IF you cannot identify a tree

You are on page out of 2 | Reverse Order
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
. She knows how.
Posted by MrFirebird
Posted by robyn808
Parents should be able to choose what organizations they want their children to be involved in. And I believe a lot of benefit can come from these types of groups.

I was in Girl Scout Brownies for less than a week, when my dad decided to pull me out because one of our merit rewards was too take the troop to see the movie The Land Before Time, but he didn't think it was a fair, since I had already seen the movie, and wouldn't give me something else.

Now, that's I guess that's what you tell a 6 year old, but in reality the group didn't met the expectations that were based on his own experience, and saw no point in paying for and taking me to Girl Scouts so I can sit around and watch movies.

Later I joined Campfire, and the group leader mom was a joke. I think all she ever really did was make snacks and sit around while everyone talked about the babysitters club or some shit. At some point I got bored and went through the book they gave me and tried to earn as many badges as I could on my own. I also did my best to outsell those other bitches in candy sales. What? My dad also taught me the importance's of being competitive, or doing my very best.

That experience would have also totally sucked, except at the end of a year we got to go to a 5 day camp. Which was totally awesome because learned how to tan leather, identify trees and someone finally showed me how to make those knots.

But unfortunately most of my experience, I saw very few people taking the responsibility of leadership seriously. And if someone is motivated to do that, then I don't care who they fuck, as long as it's not the kids.




You learned how to identify a tree?
click to expand


Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by exoskeleton
i was a brownie too. all i learned was how to hustle cookies, play stella ella ola, and make shitty arts & crafts. 😛



That's terrible. I loved the browny and girl scout cookies but I haven't seen those girls come around in ages.
You know something.... there's a funny a play on words. "Boy Scouts" and "Girl Scouts" - you would think
in a normal society, boys would be scouting for girls and girls would be scouting for boys.
I mean... I was scouting for girls before I was old enough to join the boy scouts.
We'd play house and doctor. The girls and I had a lot of fun.
Never did click with the boy scouts. IMHO, I think it's a little weird - A bunch of boys and den mothers.
Because my step brother and I didn't get along with the other kids, my step-mother got kicked out of the boy scouts.
She was furious. I didn't care. My interests were entirely elsewhere in more advanced things.


Profile picture of lildol
lildol
@lildol
16 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 334 · Posts: 8771 · Topics: 323
Oh please, LIB, you made it clear in your thread that you were against them lifting the ban on homosexuals because of the risk of pedophilia. You went from lifting the ban directly into pedophilia! Yet everyone dismissed from the boy scouts or had charges against them for inappropriate behavior were heterosexuals. Just as those Catholic Priests and Sandusky! ALL heterosexual!!! It's rather funny that you tried to defend yourself in that thread while condemning homosexuals at the same time! Classic!
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by lildol
Hey PP, LIB want's to know if you like little boys.... in her mind you must as ALL homosexuals do!

*smh*




Lildol, a pedophile need not be gay or straight. A pedophile is any adult having sexual interests in kids.
Homosexuality is a perversion of sex, a male who happens to be homosexual sounds the alarm because a) homosexual (same gender) b) boys (same gender)
Also, parents raise their children differently from other parents. IF the mom and dad of one child raise their children
to behave a certain way, they are not going to want to place that child in situations they themselves feel uncomfortable
with. Likewise also, if another mom and dad want their child to exercise their homosexual tendencies, then that is their
choice, but neither should be placed in a position that requires them to compromise their own moral standards.

IMHO, all the kids should be able to have fun, regardless their sexual orientation, provided the activities they
engage in are gender/sex neutral activities. ie no sex at all. Archery, hunting, meat cleaning, lodge building, campfires,
canoeing fishing, nature exploration, arts and crafts, cooking, etc. There is nothing wrong with that.
What is wrong is when people decide to dictate the rules of an organization they are not a member of. Don't like what
you see? Start your own club! That's the way it was in the past, why is that so hard to fathom??

I may disagree with the life style but to punish a kid from enjoying gender neutral activities IS wrong.
But.... So too is trying to change people who do not want their kids exposed to that kind of behavior to
do what you want.
When shall it end?
Shall we allow men to use the ladies rooms and vice versa— SMH

Maybe we should demand Ladies room, Men's Rooms, Gay Men's rooms Les Woman's rooms.
This way all the genders will be able to feel "comfortable". SMH.




Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by robyn808
You seriously created a thread to question wither or not I misused a term?

I'm well aware that my grammar may often not on point??_ but if I am incorrect then so is;
* Arbor Foundation
* NBC News
* Butler University
* Texas Forest A&M Service
* Atlanta Journal Constitution

Or you can you can pick up a book;
* Techniques to Identify Trees — By Eric L. Taylor, Melanie Kirk, and Chyrel Mayfield
* How to Identify Trees in South America — By Braam Van Wyk, Piet Van Wyk
* Identifying Trees: An All-Season Guide to Eastern North America - By Michael D. Williams
* Collins how to Identify Trees — By Patrick Harding, Gill Tomblin
* How to identify trees on the Ashley National Forest, - by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Region.

So if none of these publishers felt the need to edit that phrase, then I don't see why I should. And if you still don't know, well there's an app for that.

NOW, BACK UP OFF MY VIRGO RISING!



...yeah, yeah.... yeah, yeah...

http://www.steinway.com/<BR> http://www.boesendorfer.com/<BR> http://bechstein.com/en/home-page.html<BR> http://www.martinguitar.com/<BR> http://www.guitarrasramirez.com/index.php<BR> http://www.fender.com/<BR> http://www2.gibson.com/Gibson.aspx<BR> http://www.warmoth.com/<BR> http://www.alliedlutherie.com/<BR> http://www.stickley.com/<BR> http://americanwoodworker.com/<BR> http://www.rockler.com/<BR> http://vintagemachinery.org/<BR> http://www.northfieldwoodworking.com/<BR> http://www.tannewitz.com/t_woodworking.asp http://www.scmgroupna.com/us/_home<BR> http://www.evans-trailers.com/trailers/logging/tandem-logging.aspx<BR> http://www.manac.us/logging-trailers.php<BR> http://www.cat.com/forestry<BR> http://www.tigercat.com/<BR> http://www.americanloggers.org/<BR>
Seriously, I did!
Would you believe they put a man on the moon? Man on the Mooooon??
Actually, Seriously, you pitched a fit over someone else's post.
Seriously......yeah, yeah.... yeah, yeah...
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by SatoriFierce
Posted by Let*It*Be
I guess if they can handle a shot gun, buck knife, the cold, bears, wild animals, skinning small animals, fishing, gutting fish, and not getting a hard on looking at my son bathe/shower I'd be ok with it. I mean really I am curious as to what Prince Pisces thoughts are on this. I cannot WAIT to discuss this with my male gay friends!!!



Being gay has nothing to do with child molestation. An openly gay guy is not going to molest your kid. The seeminlgy straight secret Pedo is, and he doesn't distinguish with gender as much as he does with age.

The simplest understanding of this, and a very correct understanding is to see that sexual abuse isn't about sexual orientation or sexual attraction. Unattractive people are often victims of sexual abuse and sexual violence. Sexual violence and abuse is about power, domination, and control. It's not about sexual attraction.

Fischer cites a study that says 86% of men who molest boys identify themselves as gay or bisexual with no breakdown of gay or bisexual perpetrators. The study Fischer references is strongly criticized by the consensus of experts in this field. The paper he's referencing is Erickson et al. (1988). Behavior patterns of child molesters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 77-86. The paper does claim in passing that 86% of molesters of boys identified as gay or bisexual, but the paper does not describe how this data was gathered, and how it ascertained the sexual orientation of these men.

"But wait!" You might begin. "If men molest boys aren't they necessarily gay?" The answer is no. Because , for one, sexual orientation isn't about behavior alone. For example, when Governor Jim McGreevy feigned heterosexuality most of his life and formed a heterosexual family, and presumably engaged in heterosexual behavior was he a heterosexual all of that time? Or was he simply a closeted gay man? Behavior isn't always consistent with sexual orientation and attraction.

Pedophiles are attracted, primarily, to children. The sex of those children matter less than that they are children. The sex of victim has more to do with access than sexual orientation.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/09/18/903178/-Gays-are-pedophiles-No-Here-s-the-proof#

click to expand
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
"Being gay has nothing to do with child molestation. An openly gay guy is not going to molest your kid."
"Fischer cites a study that says 86% of men who molest boys identify themselves as gay or bisexual with no breakdown of gay or bisexual perpetrators."

Satori, your citation explicitly says that 86% of men who molest boys id themselves as gay or bisexual.
Your assumption that an openly gay guy is not going to molest LIB's kid, is just that, an assumption.

I DO agree with the articles remarks that power and dominance are possible predictors.
So.... an openly gay man with a power/dominance fetish is possibly going to be more apt to commit the crime.

Homosexual is very simple to define - sexual relations between two men. Lesbians
(don't know why they need a different word) are also very simple to define - sexual relations between two women.
Bi-sexual is self explanatory.

IMHO, you all need to get it together and figure out what's going on out there.


North American Man Boy Love Association (be sure to click on their "Man/Boy Love Stories"
http://www.nambla.org/

MAJOR SMH!

Just a few more steps and there will be a NAWGA and NAWBA and NAMGA added to that list.
And people wonder what's wrong—??
Hellooooo —!?!?!?!!!!
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by robyn808
Posted by MrFirebird
^^^I can't leave it at that though...

I thought it sounded funny when you said you learned about trees in the Girl Scouts.
It sounded like you didn't know what a tree was until the Girl Scouts told you.

Hey Baby, Are you havin' fun—
🙂


That's cool, just as long as I'm not being ridiculed or insulted because of who does or doesn't associate with whom. So yeah, Camp Fire taught me how to identify different species tree. And it was kinda fun reliving those moments today.

I??ve never had an issue with LIB, the few times I??ve interacted with her it's been friendly and engaging on both sides. I always kind of liked the fact that we both took an interest in the same type of subjects. I can only assume that she's blocked me because who I choose to associate with or because I respectfully disagreed with something said by someone she she associates with.

And I hope that covers your question about why I felt the way I did about being blocked. If she feels the need for it then that tool is available for her to do so. But I will not take out time to write out a thoughtful response to a topic and be denied the opportunity to share it.
click to expand




My comments to follow -
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
^^^^
I think the reason you were blocked must have been something she found insulting that you had said either to her or to someone else. I don't think she goes out of her way to block people, just because they disagree with her, as doing so, would
be counter to what she has stated in the past. It's likely you have engaged in some sort mischief with her or someone else.
Understand this, she stands up for the underdog. IF you were being bashed by a group of individuals or personas,
she'd be there to defend you. However, if you are partaking in bashing someone as part of a clique of sympathizers to
an individual or a wayward cause, then, what happened to you should have been expected.
That's the kind of person she is. It's not about her. It's about demanding fairness and respect among ALL members.
I think there is a 7 day waiting period before she can unblock you. My advice to you is to think about whatever it was
you said in her thread to her or to someone else that might have been offensive to them and consider it long and hard.
Make the necessary changes, and move on. Then you might offer an apology to whomever that apology is due and she
may lift her block against you. In short, if you want to play nice, make an effort to do so. Play games, and it's curtains for you. You'll likely be blocked for good and that once friendly experience you had enjoyed which you told me about,
will be a thing of the past. It's YOUR choice.
Those are my thoughts, whether LIB agrees with them or not, that is her choice.


Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by SatoriFierce
I should say that the article I sited does say that abuse is about domination, power and control, and that's true.




I would honestly like to read the ORIGINAL study article from way back when, and read it for myself rather than
the filtered "Fischer citation".


IF a man regardless of his orientation is inclined to choose boys, then he has homosexual tendencies on top of his
pedophilia tendencies. Which comes first, Homo before Pedo or Pedo before Homo? Does it really matter? A crime
is still being committed!
Nevertheless, a man molesting a boy is either a Pedohomosexual or a Homopedophile.
Either way, because the victim is the same sex as the offender, "Homo" tendencies exist in both instances.
In contrast, a Man molesting girl scenario would be either Pedoheterosexual or a Heteropedophile
Then there is the bi-sexual element. That is, the offender is bi-sexual, perpetrating the crime on both genders.
Which is the prefix in the combined word, would have to do with the stronger psychological inclination.
That is the technical truth. The moral truth is that pedophilia is wrong. The fear is that homosexuals in
a boy's organization is relevant and valid. Heterosexual men are NOT expected to misbehave this way, Homosexuals are
suspected because they are the same gender and because the nature of their orientation conflicts with the natural
intent of their gender, which is to procreate with a woman. When people go down that road of perversion, we open the
doors to even greater instances of lewd conduct which conflict with the morals of those who choose NOT to go down
that road. It should also be pointed out that because of the age, young gay boys may find themselves bullied
more so than is the case at the present time while both, that age are experiencing the psychological roller coaster
of puberty. IMHO, that's adding fuel to an existing fire and somebody is gonna get hurt real bad. Just you wait
and see. Mark my word. It WILL happen. IMHO, this is can make the lives of many kids, homo or hetero, all the more complicated. That's on top of all the gender-neutral uncertainties that lie ahead along with drug and alcohol abuse, lack of jobs, etc. - I see bad news, ahead. - That's why I am against it.
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
At best, they should have a "Gay Scouts" division so those kids can do those same things without fear of being bullied.
I am against bi-les/homosexuality to the nth degree, but I recognize that even bi-les/homosexuals have universal feelings outside their sex orientation like the rest of us.

I feel the same way about the mentally disturbed - They should allowed to defend themselves just as much as anyone else. To say you cannot have a gun because you're nuts, but people who use them to commit the mass shootings were considered "sane" I mean.... what's wrong with that picture— That's a slippery slope geared to disarm everyone... IMHO.
Profile picture of lildol
lildol
@lildol
16 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 334 · Posts: 8771 · Topics: 323
Posted by MrFirebird
At best, they should have a "Gay Scouts" division so those kids can do those same things without fear of being bullied.
I am against bi-les/homosexuality to the nth degree, but I recognize that even bi-les/homosexuals have universal feelings outside their sex orientation like the rest of us.




A "gay scouts division"? Then you are ostracizing those boys by telling them they are somehow different and therefore cannot be part of the main stream. Such a division maintains the status quo. By allowing these boys to be part of their local troop (not some "special" one) encourages young (straight) boys/men to be accepting of differences while at the same time enabling the "gay boy" to feel comfortable with who he is. No one should have to fear bullying because of their differences; division based on differences continues to reinforce that one is not equal to the other and only serves to perpetuate stereotypes and prejudices.
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by lildol
Posted by MrFirebird
At best, they should have a "Gay Scouts" division so those kids can do those same things without fear of being bullied.
I am against bi-les/homosexuality to the nth degree, but I recognize that even bi-les/homosexuals have universal feelings outside their sex orientation like the rest of us.




A "gay scouts division"? Then you are ostracizing those boys by telling them they are somehow different and therefore cannot be part of the main stream. Such a division maintains the status quo. By allowing these boys to be part of their local troop (not some "special" one) encourages young (straight) boys/men to be accepting of differences while at the same time enabling the "gay boy" to feel comfortable with who he is. No one should have to fear bullying because of their differences; division based on differences continues to reinforce that one is not equal to the other and only serves to perpetuate stereotypes and prejudices.
click to expand




What part of Bullshit do you NOT understand—?

"We condemn sexual abuse and all forms of coercion. Freely-chosen relationships differ from unwanted sex. Present laws, which focus only on the age of the participants, ignore the quality of their relationships. We know that differences in age do not preclude mutual, loving interaction between persons. NAMBLA is strongly opposed to age-of-consent laws and all other restrictions which deny men and boys the full enjoyment of their bodies and control over their own lives."
http://www.nambla.org/welcome.html<BR>
NAMBLA is a GAY PEDOPHILE organization under the guise of homosexual liberation opposed to what— "age-of-consent laws"!!!



Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Hold IT!!!

Robyn808 and Purr I would like for the both of you to refrain from attacking each other any further in my thread.
It is obvious that the both of you are angry with each other - so.... my advice for the both you is a) get along
b) block each other until the flared-up passionate emotions subside. Remember, when emotions are running high bad
things are said and people get offended.

Because it is plain to see, I will say this to both of you, equally.
Purr has issues, Robyn808 has issues - the BOTH of you have issues.

I personally have NOTHING against either of you, but I must make it personal, now.
IF either or both you cannot honor my request I will have to block either or both of you for a minimum of 7 days.
It's NOT personal, I truly would rather see this mess between you two come to an end on positive terms.
If neither of you want that, I don't know what else to say than the foregone issued warning.

What's it going to be?



Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by lildol
@Robyn... Purr lives in her own little world. She seems to have this uncontrollable desire to stick her nose into things where it don't belong (as she has nothing but criticism to contribute), sees others as us less than worthy, and trolls threads based on her bigoted assumptions!



Lildol, you are being blocked from contributing any further to this thread. You talked about purr sticking "her nose
into things where it don't belong", yet you did just that, right now. That is called hypocrisy and that's not good.
On top of that, your remarks was inflammatory.
I am sure you will be able to read this message when you have logged out. I'll give you 7 days minimum to think about
what you wrote.
Profile picture of Scenic
Scenic
@Scenic
13 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 273 · Posts: 5457 · Topics: 33
No offense, firebird, but why is only lildol getting blocked? A few other inflammatory comments were made after your warning, not from her alone. I don't agree with what you're doing here, but you might as well make it fair.
Though, honestly, I think this thread is not going to get back on topic of its original purpose, so it would make more sense to just delete this thread rather than block everyone who decides to come in here with negative intentions. Pretty soon you're either going to have no one left to post on here, or a really one sided discussion. Both of which cases seem anti-productive.
Profile picture of rockyroadicecream
rockyroadicecream
@rockyroadicecream
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 1243 · Posts: 16617 · Topics: 170
Posted by Let*It*Be

Thank you FB 🙂 Well, Rocks came into my other thread, got vile (was it on purpose? don't know), and TCD dear, they are after you, and it got moved to the snake pit..so I had to temp. block you both as a result.
Take no offense to the temp. blocks please!! I wonder why Rocks sent me the pm's now too. Interesting. Regardless, this needs to be repeated.

In a 3 day period this small group of people, at their hardest attempts at bullying, who really CAN'T handle an opinion but their own, had several of my threads deleted, severeal moved and got me banned. So YES....you're BLOCKED, Deal with it, or not..I truly do not care. I thank you all for exposing yourselves for what it is. No fail there. No whining here 😉

..now, let's all ask ourselves who is *missing* again? Well, not really, but you know what I mean..






...is she referring to me? I was agreeing with her...

I so confused. :/
Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Posted by Scenic
No offense, firebird, but why is only lildol getting blocked? A few other inflammatory comments were made after your warning, not from her alone. I don't agree with what you're doing here, but you might as well make it fair.
Though, honestly, I think this thread is not going to get back on topic of its original purpose, so it would make more sense to just delete this thread rather than block everyone who decides to come in here with negative intentions. Pretty soon you're either going to have no one left to post on here, or a really one sided discussion. Both of which cases seem anti-productive.



You are absolutely right, BUT...., because you wanted to see fairness, I am going to block you, also, for 14 days, minumum.
14 days because BOTH robyn808 and Purr are 2 people, so 7 days minimum for purr and 7 days minimum for robyn.
That's being fair and... you truly ARE getting what you want. You should be smiling, right now.

I don't really want to do this to anybody. I am pretty used to one sided conversations, anyway as people choose to
take my posts way off topic and try to sabotage them with flame-warfare. Not interested in flame-wars, in the least.



Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Robyn and Purr have been blocked as well. So don't anyone think that I have been unfair.
I gave a warning and they both chose continue on.

I will make this statement:
IF Purr claims she was raped, then it doesn't matter whether she was drunk or not. She felt
that she was raped. Her persistence in trying to make her case here, on dxp, while not the best
venue, should NOT be taken lightly.

Contrary to Dazed's comments about this thread being "a flame". It was NOT a flame.

Dazed is just 26 years old. I am old enough to be his Daddy! I've been around this country
enough times, driving an eighteen wheeler, to places, hauling loads of all kinds, that would make most
all of your heads spin. Some, demanding responsibilities that include protecting the lives of a small
population. I AM NOT some dumb SCHMUCK, born yesterday, with his head up his ass!

I try to be nice to everyone but when there are concerted efforts to derail a thread, my thread or anyone
else's thread, something's got to be said.

LIB posted her thread, then it got trashed, only to be restarted, then, I just pulled out a simple remark,
made by robyn, that I found kinda funny in it's irony - a play on the english language if you will, then
started this thread. Dazed overlooked that fact. IF I were a homophobe, I would going around calling homosexuals
"FAGS and DIKES!" Not one time have I done that. PP is, to my understanding is a homosexual, Scorchedearth is a
lesbian.... as near as I had been able to determine. Yet I NEVER slammed them for their orientation.

Furthermore, I am a GRANDFATHER! My concerns about where this country's goin', where this world's goin' are legit.
I try to help when and where I can. I've had many ladies PM me since I joined this site. Some in dire situations,
others just to say "hi!". IF you don't like me, block me. Go for it! Knock yourself out! No skin off my nose.
Sheesh!


Profile picture of MrFirebird
MrFirebird
@MrFirebird
14 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 13 · Posts: 10188 · Topics: 699
Getting back on topic.

I personally thought about the "Gay Scout" division and what was said....

Here's a compromise:

Boy Scouts (continue all the traditions of the organization)
Girl Scouts (continue all the traditions of the organization)
Gay Scouts (LGBT - they learn BOTH things taught in the Boy and Girl scouts)

How about that— huh— Gay Scouts get a double portion.
They are no more divided than the Girl and Boy Scouts are divided.
What would be wrong with that??

How's that for a contribution from an accused "homophobe"—
Hell, If I were bigoted homophobe, I wouldn't even dream of trying to make life easier
for a segment of society I loathed.
Profile picture of Scenic
Scenic
@Scenic
13 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 273 · Posts: 5457 · Topics: 33
Posted by Purr
Posted by Scenic
Oh ok! Looks like Duncan was listening. : )



No, I just tried unblocking someone I have blocked and it wouldn't let me. The seven day rule still stands.
click to expand



I was referring to how it switched back to the old way of blocking, apparently, at least in that we can post on the thread of the person who blocked us, but they cannot see our posts. So, the only difference is that we don't have to create new threads to post our views, anymore. I don't really have an opinion on the 7 day block rule, but I'm assuming that we're still blocked by firebird for another 7 days. Or, for me, 14, apparently.
Profile picture of Scenic
Scenic
@Scenic
13 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 273 · Posts: 5457 · Topics: 33
Posted by Purr
Did you test it?


I think Dazed did. I'm honestly too lazy and I don't want to block anyone to find out, so I'll trust what the others are saying on this, at least.
The only other option is that duncan released us from the block, himself, but that wouldn't make much sense, since firebird would just block us again. So, I'm thinking it's the former option.
Profile picture of lildol
lildol
@lildol
16 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 334 · Posts: 8771 · Topics: 323
Robyn, you probably did/said nothing wrong nor attacked her (I can't imagine you would - I can imagine why, but not that you would 🙂)... she has a tendency to take things out of context and she's very quick to jump to conclusions.

But, that's just my opinion *shrugs*

I was going to add to that list, but why put it out there all at once? I can save it for another day 😄
Profile picture of Scenic
Scenic
@Scenic
13 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 273 · Posts: 5457 · Topics: 33
Firebird is not going to be happy when he sees these new pages with, what, one or two people replying to invisible people. Not to mention the disgust he may feel if he reads these comments while logged out. The arguing continues on this thread! Haha.

This is a good thing (new block), though, because it slightly takes away the power users may feel by blocking. Sure, you still can't see them, but they can keep posting on your thread. Less discrimination. But, that topic has been worn out, so I'll stop. Carry on!

Profile picture of rockyroadicecream
rockyroadicecream
@rockyroadicecream
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 1243 · Posts: 16617 · Topics: 170
Posted by rockyroadicecream
Posted by Let*It*Be

Thank you FB 🙂 Well, Rocks came into my other thread, got vile (was it on purpose? don't know), and TCD dear, they are after you, and it got moved to the snake pit..so I had to temp. block you both as a result.
Take no offense to the temp. blocks please!! I wonder why Rocks sent me the pm's now too. Interesting. Regardless, this needs to be repeated.

In a 3 day period this small group of people, at their hardest attempts at bullying, who really CAN'T handle an opinion but their own, had several of my threads deleted, severeal moved and got me banned. So YES....you're BLOCKED, Deal with it, or not..I truly do not care. I thank you all for exposing yourselves for what it is. No fail there. No whining here 😉

..now, let's all ask ourselves who is *missing* again? Well, not really, but you know what I mean..






...is she referring to me? I was agreeing with her...

I so confused. :/
click to expand




Excuse me, but I would like this addressed. I'm not sure if she's referring to me or not, but if she is, I want this addressed because I never sent her any PMs. Not recently, anyway. The last time I talked to her via PM was during everything with Nefer.

If it isn't referring to me, then nvm. Apologies for going off topic, but this comment was off topic to begin with. :/
First
Previous
Next
Last