
tiki33
@tiki33
19 Years10,000+ Posts
Comments: 0 · Posts: 10616 · Topics: 40


Posted by HappyCapperIt's also a moral decision for me personallyPosted by truecapThank you. That was exactly what I was after - so you don't have to get married for financial reasons, just write a legal document and you're set. So why do you then need an engagement before living together? Again, no judging, just trying to understand.
The lady did get an attorney and was told "the house was in his name" and "the kids legally inherit the house". There was nothing she could do.
To protect yourselves legally when you shack up, you'd have to have a legal agreement, get your name on the titile of that house and each of you have a will that took care of each other.Might as well have a prenup agreement.
That story really pissed me off - I would like to have a serious talk with those kids. Sure, she should have protected herself with a legal document, but what they did is just not okay. Imo.click to expand
Posted by tiki33I agree. That was me being unclear. I meant that if you do have legal papers that gives you financial rights, a break-up would be worse if you were engaged or married as well - emotionally - which would be a reason not to rush into marriage. Just a self evident little side point. Sorry.
+1 True....I agree with you 100% on the issue of the house and how important it is to be protected.
""it doesn't work out, no engagement, no marriage and you have to start all over again."
Wouldn't it be even worse to start all over if you had also been engaged or married? A failed marriage isn't exactly what most people dream about. And finding a new place to live in you would pretty much have to do with or without the marriage license.
Just out of interest - I have already made clear(I hope) that I think this is up to each and every person."
No, not financially it would not be worse. At least if it doesn't work out you will have some financial relief through the interest of the home if it's sold, that's if the home is in both of your names.
If this is someone you're going to share your life with, get engaged and eventually get married then this is a life long lifetime kind of deal, failure is not an option and if it so happens it doesn't work out at least you will have some property rights etc etc.
"Also, until my name is on a mortgage for a home, I am not paying any of those bills!!" " I also won't be doing all the "wifely" duties, until I am a wife. Something he is also, very well aware of. I don't tend to change my mind, once I have it set on something, especially as serious as that."
Good!! Now get it in writing LOL!
...
Posted by truecapMoral in what way, if you don't mind my asking?Posted by HappyCapperIt's also a moral decision for me personallyPosted by truecapThank you. That was exactly what I was after - so you don't have to get married for financial reasons, just write a legal document and you're set. So why do you then need an engagement before living together? Again, no judging, just trying to understand.
The lady did get an attorney and was told "the house was in his name" and "the kids legally inherit the house". There was nothing she could do.
To protect yourselves legally when you shack up, you'd have to have a legal agreement, get your name on the titile of that house and each of you have a will that took care of each other.Might as well have a prenup agreement.
That story really pissed me off - I would like to have a serious talk with those kids. Sure, she should have protected herself with a legal document, but what they did is just not okay. Imo.click to expand

Posted by HappyCapperBlame my southern roots, , but I was raised that when you lived with someone you weren't engaged to or married to, then it is a blatant representation of yourself to the world that you're openly living in sin. I was also raised with the teaching that a woman who allows a man to take all the advantages of marriage without the commitment of marriage, is weak and doesn't respect herself or think too much of herself or believe that she is worthy of marriage.Posted by truecapMoral in what way, if you don't mind my asking?Posted by HappyCapperIt's also a moral decision for me personallyPosted by truecapThank you. That was exactly what I was after - so you don't have to get married for financial reasons, just write a legal document and you're set. So why do you then need an engagement before living together? Again, no judging, just trying to understand.
The lady did get an attorney and was told "the house was in his name" and "the kids legally inherit the house". There was nothing she could do.
To protect yourselves legally when you shack up, you'd have to have a legal agreement, get your name on the titile of that house and each of you have a will that took care of each other.Might as well have a prenup agreement.
That story really pissed me off - I would like to have a serious talk with those kids. Sure, she should have protected herself with a legal document, but what they did is just not okay. Imo.click to expand

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Either way, good luck, you are very intelligent and I'm sure you will not drink the air love sandwhiches and act like booboo the fool and not look out for yourself. You're educated and intelligent, you got this!