HappyCapper
@HappyCapper
10 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 28 · Posts: 5115 · Topics: 92
Pullen theory
Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂
Posted by sunkisses26Sure. I have moon and rising in gemini and gemini is ranked nr 12(yup, that's right, number t-w-e-l-v-e) in the sign ranking. My moon is heavily aspected and is the fastest moving "planet".Posted by HappyCapperkinda of to me....can you post an example?Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂click to expand
Posted by SDNAOh. Interesting. Please tell me if it comes back to you.
i saw a diagram explaining it once. forget where.
the nodes count in pullen.
Posted by SDNANo, the other way around. As I see it.Posted by HappyCapperso being dominant in a sign actually means being a less pure expression of it?Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂click to expand
Posted by SDNAYes, it moves pretty fast, but it's not the fastest. it depends on if it aspects slower moving or faster moving planets and also it's in comparison to what it would have been otherwise. I mean, maybe you have a ton of stuff in taurus and in the second house and would have gotten high ranking anyway...now just a little less.
do i fit your theory? venus is no.1, most aspected. venus moves pretty fast right?
Planet: Position Aspects Total Rank Percent
Sun: 47.5 ( 6) + 12.0 ( 7) = 59.5 ( 6) / 9.1%
Moon: 55.0 ( 5) + 14.3 ( 6) = 69.3 ( 5) / 10.6%
Mercury: 42.0 ( 7) + 16.1 ( 5) = 58.1 ( 7) / 8.9%
Venus: 90.0 ( 1) + 23.3 ( 2) = 113.3 ( 1) / 17.4%
Mars: 75.0 ( 2) + 11.9 ( 8) = 86.9 ( 3) / 13.3%
Jupiter: 15.0 ( 8) + 18.6 ( 4) = 33.6 ( 8) / 5.2%
Saturn: 62.5 ( 4) + 23.3 ( 3) = 85.8 ( 4) / 13.1%
Uranus: 10.0 (10) + 0.0 (10) = 10.0 (10) / 1.5%
Neptune: 15.0 ( 9) + 11.2 ( 9) = 26.2 ( 9) / 4.0%
Pluto: 67.0 ( 3) + 28.9 ( 1) = 95.9 ( 2) / 14.7%
Chiron: 7.0 (11) + 0.0 (11) = 7.0 (11) / 1.1%
Node: 7.0 (12) + 0.0 (12) = 7.0 (12) / 1.1%
Total: 493.0 + 159.6 = 652.6 / 100.0%
Sign: Power Rank Percent - Element Power Percent
Aries: 81.8 ( 3) / 12.5% - Fire: 141.9 / 21.7%
Taurus: 96.2 ( 2) / 14.7% - Earth: 181.1 / 27.8%
Gemini: 33.4 ( 8) / 5.1% - Air: 120.9 / 18.5%
Cancer: 18.7 (11) / 2.9% - Water: 208.7 / 32.0%
Leo: 44.1 ( 6) / 6.8%
Virgo: 23.5 ( 9) / 3.6% - Mode Power Percent
Libra: 65.5 ( 4) / 10.0% - Cardinal: 227.4 / 34.8%
Scorpio: 154.9 ( 1) / 23.7% - Fixed: 317.1 / 48.6%
Sagittarius: 15.9 (12) / 2.4% - Mutuable: 108.0 / 16.6%
Capricorn: 61.4 ( 5) / 9.4%
Aquarius: 21.9 (10) / 3.4%
Pisces: 35.2 ( 7) / 5.4%
Total: 652.6 / 100.0%
Not sure how well I explained this...😢
Posted by TrueFantasyIt's houses as well, yes. I'd say that's the major reason why scorpio is that highly ranked for you.
That's interesting. I thought it was houses... I have no Scorpio but it's ranked 2! Because I have sun, moon, Mercury, NN, Chiron in 8th house? Or. Is it something else?
I'm fascinated!
Btw HappyCapper what are your dominant signs? 🙂 can't remember if you mentioned it.
1. Scorpio 2. Capricorn 3. Virgo
Posted by TrueFantasyHehehe Well, do you have a heavily aspected neptune?
Btw I should add that I feel so much like a Pisces it's ridiculous but it's ranked 9 I think.
My top three are Virgo, Scorpio and Capricorn. But I don't relate much to Virgo or Capricorn :/
I know a bunch who don't relate to their dominants at all, so I'm kinda lost lol
Posted by SDNAWoot?🙂
lol
Posted by TrueFantasyYup, there you go.🙂Posted by HappyCapperI'll list my aspects to the lovely Neptune ..Posted by TrueFantasyHehehe Well, do you have a heavily aspected neptune?
Btw I should add that I feel so much like a Pisces it's ridiculous but it's ranked 9 I think.
My top three are Virgo, Scorpio and Capricorn. But I don't relate much to Virgo or Capricorn :/
I know a bunch who don't relate to their dominants at all, so I'm kinda lost lol
Neptune Conjunction Ascendant 9°07' 7
Uranus Conjunction Neptune 5°48' 126
Mars Opposition Neptune 6°38' -42
Mercury Trine Neptune 4°38' 63
Sun Trine Neptune 4°59' 45
Neptune in the first house
click to expand
F.Y.I. According to a scientific theory called "Bode's Law", Neptune and Pluto are not part or within our solar system, the Moon's Nodes are not significant as they're only calculated points, there are way too many House CUSP Systems to be a serious matter, and forget about asteroids and the like.
THE BASIS AND ONLY REASON ASTROLOGY EXISTS AND WORKS IS BECAUSE OF THE PLANETS AND THEIR ENERGIES...NO PLANETS, NO ASTROLOGY, THE BASIS IS BEST.
THE BASIS AND ONLY REASON ASTROLOGY EXISTS AND WORKS IS BECAUSE OF THE PLANETS AND THEIR ENERGIES...NO PLANETS, NO ASTROLOGY, THE BASIS IS BEST.
Posted by junemoonchild69Hmm. Do you seriously suggest that Neptune and Pluto do not exist?
F.Y.I. According to a scientific theory called "Bode's Law", Neptune and Pluto are not part or within our solar system, the Moon's Nodes are not significant as they're only calculated points, there are way too many House CUSP Systems to be a serious matter, and forget about asteroids and the like.
THE BASIS AND ONLY REASON ASTROLOGY EXISTS AND WORKS IS BECAUSE OF THE PLANETS AND THEIR ENERGIES...NO PLANETS, NO ASTROLOGY, THE BASIS IS BEST.
Regarding Bode's Law, I thought it was the other way around:
"The hypothesis correctly anticipated the orbits of Ceres (in the asteroid belt) and Uranus, but failed as a predictor of Neptune's orbit and has since been discredited further."
Wikipedia
And when you say that no planets, no astrology, I agree, but do you mean there are no planets? Please explain further, because I really don't get it.
Posted by ElTigre25According to my theory, position matters. Maybe not as much as the aspects column, but I have no figures to prove this by - just my own assumptions.Posted by HappyCapperMy Sun has more aspects than my chart ruler which is Pluto. Position matters, no?Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂click to expand
I'm sorry to say that my theory doesn't stretch as fas as the chart ruler - I haven't yet seen a presumed connection there. Do you think my theory would be applicable to your chart otherwise?
Posted by starwarsIt's weird with NN and Chiron. First of all, I*m not sure I buy into asteroids at all, but maybe some work, idk. But I do know this: my Chiron is definitely aspected...but placed as nr 11 in "planet" ranking. My theory is that NN and Chiron won't be of much influence to the rest of the chart unless veeery well aspected with veeery tight orbs...which would place them low on the ranking list.Posted by HappyCapperI just found out that there's a column for the number of aspects in the pullen chart -.- , I was trying to count them one by one by myself 😭Posted by starwars🙂
this is interesting
Do think it works with your chart?
anyway, Pluto position is 1 I have 10 aspects in there, my node position is 12 and I have 12 aspects in there -the one with most aspects- so it kinda does!
I think node and chiron aren't important, right?click to expand
Ooo! Good you found out!😄
Well, Pluto is the slowest moving "planet" which would make it pretty much unaffected by external influences no matter how many aspects it makes, as I see it.
Posted by ElTigre25In what way? Maybe I just explained it badly?Posted by HappyCapperThere's still some confusion, so far I'm not seeing the correlation so no.Posted by ElTigre25According to my theory, position matters. Maybe not as much as the aspects column, but I have no figures to prove this by - just my own assumptions.Posted by HappyCapperMy Sun has more aspects than my chart ruler which is Pluto. Position matters, no?Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂
I'm sorry to say that my theory doesn't stretch as fas as the chart ruler - I haven't yet seen a presumed connection there. Do you think my theory would be applicable to your chart otherwise?click to expand
Posted by starwarsIf would be funny if you actually post the link of your avatar haha
this is interesting
Posted by starwars😄Posted by HappyCapperyeah, I thought so too! 😢 chiron is the one in position 11 so its useless as well! yay!Posted by starwarsIt's weird with NN and Chiron. First of all, I*m not sure I buy into asteroids at all, but maybe some work, idk. But I do know this: my Chiron is definitely aspected...but placed as nr 11 in "planet" ranking. My theory is that NN and Chiron won't be of much influence to the rest of the chart unless veeery well aspected with veeery tight orbs...which would place them low on the ranking list.Posted by HappyCapperI just found out that there's a column for the number of aspects in the pullen chart -.- , I was trying to count them one by one by myself 😭Posted by starwars🙂
this is interesting
Do think it works with your chart?
anyway, Pluto position is 1 I have 10 aspects in there, my node position is 12 and I have 12 aspects in there -the one with most aspects- so it kinda does!
I think node and chiron aren't important, right?
Ooo! Good you found out!😄
Well, Pluto is the slowest moving "planet" which would make it pretty much unaffected by external influences no matter how many aspects it makes, as I see it.
I wish that's right, cause when I read about it I feel so emo. 😄click to expand
@ElTigre25
Not necessarily. Slower moving planets influence faster moving planets, not so much the other way around. So for instance:
Let's assume that a libra moon(the fastest moving "planet") is highly ranked in planet ranking. That probably means that it is aspected by slower moving planets...which makes the moon influenced by those other planets, so it's not just a libra moon, but a libra moon with, let's say, Neptunian and Plutonian and Uranian influences...which makes the moon energy on the whole less libra, but instead libra with Neptunian, Uranian and Plutonian energies.
If the libra moon was pretty much unaspected, the energy of that moon would be very "clean" - it would not be influenced by any other energy, hence the moon is a libra moon...period. ...and libra should therefore rank higher in sign ranking in comparison to the libra moon with external aspects(i.e. influences) in the example above.
Not necessarily. Slower moving planets influence faster moving planets, not so much the other way around. So for instance:
Let's assume that a libra moon(the fastest moving "planet") is highly ranked in planet ranking. That probably means that it is aspected by slower moving planets...which makes the moon influenced by those other planets, so it's not just a libra moon, but a libra moon with, let's say, Neptunian and Plutonian and Uranian influences...which makes the moon energy on the whole less libra, but instead libra with Neptunian, Uranian and Plutonian energies.
If the libra moon was pretty much unaspected, the energy of that moon would be very "clean" - it would not be influenced by any other energy, hence the moon is a libra moon...period. ...and libra should therefore rank higher in sign ranking in comparison to the libra moon with external aspects(i.e. influences) in the example above.
Posted by ElTigre25Let me clarify:Posted by HappyCapperIn regards to ranking. So you're saying less aspected planets are stronger?Posted by ElTigre25In what way? Maybe I just explained it badly?Posted by HappyCapperThere's still some confusion, so far I'm not seeing the correlation so no.Posted by ElTigre25According to my theory, position matters. Maybe not as much as the aspects column, but I have no figures to prove this by - just my own assumptions.Posted by HappyCapperMy Sun has more aspects than my chart ruler which is Pluto. Position matters, no?Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂
I'm sorry to say that my theory doesn't stretch as fas as the chart ruler - I haven't yet seen a presumed connection there. Do you think my theory would be applicable to your chart otherwise?click to expand
According to my theory, an unaspected Pluto influences a chart a lot less than an unaspected moon does, so you have to look at how fast/slowly moving the planets are.
Posted by HappyCapperYes, I see now that only Neptune doesn't fit into this theory...It's just like my opinion, so, I don't pay alot of attention to Neptune or Pluto (since it was found to be a rock and not a planet by nature) and I read in an Astrology book just the other day where the author said uote, "Without the PLANETS there would be no ASTROLOGY. Astrology, modern day, is based upon the planets....so just food for thought, imagine drawing up a natal chart if this Universe had no planets revolving around the Sun. And, for that matter, I wonder if we could not include the Earth in a natal chart?Posted by junemoonchild69Hmm. Do you seriously suggest that Neptune and Pluto do not exist?
F.Y.I. According to a scientific theory called "Bode's Law", Neptune and Pluto are not part or within our solar system, the Moon's Nodes are not significant as they're only calculated points, there are way too many House CUSP Systems to be a serious matter, and forget about asteroids and the like.
THE BASIS AND ONLY REASON ASTROLOGY EXISTS AND WORKS IS BECAUSE OF THE PLANETS AND THEIR ENERGIES...NO PLANETS, NO ASTROLOGY, THE BASIS IS BEST.
Regarding Bode's Law, I thought it was the other way around:
"The hypothesis correctly anticipated the orbits of Ceres (in the asteroid belt) and Uranus, but failed as a predictor of Neptune's orbit and has since been discredited further."
Wikipedia
And when you say that no planets, no astrology, I agree, but do you mean there are no planets? Please explain further, because I really don't get it.click to expand
In 1768, Bode published his popular book, “Anleitung zur Kenntnis des gestirnten Himmels” [Instruction for the Knowledge of the Starry Heavens]. In this book, he described an empirical law on planetary distances, originally found by J.D. Titius (1729-96), now called “Bode’s Law” or “Titius-Bode Law”.
The original formula was:
a = ( n + 4 ) / 10
where n=0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192, 384, …
To find the mean distances of the planets, begin with the following simple sequence of numbers:
0 3 6 12 24 48 96 192 384 …
These numbers (after 0) derive from the Pascal’s triangle as the sum of a row added to the sum of the previous row:
Row 1: 2+1=3
Row 2: 4+2=6
Row 3: 8+4=12
Row 4: 16+8=24
Row 5: 32+16=48
Row 6: 64+32=96
Row 7: 128+64=192
Row 8: 256+128=384
Next, add 4 to each number and you will get:
4 7 10 16 28 52 100 196 388
Then divide it by 10:
0.4 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.8 5.2 10.0 19.6 38.8
The resulting sequence is very close to the distribution of mean distances of the planets from the Sun
expressed in Astronomical Units (A
@junemoonchild69
Regarding Pluto, I feel it's just a question of semantics. I totally get your point with it being small and astronomically not very significant. However, astrology sounds pretty darn illogical too. I mean, listen to this: "the planet's positions at the moment you were born tell you about your personality." I mean, really? The only reason I keep studying astrology is that, however illogical it sounds, it does actually work far more often than I would have liked. So, yes, Pluto may seem insignificant, but it actually helps describing me and others quite accurately(imo), and I don't argue with success. 🙂
If we want to debate the semantics of planets vs. non-planets, we should discuss the sun and the moon as well. Are you willing to remove them from astrology too? Imo, who cares what they are called - the question is: does it work?
Yes, it's a neat formula...but it still didn't work, seeing as it couldn't describe the whereabouts of Neptune.
Regarding Pluto, I feel it's just a question of semantics. I totally get your point with it being small and astronomically not very significant. However, astrology sounds pretty darn illogical too. I mean, listen to this: "the planet's positions at the moment you were born tell you about your personality." I mean, really? The only reason I keep studying astrology is that, however illogical it sounds, it does actually work far more often than I would have liked. So, yes, Pluto may seem insignificant, but it actually helps describing me and others quite accurately(imo), and I don't argue with success. 🙂
If we want to debate the semantics of planets vs. non-planets, we should discuss the sun and the moon as well. Are you willing to remove them from astrology too? Imo, who cares what they are called - the question is: does it work?
Yes, it's a neat formula...but it still didn't work, seeing as it couldn't describe the whereabouts of Neptune.
Posted by tizianiYessss! Agreeed!
It'd be great if Pullen himself released the hidden tapes
What do you think about my theory?
Posted by tizianiThank you! So there is a possibility that I'm not way off, then. Great! I'll keep trying.🙂Posted by HappyCapperIt seems sound to me, I wouldn't have a clue though lolPosted by tizianiYessss! Agreeed!
It'd be great if Pullen himself released the hidden tapes
What do you think about my theory?
I never figured it out. There was one member who tried, her name was TMVclick to expand
Oh. Interesting. Did @TMV get anywhere with it?
@junemoonchild69
Oh, I forgot.
"And, for that matter, I wonder if we could not include the Earth in a natal chart?"
You can, in a heliocentric chart.
Oh, I forgot.
"And, for that matter, I wonder if we could not include the Earth in a natal chart?"
You can, in a heliocentric chart.
Posted by HappyCapperHappy..Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂click to expand
I have a doubt..
My highest ranking sign is Scorpio, Pisces and Cap.
My highest ranking planets are Sun, Saturn and Neptune (not sure about Neptune)
My sun has no aspects. Its unaspected(in the chart..by degrees). Its energy would be "clean" and thus would shine brighter?
Posted by RumiLAllright!🙂Posted by HappyCapperHappy..Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂
I have a doubt..
My highest ranking sign is Scorpio, Pisces and Cap.
My highest ranking planets are Sun, Saturn and Neptune (not sure about Neptune)
My sun has no aspects. Its unaspected(in the chart..by degrees). Its energy would be "clean" and thus would shine brighter?click to expand
May I ask, what do you mean by not sure about Neptune?
I'm not sure if Neptune is my 3rd dominant planet 🙂
Posted by RumiLAllright!🙂Posted by HappyCapperHappy..Posted by ElTigre25Sure.🙂
Hmm explain #2 a little more..
Planet ranking is determined to a high degree by how the planet in question is aspected. Let's take the fastest moving "planet" and put that as nr 1 in planet ranking. That would mean that it is heavily aspected(at least in comparison to the other planets)...meaning that since it is the fastest moving planet, it will not be influencing any other planet, but instead be influenced itself by the planets it touches...making the original energy less prominent.
Let's say that the same planet was ranked lower, it would be less aspected, hence, less influenced by other planets and therefore more"clean" in it's energy...which would rank the sign that planet is placed in higher in the sign ranking(in comparison to the high ranking example).
Do I make any sense?🙂
I have a doubt..
My highest ranking sign is Scorpio, Pisces and Cap.
My highest ranking planets are Sun, Saturn and Neptune (not sure about Neptune)
My sun has no aspects. Its unaspected(in the chart..by degrees). Its energy would be "clean" and thus would shine brighter?click to expand
We are talking about strong in comparison. Your scorpio is probably strong due to your scorpio stellium. The Pisces is probably due to a second stellium(if you count three planets as a stellium, ofc) The capricorn is probably due to planets plus 10th house placements. And I'm willing to swear that aries would be your fourth. It's all in comparison to other energies and scorp, pisces and cap just happened to be stronger signs in your chart. As I understand and remember it. I may have forgotten elements of your chart, though. If I have, please tell me.
Posted by RumiLYou've not checked Pullen?
I'm not sure if Neptune is my 3rd dominant planet 🙂
Pooossibly sag next.
I need to check astro.com Happy. I dont remember exactly if Neptune is my 3rd dominant planet..
Yeah. Aries is my 4th dominant sign! =D I will come back tomorrow and do my chart and tell you.. I'm going to sleep now 👋
I want to ask you a few things 🙂
See you!
Yeah. Aries is my 4th dominant sign! =D I will come back tomorrow and do my chart and tell you.. I'm going to sleep now 👋
I want to ask you a few things 🙂
See you!
Posted by RumiLAsk away! Sleep tight.🙂
I need to check astro.com Happy. I dont remember exactly if Neptune is my 3rd dominant planet..
Yeah. Aries is my 4th dominant sign! =D I will come back tomorrow and do my chart and tell you.. I'm going to sleep now 👋
I want to ask you a few things 🙂
See you!
I must say that i find this theory 100% ridiculous
Posted by scorpiothebadassOkay. Why?
I must say that i find this theory 100% ridiculous
Because it is
Posted by scorpiothebadassYour argument is brilliant. I'm impressed.
Because it is
What? Did you really thought you could understand how astrology projects?
Posted by scorpiothebadassNo. Do you think you can?
What? Did you really thought you could understand how astrology projects?
Maybe
Posted by scorpiothebadassOoo! Let's hear it!
Maybe
@HappyCapper. What site you can find our dominant sign? I know someone posted that before but i forgot already.
Posted by Nathan912astro.com
@HappyCapper. What site you can find our dominant sign? I know someone posted that before but i forgot already.
Choose Pullen and the last option in the drop down menue. A little bit past the middle of that page is where you find your dominants - signs, planets, modalities and elements. Gl!🙂
Posted by HappyCapperOh that's right astro.com, i remember now. Thanks.Posted by Nathan912astro.com
@HappyCapper. What site you can find our dominant sign? I know someone posted that before but i forgot already.
Choose Pullen and the last option in the drop down menue. A little bit past the middle of that page is where you find your dominants - signs, planets, modalities and elements. Gl!🙂click to expand
Happy, these are the statistics
Planet: Position Aspects Total Rank Percent
Sun: 81.0 ( 1) + 0.0 (10) = 81.0 ( 1) / 15.0%
Moon: 45.0 ( 3) + 8.2 ( 8) = 53.2 ( 5) / 9.9%
Mercury: 27.0 ( 8) + 17.0 ( 4) = 44.0 ( 7) / 8.2%
Venus: 35.0 ( 6) + 17.6 ( 2) = 52.6 ( 6) / 9.8%
Mars: 30.0 ( 7) + 9.4 ( 7) = 39.4 ( 8) / 7.3%
Jupiter: 25.0 ( 9) + 12.4 ( 6) = 37.4 (10) / 6.9%
Saturn: 45.0 ( 4) + 17.2 ( 3) = 62.2 ( 2) / 11.5%
Uranus: 15.0 (10) + 23.5 ( 1) = 38.5 ( 9) / 7.1%
Neptune: 45.0 ( 5) + 14.6 ( 5) = 59.6 ( 3) / 11.1%
Pluto: 51.0 ( 2) + 6.0 ( 9) = 57.0 ( 4) / 10.6%
Chiron: 7.0 (11) + 0.0 (11) = 7.0 (11) / 1.3%
Node: 7.0 (12) + 0.0 (12) = 7.0 (12) / 1.3%
Total: 413.0 + 125.9 = 538.9 / 100.0%
Sign: Power Rank Percent - Element Power Percent
Aries: 66.5 ( 4) / 12.3% - Fire: 161.7 / 30.0%
Taurus: 13.9 (10) / 2.6% - Earth: 111.7 / 20.7%
Gemini: 13.7 (11) / 2.5% - Air: 75.6 / 14.0%
Cancer: 14.8 ( 9) / 2.7% - Water: 189.8 / 35.2%
Leo: 54.6 ( 5) / 10.1%
Virgo: 12.1 (12) / 2.2% - Mode Power Percent
Libra: 35.0 ( 7) / 6.5% - Cardinal: 202.0 / 37.5%
Scorpio: 88.3 ( 1) / 16.4% - Fixed: 183.7 / 34.1%
Sagittarius: 40.6 ( 6) / 7.5% - Mutuable: 153.1 / 28.4%
Capricorn: 85.8 ( 3) / 15.9%
Aquarius: 27.0 ( 8) / 5.0%
Pisces: 86.8 ( 2) / 16.1%
Total: 538.9 / 100.0%
Planet: Position Aspects Total Rank Percent
Sun: 81.0 ( 1) + 0.0 (10) = 81.0 ( 1) / 15.0%
Moon: 45.0 ( 3) + 8.2 ( 8) = 53.2 ( 5) / 9.9%
Mercury: 27.0 ( 8) + 17.0 ( 4) = 44.0 ( 7) / 8.2%
Venus: 35.0 ( 6) + 17.6 ( 2) = 52.6 ( 6) / 9.8%
Mars: 30.0 ( 7) + 9.4 ( 7) = 39.4 ( 8) / 7.3%
Jupiter: 25.0 ( 9) + 12.4 ( 6) = 37.4 (10) / 6.9%
Saturn: 45.0 ( 4) + 17.2 ( 3) = 62.2 ( 2) / 11.5%
Uranus: 15.0 (10) + 23.5 ( 1) = 38.5 ( 9) / 7.1%
Neptune: 45.0 ( 5) + 14.6 ( 5) = 59.6 ( 3) / 11.1%
Pluto: 51.0 ( 2) + 6.0 ( 9) = 57.0 ( 4) / 10.6%
Chiron: 7.0 (11) + 0.0 (11) = 7.0 (11) / 1.3%
Node: 7.0 (12) + 0.0 (12) = 7.0 (12) / 1.3%
Total: 413.0 + 125.9 = 538.9 / 100.0%
Sign: Power Rank Percent - Element Power Percent
Aries: 66.5 ( 4) / 12.3% - Fire: 161.7 / 30.0%
Taurus: 13.9 (10) / 2.6% - Earth: 111.7 / 20.7%
Gemini: 13.7 (11) / 2.5% - Air: 75.6 / 14.0%
Cancer: 14.8 ( 9) / 2.7% - Water: 189.8 / 35.2%
Leo: 54.6 ( 5) / 10.1%
Virgo: 12.1 (12) / 2.2% - Mode Power Percent
Libra: 35.0 ( 7) / 6.5% - Cardinal: 202.0 / 37.5%
Scorpio: 88.3 ( 1) / 16.4% - Fixed: 183.7 / 34.1%
Sagittarius: 40.6 ( 6) / 7.5% - Mutuable: 153.1 / 28.4%
Capricorn: 85.8 ( 3) / 15.9%
Aquarius: 27.0 ( 8) / 5.0%
Pisces: 86.8 ( 2) / 16.1%
Total: 538.9 / 100.0%
What I don't understand is...there are no aspects with my Sun. It's just lying there all alone.
Buuuuut, it's near my MC, Sun is at 8 degrees and my MC is in pisces at 27 degrees could that be a reason? Sun is also in 10th house 😕
And... Saturn being up there is understandable becayse, it makes many aspects. Neptune...again.. I don't understand.
But my mars also makes equally many aspects like Saturn, both are in pisces,..but Saturn holds lower degree...hmm...
Why are Neptune up there? What gave it so much power lol.
Why is Pluto up there too?my moon is also in scorpio, and its is moon in this case that holds lower degree. Jupiter alsooooooo, it's also in scorpio. Why not Jupiter.
Do you want me to provide degrees or post my chart? 🙂
Thankyou btw 🙂
Buuuuut, it's near my MC, Sun is at 8 degrees and my MC is in pisces at 27 degrees could that be a reason? Sun is also in 10th house 😕
And... Saturn being up there is understandable becayse, it makes many aspects. Neptune...again.. I don't understand.
But my mars also makes equally many aspects like Saturn, both are in pisces,..but Saturn holds lower degree...hmm...
Why are Neptune up there? What gave it so much power lol.
Why is Pluto up there too?my moon is also in scorpio, and its is moon in this case that holds lower degree. Jupiter alsooooooo, it's also in scorpio. Why not Jupiter.
Do you want me to provide degrees or post my chart? 🙂
Thankyou btw 🙂
Just wanted to say that I haven't forgotten about you. My theory doesn't stretch as far as your question, so I need to think about it. Again, I'm not an astrologer, but if I come up with a possible explanation in my own mind, I'll give it.
Spontaneously, I'd say it's the very fact that your sun is unaspected that puts it on top of the list, though.
Spontaneously, I'd say it's the very fact that your sun is unaspected that puts it on top of the list, though.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Anyone ever experience this from a Sag early in dating them? Are they known for this? I always like to be direct when dating or in a relationship with someone, so when I felt a little suffocated by a new Sag in my life, I tried to nip it in the bud rig
Somebody sent me a private message asking me to stay. So I'll do. I won't mention who sent me the message. :P
Do you Sags ever psych yourself out about someone's feelings for you? That they might be bored of you or might find someone more fitting? Sometimes I have such high confidence, but then other times, I freak out a little and i think that is because
I think Sagittarius are kind of hard to find. When I do find them, they seem nice enough.
This Leo that Ive been talking to! I dont think Ive ever obsessed bout a man in my life like that before!! Its like I want him body and soul so strongly! he tends to take his sweet time when replying to my messages! Leo and their games! but I like him!
I was in a relationship with a sag for 3years, we had a good relationship up until the end. We ended on difficult terms and he moved to the other side of the world. This was 2 years ago, since then we have had 0 contact, we blocked each other from any way
So I posted to my zodiac message board but not much response so I'll try here lol. I'm not sure...but I think I might have caught feelings. Not sure though. Reconnected with someone from years ago. Spent vday together and we had sex. Kissed her for
So My Sag is a Cancer Moon, and I Cap in Venus. And I noticed that She is a very one thing at a time type of person. She decided lets get our own place together, so we did. She got a new job, she is doing her part as a partner to contribute and st
I never actually knew what that whole Libra/Sag spark was about. But now I do. This man is sweet, caring, adventurous, but also stable...(he lets me know exactly where we are in the relationship without me asking.) I feel so secure with him. I've met his
I'm a Sagittarius, I had a boyfriend for 3 years. We broke up 2 years ago. (Final time and I moved across the continent) before that we would break up but still contact see each other in a moment of weakness. Relationship was very intense. At the time
So I spent an entire weekend texting with a colleague from work. It was really flirty texting and definitely thought he was interested in me. We had plans to go have drinks today but instead I got a text message yesterday around 5 o'clock stating he neede
I just got to share this message to all especially Capricorn. "One of the worst things that can happen to a person Is being dumped. By "dumped' I mean when you're dating someone or in a relationship with them and then all of a sudden, they decide that
Are there any Sagittarius that couldnt move on? Just wondering if there is any odd one that is out of the common.
Heyyyy, I've got Sagitarius Mars I. Seventh house over here! I love to dance and argue and fight and be the best at everything. I go from indulging in laziness, to a hundred miles per hour! I realize that with Sagitarius Mars in the 7th, I like to g
Posted by brandyp
Are you talking about getting dry, as in the sex!!!!?? Oookay, so this conversation is happening.....did you try foreplay dude
As you people have Gemini in 7th house (descendant) I read somewhere that this brings multiple marriages or multiple long term relationships in your life. Is that true ?
@ManilaVice aka "Ands", age 99, deleted his user account peacefully February 10, 2016 from under a bridge presumably. He leaves behind myriad of dead links, quoted messages, 404 messages, and loops back to our profile pages. ManilaVice was a kind sensitiv
@DonnaElvira77, age unknown, deleted her user account peacefully February 7, 2016 from her home presumably. She leaves behind myriad of dead links, quoted messages, 404 messages, and loops back to our profile pages. DonnaElvira77 was a kind sensitive Canc
For me its when someone raises their voice or yells at me I HATE HATE HATEEE it. Ok immediately after this happen I lose it. I have Sag Moon so I'm pretty much laid back for the most part and the yelling just kills my vibe. Why waste so much energy as if
Love is in the air... YOU can send me your messages (via PM) that you want posted on this thread regarding someone here that you secretly have a crush on. You can include who it's dedicated to (or not) and I will keep the sender anonymous. Let's
My theory:
1. Ascendents are not taken much into account as they don't influence any part of the rest of the chart, except possibly for the chart ruler and its placement.
2. The higher ranked and the faster moving the planet in question is, the lower ranked the sign that planet falls into becomes in the sign ranking - the reason being that they will influence the rest of the chart less and at the same time be more influenced by other (more slow moving) planets, making the original energy less prominent.
It seems to be working for my chart and for a few friends' charts. What do you think?