LetltB
@LetltB
12 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 1 · Posts: 9186 · Topics: 179
DXP Survivor 2 Part 3 (Page 4)
You are on page out of 5 | Reverse Order
Rigged? Seriously? C'mon 😛
How long does it take one to type Mercury into the dxp search engine, and gather what you need?
And since (most) people here don't usually refer to Mercury unless it applied to themselves, the required info
was pretty easy to find, I'll bet.
How long does it take one to type Mercury into the dxp search engine, and gather what you need?
And since (most) people here don't usually refer to Mercury unless it applied to themselves, the required info
was pretty easy to find, I'll bet.
DG knows that. She's just being her troublemaking Gem self. Same old, same old.
The game is not rigged. No one has had access to any debate topic or challenge prior to it being posted and this will remain the case until the game is concluded.
DeeGee, you made an excellent argument for ketchup, it just wasn't the best. NYAA won because he made the strongest case for his choice.
The awarding of partial points was not announced prior to the most recent topic or the commencement of the game. As players may have formulated and already implemented strategies based upon this information and expectation, it would be inappropriate to begin awarding such now.
If you wish to challenge the impartiality of the judge, it would be appreciated if you would provide evidence in support of your accusation.
2 players have yet to submit their votes. The game will remain in limbo until sufficient votes are received to declare who is being voted off.
DeeGee, you made an excellent argument for ketchup, it just wasn't the best. NYAA won because he made the strongest case for his choice.
The awarding of partial points was not announced prior to the most recent topic or the commencement of the game. As players may have formulated and already implemented strategies based upon this information and expectation, it would be inappropriate to begin awarding such now.
If you wish to challenge the impartiality of the judge, it would be appreciated if you would provide evidence in support of your accusation.
2 players have yet to submit their votes. The game will remain in limbo until sufficient votes are received to declare who is being voted off.
DeeGee has quit.
Jahlia, I regret to inform your fellow players have found you to present too great a threat. You've been voted out.
Jahlia and Ms. Vulcan: your comments remain welcome, just know that you are now part of the audience.
Players: when would you like the next debate to begin?
Jahlia, I regret to inform your fellow players have found you to present too great a threat. You've been voted out.
Jahlia and Ms. Vulcan: your comments remain welcome, just know that you are now part of the audience.
Players: when would you like the next debate to begin?
Yep I'm okay with it starting ASAP! I can catch some Zs and come back and make a solid argument before it closes for once 😄
Posted by seraph
LIB
LIB's
LIB
Wow..three mentions, thanks Seraph 😉 It's like you and elle are fighting each other today to fuck me or something. I'm almost honored. 😄
"Jahlia, I regret to inform your fellow players have found you to present too great a threat. You've been voted out."
Eyes wide open...is what that was. Good job everyone!
Eyes wide open...is what that was. Good job everyone!
Posted by LetltBPosted by seraph
LIB
LIB's
LIB
Wow..three mentions, thanks Seraph 😉 It's like you and elle are fighting each other today to fuck me or something. I'm almost honored. 😄
click to expand
This is not to protect Seraph or Elle or anyone. It's not an attack on you LIB or DeeGee. It's just an honest question for you LIB and DeeGee...I'm just curious..if you really think Seraph is a multiple account of Elle..
How do you explain the voice heard on Marrakesha's 'DXP Members Let Your Voices Be Heard! (LITERALLY)' thread in this same forum?
I mean it would be easy to just say Elle got some guy to say that... but why would anyone just say that stuff for someone on a random forum ^.^? I'm just interested to hear the explanation is all...I hope you can understand that. I mean even though I did not hold the same beliefs about those two accounts as you two and whoever else does might... I at least could still see the plausibility in your views. But now, especially after hearing Seraph speak, it just seems to still say they are infact the same person you would have to make some vast and wild assumptions. Assumptions as to who the person is recorded in that thread and to why they would do it as well which just makes it seem a bit of a stretch no? God I'm probably going to get flak from you for this question but it's just in all truth a honest curiosity of mine...
What is your explanation for the voice or have you not heard it yet?
Also, if the majority wants to start a new debate tonight I will not argue with that. I have a test to study for that I don't take till tomorrow evening at like 6 pm but that doesn't mean I'm going to not study for it till tomorrow. But I will try my best to put up the best position and possible defenses to it if time allows me. 🙂
Posted by scorchedearth
nyaa, LIB is a paranoid conspiracy theorist. her view points are entirely emotional and not logical at all. she's actually trolling all of us with her paranoia. there's something really wrong with her. she's actually super scary. ugh.
dg is paranoid too but dg is harmless.
Fair Enough.
I don't really consider either of them harmful... well I dunno I don't really pay attention enough to anything that LIB says on a consistent basis to form any type of idea about her.
Although I must say her reason for bumping that thread of Pecheresse about her relationship with her mother didn't seem totally absurd to do. And the fact that Pecheresse has only deleted/closed the thread about GCD and not the one about her and her mother's relationship.... would lend one to think she actually feels sorry or guilty for the thread? I dunno I really don't even want to get into the middle of any of this to tell you the truth. I won't lie.... I love to read about the drama on this site 😛... but usually only the lighter really stupid stuff... this is more serious.. this type of stuff involves people really bullying sorta...it is after all e-bullying btw and another person's personal life IDC if they posted it to the world it's still real right..so I don't wanna get into the middle of it. I will say this though from what I saw but I did not read all of it... BUT it would appear that GCD kinda egged Pecheresse on in a thread prior to Pecheresse making that thread about her..
Posted by Purrrr
Not sure where she is, NYAA, and I'm not trying to act as her spokesperson, but DG has told me that she doesn't completely believe anyone on the Internet is who they say they are unless she sees them. Not sure if that includes webcams, or if she's only talking about seeing them in person, but yeah. It's technically a fair statement to make, though. Distrustful, sure, but certainly not "crazy." People have been SERIOUSLY duped. Just watch the news.
True. And it is good to be this way I can't fault her for that at all. I can say that I usually am a skeptic myself. So DG is not alone in that department.
Posted by feb16aqua
Ugh. I'm tired of drama. I just had to rip this bitch up, I'm still shaking. I hate when I get that mad!!
Oh at work or something?
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Also, if the majority wants to start a new debate tonight I will not argue with that. I have a test to study for that I don't take till tomorrow evening at like 6 pm but that doesn't mean I'm going to not study for it till tomorrow. But I will try my best to put up the best position and possible defenses to it if time allows me. 🙂
We'll start the next debate tomorrow at 9PM EST.
hmm that's nice of you Stoic thnx.. you sure no one else will mind though?
I suppose most said they did not care when for sure but I think some sounded like they wanted to start sooner but if they don't care GREAT!
I suppose most said they did not care when for sure but I think some sounded like they wanted to start sooner but if they don't care GREAT!
LOL...Alright Imma shut up now.. sorry ;/
I really just wanted to hear an explanation or the reasoning behind LIB and DG... I suppose Purrrr enlightened me to DeeGee's though and makes sense so with that I'm out of this thread for awhile unless I see LIB says something.
I really just wanted to hear an explanation or the reasoning behind LIB and DG... I suppose Purrrr enlightened me to DeeGee's though and makes sense so with that I'm out of this thread for awhile unless I see LIB says something.
With the resignation of someone whose vote was counted, it is necessary to hold a new vote. The previous vote is hereby voided. The current point tally is below. Robyn's name remains absent from the list, as she has immunity. Get your votes in. Again.
0 - Aquasnoz
0 - Feb16aqua
9 - Jahlia
0 - MellyMel
10 - NotYourAverageAquarius
0 - Xdimplez
Alternatively, if everyone would prefer to quit, let me know that so we can quit wasting our time.
0 - Aquasnoz
0 - Feb16aqua
9 - Jahlia
0 - MellyMel
10 - NotYourAverageAquarius
0 - Xdimplez
Alternatively, if everyone would prefer to quit, let me know that so we can quit wasting our time.
Posted by feb16aqua
This fucking blows. So now everyone has to vote all over again
Or, in light of the two resignations, we can simply not vote anyone off this round. I'll leave that decision up to the players. Let me know what you want to do.
"With the resignation of someone whose vote was counted, it is necessary to hold a new vote."
Nooooo, the vote was counted and valid, and you were going to post the new debate. It's no different if the debate began and she quit. Seriously?? lol...Go Jahlia 😢
Nooooo, the vote was counted and valid, and you were going to post the new debate. It's no different if the debate began and she quit. Seriously?? lol...Go Jahlia 😢
@NYAA..in regard to your question. I will reserve comment.
Posted by LetltBGiven that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
"With the resignation of someone whose vote was counted, it is necessary to hold a new vote."
Nooooo, the vote was counted and valid, and you were going to post the new debate. It's no different if the debate began and she quit. Seriously?? lol...Go Jahlia 😢
Posted by Jahlia
@Stoicgoat I don't want to vote anyone off-two people resigned. The game will go too fast.....
You were voted off and should be GONE. The vote was valid, and debate time was announced. Like I said, if the debate was posted in the morning and Purr quit then it would NOT matter. However the judge isn't giving a reason why it does. It should just stand with you OUT.
Posted by LetltB
@NYAA..in regard to your question. I will reserve comment.
That's cool no problem 🙂
Posted by StoicGoatPosted by LetltBGiven that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
"With the resignation of someone whose vote was counted, it is necessary to hold a new vote."
Nooooo, the vote was counted and valid, and you were going to post the new debate. It's no different if the debate began and she quit. Seriously?? lol...Go Jahlia 😢click to expand
Because the vote was VALID!
Posted by StoicGoat
DeeGee has quit.
Jahlia, I regret to inform your fellow players have found you to present too great a threat. You've been voted out.
Jahlia and Ms. Vulcan: your comments remain welcome, just know that you are now part of the audience.
Players: when would you like the next debate to begin?
You can't do a re-do lol..stick with the last five
Posted by LetltBPosted by StoicGoatPosted by LetltBGiven that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
"With the resignation of someone whose vote was counted, it is necessary to hold a new vote."
Nooooo, the vote was counted and valid, and you were going to post the new debate. It's no different if the debate began and she quit. Seriously?? lol...Go Jahlia 😢
Because the vote was VALID!click to expand
You have not complied with my request that you defend your complaint. For your convenience, I will ask it again.
Given that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
Had the next debate already commenced, this would be a moot point, as it would be inappropriate to interfere with a round in progress. However, as the next debate has not yet commenced, it is appropriate to make an effort to ensure that the remaining players get to decide who among them they wish to remove as a threat.
Posted by DeeGee
Just for the record, I never casted an official vote.
This is true.
Posted by StoicGoatYou have not complied with my request that you defend your complaint. For your convenience, I will ask it again.
Given that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
Had the next debate already commenced, this would be a moot point, as it would be inappropriate to interfere with a round in progress. However, as the next debate has not yet commenced, it is appropriate to make an effort to ensure that the remaining players get to decide who among them they wish to remove as a threat.
I did answer jackass...the vote took place 5 hours ago without DG's vote and a debate time was going to be announced. What do you mean "interfere" some people aren't even participating and there were some purr didn't even participate in. Take that explanation and shove it up your ass you fraud and comply fairly.
What is it with you people? You can't even have HONEST fun around here. This entire thing has been a complete clusterfuck. Carry on and Enjoy..
Posted by LetltBPosted by StoicGoatYou have not complied with my request that you defend your complaint. For your convenience, I will ask it again.
Given that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
Had the next debate already commenced, this would be a moot point, as it would be inappropriate to interfere with a round in progress. However, as the next debate has not yet commenced, it is appropriate to make an effort to ensure that the remaining players get to decide who among them they wish to remove as a threat.
I did answer jackass...the vote took place 5 hours ago without DG's vote and a debate time was going to be announced. What do you mean "interfere" some people aren't even participating and there were some purr didn't even participate in. Take that explanation and shove it up your ass you fraud and comply fairly.click to expand
The vitriol with which you have chosen to reply notwithstanding, you have yet to address my request. I will post it a third time:
Given that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
By "interfere" I mean that it would be inappropriate to interfere in a debate in-progress. However, as the next debate has not yet begun, and the remaining players have changed, and it possible to give the remaining players the chance to decide who among the remaining players they would like to remove from their midst, it is appropriate to grant them this option.
I note that you have accused me of being a fraud. If you possess evidence with which to substantiate your accusation, I am certain everyone reading this would appreciate your presentation thereof.
Posted by EusiveSoulll
Ohhhh...let's see....Three major conspiracy theorist around this site who cannot help themselves but be ATTENTION seekers!!!!
GIVE ME A F-ing break!!!
Is this what it was planed to happen from the get go!?!?!? Just curious.... because it sure looks like it right now—
What a joke!! Beyond sad !!!
The only plan going on here is someone with a hard on low enough to cheat their way through a fucking game. Now that honey is sad and pathetic. It was rigged with the first judge and he got his ass booted, and the b.s. just lingers. Yea..a joke indeed.
Posted by StoicGoat
The vitriol with which you have chosen to reply notwithstanding, you have yet to address my request. I will post it a third time:
Given that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
By "interfere" I mean that it would be inappropriate to interfere in a debate in-progress. However, as the next debate has not yet begun, and the remaining players have changed, and it possible to give the remaining players the chance to decide who among the remaining players they would like to remove from their midst, it is appropriate to grant them this option.
I note that you have accused me of being a fraud. If you possess evidence with which to substantiate your accusation, I am certain everyone reading this would appreciate your presentation thereof.
First let me just say, if you are going to play a Capricorn try and take notes to be good at it. Second, I DID explain, and you are hiding behind the FACT that the votes were in, counted and VALID. Look up the word VALID. She quit AFTER THE FACT FIVE hours ago.. The players ALREADY decided to vote off the person you announced. Let's look at a nascar qualification race. Jeff Gordon gets eliminated in the qualification process. Another driver who is still in for the main race gets sick and drops out...does Jeff Gordon get to come back in? Fuck no. Now YOU explain to me how putting an eliminated player back in is fair. There are five players left.
Posted by EusiveSoulllPosted by LetltB
The only plan going on here is someone with a hard on low enough to cheat their way through a fucking game. Now that honey is sad and pathetic. It was rigged with the first judge and he got his ass booted, and the b.s. just lingers. Yea..a joke indeed.
With all due respect LIB... could you pleaseee, pleaseeee breack it down to this clueless fish and explain it in a fashion where I could follow who, where and why anyone in the world would go to the extend of rigging the game?!?!
Fine details would be much appreciated!!! Because, you know... big picture is in a detail after all... no?click to expand
No. If you haven't been paying attention, that's your loss.
Also, I cannot resurrect two deleted threads taken down for you to read to catch up either. They were taken down due to embarrassment and a lot of slip ups by those who don't know what the word honest and fair means.
Posted by LetltBPosted by StoicGoat
The vitriol with which you have chosen to reply notwithstanding, you have yet to address my request. I will post it a third time:
Given that the purpose of the vote is for the remaining players to choose who among them should depart, please explain why it would be appropriate to allow the vote of someone who quits the game to determine the fate of a player who wishes to continue playing.
By "interfere" I mean that it would be inappropriate to interfere in a debate in-progress. However, as the next debate has not yet begun, and the remaining players have changed, and it possible to give the remaining players the chance to decide who among the remaining players they would like to remove from their midst, it is appropriate to grant them this option.
I note that you have accused me of being a fraud. If you possess evidence with which to substantiate your accusation, I am certain everyone reading this would appreciate your presentation thereof.
First let me just say, if you are going to play a Capricorn try and take notes to be good at it. Second, I DID explain, and you are hiding behind the FACT that the votes were in, counted and VALID. Look up the word VALID. She quit AFTER THE FACT FIVE hours ago.. The players ALREADY decided to vote off the person you announced. Let's look at a nascar qualification race. Jeff Gordon gets eliminated in the qualification process. Another driver who is still in for the main race gets sick and drops out...does Jeff Gordon get to come back in? Fuck no. Now YOU explain to me how putting an eliminated player back in is fair. There are five players left.click to expand
I note that my request of you to provide evidence in support of your accusation that I am a fraud has been ignored. This would appear to indicate you possess no such evidence.
I also note that you have still not troubled yourself to address the issue I placed before you. I will not trouble to do so again, as you do not appear interested in providing a logical defense of your opinion.
The players did cast their votes for the player they wished to see removed from the game prior to Purrrr's resignation. However, as she was among those whom they could choose to vote against, it is appropriate to allow them to vote again now that she has removed herself. Although it may have escaped your attention, I have added no one back to the game. I have only requested that the remaining players cast their votes again in light of Purrrr's resignation. Nothing prevents them from casting the same vote a second time.
There will be exactly as many players remaining n the game as the players themselves determine. I am unable to grasp why you find permitting them to have a say in the operation of the game they are playing to be so offensive.
There will be exactly as many players remaining n the game as the players themselves determine. I am unable to grasp why you find permitting them to have a say in the operation of the game they are playing to be so offensive.
Posted by StoicGoatlol...let's take a look again shall we?
The players did cast their votes for the player they wished to see removed from the game prior to Purrrr's resignation. However, as she was among those whom they could choose to vote against, it is appropriate to allow them to vote again now that she has removed herself.
Posted by StoicGoat
Robyn has two immunity challenge wins in a row. Congratulations!
Here was the first cast you put up:
Players: please PM who you would like to vote off to me. It goes without saying, but you obviously cannot vote to get rid of the winner of the immunity challenge.
Current point tally of those you can vote against:
0 - Aquasnoz
0 - DeeGee
0 - Feb16aqua
9 - Jahlia
0 - MellyMel
10 - NotYourAverageAquarius
0 - Purrrr
0 - xdimplez
click to expand
Right after you posted the line up to be voted out you put this up:
Posted by StoicGoat
DeeGee has quit.
Jahlia, I regret to inform your fellow players have found you to present too great a threat. You've been voted out.
Actually..here's the entire post
Posted by StoicGoat
DeeGee has quit.
Jahlia, I regret to inform your fellow players have found you to present too great a threat. You've been voted out.
Jahlia and Ms. Vulcan: your comments remain welcome, just know that you are now part of the audience.
Players: when would you like the next debate to begin?
THE VOTE WAS COMPLETED AND VALID
Posted by LetltBPosted by StoicGoatlol...let's take a look again shall we?
The players did cast their votes for the player they wished to see removed from the game prior to Purrrr's resignation. However, as she was among those whom they could choose to vote against, it is appropriate to allow them to vote again now that she has removed herself.
Posted by StoicGoat
Robyn has two immunity challenge wins in a row. Congratulations!
Here was the first cast you put up:
Players: please PM who you would like to vote off to me. It goes without saying, but you obviously cannot vote to get rid of the winner of the immunity challenge.
Current point tally of those you can vote against:
0 - Aquasnoz
0 - DeeGee
0 - Feb16aqua
9 - Jahlia
0 - MellyMel
10 - NotYourAverageAquarius
0 - Purrrr
0 - xdimplez
You have, yet again, failed to make a relevant point. You also truncated my first quote. I have posted the balance below. Please note the portion I have bolded for your convenience.
Posted by StoicGoat
Although it may have escaped your attention, I have added no one back to the game. I have only requested that the remaining players cast their votes again in light of Purrrr's resignation. Nothing prevents them from casting the same vote a second time.
There will be exactly as many players remaining n the game as the players themselves determine. I am unable to grasp why you find permitting them to have a say in the operation of the game they are playing to be so offensive.click to expand
Then you put an eliminated player back in. Sorry..but that's just wrong, and you know it. But hey Toxic DXP Survivor is your game..not mine. You go ahead and feel good about that. It shows character. Good night.
Posted by StoicGoat
With the resignation of someone whose vote was counted, it is necessary to hold a new vote. The previous vote is hereby voided. The current point tally is below. Robyn's name remains absent from the list, as she has immunity. Get your votes in. Again.
0 - Aquasnoz
0 - Feb16aqua
9 - Jahlia
0 - MellyMel
10 - NotYourAverageAquarius
0 - Xdimplez
Alternatively, if everyone would prefer to quit, let me know that so we can quit wasting our time.
"Nothing prevents them from casting the same vote a second time."
The POINT is..there should NOTbe a vote and it should go to debate. AND you KNOW that. Good night.
The POINT is..there should NOTbe a vote and it should go to debate. AND you KNOW that. Good night.
Posted by LetltB
Two hours later Purr makes her announcement
Posted by Purrrr
Oh, and to the Genie: I quit, too.click to expand
Correct.
As the game had (has) not moved forward, and as it is possible to conduct a vote taking into account the individual who has voluntarily removed herself from the game, it is appropriate to give the remaining players the opportunity to cast their votes against those players who did not voluntarily exit the game. As I have previously stated, nothing prevents them from casting the exact same vote.
Posted by DeeGee
Let it go, its all spite work....
I know.. lol The transparency is cyrstal though isn't it?
Did you hear I'm the judge for the Allstars?😉
"As the game had (has) not moved forward, and as it is possible to conduct a vote taking into account the individual who has voluntarily removed herself from the game, it is appropriate to give the remaining players the opportunity to cast their votes against those players who did not voluntarily exit the game. As I have previously stated, nothing prevents them from casting the exact same vote."
BUT THE VOTE CONCLUDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that means over, end and DONE! A second vote is not needed.
BUT THE VOTE CONCLUDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that means over, end and DONE! A second vote is not needed.
" nothing prevents them from casting the exact same vote."
A second vote is NOT needed or fair. It was concluded.
A second vote is NOT needed or fair. It was concluded.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
For those who would like to comment on the debate.
Just curious as to what you've done that's kinky. Include your sun, venus and mars, too! Be interesting to see how t
very formal settings very formal attire all things very formal and for you?
What do you think? and in what ways does it make it easier, harder, or does it not matter?
The topic of the new first debate follows below. All players are starting with a score of zero. Audience and players a
The other day I was sitting in my living room when all of a sudden out of nowhere, the wonderful aroma of halloween cand
Ek dink al n lank tyd of daar dalk enige ander suid afrikaners wat lid is hier. Voel net partykeer verskriklik alleen hi
A 50- something year old white woman arrived at her seat on a crowded flight and immediately didn't want the seat. T
In case any of you aren't aware of what DMT is, it's basically a psychedelic compound found throughout the plant kingdom
Whats your favourite slang word(s)?
Which dxper(s) you didnt like at 1st until you understood them better? a)EEE, I thought he was an asshole because I d
Its been a while since Ive started a new thread. I realized this last week and didnt wanna just break my streak with so
I put fish sauce in everything I cook instead of salt I don't answer phones with hello I just pick up and wait for th
Contestants: 2010 Chevy Malibu v 2005 Volvo 18-Wheeler Venue: High speed rear end collision Results:
Ok this is my last thread for the day. I have so many thoughts LOL, so forgive & one just popped in my head. Which inven
Serial thread maker in the house! Woot! *throws gang member signs in the air* LOL Seriously, what things do you think
Who do you think is the most notorious thread maker on DXP? You know, every time you log into the main page there is ye
Thanks to the lovely resident fishy my brain is on cartoon mode. SO come on, what were your favourite cartoons as a chil
Ok please help me help a friend of mine because I don't know what to say in her situation. Plus I'm crap in relationship
this video is from last year so apologies if its been posted before, but anyway,some young egyptian adults thought it wo
Whatever it takes to give one self-meaning and self-identity with a fake cyber crown that can't be achieved in the real world I suppose😢...before the first fraud judge was outted, I thought this was all good & honest fun too.
It seems deception and having the brains to be deceptive is the real game here. The ability to catch it is key. How easy that was eh?
So in actuality DG, you are a winner.😉