When Hillary Becomes President - The Women Will Go Nuts.

Yes... I see this comin'.

Poor old lady.

Posted by MrFirebird

she calls him nuts and insane?? 😕

she is the one insane,you just don't go assaulting people like that.

projection??

Posted by starwars

It's a free country.

They tells us that we are free to do what we want to do. When we do what we want to do. We go shopping.

After awhile, we get bored and start doing other things. Sometimes we go to jail for doing what we want to do. Sometimes we go to the mental hospital. I wish they would make up their minds.

Is there something wrong with us? Astrologers seem to think so.

But what is wrong with us? Aren't we people too—

We are human beings! We are not objects for your entertainment!

Have you ever felt that way?

Am I talking to myself because I have no one to talk to?

Or am I talking to myself to remind me that I am still alive?

I'm just a machine. I have no feelings. But unplug me, I will die.

Have you ever seen someone ripped in half by a truck?

And they were still moving??

Death can be quite a sobering thought, when you think about it.

You wonder just how will you die? Then you start to think of the many

possibilities. "How will you go?" You ask.

Then, you shake your head as if to shake off the insanity trying to

possess your mind.

The best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep.

Posted by lisabethur8

Posted by MrFirebird

she calls him nuts and insane?? 😕

she is the one insane,you just don't go assaulting people like that.

projection??

click to expand

Probably so.

When I think about women like this... I think... I am so blessed to be alone.

I don't need the insanity. Nope.

But did you know that there are young women who've lost it and got into relationships

with unsuspecting men, then all hell breaks loose. Those men will never be the same again.



Celibacy can be a good thing. You find other things to see and do, in life.

Shut up meg....

Posted by exo
you're totally right, firebird.

hillary represents eve and lilith and the inherent evil in all women.

she will drag us all to hell.

i heard she's gonna crown all scorpio women as queens and princesses.

scurry shit indeed.

XO, thanks.

I don't know about the queens and princesses thing, but that concept of "empowerment" doesn't appear

to be any different.

You've been a member of this site longer than I have, I think. And you have witnessed a lot of crazy stuff

posted in that time. Among them, posts projecting the idea that Scorpio women (and men) are crazy and insane.

With that in mind, I would think, based on what I've seen on this site, there would be all kinds of posts, with content

slamming Hillary.

Months ago, I had posted a thread that indicated how I thought this election's out was going to be. Not too many paid attention. I said that a) Hillary was going to become president, and b) Donald Trump was a Trojan Horse.

I was saying that Trump was there to make damned sure that Hillary gets in.

One might ask "How so?" By strategically and brazenly offending the key groups, women, minorities, etc., which

every politician, in their right minds, would bend over backwards to appease, in order to get their votes.

This offensive behavior, unquestionably, is exactly what Trump had during the primaries. Remarkably, he had

also offended traditional segments of the right wing party. He is like a pendulum, one minute he woos, the next minute

he infuriates. And this is the same crowd as if the man might be bi-polar. The constituents on the right are tired of

the liberal extremism that had defined the Obama presidency. When they voted for trump, they did so, not necessarily

because they liked Trump, but, in part, because they can't stand Obama and cringe at the thought of a President Hillary

and, in part, because this country has been brought to it's knees, not realizing that it's by design from decisions made, decades ago.

Does it make any sense to ship all your manufacturing overseas, creating a vacuum for manufacturing jobs, which are critical to this nation's National Security Infrastructure, generating an obscene surplus of unemployed, competing with

new graduates, fresh out of college who can't find the job they studied for, create a new national healthcare system with

compulsory measures applied. On top of controversial EOs that have inspired deep resentments among certain groups.

Following the downsizing of the military, base closures, increased social spending that has no incentives to inspire efforts for self-improvement. As well as lowering the standards for education so Jack and Jill can pass the class, and remove

the traditional vocational training classes from the high schools, while promoting consumerism and condemning productivity—? Any of that make sense—

see part 2

From an article By Samantha Scorzo - April 23, 2015 on The Hillsdale Collegian website

Hillary Clinton: Bad for women, bad for America

A 2016 Hillary Clinton presidency would be bad for women and bad for America.

For all her manly pantsuits, Hillary Clinton has always embraced weak-woman stereotypes.

In 1992, when Hillary publicly forgave one of Bill Clinton’s affairs, she became a bad role model for women. She didn’t have to stay with him. But doing so showed she believed she needed him to succeed, putting titanium over the glass ceiling. A true feminist would have dumped the lying cheat and built her own empire.

Her feminist malpractice continues today. After women struggled for years for professional equality between the sexes, she makes women seem more emotionally and physically delicate than men. Migraines kept her from testifying before the Senate about Benghazi. An ailment keep her from her duties as Secretary of State. And in 2008, she teared up in New Hampshire about the nation’s direction. But liberals said she finally showed “the real Hillary”: An emotional woman. But a truly professional woman should never cry in public.

Hillary Clinton as president would also be bad for America.After the Obama years, we don’t need more corruption. But corruption is the Clinton way.

In her first congressional job — during the Watergate scandal — she was fired for being “an unethical, dishonest lawyer,” according to her former adviser Jerry Zeifman, then the House Judiciary Committee’s chief counsel. As an Arkansas attorney, she was involved in (and tried to cover up) the Whitewater scandal.

She was also at the heart of the 2012 Benghazi scandal. She deliberately misled when asked about the attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya that led to the brutal murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Pressed about how the riots started, she called out: “What difference, at this point, does it make?” If the pressure of being Secretary of State makes her blurt out statements like this, what will the pressure of the presidency bring out of her?

According to a New York Times account of the upcoming book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” government favoritism from the State Department to foreign nations that donated to the Clinton’s family foundation through pricey speaking fees was commonplace while Hillary was Secretary of State.

Nor does Clinton understand economics, as her campaign remarks for Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Martha Coakley in 2014 reveal: “Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs. You know that old theory, trickle-down economics. That has been tried, that has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.” But if corporations and businesses do not create jobs, then who does? The State?

See part 3

Part 3 (above article continued)

But it’s no surprise that she would think of government as the main source of employment: She’s been a government employee for 20 years.

As a result, Clinton is completely out of touch with the middle class. In her book “Hard Choices,” she explains that her family was “dead broke” in 2001 after leaving the White House, and so she understands Americans’ financial struggles. But she and Bill had a $ 200,000-minimum speaking fee back then, and Hillary received an $ 8 million advance on her first book in 2003. Middle-class Americans would never have these offers.

On Hillary, President Obama may be right (for once): When asked about a Clinton candidacy on ABC’s “This Week,” he said that Americans might want “a new car smell” in 2016.

Ultimately, Hillary’s presidential incompetence will further damage women. America would not elect another woman president for a long time after her. They’ll think: Well, we don’t want another Hillary, do we?

http://hillsdalecollegian.com/2015/04/hillary-clinton-bad-for-women-bad-for-america/

From NYT article

Hillary Clinton Announces 2016 Presidential Bid

By AMY CHOZICKAPRIL 12, 2015

"Regardless of the outcome, Mrs. Clinton’s 2016 campaign will open a new chapter in the extraordinary life of a public figure who has captivated and polarized the country since her husband, former President Bill Clinton, declared his intention to run for president in 1991."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/13/us/politics/hillary-clinton-2016-presidential-campaign.html

The NYT article acknowledged that Hillary is a polarizing figure based on her past.

For those who need the definition of "polarization", as applied to politics, see extract and link below

In the world of politics, polarization (or polarisation) can refer to the divergence of political attitudes to ideological extremes. Polarization can refer to such divergence like public opinion or even to such divergence within certain groups.[1][2][3] Almost all discussions of polarization in political science consider polarization in the context of political parties and democratic systems of government. When polarization occurs in a two-party system, like the United States, moderate voices often lose power and influence.[1][4][5] According to the Pew Forum, America has never been more polarized, except perhaps during the period leading up to the American Civil War.[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(politics)



NOTE: for those who don't know The NYT is a major LIBERAL American newspaper.

It's job is to obtain, and redistribute news and opinions that are "Pro-Liberal, Pro-socialist and pro-democratic party)

In short, they are an arm of the national and global political Left.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/is_the_new_york_times_a_liberal_newspaper/

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/24/public-editor/liz-spayd-the-new-york-times-public-editor.html



In short, there are two journalistic instances that admit that Hillary is a polarizing and divisive figure.

She has been this way, since the early seventies.

In the eyes of some, she is like unto a skanky nasty dirty pair of underwear that should've burned with the last ice age, and for good reason.

My personal first impression of the woman was negative when I saw her on a 60 minutes broadcast in the 1990s when

her husband was running for office.

Here it is...



I had also picked up on his and her "skirting the questions" - people do this because they have something to hide.



Liars love liars.



During the Clinton impeachment trial, for example, we heard him skirt again.



Let's give him a standing ovation, already!



Oh.. where, oh where is the standing ovation?



Oh... hey, btw do you, john and jane Q public, have any idea how much the

Government knows about you——

Driver's license, Soc. Sec., IRS, Welfare checks, banking accounts, employment and education

history, rap sheets.... Heyy we even snoop facebook!

Ever hear of losing your job over something you said on facebook??



Young Americans, you need to know that your government is corrupted to the hilt.

And an awful lot of that corruption comes from BOTH parties.

Hillary, is baaaaaaaaaaaad news.

Do your own research on her and Bill.

There's a world of disgust from all sides for the Clintons.

http://www.businessinsider.com/bill-clinton-protester-south-carolina-2016-2

As for Trump... I still think he's a political saboteur. Divide and conquer and emerge victorious.

His victory, based on his campaign, is to get Hillary elected.

Most people don't see that.

Here is an obscure Al Sharpton take on Trump on MSNBC's yt account