Rise above the asses
@Bluemoon86
500+ PostsAries
Comments: 347 · Posts: 720 · Topics: 10
Charlie Kirk (Page 6)
You are on page out of 9 | Reverse Order
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86
While there were those who cheered the assassination, silencing a voice, they're not going to be satisfied, and even angered as more rise up, imho.
Contrast:
Five years ago, a man's death was memorialized with mayhem, violence, destruction, and hate.
Today, a man's death is memorialized with vigils, prayer, and determination to move forward.
click to expand
👍
I do not think that stadium even packs out for Cardinal games. Will you be watching live?
click to expand
I have it on now
click to expand
Awesome! 😎 Me, too!
Here are the Māori people paying tribute to Charlie Kirk with Haka in the UK.
Packed to the rafters.
#Freedom
This guy lived a full life. He was all-systems-go 24/7.
I remember him impressing establishment figures back in 2012 or so. It's like he never ages.
I'm really surprised how 98% of the population, of the world, who's tuned in with the United States loved this guy and what he was doing.
I felt I was an underground radical watching him, but it turns out we're all, sane rational people, awakening to how we all really feel.
On a side note, I read Jimmy Kimmel's viewership was like 100,000 a night. That's about what I imagined, and if it's true it shows how corrupt the "Legacy Media" is in how they stay in business and how they air certain viewpoints.
More remains to be done. Make America Safe Again, Make America Strong Again, and Make America Great Again!
🎶Young man, there's a place you can go...
This guy lived a full life. He was all-systems-go 24/7.
I remember him impressing establishment figures back in 2012 or so. It's like he never ages.
I'm really surprised how 98% of the population, of the world, who's tuned in with the United States loved this guy and what he was doing.
I felt I was an underground radical watching him, but it turns out we're all, sane rational people, awakening to how we all really feel.
On a side note, I read Jimmy Kimmel's viewership was like 100,000 a night. That's about what I imagined, and if it's true it shows how corrupt the "Legacy Media" is in how they stay in business and how they air certain viewpoints.
More remains to be done. Make America Safe Again, Make America Strong Again, and Make America Great Again!
🎶Young man, there's a place you can go...
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86
While there were those who cheered the assassination, silencing a voice, they're not going to be satisfied, and even angered as more rise up, imho.
Contrast:
Five years ago, a man's death was memorialized with mayhem, violence, destruction, and hate.
Today, a man's death is memorialized with vigils, prayer, and determination to move forward.
click to expand
👍
I do not think that stadium even packs out for Cardinal games. Will you be watching live?
click to expand
I have it on now
click to expand
Awesome! 😎 Me, too!
Here are the Māori people paying tribute to Charlie Kirk with Haka in the UK.
Packed to the rafters.click to expand
What a great service to commemorate a honorable man. He was a visionary and made his vision happen. I’ve been streaming it since it started. Over 100,000 people at the event and I see that 615.2k+ people are streaming it as well. I see that people are switching parties to the Republican Party in the wake of this tragedy. I also seen voters were turning out big for the Republicans in Virginia.
What gets me is how entitled Democrats feel. They think there should be more liberal judges in the court in a sense of entitlement and just because there has been more liberal judges on the court. They are entitled to believe they can destroy the values of this country. They feel entitled to stifle you and get answers to their questions. They are sick. Have they checked on the history of the party they are supporting? The Westboro Baptist Church is registered Democrats. Wasn’t Jim Crow a Democrat? The KKK were Democrats. I can keep going, but you get the gist… talk soon!!
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
https://x.com/andrewk_smith/status/1969159804204564759
An hour before his event at UVU, I sat down with Charlie Kirk for what would become his final recorded conversation: a warm, inspiring, and apolitical dialogue on entrepreneurship, building businesses and an outlook for tomorrow.
An hour before his event at UVU, I sat down with Charlie Kirk for what would become his final recorded conversation: a warm, inspiring, and apolitical dialogue on entrepreneurship, building businesses and an outlook for tomorrow.
Posted by ThatWomanAgain11Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hebdo was attacked because he tried to paint prophet Muhammed. No one can't do that as the "entity" are deemed to serve values and lessons instead of any other things. The thing is Hebdo didn't get the message, thus Islamophobia and 2 faced lying bitch
Btw, your "temple" is so attractive like the vocalist of Incubus.
I love Incubus' songsclick to expand
I know why Hebdo was attacked. I'm just saying to me... a death is a death. I find it hard to value one stranger's life more than another's. In the case of Charlie Kirk, I find it hard to reconcile how invested people are in his murder, when there are over a thousand people murdered every day. I understand that familiarity and name recognition plays a role. But Charlie Kirk himself took a cold rationalist approach to 2nd amendment. "We accept that some deaths will be inevitable but it's WORTH it because the alternative would/could be dystopian with even more deaths."
So my cold rationalist approach to Charlie Kirk is "He was a political influencer. He spread a message that- whether you agree with or not- was NOT equivalent to Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves. You can like his message, but objectively, he did not do anything so great for this country or for the world, that he is worth trying to incite a civil war over. He wasn't an actual civil rights leader. He wasn't actually 'him'."
Alright check it: Trump said at his memorial service something to the effect of "Charlie Kirk loved his enemies and wanted what's best for them. I don't love my enemies and I don't want what's best for them." And everyone cheered and clapped.
To me, that doesn't seem very respectful of his memory. That seems like trying to take advantage of his death for political posturing. That doesn't make him a martyr, to me. That makes him an unwilling posthumous pawn. And since he wasn't actually someone who changed the country... I don't see him as being someone worth changing the country over (i.e. further civil discord).
https://nypost.com/2025/09/21/opinion/charlie-kirks-massive-memorial-was-so-much-more-than-that-it-was-a-message-to-the-mainstream-media/
"A 200,000-person crowd inundated the stadium inside and out, and millions around the world watched live. They prayed for, celebrated and mourned a man who brought them all together. Multitudes in red, white and blue. Yet these faithful, and Kirk himself, have been mostly disregarded by the mainstream media — or worse, slandered by them — for their Christian faith and conservative values."
Notice they were not:
Burning
Looting
Murderering
"A 200,000-person crowd inundated the stadium inside and out, and millions around the world watched live. They prayed for, celebrated and mourned a man who brought them all together. Multitudes in red, white and blue. Yet these faithful, and Kirk himself, have been mostly disregarded by the mainstream media — or worse, slandered by them — for their Christian faith and conservative values."
Notice they were not:
Burning
Looting
Murderering
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1970278467033055696
"Registered Democrat voter is finally seeing the indoctrination taking place after her 11 year old daughter came home from school saying “I hate Charlie Kirk”
She’s never spoke of Charlie Kirk but learned to hate him at school
She’s had enough, “They’re teaching this in school — My Turning Point was when I realized they're influencing my children for real — This is actual influence on my child, for my child to turn to me and say, "I hate him," for no reason, she couldn't back it up, that was my turning point.”"
"Registered Democrat voter is finally seeing the indoctrination taking place after her 11 year old daughter came home from school saying “I hate Charlie Kirk”
She’s never spoke of Charlie Kirk but learned to hate him at school
She’s had enough, “They’re teaching this in school — My Turning Point was when I realized they're influencing my children for real — This is actual influence on my child, for my child to turn to me and say, "I hate him," for no reason, she couldn't back it up, that was my turning point.”"
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1970278467033055696
"Registered Democrat voter is finally seeing the indoctrination taking place after her 11 year old daughter came home from school saying “I hate Charlie Kirk”
She’s never spoke of Charlie Kirk but learned to hate him at school
She’s had enough, “They’re teaching this in school — My Turning Point was when I realized they're influencing my children for real — This is actual influence on my child, for my child to turn to me and say, "I hate him," for no reason, she couldn't back it up, that was my turning point.”"
Most teachers that I met, no, in fact all teachers that I met in my past social group were Democrats.
Unfortunately.
What did I say before? If Trump came up with a cure for cancer, the radical leftists would be protesting him. Trump Derangement Syndrome. It’s a shame the amount of babies that will be born with autism just because of this !
Also, I am sure you can see this playing out.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1970278467033055696
"Registered Democrat voter is finally seeing the indoctrination taking place after her 11 year old daughter came home from school saying “I hate Charlie Kirk”
She’s never spoke of Charlie Kirk but learned to hate him at school
She’s had enough, “They’re teaching this in school — My Turning Point was when I realized they're influencing my children for real — This is actual influence on my child, for my child to turn to me and say, "I hate him," for no reason, she couldn't back it up, that was my turning point.”"
Most teachers that I met, no, in fact all teachers that I met in my past social group were Democrats.
Unfortunately.
What did I say before? If Trump came up with a cure for cancer, the radical leftists would be protesting him. Trump Derangement Syndrome. It’s a shame the amount of babies that will be born with autism just because of this !
Also, I am sure you can see this playing out.
click to expand
I've been seeing reports on pregnant women doing that on social media with the videos.
Who would do that to their unborn child just to 'show up Trump'? That is mental illness right there.
And there are some joking about Trump putting out a PSA about how its dangerous to (enter Darwin award activity here) and not to do it, just so the TDS sufferers do it just to be 'edgy'. I don't find that funnuy either.
Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hey, just wanted to acknowledge you. Thank you for contributing your thoughts here, they are appreciated. I would have been posting Charlie Kirk quotes, memes, and random thoughts all over DXPnet, so made a thread for it instead. I heard very little about Charlie Kirk before his death, but I think I had to process it in a way that brings me peace inside with it, if that makes sense. He died in a very sudden fashion and those types of deaths are not very easy to grieve or process. My own mother died in a car accident on Mother’s Day 20 years ago. It was very sudden, traumatic, and it gave Mother’s Day a whole other meaning. So while you think it is just another man’s death… he was a visionary or leader (life path 1) and carried out his vision. He lived a full life even though he went so young at 31.
There are some sites that list Sagittarius rising as his ascendant, but Astrotheme has no time of birth. Wonder if he had Uranus in the 8th house.
https://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Charlie_Kirk_
Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by ThatWomanAgain11Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hebdo was attacked because he tried to paint prophet Muhammed. No one can't do that as the "entity" are deemed to serve values and lessons instead of any other things. The thing is Hebdo didn't get the message, thus Islamophobia and 2 faced lying bitch
Btw, your "temple" is so attractive like the vocalist of Incubus.
I love Incubus' songs
click to expand
I know why Hebdo was attacked. I'm just saying to me... a death is a death. I find it hard to value one stranger's life more than another's. In the case of Charlie Kirk, I find it hard to reconcile how invested people are in his murder, when there are over a thousand people murdered every day. I understand that familiarity and name recognition plays a role. But Charlie Kirk himself took a cold rationalist approach to 2nd amendment. "We accept that some deaths will be inevitable but it's WORTH it because the alternative would/could be dystopian with even more deaths."
So my cold rationalist approach to Charlie Kirk is "He was a political influencer. He spread a message that- whether you agree with or not- was NOT equivalent to Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves. You can like his message, but objectively, he did not do anything so great for this country or for the world, that he is worth trying to incite a civil war over. He wasn't an actual civil rights leader. He wasn't actually 'him'."
Alright check it: Trump said at his memorial service something to the effect of "Charlie Kirk loved his enemies and wanted what's best for them. I don't love my enemies and I don't want what's best for them." And everyone cheered and clapped.
To me, that doesn't seem very respectful of his memory. That seems like trying to take advantage of his death for political posturing. That doesn't make him a martyr, to me. That makes him an unwilling posthumous pawn. And since he wasn't actually someone who changed the country... I don't see him as being someone worth changing the country over (i.e. further civil discord).click to expand
Fair enough. That is your opinion. Charlie Kirk went on college campuses, where no one else dared to go, and debated with woke people.. mostly. He was making such a big impact that the youth in America he impacted pushed Trump into office in the swing states.
People clapped in the audience because Trump was being truthful of his own flaws in comparison to Charlie Kirk.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by ThatWomanAgain11Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hebdo was attacked because he tried to paint prophet Muhammed. No one can't do that as the "entity" are deemed to serve values and lessons instead of any other things. The thing is Hebdo didn't get the message, thus Islamophobia and 2 faced lying bitch
Btw, your "temple" is so attractive like the vocalist of Incubus.
I love Incubus' songs
click to expand
I know why Hebdo was attacked. I'm just saying to me... a death is a death. I find it hard to value one stranger's life more than another's. In the case of Charlie Kirk, I find it hard to reconcile how invested people are in his murder, when there are over a thousand people murdered every day. I understand that familiarity and name recognition plays a role. But Charlie Kirk himself took a cold rationalist approach to 2nd amendment. "We accept that some deaths will be inevitable but it's WORTH it because the alternative would/could be dystopian with even more deaths."
So my cold rationalist approach to Charlie Kirk is "He was a political influencer. He spread a message that- whether you agree with or not- was NOT equivalent to Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves. You can like his message, but objectively, he did not do anything so great for this country or for the world, that he is worth trying to incite a civil war over. He wasn't an actual civil rights leader. He wasn't actually 'him'."
Alright check it: Trump said at his memorial service something to the effect of "Charlie Kirk loved his enemies and wanted what's best for them. I don't love my enemies and I don't want what's best for them." And everyone cheered and clapped.
To me, that doesn't seem very respectful of his memory. That seems like trying to take advantage of his death for political posturing. That doesn't make him a martyr, to me. That makes him an unwilling posthumous pawn. And since he wasn't actually someone who changed the country... I don't see him as being someone worth changing the country over (i.e. further civil discord).
click to expand
Fair enough. That is your opinion. Charlie Kirk went on college campuses, where no one else dared to go, and debated with woke people.. mostly. He was making such a big impact that the youth in America he impacted pushed Trump into office in the swing states.
People clapped in the audience because Trump was being truthful of his own flaws in comparison to Charlie Kirk.
click to expand
No one dared to go to college campuses? Really?
Ignoring all the students and professors and workers and employees that live on college campuses... "But campuses are hostile to conservatives-"
Pretty sure Shapiro did it first, then Crowder. Pretty sure all the right wingers influencers regularly do/have done it.
I'm not arguing against whatever ideology you believe in here, I'm arguing against delusional hysteria and disingenuous rhetoric. Y'all as loony as the left with your hyperbole. Have fun arguing about what a woman is, I guess.
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1970278467033055696
"Registered Democrat voter is finally seeing the indoctrination taking place after her 11 year old daughter came home from school saying “I hate Charlie Kirk”
She’s never spoke of Charlie Kirk but learned to hate him at school
She’s had enough, “They’re teaching this in school — My Turning Point was when I realized they're influencing my children for real — This is actual influence on my child, for my child to turn to me and say, "I hate him," for no reason, she couldn't back it up, that was my turning point.”"
Most teachers that I met, no, in fact all teachers that I met in my past social group were Democrats.
Unfortunately.
What did I say before? If Trump came up with a cure for cancer, the radical leftists would be protesting him. Trump Derangement Syndrome. It’s a shame the amount of babies that will be born with autism just because of this !
Also, I am sure you can see this playing out.
click to expand
I've been seeing reports on pregnant women doing that on social media with the videos.
Who would do that to their unborn child just to 'show up Trump'? That is mental illness right there.
And there are some joking about Trump putting out a PSA about how its dangerous to (enter Darwin award activity here) and not to do it, just so the TDS sufferers do it just to be 'edgy'. I don't find that funnuy either.click to expand
Wonder if Obama will ever be charged for Russiagate? Looks like he is still undermining his successor and RFK Jr, who the Democrats threw under the bus!
Obama says that their claim about Tylenol causing autism is “violence against truth”. Of course he offers no scientific evidence to back or support his claim. I do not think any medication is safe to take while pregnant. So how about that, Obama?
Oh, I found that you can read Aristotle The Organon fully here:
https://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/philos/classics/aristotl/obook_draft.pdf
The left is in a violence frenzy since Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
It’s only been only 2 weeks since his murder and now we have this ICE shooting in a Dallas. We also had:
- Attempted bombing of FOX news truck.
- Shooting at Sky Meadows Country club.
- Vandalism of Charlie’s memorials.
- shots fired at ABC over Kimmel’s cancellation.
- debate assault at Tennessee State Uni.
That’s nearly every other day.
Meanwhile there has been no violence or riots from the right.
“Both sides” and “random person violence” is the biggest lie in media right now.
Speaking of which, the Democrats have said Elon was a Nazi, leftists went and burned Tesla cars and dealerships. Democrats said ICE is the Gestapo, indiscriminate shootings and other political violence is happening by radical leftists. Internet radicalism… on Discord.. Dxpnet discord needs to be investigated.
Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by ThatWomanAgain11Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hebdo was attacked because he tried to paint prophet Muhammed. No one can't do that as the "entity" are deemed to serve values and lessons instead of any other things. The thing is Hebdo didn't get the message, thus Islamophobia and 2 faced lying bitch
Btw, your "temple" is so attractive like the vocalist of Incubus.
I love Incubus' songs
click to expand
I know why Hebdo was attacked. I'm just saying to me... a death is a death. I find it hard to value one stranger's life more than another's. In the case of Charlie Kirk, I find it hard to reconcile how invested people are in his murder, when there are over a thousand people murdered every day. I understand that familiarity and name recognition plays a role. But Charlie Kirk himself took a cold rationalist approach to 2nd amendment. "We accept that some deaths will be inevitable but it's WORTH it because the alternative would/could be dystopian with even more deaths."
So my cold rationalist approach to Charlie Kirk is "He was a political influencer. He spread a message that- whether you agree with or not- was NOT equivalent to Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves. You can like his message, but objectively, he did not do anything so great for this country or for the world, that he is worth trying to incite a civil war over. He wasn't an actual civil rights leader. He wasn't actually 'him'."
Alright check it: Trump said at his memorial service something to the effect of "Charlie Kirk loved his enemies and wanted what's best for them. I don't love my enemies and I don't want what's best for them." And everyone cheered and clapped.
To me, that doesn't seem very respectful of his memory. That seems like trying to take advantage of his death for political posturing. That doesn't make him a martyr, to me. That makes him an unwilling posthumous pawn. And since he wasn't actually someone who changed the country... I don't see him as being someone worth changing the country over (i.e. further civil discord).
click to expand
Fair enough. That is your opinion. Charlie Kirk went on college campuses, where no one else dared to go, and debated with woke people.. mostly. He was making such a big impact that the youth in America he impacted pushed Trump into office in the swing states.
People clapped in the audience because Trump was being truthful of his own flaws in comparison to Charlie Kirk.
click to expand
No one dared to go to college campuses? Really?
Ignoring all the students and professors and workers and employees that live on college campuses... "But campuses are hostile to conservatives-"
Pretty sure Shapiro did it first, then Crowder. Pretty sure all the right wingers influencers regularly do/have done it.
I'm not arguing against whatever ideology you believe in here, I'm arguing against delusional hysteria and disingenuous rhetoric. Y'all as loony as the left with your hyperbole. Have fun arguing about what a woman is, I guess.click to expand
Yes, no one on the right or conservative side wanted to deal with woke or progressive students. It was a lost cause to most people. @Canceronthecusp does not respond to the leftists on Dxpnet because he feels it is a lost cause and a total waste of time/effort to do so. I have to admit, it frustrates me because most are dumb. They also resort to ad-hominem fallacies with attacking the messenger because they cannot form logic to attack what is said. Something tells me you will go there. I hope to be proven wrong, but I trust my instincts more.
The Democrats are only voted in by people that they appeal with emotion!! No logic in their approach. Tim Walz put tampons in boys restrooms in Minnesota for crying out loud. 🥹
It’s no secret that the majority of teachers are Democrats!! I used to be in this huge social group of over 300 members and another social group of over 750 members… all the teachers in both social groups were Democrats!! Notice the Free Palestine movement, which is a combination of woke/progressive, LGBTQ+, and Muslims that have been intimidating and promoting violence of Jewish people on campuses!! It’s right in front of you out in the open!! They want to attack the values of America. Mosab Hassan Yousef, the green prince, spells this out for anyone listening.
BTW, I had to leave the social groups because they were no longer within my soul alignment!!!
^^^ This is true!! I grew up in a Christian home that kept the Sabbath holy. The 7th day of the week, Saturday, from Friday sunset to Saturday sunset. It was 7th day Adventist. It is true what he says about honoring the Sabbath. I used to “unplug” on the sabbath and am starting to do that again. It is one of the 10 commandments to keep the sabbath holy!!! I used to spend time with God on that day studying the Bible, praying, etc. developing my relationship with God.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by ThatWomanAgain11Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hebdo was attacked because he tried to paint prophet Muhammed. No one can't do that as the "entity" are deemed to serve values and lessons instead of any other things. The thing is Hebdo didn't get the message, thus Islamophobia and 2 faced lying bitch
Btw, your "temple" is so attractive like the vocalist of Incubus.
I love Incubus' songs
click to expand
I know why Hebdo was attacked. I'm just saying to me... a death is a death. I find it hard to value one stranger's life more than another's. In the case of Charlie Kirk, I find it hard to reconcile how invested people are in his murder, when there are over a thousand people murdered every day. I understand that familiarity and name recognition plays a role. But Charlie Kirk himself took a cold rationalist approach to 2nd amendment. "We accept that some deaths will be inevitable but it's WORTH it because the alternative would/could be dystopian with even more deaths."
So my cold rationalist approach to Charlie Kirk is "He was a political influencer. He spread a message that- whether you agree with or not- was NOT equivalent to Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves. You can like his message, but objectively, he did not do anything so great for this country or for the world, that he is worth trying to incite a civil war over. He wasn't an actual civil rights leader. He wasn't actually 'him'."
Alright check it: Trump said at his memorial service something to the effect of "Charlie Kirk loved his enemies and wanted what's best for them. I don't love my enemies and I don't want what's best for them." And everyone cheered and clapped.
To me, that doesn't seem very respectful of his memory. That seems like trying to take advantage of his death for political posturing. That doesn't make him a martyr, to me. That makes him an unwilling posthumous pawn. And since he wasn't actually someone who changed the country... I don't see him as being someone worth changing the country over (i.e. further civil discord).
click to expand
Fair enough. That is your opinion. Charlie Kirk went on college campuses, where no one else dared to go, and debated with woke people.. mostly. He was making such a big impact that the youth in America he impacted pushed Trump into office in the swing states.
People clapped in the audience because Trump was being truthful of his own flaws in comparison to Charlie Kirk.
click to expand
No one dared to go to college campuses? Really?
Ignoring all the students and professors and workers and employees that live on college campuses... "But campuses are hostile to conservatives-"
Pretty sure Shapiro did it first, then Crowder. Pretty sure all the right wingers influencers regularly do/have done it.
I'm not arguing against whatever ideology you believe in here, I'm arguing against delusional hysteria and disingenuous rhetoric. Y'all as loony as the left with your hyperbole. Have fun arguing about what a woman is, I guess.
click to expand
Yes, no one on the right or conservative side wanted to deal with woke or progressive students. It was a lost cause to most people. @Canceronthecusp does not respond to the leftists on Dxpnet because he feels it is a lost cause and a total waste of time/effort to do so. I have to admit, it frustrates me because most are dumb. They also resort to ad-hominem fallacies with attacking the messenger because they cannot form logic to attack what is said.click to expand
You have been paying attention. I've engaged before, and it always ends up with epithets, accusations of things I am not, and rank dishonesty. The more egregious are not 'honest brokers'.
I don't take it personally, 'they' can't help themselves for whatever reason. When they say they want a dialogue, it means 'agree with what I say or else', even if their own actions elsewhere are hypocritical.
I finally muted one of them, here because from that one its nothing but garbage, much like another handle that used to post here that I finally muted.
Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/
Should be somewhere in hereclick to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
Should be somewhere in here
click to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?click to expand
No. I did not say 'Haitians are eating pets'.
I did post the article on that fellow carrying the two Canadian geese.
A. It was out out season
B. There was no indication of a hunting license or migratory waterfowl stamp
Stories were quick to point out the fellow was 'just moving them'. I guarantee you, I would have gotten a hard time from the cops if I was caught doing that, along with who knows what hell from the DNR.
But your quoted post demonstrates exactly what I was talking about with respect to having things attributed to me that aren't. Pure garbage.
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/
Should be somewhere in here
click to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?
click to expand
No. I did not say 'Haitians are eating pets'.
I did post the article on that fellow carrying the two Canadian geese.
A. It was out out season
B. There was no indication of a hunting license or migratory waterfowl stamp
Stories were quick to point out the fellow was 'just moving them'. I guarantee you, I would have gotten a hard time from the cops if I was caught doing that, along with who knows what hell from the DNR.
But your quoted post demonstrates exactly what I was talking about with respect to having things attributed to me that aren't. Pure garbage.click to expand
Then I think he owes you an apology.
Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/
Should be somewhere in here
click to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?
click to expand
So it's still not what was claimed and has caused a lot of issues for springfield oh. I do think if the ohio wildlife thing if had any record of a call for him picking the goose up or receipt or whatever, anything, releasing it if possible would help to dispel it more.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/-just-exploded-springfield-woman-says-never-meant-spark-rumors-haitian-rcna171099
This was the very last bit of my last post replying to him there. So it seems looking back he didn't explicitly claim it but he was basically arguing for it until the last post and then stopped. So I'll rescind my statement about saying he said xyz. Overall don't think it changes what happened.
Listen, you put words in @canceronthecusp ‘s mouth that he never said. That is wrong. 😑
You speak of the lies of the right like JD Vance , but at least he owned up to it. What are you going to do with your lies about @canceronthecusp ?
JD Vance also explained why they did it. The media feeds off of shit 💩 like that!!! I like JD Vance and he completely had Tim Wakz in a fenzy during the VP debate. Tim Walz was taking notes during the debate and looked very nervous!! He was not self-assured like a typical Aries. JD Vance was very confident/bold and well-spoken!! He was comfortable on stage, I guess that comes with being a Leo. Yeah, I watched it and took mental notes on my own. JD Vance has not had an easy life and spoke how he joined the military , which was a much better introduction than what Tim Walz had. He wiped the floor with Tim Walz.
Watch from 5:40:
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.click to expand
I officially am registered as a Republican now, so I can now officially have these debates with you @Solo
Fetterman should change his party, too.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
Should be somewhere in here
click to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?
click to expand
No. I did not say 'Haitians are eating pets'.
I did post the article on that fellow carrying the two Canadian geese.
A. It was out out season
B. There was no indication of a hunting license or migratory waterfowl stamp
Stories were quick to point out the fellow was 'just moving them'. I guarantee you, I would have gotten a hard time from the cops if I was caught doing that, along with who knows what hell from the DNR.
But your quoted post demonstrates exactly what I was talking about with respect to having things attributed to me that aren't. Pure garbage.
click to expand
Then I think he owes you an apology.click to expand
Appreciate the sentiment.
Honestly, he has demonstrated his character enough that I don't expect one, don't want one, and it wouldn't be sincere anyway. That's how his type roll.
So, I block the garbage.
Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/
Should be somewhere in here
click to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?
click to expand
So it's still not what was claimed and has caused a lot of issues for springfield oh. I do think if the ohio wildlife thing if had any record of a call for him picking the goose up or receipt or whatever, anything, releasing it if possible would help to dispel it more.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/-just-exploded-springfield-woman-says-never-meant-spark-rumors-haitian-rcna171099
This was the very last bit of my last post replying to him there. So it seems looking back he didn't explicitly claim it but he was basically arguing for it until the last post and then stopped. So I'll rescind my statement about saying he said xyz. Overall don't think it changes what happened.
Listen, you put words in @canceronthecusp ‘s mouth that he never said. That is wrong. 😑
You speak of the lies of the right like JD Vance , but at least he owned up to it. What are you going to do with your lies about @canceronthecusp ?
JD Vance also explained why they did it. The media feeds off of shit 💩 like that!!! I like JD Vance and he completely had Tim Wakz in a fenzy during the VP debate. Tim Walz was taking notes during the debate and looked very nervous!! He was not self-assured like a typical Aries. JD Vance was very confident/bold and well-spoken!! He was comfortable on stage, I guess that comes with being a Leo. Yeah, I watched it and took mental notes on my own. JD Vance has not had an easy life and spoke how he joined the military , which was a much better introduction than what Tim Walz had. He wiped the floor with Tim Walz.
Watch from 5:40:
Lol I literally said I rescind my comment about him explicitly claiming it but overall I dont think it changes much about the situation.
So Vance admits that he makes shit up and thats supposed to be a good thing? If Biden had went out and lied about things going on like that, would you accept it in the same way?click to expand
Okay.
Vance owned up to his shit. 💩 He took ownership of his own flaw/mistake. He is only human. So is Trump. They have their flaws. We all do. One thing I can appreciate about that is they can be truthful and own up to them. If you are sitting there looking and pointing out the flaws of others all the time, then you are not looking/examining your own and working on them.
Biden lied many times. We were led as a country to believe he was in good health/cognitive abilities. Who was really leading the country? His wife? Kamala ?!?!?
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/miscellaneous/what-percentage-of-people-are-eating-pets--15914900/Posted by Solo
Yeah, that's not really true. He doesn't engage because he's been proven wrong so many times and he knows that he can't defend what he says or believes. So now, he's watching YOU try to do it. He tried to go back and forth with me on the "Haitians are eating the dogs, they're eating the cats!" and their legal status here and all of that and he was proven incorrect. Brought up where Vance said he'd make up any story for attention. Pretty soon after that little thread, he decided to hop back into the shadows and do what he normally does.. which is ignore any and everything that doesn't align with his beliefs and misinterpret previous events by ANY admin.
I don't want anyone to "agree with me," I want you to give real fucking arguments and not xenophobic skewed bullshit lmao and to actually stand on one point instead of shifting the goal posts every time it's met. Why in the fuck would I want people to just accept what I say? That's stupid as shit. I want SUBSTANCE. Not nice sounding audio clips.
You better not be lying. Sheesh. ☺️
Do you have the post or thread where he said that? I’d like to see for myself. I like to get the context behind things people do or say.
Also, I’m not exactly a Conservative, but I might as well be now since I voted for Trump. I’m registered as “No party affiliation” and have primarily voted Democrat. The “No party affiliation” was like it being up in the air until something actually aligned.
I am going to change my voter registration to Republican.
click to expand
Should be somewhere in here
click to expand
I’m disappointed. 😔 Not there !! @Canceronthecusp did you say this?
click to expand
So it's still not what was claimed and has caused a lot of issues for springfield oh. I do think if the ohio wildlife thing if had any record of a call for him picking the goose up or receipt or whatever, anything, releasing it if possible would help to dispel it more.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/-just-exploded-springfield-woman-says-never-meant-spark-rumors-haitian-rcna171099
This was the very last bit of my last post replying to him there. So it seems looking back he didn't explicitly claim it but he was basically arguing for it until the last post and then stopped. So I'll rescind my statement about saying he said xyz. Overall don't think it changes what happened.
Listen, you put words in @canceronthecusp ‘s mouth that he never said. That is wrong. 😑
You speak of the lies of the right like JD Vance , but at least he owned up to it. What are you going to do with your lies about @canceronthecusp ?
JD Vance also explained why they did it. The media feeds off of shit 💩 like that!!! I like JD Vance and he completely had Tim Wakz in a fenzy during the VP debate. Tim Walz was taking notes during the debate and looked very nervous!! He was not self-assured like a typical Aries. JD Vance was very confident/bold and well-spoken!! He was comfortable on stage, I guess that comes with being a Leo. Yeah, I watched it and took mental notes on my own. JD Vance has not had an easy life and spoke how he joined the military , which was a much better introduction than what Tim Walz had. He wiped the floor with Tim Walz.
Watch from 5:40:
Lol I literally said I rescind my comment about him explicitly claiming it but overall I dont think it changes much about the situation.
So Vance admits that he makes shit up and thats supposed to be a good thing? If Biden had went out and lied about things going on like that, would you accept it in the same way?
click to expand
Okay.
Vance owned up to his shit. 💩 He took ownership of his own flaw/mistake. He is only human. So is Trump. They have their flaws. We all do. One thing I can appreciate about that is they can be truthful and own up to them. If you are sitting there looking and pointing out the flaws of others all the time, then you are not looking/examining your own and working on them.
Biden lied many times. We were led as a country to believe he was in good health/cognitive abilities. Who was really leading the country? His wife? Kamala ?!?!?click to expand
Let’s go Brandon.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by cornmaizesharkPosted by ThatWomanAgain11Posted by cornmaizeshark
It's too bad, and I can sympathize with him and his family. Hope that justice is served.
That said, there is a societal reaction that kind of disgusts me.
I remember, a decade or so ago. I was very moved by different skirmishes going on around the world. I was young, and I was too emotionally invested in things I had no power over. In particular, the Syrian Civil War had broken out. I was daily checking the casualty count. I would post about it on Facebook. No one gave a fuck. No one had any interest. And to the extent that anyone... spoke to me about it? Their reactions were "that's too bad, but why do you care so much?"
Then there was a terrorist attack at a magazine publisher in France. And all of a sudden, everyone had changed their profile pics to the French flag. Everyone was putting "Je Suix Charlie Hebdo" as their status.
And it struck me that 5? 6? 7? people being murdered in a place that isn't so far from home... impacted people exponentially more than tens of thousands of people being blown up by drones, or dissolving internally from chemical weapons.
Anyway... to the extent that I had common ground with Charlie Kirk... it's probably a cold pragmatism. Like, I understand what he was saying about the cost of the second amendment. That's cold, that's callous. That's pragmatic.
My point is... it's a little disgusting to me how much people are invested in this one man. Whether you loved or hated him. For better or worse. First, because I don't believe its sincere whatsoever. I give it a half life similar to Sydney Sweeney's jeans. And even if it outlives that... I never once heard people I know namedrop Charlie Kirk irl before he was killed. People namedropped, say, Ben Shapiro. Jordan Peterson. Candace. Even Andrew Tate. But NO ONE was talking about how inspirational Charlie Kirk was. But now they want to use him as a rallying point. And that - to me - is as disingenuous as using Sydney Sweeney as a flag in the culture war.
But also? There's nothing pragmatic about investing so much in one person. Sorry, but Kirk himself would agree.
Hebdo was attacked because he tried to paint prophet Muhammed. No one can't do that as the "entity" are deemed to serve values and lessons instead of any other things. The thing is Hebdo didn't get the message, thus Islamophobia and 2 faced lying bitch
Btw, your "temple" is so attractive like the vocalist of Incubus.
I love Incubus' songs
click to expand
I know why Hebdo was attacked. I'm just saying to me... a death is a death. I find it hard to value one stranger's life more than another's. In the case of Charlie Kirk, I find it hard to reconcile how invested people are in his murder, when there are over a thousand people murdered every day. I understand that familiarity and name recognition plays a role. But Charlie Kirk himself took a cold rationalist approach to 2nd amendment. "We accept that some deaths will be inevitable but it's WORTH it because the alternative would/could be dystopian with even more deaths."
So my cold rationalist approach to Charlie Kirk is "He was a political influencer. He spread a message that- whether you agree with or not- was NOT equivalent to Abraham Lincoln freeing the slaves. You can like his message, but objectively, he did not do anything so great for this country or for the world, that he is worth trying to incite a civil war over. He wasn't an actual civil rights leader. He wasn't actually 'him'."
Alright check it: Trump said at his memorial service something to the effect of "Charlie Kirk loved his enemies and wanted what's best for them. I don't love my enemies and I don't want what's best for them." And everyone cheered and clapped.
To me, that doesn't seem very respectful of his memory. That seems like trying to take advantage of his death for political posturing. That doesn't make him a martyr, to me. That makes him an unwilling posthumous pawn. And since he wasn't actually someone who changed the country... I don't see him as being someone worth changing the country over (i.e. further civil discord).
click to expand
Fair enough. That is your opinion. Charlie Kirk went on college campuses, where no one else dared to go, and debated with woke people.. mostly. He was making such a big impact that the youth in America he impacted pushed Trump into office in the swing states.
People clapped in the audience because Trump was being truthful of his own flaws in comparison to Charlie Kirk.
click to expand
No one dared to go to college campuses? Really?
Ignoring all the students and professors and workers and employees that live on college campuses... "But campuses are hostile to conservatives-"
Pretty sure Shapiro did it first, then Crowder. Pretty sure all the right wingers influencers regularly do/have done it.
I'm not arguing against whatever ideology you believe in here, I'm arguing against delusional hysteria and disingenuous rhetoric. Y'all as loony as the left with your hyperbole. Have fun arguing about what a woman is, I guess.
click to expand
Yes, no one on the right or conservative side wanted to deal with woke or progressive students. It was a lost cause to most people. @Canceronthecusp does not respond to the leftists on Dxpnet because he feels it is a lost cause and a total waste of time/effort to do so. I have to admit, it frustrates me because most are dumb. They also resort to ad-hominem fallacies with attacking the messenger because they cannot form logic to attack what is said. Something tells me you will go there. I hope to be proven wrong, but I trust my instincts more.
The Democrats are only voted in by people that they appeal with emotion!! No logic in their approach. Tim Walz put tampons in boys restrooms in Minnesota for crying out loud. 🥹
It’s no secret that the majority of teachers are Democrats!! I used to be in this huge social group of over 300 members and another social group of over 750 members… all the teachers in both social groups were Democrats!! Notice the Free Palestine movement, which is a combination of woke/progressive, LGBTQ+, and Muslims that have been intimidating and promoting violence of Jewish people on campuses!! It’s right in front of you out in the open!! They want to attack the values of America. Mosab Hassan Yousef, the green prince, spells this out for anyone listening.
I'm not woke or progressive or a student lol
Posted by Solo
@Bluemoon86
They don't "own up to them." They continue to lie lol. Even there he didn't own up to it at first, he tried to fight back with "it's what my constituent said" (not verbatim).
Okay so you have a problem with the Biden health stuff. Totally worth being mad about if it's something you really do care about (and even though this isn't the first time in US History, it doesn't make it any better at all, we all deserve to know how our leadership is doing). You feel equally then about them covering up Trump's right? Before Leavitt came out and admitted to at least one problem.
I'll go through the video a bit later, having to watch over stuff this week and move stuff around.
So then you also agree that Trump and them need to focus on themselves, cause they're always pointing at everyone else and all they do is great?
Trump likes to pick on or call out people who start things with him. Ex: Rosie O’Donnell and Bruce Springsteen. There is a long list of others. He doesn’t just sit there and take it. Should he? Would that make him a more effective leader?
Was actually mentioning the flaw thing for you and others reading. It’s just common sense that if we are focused on flaws of others, we are not looking at our own and working on our own.
Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
@Bluemoon86
They don't "own up to them." They continue to lie lol. Even there he didn't own up to it at first, he tried to fight back with "it's what my constituent said" (not verbatim).
Okay so you have a problem with the Biden health stuff. Totally worth being mad about if it's something you really do care about (and even though this isn't the first time in US History, it doesn't make it any better at all, we all deserve to know how our leadership is doing). You feel equally then about them covering up Trump's right? Before Leavitt came out and admitted to at least one problem.
I'll go through the video a bit later, having to watch over stuff this week and move stuff around.
So then you also agree that Trump and them need to focus on themselves, cause they're always pointing at everyone else and all they do is great?
Trump likes to pick on or call out people who start things with him. Ex: Rosie O’Donnell and Bruce Springsteen. There is a long list of others. He doesn’t just sit there and take it. Should he? Would that make him a more effective leader?
Was actually mentioning the flaw thing for you and others reading. It’s just common sense that if we are focused on flaws of others, we are not looking at our own and working on our own.
click to expand
He literally verbally attacks judges and congress members and shit. I'm not worried about entertainment people.click to expand
Yes, I know this. Ilhan Omar is one of his latest targets, which I think it is fairly deserved. Again, these people verbally attack Trump. Instead of always taking the high road with it, he dishes it back. He doesn’t just sit there and take it. Should he? Would it make him a more effective leader?
Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by SoloPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by Solo
@Bluemoon86
They don't "own up to them." They continue to lie lol. Even there he didn't own up to it at first, he tried to fight back with "it's what my constituent said" (not verbatim).
Okay so you have a problem with the Biden health stuff. Totally worth being mad about if it's something you really do care about (and even though this isn't the first time in US History, it doesn't make it any better at all, we all deserve to know how our leadership is doing). You feel equally then about them covering up Trump's right? Before Leavitt came out and admitted to at least one problem.
I'll go through the video a bit later, having to watch over stuff this week and move stuff around.
So then you also agree that Trump and them need to focus on themselves, cause they're always pointing at everyone else and all they do is great?
Trump likes to pick on or call out people who start things with him. Ex: Rosie O’Donnell and Bruce Springsteen. There is a long list of others. He doesn’t just sit there and take it. Should he? Would that make him a more effective leader?
Was actually mentioning the flaw thing for you and others reading. It’s just common sense that if we are focused on flaws of others, we are not looking at our own and working on our own.
click to expand
He literally verbally attacks judges and congress members and shit. I'm not worried about entertainment people.
click to expand
Yes, I know this. Ilhan Omar is one of his latest targets, which I think it is fairly deserved. Again, these people verbally attack Trump. Instead of always taking the high road with it, he dishes it back. He doesn’t just sit there and take it. Should he? Would it make him a more effective leader?
click to expand
We fundamentally disagree that they've been attacking Trump. A ton of it is just facts about him or things that he's done etc. Him committing crimes and shit just is what it is. I think him ignoring it would be a better show of leadership to the rest of us and the world if what was flung was baseless and if not then he should address it head on in civil discussion. That's what a leader does. They lead and show others how to act. If he keeps cultivating this shit with threats like "you don't wanna get the right energized," where do you think this is going to go? When he keeps overstepping power and kidnapping people and sending them to different countries or places in our own country where records are poorly recorded if at all?
So like, you would've PREFERRED that Biden, when Trump and others talked shit about him, you would've preferred that he called them names and attacked them and all that? That's what you're telling me? Cuz I feel like if he did, the Right would cry about him being unprofessional etc.click to expand
Okay.
His latest target has been Ilhan Omar. She claims he is an “embarrassing fool”. This is not facts or things that he has done. It’s her opinion and an attack on his character or an ad-hominem fallacy. So I see his attacks on her character just. It came after her remarks on Charlie Kirk.
Not to mention, Ilhan Omar should be investigated and impeached. Credible evidence, including marriage licenses and DNA records, points to Omar illegally marrying her brother, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, in 2009 to commit immigration fraud and secure his U.S. residency. She should not even be a part of a government and I think a law needs to be implemented that natural born citizens of America should only be elected to government positions.
Every leader has their unique style . If they all acted the same, then it would be pretty boring. Don’t you think?
https://www.newsweek.com/benny-johnson-threat-george-isabel-jr-arrest-bondi-10862578
"On Friday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the arrest of George Isabel Jr., who is accused of sending a letter threatening to kill conservative political commentator Benny Johnson at his home.
Johnson said at the press conference in Tampa, Florida, according to Fox 13, "The individual who wrote me described why he wanted me dead. I was a white, cis, Christian Trump supporter. They described in great detail how I would be killed in an open field just like Charlie [Kirk]. How much blood would come out of my head and neck when it would come off. This individual described orphaning my four children and widowing my beautiful wife with great joy.""
"On Friday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the arrest of George Isabel Jr., who is accused of sending a letter threatening to kill conservative political commentator Benny Johnson at his home.
Johnson said at the press conference in Tampa, Florida, according to Fox 13, "The individual who wrote me described why he wanted me dead. I was a white, cis, Christian Trump supporter. They described in great detail how I would be killed in an open field just like Charlie [Kirk]. How much blood would come out of my head and neck when it would come off. This individual described orphaning my four children and widowing my beautiful wife with great joy.""
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
https://www.newsweek.com/benny-johnson-threat-george-isabel-jr-arrest-bondi-10862578
"On Friday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the arrest of George Isabel Jr., who is accused of sending a letter threatening to kill conservative political commentator Benny Johnson at his home.
Johnson said at the press conference in Tampa, Florida, according to Fox 13, "The individual who wrote me described why he wanted me dead. I was a white, cis, Christian Trump supporter. They described in great detail how I would be killed in an open field just like Charlie [Kirk]. How much blood would come out of my head and neck when it would come off. This individual described orphaning my four children and widowing my beautiful wife with great joy.""
What a delight to see you!! Hope all has been good with you!!
Holy shit!! That is some whacked psychotic shit there!!
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
https://www.newsweek.com/benny-johnson-threat-george-isabel-jr-arrest-bondi-10862578
"On Friday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the arrest of George Isabel Jr., who is accused of sending a letter threatening to kill conservative political commentator Benny Johnson at his home.
Johnson said at the press conference in Tampa, Florida, according to Fox 13, "The individual who wrote me described why he wanted me dead. I was a white, cis, Christian Trump supporter. They described in great detail how I would be killed in an open field just like Charlie [Kirk]. How much blood would come out of my head and neck when it would come off. This individual described orphaning my four children and widowing my beautiful wife with great joy.""
What a delight to see you!! Hope all has been good with you!!
Holy shit!! That is some whacked psychotic shit there!!click to expand
Busy life. This year has been nuts.
Generally, its been good.
Hope things are going well on your end.
The Benny Johnson thing is definitely messed up. The sad part is, there are a number of those types running about.
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
https://www.newsweek.com/benny-johnson-threat-george-isabel-jr-arrest-bondi-10862578
"On Friday, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the arrest of George Isabel Jr., who is accused of sending a letter threatening to kill conservative political commentator Benny Johnson at his home.
Johnson said at the press conference in Tampa, Florida, according to Fox 13, "The individual who wrote me described why he wanted me dead. I was a white, cis, Christian Trump supporter. They described in great detail how I would be killed in an open field just like Charlie [Kirk]. How much blood would come out of my head and neck when it would come off. This individual described orphaning my four children and widowing my beautiful wife with great joy.""
What a delight to see you!! Hope all has been good with you!!
Holy shit!! That is some whacked psychotic shit there!!
click to expand
Busy life. This year has been nuts.
Generally, its been good.
Hope things are going well on your end.
The Benny Johnson thing is definitely messed up. The sad part is, there are a number of those types running about.click to expand
Yes, it is a busy time of the year and I love the fall weather coming in. Yes, you are right. It’s like tip of the iceberg to the sicko creeps out there. We certainly do live in strange times.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-awards-charlie-kirk-presidential-medal-of-freedom/
"President Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom — the government's highest civilian honor — to conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk on Tuesday, over a month after he was fatally shot on a Utah college campus.
During a ceremony in the White House's Rose Garden on what would have been Kirk's 32nd birthday, Mr. Trump called Kirk a "fearless warrior for liberty" and credited the political activist with helping him win a greater share of the under-30 vote in last year's presidential race."
"President Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom — the government's highest civilian honor — to conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk on Tuesday, over a month after he was fatally shot on a Utah college campus.
During a ceremony in the White House's Rose Garden on what would have been Kirk's 32nd birthday, Mr. Trump called Kirk a "fearless warrior for liberty" and credited the political activist with helping him win a greater share of the under-30 vote in last year's presidential race."
Posted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
When you realize that its not really about 'free Palestine', and that the same/similar faces show up at the protest for the next grievance du jour, especially with professionally made signs and parallel messages from so called 'legimate press', it will begin to make sense.
Posted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Its because majority of the "free Palestine" protesters don't actually care/ know anything about Palestine whatsoever. They just protest to feel like they are a part of something. The fact they don't have a topic they know nothing about to complain about anymore like Palestine actually makes them upset.
You wont see a single radical leftist to be thankful of the ceasefire. They will simply find something else to complain about, that way they remain in an everlasting state of anger, frustration, and stress like they were programmed to do. All while pretending like they know more about Palestine and Isreal then Palestine and Isreal.
Posted by SoulPosted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Its because majority of the "free Palestine" protesters don't actually care/ know anything about Palestine whatsoever. They just protest to feel like they are a part of something. The fact they don't have a topic they know nothing about to complain about anymore like Palestine actually makes them upset.
You wont see a single radical leftist to be thankful of the ceasefire. They will simply find something else to complain about, that way they remain in an everlasting state of anger, frustration, and stress like they were programmed to do. All while pretending like they know more about Palestine and Isreal then Palestine and Isreal.click to expand
i was talking to a radical leftist the other day who said we should welcome even illegal immigrants who may have criminal history because they only committed those crimes because they were poor so i told her “cool. then you wanna free up some space in your own house and take him in?” and she was like “no” so i told her “well, that’s called fake, performative compassion. you say you feel sorry for him but you don’t want him in your own house or anywhere near your own family?” and she was like “you’re being an asshole”.
i walked away from that conversation so confused. :/
but everyday i’m seeing videos of illegal migrants (oops, i’m sorry “doctor” or “engineer” 😅) attacking someone, stealing/vandalizing something, raping/stalking women or muslims admitting they have no plans whatsoever to assimilate into western culture. i even saw a video of a muslim proudly saying “we’re not here to take part, we’re here to take over.” a muslim person said they pray in the middle of streets in non-muslim countries to assert their dominance. in muslim countries, they all pray in mosques.
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
When you realize that its not really about 'free Palestine', and that the same/similar faces show up at the protest for the next grievance du jour, especially with professionally made signs and parallel messages from so called 'legimate press', it will begin to make sense.
click to expand
these are probably the same people who made BLM their entire identity yet had absolutely nothing to say when Iryna was murdered for simply being white.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Here are some words and their real definitions despite the fact that the world will tell you otherwise.
“Israeli prisoners held by Hamas” = Innocent hostages
“Palestinian hostages held by Israel” = Terrorists
“Free Palestine” = I hate Jews
“From the river to the sea” = Kill all Israelis
“Ceasefire now” = Tell Israel to agree to be wiped out
“Starvation” = What Gazans do to Israeli hostages and the opposite of what Israel does to Gazans or even Palestinian prisoners
“Israeli genocide” = Israel is defending itself against an actual genocide
“Globalize the intifada” = Bring radical Islam to the west and kill all infidels
“Israeli apartheid” = Israel keeps blocking terrorists and suicide bombers
“Ethnic cleansing of Palestinians” = All my lies have been debunked so I’ll try this one even though the Palestinian population keeps growing
“Israeli child killers” = Somewhere deep down (very deep), I feel disgusted that Hamas raped and burned children alive so I’m gonna deflect and project that on Israel
“Palestinian resistance” = Kill all the Jews and call it some fancy name
“Gaza Occupation” = A good excuse to kill Jews even though there was not a single Jew in Gaza on October 7th.
“Palestinian authority” = Hamas with suits
“Innocent Gazans” = People of all ages who openly support 10/7, Hamas, and the killing of any Jew.
“Zionist” = Jew
“Anti zionist” = Antisemite
“Israel killing innocent people” = See “Israeli child killers”
“Al Aqsa” = The Jewish Temple Mount
“West Bank” = Judea and Samaria
“Palestine” = Israel
“Palestinians” = Once used to describe Israelis and today used to describe Jordanians and Egyptians
“Two state solution” = Israel agreeing to 10/7 happening over and over
“Shariah law” = A nice way to say radical Islamic law including marrying relatives, abusing women, and raping underage girls
“Hamas fighters” = Rapists and pedophiles
“Abu mazen” = A terrorist in a suit who wrote dissertation about holocaust denial
“Israeli crimes” = Israelis having the audacity to fight back
“Nakba” = When the UN gave the Jews a state, and the Arabs a state. The Jews accepted, the Arabs rejected, and left their homes so their Arab friends can attack Israel, which they did, and lost.
“A Palestinian state” = Gaza 2.0, or a deeply indoctrinated state that has one goal, to eradicate Israel
“Bibi Netanyahu” = One of the greatest politicians of the century and one of the most vilified for absolute lies
“The Jews killed Charlie Kirk” = A good and very popular man was assassinated, which presented an opportunity to lie about the Jews and cause more violence
“Queers for Palestine” = I am a total moron who knows zero about radical Islam and the fact that if I was queer in any area controlled by Arabs, I’d be publicly murdered while thousands cheered on
“Neturei Karta” = A tiny group of mentally challenged Jews who antisemites use to prove that Jews don’t support Zionism
“American liberal” = A totally confused and morally bankrupt individual who stands for everything that is the opposite of real liberalism
“American democrat” = A (mostly) deeply antisemitic party that bases its opinions on what republicans believe. Whatever they believe, dems will believe the opposite with absolutely no moral spine
“Candace Owens” = A very very sick and dangerous individual who is most likely paid by Qatar to spread baseless lies about Jews and increase antisemitism
“Tucker Carlson” = See Candace Owens
“Piers Morgan” = A journalist who is becoming increasingly irrelevant and to get more traffic decided to embrace the lies being told about Jews
“Gaza health ministry” = Hamas
“CNN” = Complete nonsense network
“AntI Israel march” = Nazi supporting march
“Pro Israel march” = A march consisting of peace loving moral individuals supporting the miraculous state of Israel
“Middle East” = A massive region filled with Arab and Muslim states and one tiny sliver of land called Israel that is accused of colonizing even though it’s smaller than New Jersey
“Hasbara” = Fighting the lies about Israel with actual facts
“Israeli settlers” = A group of ideological people with strong values settling their eternal homeland
“Jewish terrorists” = A made up phenomenon as real as unicorns and dragons
“October 7th” = A day on which thousands of Hamas terrorists and even more “Regular Gazans” invaded Israel unprovoked, raped kids, murdered holocaust survivors, burned parents alive in front of their kids, and kidnapped hundreds of innocent people of all ages, genders, nationalities, and political opinions.
“Watermelon emoji” = An emoji hijacked by antisemites to justify their violence against and hatred of Jews
“Jihad” = A fancy word used to justify mass murder and terror
“Shahid” = A coward who killed innocent people and then died like a dog
“Macron/Starmer”: A weak and irrelevant politician who thinks he can survive politically by appeasing radical Islamists who are ruining his once beautiful country
“Israeli boycott/BDS”: A bogus movement that tries to vilify Israel while it spreads its hate on sites built on Wix (Israeli company) and using phones built in Israel
“Houthis”: A group of lowlife terrorists who no one has ever heard of but like cowards, jumped on the bandwagon to attack Israel, totally unsuccessfully
“IRGC”: The weak Iranian regime with a failing economy, no support from its people, and a deep creepy obsession with Israel
“Hezbollah”: An extinct radical Islamic terrorist organization that was taken out by Israeli beepers and walkie talkies
“Deif/Haniyeh/Sinwar” = Coward leaders of Hamas, all of whom are burning in the depths of hell
“The Jewish people” = A miraculous nation that has survived unparalleled persecution and has outlived every single empire that tried to destroy it.
“Am Yisrael Chai” = Hey Jew haters, screw you. You lose. Again. We are still here. You are not. Buh bye
- The endclick to expand
lib logic 101 lol
Posted by serenidadPosted by SoulPosted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Its because majority of the "free Palestine" protesters don't actually care/ know anything about Palestine whatsoever. They just protest to feel like they are a part of something. The fact they don't have a topic they know nothing about to complain about anymore like Palestine actually makes them upset.
You wont see a single radical leftist to be thankful of the ceasefire. They will simply find something else to complain about, that way they remain in an everlasting state of anger, frustration, and stress like they were programmed to do. All while pretending like they know more about Palestine and Isreal then Palestine and Isreal.
click to expand
i was talking to a radical leftist the other day who said we should welcome even illegal immigrants who may have criminal history because they only committed those crimes because they were poor so i told her “cool. then you wanna free up some space in your own house and take him in?” and she was like “no” so i told her “well, that’s called fake, performative compassion. you say you feel sorry for him but you don’t want him in your own house or anywhere near your own family?” and she was like “you’re being an asshole”.
i walked away from that conversation so confused. :/
but everyday i’m seeing videos of illegal migrants (oops, i’m sorry “doctor” or “engineer” 😅) attacking someone, stealing/vandalizing something, raping/stalking women or muslims admitting they have no plans whatsoever to assimilate into western culture. i even saw a video of a muslim proudly saying “we’re not here to take part, we’re here to take over.” a muslim person said they pray in the middle of streets in non-muslim countries to assert their dominance. in muslim countries, they all pray in mosques.
click to expand
I've been poor and homeless, and I committed zero crimes and was never even tempted to commit a crime.
People commit crimes because they are criminals.
You seem like you were never homeless maybe, so it's impossible to argue from experience in your case, maybe.
I talker to a migrant in another country who went to jail for selling drugs and he said he paid his debt to society, at least for drug dealing.
So yes, criminals are criminals and anyone breaking into a country is a danger to the people around them. There is no excuse; they just take adantage of situations when they can.
Posted by serenidadPosted by SoulPosted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Its because majority of the "free Palestine" protesters don't actually care/ know anything about Palestine whatsoever. They just protest to feel like they are a part of something. The fact they don't have a topic they know nothing about to complain about anymore like Palestine actually makes them upset.
You wont see a single radical leftist to be thankful of the ceasefire. They will simply find something else to complain about, that way they remain in an everlasting state of anger, frustration, and stress like they were programmed to do. All while pretending like they know more about Palestine and Isreal then Palestine and Isreal.
click to expand
i was talking to a radical leftist the other day who said we should welcome even illegal immigrants who may have criminal history because they only committed those crimes because they were poor so i told her “cool. then you wanna free up some space in your own house and take him in?” and she was like “no” so i told her “well, that’s called fake, performative compassion. you say you feel sorry for him but you don’t want him in your own house or anywhere near your own family?” and she was like “you’re being an asshole”.
i walked away from that conversation so confused. :/
but everyday i’m seeing videos of illegal migrants (oops, i’m sorry “doctor” or “engineer” 😅) attacking someone, stealing/vandalizing something, raping/stalking women or muslims admitting they have no plans whatsoever to assimilate into western culture. i even saw a video of a muslim proudly saying “we’re not here to take part, we’re here to take over.” a muslim person said they pray in the middle of streets in non-muslim countries to assert their dominance. in muslim countries, they all pray in mosques.
click to expand
Honestly based. They truly want to stick up for criminals and people illegally here, but dont want them in their own neighborhood. Meanwhile they are living above middle class life style in a nice gated community. Likely sitting in room with the AC blasting and sipping iced sparkling water through a metal straw spewing nonsense on how they know more then anyone about the lower class.
Then you have multimillionaire online influencers like Pokimane leave their mansion bought by left leaning simps to tell random civilians she agrees that we should eat the rich. She is literally one of the rich, yet if you asked her to home a few non vetted immigrants in her mansion she would 100% pass on that. Yet the left leaning democrats are supposed to care about the people. Yesterday I saw a sign outside an apartment complex that said "Democrats put people first. Always have, always will." All I could think is how much a hypocritical lie that statement was. It should have said "Rules for thee not for me."
Posted by HereforTaurusAgainPosted by serenidadPosted by SoulPosted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Its because majority of the "free Palestine" protesters don't actually care/ know anything about Palestine whatsoever. They just protest to feel like they are a part of something. The fact they don't have a topic they know nothing about to complain about anymore like Palestine actually makes them upset.
You wont see a single radical leftist to be thankful of the ceasefire. They will simply find something else to complain about, that way they remain in an everlasting state of anger, frustration, and stress like they were programmed to do. All while pretending like they know more about Palestine and Isreal then Palestine and Isreal.
click to expand
i was talking to a radical leftist the other day who said we should welcome even illegal immigrants who may have criminal history because they only committed those crimes because they were poor so i told her “cool. then you wanna free up some space in your own house and take him in?” and she was like “no” so i told her “well, that’s called fake, performative compassion. you say you feel sorry for him but you don’t want him in your own house or anywhere near your own family?” and she was like “you’re being an asshole”.
i walked away from that conversation so confused. :/
but everyday i’m seeing videos of illegal migrants (oops, i’m sorry “doctor” or “engineer” 😅) attacking someone, stealing/vandalizing something, raping/stalking women or muslims admitting they have no plans whatsoever to assimilate into western culture. i even saw a video of a muslim proudly saying “we’re not here to take part, we’re here to take over.” a muslim person said they pray in the middle of streets in non-muslim countries to assert their dominance. in muslim countries, they all pray in mosques.
click to expand
I've been poor and homeless, and I committed zero crimes and was never even tempted to commit a crime.
People commit crimes because they are criminals.
You seem like you were never homeless maybe, so it's impossible to argue from experience in your case, maybe.
I talker to a migrant in another country who went to jail for selling drugs and he said he paid his debt to society, at least for drug dealing.
So yes, criminals are criminals and anyone breaking into a country is a danger to the people around them. There is no excuse; they just take adantage of situations when they can.click to expand
exactly. being poor is not an excuse or a free pass to be a criminal. like you said, you were homeless at one point and never committed any crime.
i’m glad you were able to get back on your feet after experiencing homelessness.
countries in the west have a large homeless population who remain homeless long term whilst immediate arrival “asylum seekers” are housed in hotels (sometimes luxury hotels).
Posted by SoulPosted by serenidadPosted by SoulPosted by serenidad
the “free palestine” crowd has been real quiet after trump freed palestine 😅 they seemed more happy about charlie kirk being murdered than trump freeing palestine.
i also don’t see any of them protesting for or even acknowledging the recent mass murder of nigerian christians by the muslims either. :/
Its because majority of the "free Palestine" protesters don't actually care/ know anything about Palestine whatsoever. They just protest to feel like they are a part of something. The fact they don't have a topic they know nothing about to complain about anymore like Palestine actually makes them upset.
You wont see a single radical leftist to be thankful of the ceasefire. They will simply find something else to complain about, that way they remain in an everlasting state of anger, frustration, and stress like they were programmed to do. All while pretending like they know more about Palestine and Isreal then Palestine and Isreal.
click to expand
i was talking to a radical leftist the other day who said we should welcome even illegal immigrants who may have criminal history because they only committed those crimes because they were poor so i told her “cool. then you wanna free up some space in your own house and take him in?” and she was like “no” so i told her “well, that’s called fake, performative compassion. you say you feel sorry for him but you don’t want him in your own house or anywhere near your own family?” and she was like “you’re being an asshole”.
i walked away from that conversation so confused. :/
but everyday i’m seeing videos of illegal migrants (oops, i’m sorry “doctor” or “engineer” 😅) attacking someone, stealing/vandalizing something, raping/stalking women or muslims admitting they have no plans whatsoever to assimilate into western culture. i even saw a video of a muslim proudly saying “we’re not here to take part, we’re here to take over.” a muslim person said they pray in the middle of streets in non-muslim countries to assert their dominance. in muslim countries, they all pray in mosques.
click to expand
Honestly based. They truly want to stick up for criminals and people illegally here, but dont want them in their own neighborhood. Meanwhile they are living above middle class life style in a nice gated community. Likely sitting in room with the AC blasting and sipping iced sparkling water through a metal straw spewing nonsense on how they know more then anyone about the lower class.
Then you have multimillionaire online influencers like Pokimane leave their mansion bought by left leaning simps to tell random civilians she agrees that we should eat the rich. She is literally one of the rich, yet if you asked her to home a few non vetted immigrants in her mansion she would 100% pass on that. Yet the left leaning democrats are supposed to care about the people. Yesterday I saw a sign outside an apartment complex that said "Democrats put people first. Always have, always will." All I could think is how much a hypocritical lie that statement was. It should have said "Rules for thee not for me."click to expand
the mass immigration wouldn’t be much of a problem if these people plan on assimilating and respecting the country they were accepted into. but the muslims have made it crystal clear that they have no intentions whatsoever of assimilating or respecting other people’s cultures and values.
muslim migrants trying to put sharia law in place in OTHER PEOPLE’S NON-MUSLIM countries is a huge problem worldwide right now 😅
lib logic 101:
“Islam Exposed: 8 Year Old Child Bride Dies From Internal Bleeding After Her Wedding Night”
muslim men commit every other damn sin under the sun besides eating pork 😂 this type of shit (video above) is ”normal” for this religion.
also i wonder if the “free palestine rainbow they/them crowd” even knows that they will be stoned to death in any islamic country 🏳️🌈😅
Charlie Kirk’s video and my return to the Synagogue has solidified me keeping shabbos… a lot better than in years recent. I’ve noticed that I get more quality time with my family, think more sharper, have more energy, and am even more happier…..
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Assign one option to each person please: -tom brady -ryan reynolds -danny
@HereforTaurusAgain
Joined: Aug 11, 2025 · Topics: 23 · Posts: 209
D Smoke (winner of Rhythm & Flow)
The Weeknd
Which celebrity would you most like to be trapped alone with in an elevator for a few hours if you could choose? For me
don't know which forum to put this in, so i figure celebrities is ok. [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/2lnfs0n.jpg[/IMG]
Eliza Dushku Kelly Rowland Lexa Doig Kristen Kreuk Eva Mendes
Awesome! 😎 Me, too!
Here are the Māori people paying tribute to Charlie Kirk with Haka in the UK.