Natal Charts: How realistic are they?

Example:

I'm a Pisces with Leo moon.

Pisces is non ego driven, while Leo is. A person cannot be both ego driven and non ego driven. What now?

I think those natal charts are stupid.

I like to think its all aspects..like of each persona..Me:Sagg sun Cancer moon, i just so happen to see a lot of dynamic SaGG in my persona cause i have it in like 4 planets

Though, it doesn't explain how a person should find the ballance. If moon sign defines emotions, then this sign also defines who the person is. Because emotions are who we are, and nothing else cannot claim our nature.

Then what the purporse does Sun sign and Ascendant have?

More than that, if they have any effect, then how can a Pisces Sun still become dominant while moon sign say contrary.

There is alot of confusion in that.

"From an astrological point of view, I think youre forgetting the planetary aspects and the planets in the houses."

This doesnt make things simplier. Every plant attends specific quality which has its own sign. Now, many of those qualities have very big similarities. For example: Mars sign defines your drive, while moon signs define your emotion. We are talking here about the same thing and how come they can be different and which one is true one?

Moon sign and other planetary positions are subliminal..with emotions and feeling and all that, sun and ascendant are positions that tend to be more visible from a physical perspective.

Then my assesment is right. I'm more between Scorpio and Pisces rather than Leo.

Then another problem arises.

If our moon sign is in Leo, then when I reach full emotional development, then I will like a Leo?

I'm sure that I will start like a Leo on my way to it.Right? Maybe at % 80 I will be mostly like one?

Am I?

Why that?

It's a normal situation for me.

Arent it for you too—