
NZAqua
@NZAqua
16 Years500+ PostsAquarius
Comments: 0 · Posts: 665 · Topics: 52






Posted by caligula
IF he was truly at work, IF he was kneedeep in a child abuse issue, then why are you choosing THIS instance to make an issue out of it?
sounds like, he's been a prick in the past and you chose this opportunity to get on your hind legs. sure, he could have text you, but he didnt and truthfully, depending on what he was doing at the time, maybe it would be like i dunno...UNPROFESSIONAL to answer text in the midst of such drama?
maybe the dude deserved to be ex'd, but frankly, you chose the absolute WRONG time to assert yourself. frankly, it makes you look needy and unsympathetic.
i'm sure that after having a long day, he would have loved to come over and share with you the drama he just experienced and you know, had you handled this more tactfully...more like an adult, you would have let him come over. you would have allowed him to explain. and you would have taken the opportunity to discuss how inconsiderate it was to not keep you informed TO HIS FACE rather than texting your feelings like a teenager.

Posted by caligula
yeah, he's right...you are a child.
it's shocking that you actually think you're in the right.




























Posted by SweetestFatale
...lol Like I said, he probably did himself a favor, hopefully he doesnt pick up with someone with the same insecurities.

Posted by lnana04
It has more to do with his game playing than her insecurities. Even after he said the case just came in, he said he would finish it off and be there soon. That was at 6:40. She texts him at 8:50. He reads the text and decides not to answer. Why? She doesn't hear from him again until 9:40. If you have time to read the text, you have time to reply back and say that you may not make it in time. He was being an a@@. It has nothing to do with no play by play. If she's insecure, all he did was play a slick game by feeding her insecurity, which makes me wonder why would he even do that?
She didn't call him a rude prick for saving a child's life. She didn't know he did that because he never replied back and kept her in the know of what was going on. Come on, she called him a rude prick for keeping her waiting with no word for three hours. If you and him can't make those kind of connections then, yeah, I guess it makes sense to y'all for a reason to blow-up. One has nothing to do with the other. It's as if it's being said I have right to ignore you or treat you however I want because I'm helping fight a cause. If you can't multi-task by sending a simple text then a relationship is not needed.





Posted by lnana04
caligula, I get the point.
I just think it's going back to square one to have to sit down face-to-face and tell someone how/why it's rude to have you waiting for three hours with no call. You'd think after dating someone, the courtesy to let your significant other know what's going on would be embedded by now. I agree with tiki, that it was probably something building, but obviously between them both. I'm not sure if it's as much about allowing men to control our moods, as it is about being frustrated that you still have to go over little stuff like this. He understands it, clearly, because he asks her to be considerate when the shoe is on his foot. He doesn't like being in that position, but it's okay to put her in it?
I understand the whole thing on handling it better, but more than anything, I understand her frustration. Imo, if it was me, I would really feel like I was working backwards.
Posted by caligulaPosted by lnana04
caligula, I get the point.
I just think it's going back to square one to have to sit down face-to-face and tell someone how/why it's rude to have you waiting for three hours with no call. You'd think after dating someone, the courtesy to let your significant other know what's going on would be embedded by now. I agree with tiki, that it was probably something building, but obviously between them both. I'm not sure if it's as much about allowing men to control our moods, as it is about being frustrated that you still have to go over little stuff like this. He understands it, clearly, because he asks her to be considerate when the shoe is on his foot. He doesn't like being in that position, but it's okay to put her in it?
I understand the whole thing on handling it better, but more than anything, I understand her frustration. Imo, if it was me, I would really feel like I was working backwards.
i get it! he didn't find and kill bin laden, so he could have txt her. we all get that 😛
what i find strange about you is that you want to uphold her perspective as if regardless of the outcome, she did the "right" thing.click to expand


Posted by lnana04
What I find strange about some of you is that you all can call her immature, insecure, childish, needy etc. yet try and tell her she needs to learn how to stop the name calling and react to the situation like an adult. That's what sets me off because the replies are the opposite of what you all claim she needs to be in her situation.
As far as her doing the right or wrong thing, I'd say she was more in the right then he was. I would have been worse if I was in the situation, so of course I'm on her side because I don't think she overreacted at all. Not only is she suppose to sit there and wait for three hours, she's also suppose to calmly agree to see him and pretend she's not upset about it? All so she can be viewed as mature and able to handle a situation in his eyes. Just freakin much, but don't listen to me NZ. I'd definitely have you single, like I am lol, because I get highly irritated about things like this, especially when the person know they ain't doing right.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Mr Taurus texts at 5pm "Hey hon, just finished work, I'll be over to yours at about 6.0, 6.45 okay? I love you xxx".
I text back yes, we discuss what to have for dinner, i suggest buying us a hot roast meal, he agrees, says he's looking forward to it.
I get a text at 6.40 "Hey hon, just been landed a case to work on, I'll finish it off and be over soon, looking forward to dinner, looking forward to seeing you". (He deals with child abuse cases and will sometimes get them after work, though rarely).
Me "Okay, no worries, see you soon, looking forward to eating dinner together xxx".
Him "Me too, sorry I'm held up but I'll be there soon, shouldn't be long"
At 8pm I go down and buy dinner. At 8.30 I eat alone. No word, no text, no idea of when he's coming over.
At 8.500 I send a text asking where he is. No reply. I know he's read the text cos my phone alerts me to when texts are read, not just received.
At 9.40 i send a text "You rude prick, I've been sitting waiting for three hours. Dinner is cold, I've eaten mine alone and I've had no word from you as to when you're likely to turn up" (He has a thing about me being late. i rarely am, but he asks that i text and let him know if I'll be late, which i always do because it's inconsiderate otherwise and I text whoever I'm due to meet if I'm going to be late).
9.40, him: "Do you want me to come over now?" (No apology, no acknowledgement of the dinner I bought and sat waiting to eat with him, no kiss my arse, nothing).
I tell him no, not to bother, I've been waiting for hours and it would have taken 30 seconds to send me a text to let me know wtf was going on. I say i don't mind if he's not coming because he has work to do, but i do expect the bloody courtesy of a text to tell me what the story is, especially since I've been told he's coming, I've spent money on dinner and waited to eat with him.
I get this (actual text)
"You know what? The child I helped tonight won't get beaten up by his parents. Fuck you Elle"
Me "What? Fuck you too". (I'm gobsmacked by now).
Him "Goodbye Elle, You just don't get it. It's not about you. You go find a man that will bow down to your world. If it comes down to being at a location for dinner and saving a child then I'll always take saving the child. Fuck you and goodbye. And I mean that".