
Silvuh
@Silvuh
9 Years500+ Posts
Comments: 1 · Posts: 630 · Topics: 22



Posted by tiziani
Yes I only use fixed star and progressed astrology.
It's simple and consistent even if flawed like everything else.
Once I knew stars, it was easier to be intuitive about planets. You can cut out a lot of superficial info at that point which is a time and thought saver.

Posted by Endless
I did, can't relate, I think I was a cancer or something, don't remember.
anyway, there's no way the actual position of some stars, thousands of light years away are influencing us lmao, heck even the light we see from them is all wrong, it takes so much time for their light to travel here, that those stars could pretty much be gone right now, we just haven't see it yet.
the sun is closer and makes some more sense.
my biggest problem with the tropical system is the seasons and the southern hemisphere, but that's another topic.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Only a lucky few have the privilege of keeping their dear sun sign identities in tact (Cancer, Taurus etc)
My question is, have you looked into your sidereal sign? Did you relate? Did you adapt your theories to coincide with sidereal's method/explanation of the zodiac? If not, why?
I've learned sidereal deals with progression, the position of the stars rather than the sun at your birth time, and that since our calendar system had been altered by the roman empire, we may actually be super far off regarding understanding our signs. This makes a lot of sense to me actually.
I'm personally crushed this system doesn't respect my Scorpiana aesthetic. I don't feel like a libra, i wouldn't have been surprised by a being a virgo, but lib? Interesting.
What are all yall's opinions regarding the sidereal v tropical debate?