DXP Survivor 2 Part V (Page 4)

Posted by feb16aqua
has anyone come up with the correct answers stoic?

Not yet...

Posted by xdimplez
does this have to do with money?

Money is something they have not always had.

haha I must be a lazy ass if I haven't found this shit out already xD

The numbers are not dependent on the individuals with whom they are presently related.

do they represent recording megabytes lol

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
do they represent recording megabytes lol

Nope.

Look at the numbers.

In what form are the numbers presented?

I think it's a ratio TO something but that just made things more complicated for me 😛

Have you considered how many numbers there are?

And they do bear an uncanny resemblance to ratios 😉

Not that I can tell.

If they were ratios, I wonder what they would represent—

How many are there?

What can you think of to which these numbers might relate?

Posted by feb16aqua
There are 34 total on the left hand side

Wrong line of thought, Natalya 😛

Posted by feb16aqua
number of children, number of marriages, awards won

click to expand

Ditto

Mmmmm...measurement...I wonder what could be measured that would end up with ratios that look like this...

There appear to be 10 of them. That could be an important piece of information...

I'm really going to give you an award on being cryptic stoic lol.

In my mind your question is similar to asking us "What shape is this"

- this shape has x sides
- how many sides would a triangle have
- it is not the number of sides
- what shape is makes doesn't matter.

etc

yeah well if it has anything to do with ratios fucking johnny depp has 600% increase on jolie

To tell the truth the two anomalies in that list are Affleck's 1:1 and Depp's 600.02:1!!!! lol

They're measurements of the same thing, of which weight isn't really a component. Accounting for weight would result in entirely different numbers.

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
yeah well if it has anything to do with ratios fucking johnny depp has 600% increase on jolie

Are you sure about that?

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
To tell the truth the two anomalies in that list are Affleck's 1:1 and Depp's 600.02:1!!!! lol

This is a comparison I would put some more thought in to...

Posted by xdimplez
is this a ratio of body proportions and how they compare to angelina?

angelina is the only female out of the list of guys

I thought you already knew that?

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius

Posted by xdimplez
is this a ratio of body proportions and how they compare to angelina?

angelina is the only female out of the list of guys

I thought you already knew that?

click to expand

Wasn't she the one who said Angelina had a penis?

lol ^^

Has nothing to do with their bodies...

Posted by xdimplez
listen, i said a lot of things. doesn't mean you have to take it as the truth

dude one in god's name do her and affleck have a 1 to 1 relationship on

That shit is driving me insane

10 ratios

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
dude one in god's name do her and affleck have a 1 to 1 relationship on

That shit is driving me insane

Who says they do?

yes but the ratio thing would imply there is some way to sum up to 100% which there obvioulsy isn't there isn't even a even number those number sum to.

NO math needed to identify what the ratios relate to.

If the ratios referred to somethings of the same general shape...

Where do you live stoic? My Capricorn astrological neighbor.

If they're ratios, it would appear the largest is 600x the size of the smallest one...

I wonder what that might apply to...

That would seem to indicate the second largest is 1.51x the smallest...

jenny depp and jolie are both geminis and that's the 600.02:1

but affleck is leo... and they are the 1:1 hmm

Posted by StoicGoat
That would seem to indicate the second largest is 1.51x the smallest...

First off how? and I thought this had nothing to do with math not that I am opposed to math or anything 🙂

Posted by StoicGoat
That would seem to indicate the second largest is 1.51x the smallest...

As nearly as I can tell, I didn't engage in any math in making the quoted statement.

Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
jenny depp and jolie are both geminis and that's the 600.02:1

but affleck is leo... and they are the 1:1 hmm

I'm not entirely clear on your line of reasoning, but I like the general direction of your thought process.

So. They all have something in common.

- not the fact they're actor/acress
- Not their political views
- Their past jobs have nothing to do with it
- Their ancestry has nothing to do with it
- Anything related to what they've done has been dismissed
- It's something they share in common, always had and always will...

Is it something relating to what they've possessed at birth? If so where are the figures coming from? Jolie and Affleck share very little in terms of birth or physical attributes, their careers ANYTHING that I can conjure up...

The ratios are the key.

The second smallest is 1.51x larger than the smallest.
The third smallest is 2.13x larger than the smallest.
The fourth smallest is 2.96x larger than the smallest.
The fifth largest is 5.27x larger than the smallest.
The sixth largest is 21.61x larger than the smallest.
The seventh largest is 22.28x larger than the smallest.
The eighth largest is 52.28x larger than the smallest.
The ninth largest is 62.17x larger than the smallest.
The largest is 600.02x larger than the smallest.

What do these represent?

They are linked to specific individuals for a specific reason.

Posted by StoicGoat
They are linked to specific individuals for a specific reason.

So everyone of them is linked to Angelina Jolie and the connection can be quantified somehow through some mean. Affleck is 1:1 all the way up to Depp who sits at 600.02.

And this link is their similarity... I'm assuming.

Posted by aquasnoz

Posted by StoicGoat
They are linked to specific individuals for a specific reason.

So everyone of them is linked to Angelina Jolie and the connection can be quantified somehow through some mean. Affleck is 1:1 all the way up to Depp who sits at 600.02.

click to expand

I seem to recall stating that no math was required...

Posted by aquasnoz
And this link is their similarity... I'm assuming.

Similarity is an ok word, but I like commonality better. 'Tis a more accurate description.

Don't forget it is sorta a trick question

Well no it's not maths, it doesn't require working out but that RATIO must've been obtained through some mean because they were quite specific. But there in lies the problem seeing what's already been dismissed and if Astrology is the right way of thinking about it that means they must all share something similar in their chart.

yeah but here is my problem with the astrology snoz ....Johnny Depps 600.02 where have you seen that number in a chart ever?