners?
Define "manners".
Why don't you get over it already?
Define "it" in regard to "getting over".
Why do I have to accept someone talking about me wrongly?
Define why constitutes speaking "wrongly" about someone.
Why should I accept you being rude?
Define "rude".
I mean obviously you have the free will to do whatever the hell you want. But, so do I and I'll be here all day.
😄
Why must you answer a question with a question?
Ps, Free will is not an inalienable right according to you.
click to expand
LoL how many times are you going to lie today?
oh my god.... (takes two 1000 mg paracetomals after reading just this page) -.-
Posted by StoicGoatFor the purposes of this debate, —human rights?? shall be defined as —those fundamental rights humans have by virtue of being human.??
He didn't say by virtue of law. He said virtue of being HUMAN.
And you can defend a debate without sourcing a doctrine or any formal sour for that matter when the rules say you may use EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE to support your claims.
Posted by StoicGoat
For the first debate, each team is charged to identify those 5 rights it believes most essential as human rights. , The winning team will be determined based on how well its members argue in favor of their rights, defend them against attack, support them logically and/or with empirical evidence and weaken the opposing team??s chosen rights. For the purposes of this debate, —human rights?? shall be defined as —those fundamental rights humans have by virtue of being human.?? The members of the winning team will each receive one point for the first debate. Points awarded to the winning team??s members in each subsequent debate will increase by one. The winner will (hopefully) be declared 24 hours after the conclusion of each debate, at which time the challenge will be presented.(cont.)
click to expand
Definition of Empirical
Empirical: based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience than theory or pure logic.
Posted by lisabethur8
oh my god.... (takes two 1000 mg paracetomals after reading just this page) -.-
Yes I agree
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
Why can't you just admit that you suck at debating?Why can't you lose humbly ^.^?
Define "humbly".
Why don't you have manners?
Define "manners".
Why don't you get over it already?
Define "it" in regard to "getting over".
Why do I have to accept someone talking about me wrongly?
Define why constitutes speaking "wrongly" about someone.
Why should I accept you being rude?
Define "rude".
I mean obviously you have the free will to do whatever the hell you want. But, so do I and I'll be here all day.
😄
Why must you answer a question with a question?
Ps, Free will is not an inalienable right according to you.
LoL how many times are you going to lie today?
Define "lie".
click to expand
No
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
Why can't you just admit that you suck at debating?Why can't you lose humbly ^.^?
Define "humbly".
Why don't you have manners?
Define "manners".
Why don't you get over it already?
Define "it" in regard to "getting over".
Why do I have to accept someone talking about me wrongly?
Define why constitutes speaking "wrongly" about someone.
Why should I accept you being rude?
Define "rude".
I mean obviously you have the free will to do whatever the hell you want. But, so do I and I'll be here all day.
😄
Why must you answer a question with a question?
Ps, Free will is not an inalienable right according to you.
LoL how many times are you going to lie today?
Define "lie".
click to expand
Reading a dictionary.
Get a formal education.
Learn to google....
All will define a lie for you. Any more definitions and I'm afraid I'll have to charge a fee.
😄
Posted by GetMisted
1. He said you could use law. That means if I use it, you must counter it.2. You still have to prove your empirical evidence. You don't get studies published by simply saying I saw this or did that, without "documenting" your methods of research and findings.
You're stuck in the "It is because I say".
If you want to cite a sourse that shows how the empirical evidence came to be, then go for it. But unless you what to do the research, present it, and use it as your claim.. Cite a source.
I did
Posted by GetMisted
"All will define a lie for you. Any more definitions and I'm afraid I'll have to charge a fee."I can pay you in bubble gum and sarcasm.
Will either of those work for you?
I accept visa, mastercard, or cash
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
1. He said you could use law. That means if I use it, you must counter it.2. You still have to prove your empirical evidence. You don't get studies published by simply saying I saw this or did that, without "documenting" your methods of research and findings.
You're stuck in the "It is because I say".
If you want to cite a sourse that shows how the empirical evidence came to be, then go for it. But unless you what to do the research, present it, and use it as your claim.. Cite a source.
I did
No, you didn't.
click to expand
It's not my problem if you don't understand plain English.
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
1. He said you could use law. That means if I use it, you must counter it.2. You still have to prove your empirical evidence. You don't get studies published by simply saying I saw this or did that, without "documenting" your methods of research and findings.
You're stuck in the "It is because I say".
If you want to cite a sourse that shows how the empirical evidence came to be, then go for it. But unless you what to do the research, present it, and use it as your claim.. Cite a source.
I did
No, you didn't.
It's not my problem if you don't understand plain English.
There's no issue with my understanding of the English language. There is an issue when the judge awards a team win, to a team that didn't fully defend the arguements in the debate.
Hence my suggestion.
click to expand
That's your opinion. Obviously if you feel the game is rigged you can just drop out.
If your not going to drop out then ... it would only make sense that you shut that big ass mouth of yours.
Posted by GetMisted
I don't plan to drop out unless you get voted to my team.
we will see in 1 and 1/2 hours
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
1. He said you could use law. That means if I use it, you must counter it.2. You still have to prove your empirical evidence. You don't get studies published by simply saying I saw this or did that, without "documenting" your methods of research and findings.
You're stuck in the "It is because I say".
If you want to cite a sourse that shows how the empirical evidence came to be, then go for it. But unless you what to do the research, present it, and use it as your claim.. Cite a source.
I did
No, you didn't.
It's not my problem if you don't understand plain English.
There's no issue with my understanding of the English language. There is an issue when the judge awards a team win, to a team that didn't fully defend the arguements in the debate.
Hence my suggestion.
click to expand
You know you have gall to talk about my TEAM at all....
At least every team member in my entire team posted something GENIUS.
That by default alone should win us the debate by the way you defined it from your perception earlier.
You had like 3-4 people not contribute squat which should by default be trumped by team members of another team actually contributing SOMETHING.
wow
you people take this stuff way too seriously...
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
If your not going to drop out then ... it would only make sense that you shut that big ass mouth of yours.I'll shut my big gluteus mouth of mine when you learn how to debate, and the Goat gives a better reason for why a team won other than just because.
click to expand
I gave you plenty of reasons you just have a problem with your comprehension.
😄
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
1. He said you could use law. That means if I use it, you must counter it.2. You still have to prove your empirical evidence. You don't get studies published by simply saying I saw this or did that, without "documenting" your methods of research and findings.
You're stuck in the "It is because I say".
If you want to cite a sourse that shows how the empirical evidence came to be, then go for it. But unless you what to do the research, present it, and use it as your claim.. Cite a source.
I did
No, you didn't.
It's not my problem if you don't understand plain English.
There's no issue with my understanding of the English language. There is an issue when the judge awards a team win, to a team that didn't fully defend the arguements in the debate.
Hence my suggestion.
You know you have gall to talk about my TEAM at all....
At least every team member in my entire team posted something GENIUS.
That by default alone should win us the debate by the way you defined it from your perception earlier.
You had like 3-4 people not contribute squat which should by default be trumped by team members of another team actually contributing SOMETHING.
Hey Mr. Rules Quoter, why don't you go quote what it says about being here for challenges and debates.
click to expand
Why would I do anything for you ^.^?
Posted by GetMisted
You do not have to be here for either if you can't make it #airhead
Why wouldn't I be able to make it?
Posted by aquapiscescusp
you people take this stuff way too seriously...
I take it seriously when someone likes to be rude for the sake of being rude.
Sorry it's a fucking pet peeve of mine.
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
If your not going to drop out then ... it would only make sense that you shut that big ass mouth of yours.I'll shut my big gluteus mouth of mine when you learn how to debate, and the Goat gives a better reason for why a team won other than just because.
I gave you plenty of reasons
😄So now you just need to learn how to debate.
click to expand
Apparently I can win without know how.
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
You do not have to be here for either if you can't make it #airheadWhy wouldn't I be able to make it?
What happens if Snoz or Stillwater can't make it?
By your rules, your team would automatically lose.
Also just posting a comment isn't debating. Did Twinks actually even argue anything?
click to expand
Well they I would lose your right.
I don't have a problem with that actually.... It's fucking team game at the moment. How bout you organize yours better?
then*
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Posted by GetMisted
You do not have to be here for either if you can't make it #airheadWhy wouldn't I be able to make it?
What happens if Snoz or Stillwater can't make it?
By your rules, your team would automatically lose.
Also just posting a comment isn't debating. Did Twinks actually even argue anything?
click to expand
Well??_at least something was said..
be it in your opinion it was a statement/comment or a debate or whatever??_our team participated fully from the get go??_
No body started to bash you about your debating skills. As far as I know my team actually had the courtesy to give both you and D credit for holding your team up. (but this comment is not ment for D because I don't see D on here ranting away over ONE LOSS like you)..THE WIN IS STILL UP IN THE AIR.
Instead of talking about who on our team debated or made a statement/comment??_Direct your comments towards your people and tell them to STEP THEIR GAME UP. Maybe that is why you are so upset cause you had no help?
It is a TEAM effort..That is what WE did..and that is why we WON
NOT YOU.
Somewhere along the line it was said that NYAA thought he was superman??_
To me it looks like you want to be SUPERMAN. ..because you fail to address your team..
Instead you want to play SUPERMAN and debate the whole thing yourself and still LOOSE
Okay SUPERMAN??_
WIN THE D*** GAME THEN
See yal at 4pm
Posted by LetltB
Open a thread stoic and let the audience vote.
That would be unfair at this point. Maybe next time.
Can we please let.it.go?
@ beluga
Yes in a real debate you have to define every term..but there are a lot of rules in a real debate that do not apply here. We go with whatever rules we are given by the judge in this case.
We can all agree to disagree on which team won. Meanwhile, a new challenge is coming our way and we should save our brains for that. *shrug*
Posted by Damnata
Can we please let.it.go?@ beluga
Yes in a real debate you have to define every term..but there are a lot of rules in a real debate that do not apply here. We go with whatever rules we are given by the judge in this case.
We can all agree to disagree on which team won. Meanwhile, a new challenge is coming our way and we should save our brains for that. *shrug*
True!!
Posted by StillWater
10 more minutes......... who is it going to be.........
Lol??_probably me??_Oh no I'm scared.
Heart is pounding away??_.. 🙂
Posted by LetltB
Open a thread stoic and let the audience vote.That would be unfair at this point. Maybe next time.
click to expand
yea I knew that...it's your pick who goes then. Got it.
On the last 72 pages of Survivor??_Airheads took the first win and Getmisted argues about a loss..and him and NYAA go back and forth (lol
Now today..We will find out will join the DowneyDryerSheets??_
Music plays
So who does the judge pick? Times up...
Why is the Judge keeping us waiting...
the suspence is high....
..lol
Posted by LetltB
Open a thread stoic and let the audience vote.That would be unfair at this point. Maybe next time.
In all fairness to the judge: he probably wanted the voting to be private to curtail drama. "Oh you voted for so and so?" He could find no other method for the voting.
How would shellshocker know that Nights was cheating? How does shellshocker have access to his inbox?
click to expand
PM's..that were shared between the judge and the people he wanted to win. Ask her. She won't lie.
The audience members who submitted their votes have traded NotYourAverageAquarius to the Downy Dryer Sheets. Double D's, please give your new teammate a warm welcome. A new debate topic will be posted this evening.
Regarding FAIRNESS?
The audience are not in this game, so us voting in ONE thread together would make it very simple. Easy to count and BOTH TEAMS can fairly see the vote. Not the one the judge chooses.
Posted by StoicGoat
The audience members who submitted their votes have traded NotYourAverageAquarius to the Downy Dryer Sheets. Double D's, please give your new teammate a warm welcome. A new debate topic will be posted this evening.
Boooya... gee who would've guessed? lol...asshole
Posted by LetltB
Regarding FAIRNESS?The audience are not in this game, so us voting in ONE thread together would make it very simple. Easy to count and BOTH TEAMS can fairly see the vote. Not the one the judge chooses.
I see you are still leveling allegations and still failing to provide any substantiating evidence. Carry on.
Posted by StillWater
In a way it will be good because you guys will get more support. It wasn't fair that only you two were contributing on behalf of the entire team.I'm not sure why one of our members have to go over to the opposing team? Wouldn't that make the winning team one player short? I am not trying to step on the judge's toes but why should a winning team be penalized in a way in this Survivor game?
click to expand
Just watch this is only the beginning...it gets better and sneakier 😉
Posted by LetltB
Regarding FAIRNESS?The audience are not in this game, so us voting in ONE thread together would make it very simple. Easy to count and BOTH TEAMS can fairly see the vote. Not the one the judge chooses.
I see you are still leveling allegations and still failing to provide any substantiating evidence. Carry on.
click to expand
Oh..stop. This thread will be deleted, and in the end when you really cheat, those threads will get deleted too. Same shit different year. You just successfully cheated, for all to see. No vote count, no showing of who voted. Real fair.. slick.
Word on the street is that you won because everyone else quit due to judge bias. Any truth to that?
lol...see what I mean Steve? Just watch..
Posted by StillWater
In a way it will be good because you guys will get more support. It wasn't fair that only you two were contributing on behalf of the entire team.I'm not sure why one of our members have to go over to the opposing team? Wouldn't that make the winning team one player short? I am not trying to step on the judge's toes but why should a winning team be penalized in a way in this Survivor game?
click to expand
It's going down this way because that is how I initially described the game would play out this year. To deviate from what I initially said now would be unfair.
Posted by TwirlingStrawberry
are you seriously going to start whining NOW?
Then...when you question, they start pulling shit like this twit^^^and her multiples.
Stay in the game..you'll see.
...but don't let the "act" of disapproval fool you..there's some other really shady shit going on that will reveal itself in time.
They are all pming each other now...
..lol
Posted by LetltB
They are all pming each other now.....lol
*whispers* Duncan's in on the conspiracy, too. 😉
Posted by StoicGoat
The audience members who submitted their votes have traded NotYourAverageAquarius to the Downy Dryer Sheets. Double D's, please give your new teammate a warm welcome. A new debate topic will be posted this evening.Sersiously? This is BS
click to expand
Bol
Did this help you understand your situation?
dxpnet has hosted real conversations like this since 2000. If you value independent communities, you can support the site below.
Every contribution helps keep dxpnet independent and ad-light.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
bol.....back and forth...back and forth...back and forth...bol