StoicGoat
@StoicGoat
13 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 0 · Posts: 3217 · Topics: 32
DXP Survivor 2 Part V (Page 4)
You are on page out of 7 | Reverse Order
haha I must be a lazy ass if I haven't found this shit out already xD
The numbers are not dependent on the individuals with whom they are presently related.
do they represent recording megabytes lol
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
do they represent recording megabytes lol
Nope.
Look at the numbers.
In what form are the numbers presented?
I think it's a ratio TO something but that just made things more complicated for me 😛
Have you considered how many numbers there are?
And they do bear an uncanny resemblance to ratios 😉
Not that I can tell.
If they were ratios, I wonder what they would represent—
If they were ratios, I wonder what they would represent—
How many are there?
What can you think of to which these numbers might relate?
What can you think of to which these numbers might relate?
Posted by feb16aqua
There are 34 total on the left hand side
Wrong line of thought, Natalya 😛
Posted by feb16aqua
number of children, number of marriages, awards wonclick to expand
Ditto
Mmmmm...measurement...I wonder what could be measured that would end up with ratios that look like this...
There appear to be 10 of them. That could be an important piece of information...
I'm really going to give you an award on being cryptic stoic lol.
In my mind your question is similar to asking us "What shape is this"
- this shape has x sides
- how many sides would a triangle have
- it is not the number of sides
- what shape is makes doesn't matter.
etc
In my mind your question is similar to asking us "What shape is this"
- this shape has x sides
- how many sides would a triangle have
- it is not the number of sides
- what shape is makes doesn't matter.
etc
yeah well if it has anything to do with ratios fucking johnny depp has 600% increase on jolie
To tell the truth the two anomalies in that list are Affleck's 1:1 and Depp's 600.02:1!!!! lol
They're measurements of the same thing, of which weight isn't really a component. Accounting for weight would result in entirely different numbers.
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
yeah well if it has anything to do with ratios fucking johnny depp has 600% increase on jolie
Are you sure about that?
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
To tell the truth the two anomalies in that list are Affleck's 1:1 and Depp's 600.02:1!!!! lol
This is a comparison I would put some more thought in to...
Posted by xdimplez
is this a ratio of body proportions and how they compare to angelina?
angelina is the only female out of the list of guys
I thought you already knew that?
Posted by NotYourAverageAquariusPosted by xdimplez
is this a ratio of body proportions and how they compare to angelina?
angelina is the only female out of the list of guys
I thought you already knew that?click to expand
Wasn't she the one who said Angelina had a penis?
lol ^^
Has nothing to do with their bodies...
dude one in god's name do her and affleck have a 1 to 1 relationship on
That shit is driving me insane
That shit is driving me insane
10 ratios
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
dude one in god's name do her and affleck have a 1 to 1 relationship on
That shit is driving me insane
Who says they do?
yes but the ratio thing would imply there is some way to sum up to 100% which there obvioulsy isn't there isn't even a even number those number sum to.
NO math needed to identify what the ratios relate to.
If the ratios referred to somethings of the same general shape...
Where do you live stoic? My Capricorn astrological neighbor.
If they're ratios, it would appear the largest is 600x the size of the smallest one...
I wonder what that might apply to...
That would seem to indicate the second largest is 1.51x the smallest...
jenny depp and jolie are both geminis and that's the 600.02:1
but affleck is leo... and they are the 1:1 hmm
but affleck is leo... and they are the 1:1 hmm
Posted by StoicGoat
That would seem to indicate the second largest is 1.51x the smallest...
First off how? and I thought this had nothing to do with math not that I am opposed to math or anything 🙂
Posted by StoicGoat
That would seem to indicate the second largest is 1.51x the smallest...
As nearly as I can tell, I didn't engage in any math in making the quoted statement.
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
jenny depp and jolie are both geminis and that's the 600.02:1
but affleck is leo... and they are the 1:1 hmm
I'm not entirely clear on your line of reasoning, but I like the general direction of your thought process.
So. They all have something in common.
- not the fact they're actor/acress
- Not their political views
- Their past jobs have nothing to do with it
- Their ancestry has nothing to do with it
- Anything related to what they've done has been dismissed
- It's something they share in common, always had and always will...
Is it something relating to what they've possessed at birth? If so where are the figures coming from? Jolie and Affleck share very little in terms of birth or physical attributes, their careers ANYTHING that I can conjure up...
- not the fact they're actor/acress
- Not their political views
- Their past jobs have nothing to do with it
- Their ancestry has nothing to do with it
- Anything related to what they've done has been dismissed
- It's something they share in common, always had and always will...
Is it something relating to what they've possessed at birth? If so where are the figures coming from? Jolie and Affleck share very little in terms of birth or physical attributes, their careers ANYTHING that I can conjure up...
The ratios are the key.
The second smallest is 1.51x larger than the smallest.
The third smallest is 2.13x larger than the smallest.
The fourth smallest is 2.96x larger than the smallest.
The fifth largest is 5.27x larger than the smallest.
The sixth largest is 21.61x larger than the smallest.
The seventh largest is 22.28x larger than the smallest.
The eighth largest is 52.28x larger than the smallest.
The ninth largest is 62.17x larger than the smallest.
The largest is 600.02x larger than the smallest.
What do these represent?
The second smallest is 1.51x larger than the smallest.
The third smallest is 2.13x larger than the smallest.
The fourth smallest is 2.96x larger than the smallest.
The fifth largest is 5.27x larger than the smallest.
The sixth largest is 21.61x larger than the smallest.
The seventh largest is 22.28x larger than the smallest.
The eighth largest is 52.28x larger than the smallest.
The ninth largest is 62.17x larger than the smallest.
The largest is 600.02x larger than the smallest.
What do these represent?
They are linked to specific individuals for a specific reason.
Posted by StoicGoat
They are linked to specific individuals for a specific reason.
So everyone of them is linked to Angelina Jolie and the connection can be quantified somehow through some mean. Affleck is 1:1 all the way up to Depp who sits at 600.02.
And this link is their similarity... I'm assuming.
Posted by aquasnozPosted by StoicGoat
They are linked to specific individuals for a specific reason.
So everyone of them is linked to Angelina Jolie and the connection can be quantified somehow through some mean. Affleck is 1:1 all the way up to Depp who sits at 600.02.click to expand
I seem to recall stating that no math was required...
Posted by aquasnoz
And this link is their similarity... I'm assuming.
Similarity is an ok word, but I like commonality better. 'Tis a more accurate description.
Don't forget it is sorta a trick question
Well no it's not maths, it doesn't require working out but that RATIO must've been obtained through some mean because they were quite specific. But there in lies the problem seeing what's already been dismissed and if Astrology is the right way of thinking about it that means they must all share something similar in their chart.
yeah but here is my problem with the astrology snoz ....Johnny Depps 600.02 where have you seen that number in a chart ever?
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
We miss your miserable ass old buddy... You are not dead yet.... yes..? :P
:-) After decades of controversy, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new H.I.V. test on Tuesday that for the f
Discuss A federal judge ruled Friday that the morning-after pill, known by its brand name of Plan B, should be availa
Do you a)turn a blind eye to crime or b)report it? Why? Plus, do snitches really get stitches?
...let me count three ways. Top three things you personally look to gain from dxp:
Harry99 removed her g'bye thread because she didn't like being called out on her own racist attitudes (and projection on
Well, they make me scratch my head :D what part does sex play in the falling in love process? What makes LOVE some
or those who push their kids to partake in any kind of competitive enviroment ie. talent shows, etc. Do you think the
Mine was 'You have great blow job lips' WTF?
an article... During a recent radio show I had the pleasure of interviewing Psychologist Ernie Vecchio who told the
Did he delete? :(
Jahlia, I regret to inform the votes are in and you—re out. Remaining players: the topic of the current debate is b
Which one, and why?
CONSTRUCT A CELLULAR DEVICE APP. FOR REALZ.
Does it really hurt that much? I dont have a pet so I dont understand the attachment between a person & their pet(s),
Any thoughts on this? U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says North Korea's nuclear threats are not a game and that
I was originally going to post this on the pisces board, but I've gained some courage since then. Post the birth inf
Is there anybody else on here who shares my strong feeling for/interest in this era? As I was born in 1958 it was a bit
Has anyone in here heard of this thing called couch-surfing? I think it sounds like an excellent way of getting to meet
Not yet...