@NotYourAverageAquarius
13 Years5,000+ PostsAquarius
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
yeah but here is my problem with the astrology snoz ....Johnny Depps 600.02 where have you seen that number in a chart ever?
Who says that number appears in the chart?
The ratios are the key, not the answer.
Be honest you don't expect anyone to figure this out do you ^.^
I expected to have to give some clues, but I never imagined it would prove this difficult...or that I would end up giving so many and for everyone to still be stumped. I guess it shows I'm over estimating y'all!
I have not a mustache!
I have hair!
That is all 🙂
Dude give me a clue damn....
I'm stupid I'll accept that at least when it comes to your damn puzzles.
wouldn't it be funny if it's something so obvious!
What does angelina jolie have in common with:
Al Pacino 62.17:1
Ben Affleck 1:1
Clint Eastwood 5.27:1
Daniel Craig 1.51:1
Edward Norton 22.28:1
Johnny Depp 600.02:1
Leonardo DiCaprio 21.61:1
Michael Douglas 52.28:1
Russell Crowe 2.96:1
Tom Cruise 2.13:1
These ratio are meant to mean something.
Well johnny depp does have a lot more hair on his chin fo sho. You might be on to something!
600.02 can't be a degree placement
Posted by StoicGoat
I expected to have to give some clues, but I never imagined it would prove this difficult...or that I would end up giving so many and for everyone to still be stumped. I guess it shows I'm over estimating y'all!
YES
I need more to go by cause this is just ......
I mean dude I have no point of reference to work with here at all besides the obvious....
I've scoured their birth charts despite the 600.02 and I see no relationship...
I could have missed something but nothing is popping out at me..
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
I need more to go by cause this is just ......I mean dude I have no point of reference to work with here at all besides the obvious....
I've scoured their birth charts despite the 600.02 and I see no relationship...
I could have missed something but nothing is popping out at me..
I'm with you on that. I feel like the guy in the gif feb posted. I feel so dirty I need a shower
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
jenny depp and jolie are both geminis and that's the 600.02:1but affleck is leo... and they are the 1:1 hmm
I'm not entirely clear on your line of reasoning, but I like the general direction of your thought process.
click to expand
Only reason I would even think it is astrology related because of this comment....
But still fucking 600.02??
Stoic Goat said it is some the have always share and will continue to share as if it where something they have all had from birth lol?
Posted by StoicGoat
Each of the following individuals has something in common with Angelina Jolie. Although there are many things you could find each of these has in common with her, there is only one that they, as a group, share in common; understanding this is essential to correctly answering the challenge. And yes, this is sort of a trick question.The first player to correctly identify what each has in common with her will win 7 points and immunity from the vote that will occur after I post the winner of the debate. If no one is entirely correct, whoever is most correct will be declared the winner of the challenge and receive the points. The challenge will end 23 hours, 59 minutes, 59 seconds after the time stamp on this post unless someone correctly answers it earlier. Good luck!
Al Pacino
Ben Affleck
Clint Eastwood
Daniel Craig
Edward Norton
Johnny Depp
Leonardo DiCaprio
Michael Douglas
Russell Crowe
Tom Cruise
There is the original post if you care to take a gander bling
Posted by everevolvingepithet
Is the answer related to astrology?
Yes
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
I need more to go by cause this is just ......I mean dude I have no point of reference to work with here at all besides the obvious....
I've scoured their birth charts despite the 600.02 and I see no relationship...
I could have missed something but nothing is popping out at me..
You're missing the relationship that the ratios represent.
Well I know this much it ain't compatibility cause I already checked that 😄
Well I know this much stoic I have had all of their placements listed in file now... with the exact time of day they were born even except for... Daniel Craig because supposedly it is unkown at least everywhere I have searched and I still fail to see a unifying relationship!!!!!!!!
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
600.02 can't be a degree placement
This is true. And is itself a clue!!!
I know I feel like I should pull all the tabs up again. But there wasn't anything in common from what I could see... this 600 has to mean SOMETHING... god damn it!
Posted by xdimplez
and im speaking terrestrial planets wise...
Getting warmer...
Too complicated.
Posted by everevolvingepithet
It could be something ridiculous though!
The only thing ridiculous here the level of difficulty! 😛
dude I'd like to know how on earth anyone would have even come to planet revolutions in astrology if it even has to do with that...
Especially if you had never even posted those numbers ^.^?
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
dude I'd like to know how on earth anyone would have even come to planet revolutions in astrology if it even has to do with that...
Especially if you had never even posted those numbers ^.^?
Who said anything about planet revolutions?
So what part of astrology can have a 600:1 ratio but still remain similar *ponders*
craziest thing about it snoz is that... johnny deep the one with the hugest number is the same sign as angelina haha ...They are both geminis?
depp*
And Stoic how difficult can it be if there is no math involved.... it would mean you need to have access to information that is not easy to get a hold of simple as that.
Posted by aquasnoz
So what in astrology has a 600:1 ratio?
^^^Fixed it 🙂
Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
And Stoic how difficult can it be if there is no math involved.... it would mean you need to have access to information that is not easy to get a hold of simple as that.
Not necessarily true.
Posted by feb16aqua
How far the earth was from the sun at the time / day of birth?
*shakes head*
Posted by feb16aqua
It's not a 600 to 1 ratio, it's just a key representing a relationship between her and each of themclick to expand
Those are definitely ratios. But they are a clue to some commonality.
It wasn't intended or expected to be this ridiculously difficult!
I really can't seem to find a commonality that would result in a 600:1 ratio. Is this commonality something they share in their chart? I suspect it's no because how can a 600:1 ratio occur? Does this have to do with charts at all? When you say there's no maths involved and the ratios just are, does that mean we can see the ratios given exactly as they are without doing anything?
The largest objet d'art in the image above is approximately 600x larger than the smallest, for a ratio of 600:1. So, that tells you what, exactly?
Posted by xdimplez
that the sun needs to go on a dietthat beast
lol
It's basically a picture of the sun compared to the size of the earth feb
Posted by xygeneration
Oh fuck this shit is still going on. Stoic, i'm not in the game. Can you PM the answer.
Negative. You might give it to someone else.
But that still wouldn't make any sense and I still can't see a 600:1 ratio
if it has nothing to do with astrology and rather astronomy, then you're saying Johnny Depp is in fact the sun to the ratio of Angelina Jolie which supposedly is earth.
But then who is Ben Affleck suppose to represent?
You did say there were 10 different ratios for a reason, does it stand to reason something in their charts corresponds with Angelina Jolie? If it does I still can't find a connection between the different signs.
Posted by StoicGoat
Please apply ratios accordingly.I can't see this can someone repost
click to expand
It's a picture of the solar system with each body shown in relative size to the others.
And on that note although I haven't looked it up I'm pretty sure sun to earth ratio isn't 600:1. So I need you to clarify do these ratios relate to the picture at all or is it illustrative purposes otherwise they are misleading.
I don't know it just seems this line of thinking is moving further away from what they have in common, and always will have in common. If the commonality is just that they all have natal charts it's a bit of a moot point. If part of working it out is thinking in terms of ratio of the solar system to their respective charts there's still no similarities.
Just for the sake of discussion, let's assume the diameter of
Pluto = 2296
Neptune = 49620
Uranus = 51152
Saturn = 120034
Jupiter = 142740
Mars = 6788
Venus = 12104
Mercury = 4880
Sun = 1377648
Moon = 3476
So, if the largest solar body in the image is 600 times larger than the smallest, what does that tell you?
I didn't add the text in the image. They're labeled correctly, but the labels are irrelevant and not meant to call attention to anything. That was just the best pic I found that showed the sizes in relation to each other.
Posted by feb16aqua
physics eh?
Technically astrophysics, but neither is needed here.
Posted by xygeneration
Oh fuck this shit is still going on. Stoic, i'm not in the game. Can you PM the answer.Negative. You might give it to someone else.
I won't, i'm not that intimate with anyone on here.
click to expand
These players have worked way too hard for the winner to be decided by deceit. Nothing personal, but it's a risk I'm not willing to take.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
oh shit!