GFY
@CancerOnTheCusp
12 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 433 · Posts: 8306 · Topics: 311
Charlie Kirk (Page 2)
You are on page out of 10 | Reverse Order
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
Posted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
Posted by Bluemoon86
If there is anything you could have done to save Charlieâs life, what would you have done?
Campaigned for stricter gun laws. No person under 25 should own a gun their brains are not fully developed.
I would also insist that all schools colleges and hospitals govt buildings etc be gun free zones.
Gun clubs of which the straight white man of 22 ( who is the suspect) and his entire republican registered family were avid members of need to be carefully monitered.
I dont believe normal citizens should be allowed to carry a gun around in public.
That is what I would have done to save the life of Charlie Kirk.
I have this only to say I condemn all gun violence.
I condemn the beliefs and incitement of Charlie kirk who I believe was a white supremacist and allegedly incited violence against minorities.
Perhaps this was a John Lennon type scenario. He disappointed an avid fan in some way.
Extremists encourage extreme fans.. . his base was young white males etc.
I think its likely the suspect stalked Kirk online. Possibly attended a few other events and perhaps felt rejected in some part by Kirk and his other fans ?
The suspect is a white straight man named Tyler Robertson who is 22. His father did the right thing and turned him in. His family allegedly are registered republicans. HIs father was ex law enforcement and now a minister of a christian church. They were all avid members of a gun club.
Of course innocent until proven guilty etc. All is alleged.
But if you ask what I would have done to save his life?
Security details should only be allowing these people to speak in gun free zones.
I would advocate for stricter gun control.
I would advise speakers to be polite and professional at all times to their fans. I would advise them to notice stalking behaviours etc soon and report them to the police. I would urge them to say things like ' I AM NOT YOUR LEADER' ' I AM NOT THE CHOSEN ONE' to discourage psychosis and a delusional following.
If your fans think you are god or a great leader etc. Its likely they are not right in the head. You want to weed people like that right out fast.
Stressing how normal you are and that the parasocial relationship you have while you respect it has boundaries etc... is important.
Stressing civility to your following and expressing to them how you would like them to behave etc. To you and others .
âCelebrating Charlie Kirkâs Deathâ - TMZ BUSTED As Fake Car Chase Excuse DOESNâT Add Up
Posted by Polyannanana
Can someone summarize who this guy was and what he did? I'm not american đ€Ș
He was a white supremacist.
He wanted to repeal the civil rights act of the 1960s.
He said Black Americans were happiest during slavery.
The death penalty
DIRECT QUOTE
"[The death penalty] should be public, should be quick, should be televised⊠I think at a certain age, itâs an initiation⊠At what age should you start to see public executions?"
Posted by Bluemoon86
I think this will help those of us who have empathy for the lives of others who are senselessly murdered for no logical reason.
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
https://x.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1580241307515383808
Charlie Kirk wouldn't have wanted my empathy or sympathy. Therefore I give it to him as a final act of defiance.
I empathize.
Isn't it Ironic?
Posted by Bluemoon86
.
The Jewish people believe that if you save one life, it is as if you have the world.
The man was an alleged anti semite.
His quotes on the Jewish community.
âJewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open-border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews and now itâs coming for Jews, and they're like, âWhat on Earth happened?â And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it.â
https://trt.global/world/article/c915eadce012
He became popular for antagonizing stupid people in a country like a USA - where gun laws are a joke - thus, shootings are a common thing. That's rather unwise (risky).
Who's next, Ben Shapiro? đ
Who's next, Ben Shapiro? đ
BTW I truly hope his kids and wife are being safe and sensible.
I truly hope this ends here and no more members of his family suffer. This has to stop its crazy.
Im a liberal saying this. I condemn all gun violence.
I truly hope this ends here and no more members of his family suffer. This has to stop its crazy.
Im a liberal saying this. I condemn all gun violence.
Charlie Kirk was NOT a racist. I have proof and I am proof.
https://x.com/TheDamaniFelder/status/1966655592296063478
Fun fact: right wing extremism has always been the leading cause of domestic terrorism in the US as reported by the DHS. But conservatives cried so hard about it they watered down the language to âDomestic Violent Extremistsâ or âRacially or Ethnically motivated violent extremistâ. Itâs still the same threat, just softer language.
Conservatives on Twitter love to argue âfind something within the past 10 years about right wing extremismâ. I canât ya cunt, the language was softened for you. The Feds are still talking about you, they just sanitized the reality so you can stay comfy in your delusion.
Conservatives on Twitter love to argue âfind something within the past 10 years about right wing extremismâ. I canât ya cunt, the language was softened for you. The Feds are still talking about you, they just sanitized the reality so you can stay comfy in your delusion.
Trying to be positive, but this is sick:
https://x.com/TheFreelyAshley/status/1966688779487342833
"I'm surprised you aren't getting rid of more people. Don't let it stop with him."
"Get rid of the whole family."
Woman calls for more assassinations, including executing Charlie Kirk's entire family.
I'm really horrified by what I'm seeing. Honestly. These people are sick in the head.
https://x.com/TheFreelyAshley/status/1966688779487342833
"I'm surprised you aren't getting rid of more people. Don't let it stop with him."
"Get rid of the whole family."
Woman calls for more assassinations, including executing Charlie Kirk's entire family.
I'm really horrified by what I'm seeing. Honestly. These people are sick in the head.
Posted by Textosmoon
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
Why don't you post the whole quote, you hack?
The irony is he wouldn't have, as you say, "mocked you for expressing SYMPATHY" if you bothered to read the entire quote. Another dumbass
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by Textosmoon
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
Why don't you post the whole quote, you hack?
The irony is he wouldn't have, as you say, "mocked you for expressing SYMPATHY" if you bothered to read the entire quote. Another dumbass
click to expand
People are going to cherry pick. If you can make Charlie Kirk a villain, it rationalizes his assassination.
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by Textosmoon
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
Why don't you post the whole quote, you hack?
The irony is he wouldn't have, as you say, "mocked you for expressing SYMPATHY" if you bothered to read the entire quote. Another dumbass
click to expand
Lmao thatâs not what he said either. He did say he preferred the word âsympathyâ but the rest on that photo is made up
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
Restoration of the Smith-Mundt Act would be a good thing, imho. It doesn't have to be this, but maybe this could be a catalyst:
https://www.change.org/p/enact-the-charlie-kirk-act-to-restore-media-accountability?source_location=search
Enact the Charlie Kirk Act to Restore Media Accountability
"I watched a powerful and influential man die in a public setting, surrounded by thousands of people who simply came to engage in a dialogue championing free speech, truth, and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. His life was taken, not from any wrongdoing of his own, but because of unfounded allegations perpetuated by mainstream media. These allegations lacked any substantial evidence, offering a stark reminder of the extent to which misinformation can endanger lives.
We find ourselves calling for the reimplementation of the Smith-Mundt Act, a pivotal legislative piece that safeguarded the American public from the manipulation and dissemination of false information. However, in this new era, it should be revitalized and renamed as the Charlie Kirk Act. This amended act will hold media outlets, radio stations, educators, and content creators accountable for the false narratives and erroneous information they spread deliberately or irresponsibly."
https://www.change.org/p/enact-the-charlie-kirk-act-to-restore-media-accountability?source_location=search
Enact the Charlie Kirk Act to Restore Media Accountability
"I watched a powerful and influential man die in a public setting, surrounded by thousands of people who simply came to engage in a dialogue championing free speech, truth, and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. His life was taken, not from any wrongdoing of his own, but because of unfounded allegations perpetuated by mainstream media. These allegations lacked any substantial evidence, offering a stark reminder of the extent to which misinformation can endanger lives.
We find ourselves calling for the reimplementation of the Smith-Mundt Act, a pivotal legislative piece that safeguarded the American public from the manipulation and dissemination of false information. However, in this new era, it should be revitalized and renamed as the Charlie Kirk Act. This amended act will hold media outlets, radio stations, educators, and content creators accountable for the false narratives and erroneous information they spread deliberately or irresponsibly."
âI can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that â it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.â
Calling people dumbass and then posting soemthing someoneâs mom made on Facebook
Calling people dumbass and then posting soemthing someoneâs mom made on Facebook
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Restoration of the Smith-Mundt Act would be a good thing, imho. It doesn't have to be this, but maybe this could be a catalyst:
https://www.change.org/p/enact-the-charlie-kirk-act-to-restore-media-accountability?source_location=search</a>
Enact the Charlie Kirk Act to Restore Media Accountability
"I watched a powerful and influential man die in a public setting, surrounded by thousands of people who simply came to engage in a dialogue championing free speech, truth, and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. His life was taken, not from any wrongdoing of his own, but because of unfounded allegations perpetuated by mainstream media. These allegations lacked any substantial evidence, offering a stark reminder of the extent to which misinformation can endanger lives.
We find ourselves calling for the reimplementation of the Smith-Mundt Act, a pivotal legislative piece that safeguarded the American public from the manipulation and dissemination of false information. However, in this new era, it should be revitalized and renamed as the Charlie Kirk Act. This amended act will hold media outlets, radio stations, educators, and content creators accountable for the false narratives and erroneous information they spread deliberately or irresponsibly."
You realize this would probably remove just about every creator that you like?
Posted by PilatesBodPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by Textosmoon
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
Why don't you post the whole quote, you hack?
The irony is he wouldn't have, as you say, "mocked you for expressing SYMPATHY" if you bothered to read the entire quote. Another dumbass
click to expand
Lmao thatâs not what he said either. He did say he preferred the word âsympathyâ but the rest on that photo is made upclick to expand
... and went on to explain how compassion is an even better term than sympathy. Same difference.
Do you see the difference between the actual quote and how the person above me was trying to pass it off as?
Posted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by PilatesBodPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by Textosmoon
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
Why don't you post the whole quote, you hack?
The irony is he wouldn't have, as you say, "mocked you for expressing SYMPATHY" if you bothered to read the entire quote. Another dumbass
click to expand
Lmao thatâs not what he said either. He did say he preferred the word âsympathyâ but the rest on that photo is made up
click to expand
... and went on to explain how compassion is an even better term than sympathy. Same difference.
Do you see the difference between the actual quote and how the person above me was trying to pass it off as?
click to expand
I mean it doesnât matter to me either way, Iâm not celebrating his death. I do think he is a casualty of divisive rhetoric but that doesnât mean I think he deserved it or that Iâm happy about it. Especially given how those of you who wack it to power and domination fantasies are about to act over it.
Posted by PilatesBod
âI can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that â it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.â
Calling people dumbass and then posting soemthing someoneâs mom made on Facebook
And he went on to elaborate on compassion aswell in a debate stemming from that quote. The meaning is literally the same, as oppose to what the asshat above was trying to pass it off as - which is the exact opposite. Do I even have to explain this?
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by PilatesBod
âI can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that â it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.â
Calling people dumbass and then posting soemthing someoneâs mom made on Facebook
And he went on to elaborate on compassion aswell in a debate stemming from that quote. The meaning is literally the same, as oppose to what the asshat above was trying to pass it off as - which is the exact opposite. Do I even have to explain this?
click to expand
Semantics I guess. I donât think he was a terrible person, I think he said what would appease his billionaire donors. Just like Candace Owenâs did before she jumped ship
Posted by PilatesBodPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by PilatesBod
âI can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that â it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.â
Calling people dumbass and then posting soemthing someoneâs mom made on Facebook
And he went on to elaborate on compassion aswell in a debate stemming from that quote. The meaning is literally the same, as oppose to what the asshat above was trying to pass it off as - which is the exact opposite. Do I even have to explain this?
click to expand
Semantics I guess. I donât think he was a terrible person, I think he said what would appease his billionaire donors. Just like Candace Owenâs did before she jumped shipclick to expand
Yeah bc money only speaks on the Right đ
Like you said, semantics đ
Posted mainly for starting at the 22 minute mark (the guy addressing some of the worst on network TV). I'm surprised they didn't try to cut to commercial. That guy spoke the truth:
And a very incisive statement in the comments: "They celebrated a man dying for his opinions, but they are upset they got fired for their opinions"
And a very incisive statement in the comments: "They celebrated a man dying for his opinions, but they are upset they got fired for their opinions"
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Watch Cenk Listen in Horror When Dave Rubin Plays Audio Proof of Past Charlie Kirk Comments
Damn! Dude got exposed and owned.
I made the bold move in life and left all lesbian social groups I was a part of. Iâm seeking a new tribe and think I found it in a Jewish Temple. Would need to keep going and see if it is my true tribe that aligns with my authenticity and soul.
click to expand
That is a bold step. You get any flack for doing that?
You've mentiioned your interest in Judaism a few times here. Hope you find what you're seeking.click to expand
Thank you ! âșïž
No, not really. I left the social groups like a thief in the night without too much drama and with my self-respect intact. I blocked some women on my phone from contacting me. One woman circumvented my blocks to 2 different numbers and changed her number to contact me. I changed my phone number, so no others can do it.
Itâs something that had to happen. The majority of people in one social group were so not aligned with the authenticity of my soul. Peace comes with a lot of goodbyes.
Iâm pretty sure @Textosmoon can be sued. Hey Erika⊠you might have a big fish in a small pond here.
Posted by TextosmoonPosted by Bluemoon86
If there is anything you could have done to save Charlieâs life, what would you have done?
Campaigned for stricter gun laws. No person under 25 should own a gun their brains are not fully developed.
I would also insist that all schools colleges and hospitals govt buildings etc be gun free zones.
Gun clubs of which the straight white man of 22 ( who is the suspect) and his entire republican registered family were avid members of need to be carefully monitered.
I dont believe normal citizens should be allowed to carry a gun around in public.
That is what I would have done to save the life of Charlie Kirk.
I have this only to say I condemn all gun violence.
I condemn the beliefs and incitement of Charlie kirk who I believe was a white supremacist and allegedly incited violence against minorities.
Perhaps this was a John Lennon type scenario. He disappointed an avid fan in some way.
Extremists encourage extreme fans.. . his base was young white males etc.
I think its likely the suspect stalked Kirk online. Possibly attended a few other events and perhaps felt rejected in some part by Kirk and his other fans ?
The suspect is a white straight man named Tyler Robertson who is 22. His father did the right thing and turned him in. His family allegedly are registered republicans. HIs father was ex law enforcement and now a minister of a christian church. They were all avid members of a gun club.
Of course innocent until proven guilty etc. All is alleged.
But if you ask what I would have done to save his life?
Security details should only be allowing these people to speak in gun free zones.
I would advocate for stricter gun control.
I would advise speakers to be polite and professional at all times to their fans. I would advise them to notice stalking behaviours etc soon and report them to the police. I would urge them to say things like ' I AM NOT YOUR LEADER' ' I AM NOT THE CHOSEN ONE' to discourage psychosis and a delusional following.
If your fans think you are god or a great leader etc. Its likely they are not right in the head. You want to weed people like that right out fast.
Stressing how normal you are and that the parasocial relationship you have while you respect it has boundaries etc... is important.
Stressing civility to your following and expressing to them how you would like them to behave etc. To you and others .click to expand
Chicago is a crime-ridden city that has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. It also has one of the highest homicide rates in America. Gun laws only prevent lawful abiding citizens from arming for self-defense. It does not prevent criminals from getting them if they want them.
The gun did not murder Charlie Kirk, an assassin did. Take away the gun and there are other weapons to use. Bow & Arrow, knife, and some have mobilized vehicles to be used as weapons. So what is your solution to those weapons? More weapon control?
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.click to expand
Go look at the clips posted in the Politicals thread recently. Then come back with your response.
Posted by TextosmoonPosted by Polyannanana
Can someone summarize who this guy was and what he did? I'm not american đ€Ș
He was a white supremacist.
He wanted to repeal the civil rights act of the 1960s.
He said Black Americans were happiest during slavery.
The death penalty
DIRECT QUOTE
"[The death penalty] should be public, should be quick, should be televised⊠I think at a certain age, itâs an initiation⊠At what age should you start to see public executions?"click to expand
Hey Erika!! Iâm fairly certain this is libel.
The legal threats are fucking hilarious
Posted by Textosmoon
BTW I truly hope his kids and wife are being safe and sensible.
I truly hope this ends here and no more members of his family suffer. This has to stop its crazy.
Im a liberal saying this. I condemn all gun violence.
When I said you were a hardcore Progressive before, you denied this but now tell us you are a âliberalâ. Youâre a Progressive.
Posted by Bluemoon86Posted by TextosmoonPosted by Polyannanana
Can someone summarize who this guy was and what he did? I'm not american đ€Ș
He was a white supremacist.
He wanted to repeal the civil rights act of the 1960s.
He said Black Americans were happiest during slavery.
The death penalty
DIRECT QUOTE
"[The death penalty] should be public, should be quick, should be televised⊠I think at a certain age, itâs an initiation⊠At what age should you start to see public executions?"
click to expand
Hey Erika!! Iâm fairly certain this is libel.click to expand
Are youâŠare you addressing his widow directly?
Posted by PilatesBodPosted by Bluemoon86Posted by TextosmoonPosted by Polyannanana
Can someone summarize who this guy was and what he did? I'm not american đ€Ș
He was a white supremacist.
He wanted to repeal the civil rights act of the 1960s.
He said Black Americans were happiest during slavery.
The death penalty
DIRECT QUOTE
"[The death penalty] should be public, should be quick, should be televised⊠I think at a certain age, itâs an initiation⊠At what age should you start to see public executions?"
click to expand
Hey Erika!! Iâm fairly certain this is libel.
click to expand
Are youâŠare you addressing his widow directly?click to expand
Mental illness
Posted by Polyannanana
Can someone summarize who this guy was and what he did? I'm not american đ€Ș
i think it would be better for you to watch some of his videos on YouTube and draw your own conclusions about him like i did.
asking already biased people for opinions is how you get indoctrinated :/ just sayinâ :/
Posted by TextosmoonPosted by Bluemoon86
I think this will help those of us who have empathy for the lives of others who are senselessly murdered for no logical reason.
Of course. I disavow his beliefs entirely I think he was a white supremacist.
But I have empathy this never should have happened. However Charlie Kirk would have hated me for empathizing with him and i am aware of that. He would mocked me for expressing sympathy over his death and I know that. He would have thought me weak for expressing empathy for him and I know that.
I quote
' "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made up new age term that does a lot of damage."
https://x.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1580241307515383808</a>
Charlie Kirk wouldn't have wanted my empathy or sympathy. Therefore I give it to him as a final act of defiance.
I empathize.
Isn't it Ironic?
White Supremacists do not like Jews, blacks, or any other minorities. Think Proud Boys. Think KKK.
Can you post anything like a video that supports your claims?
Charlie Kirk loved Jewish people and he loved Israel. And the Jewish people and Israel loved Charlie Kirk. He was a righteous Noahide.
Evidence-
His last message to Jewish students-
Posted by TextosmoonPosted by Bluemoon86
.
The Jewish people believe that if you save one life, it is as if you have the world.
The man was an alleged anti semite.
His quotes on the Jewish community.
âJewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open-border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews and now itâs coming for Jews, and they're like, âWhat on Earth happened?â And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it.â
https://trt.global/world/article/c915eadce012</a>click to expand
Charlie Kirk was a staunch Israel supporter, so it will be no surprise if these views motivated the murderer.
His last message to Jewish students-
@Canceronthecusp
The cardinal signs combining forces - namely the Aries, Cancers, and Libras could take over the world and have world domination ! đ
From the fixed signs, letâs bring the Leos with us.
Fuck the rest.
The cardinal signs combining forces - namely the Aries, Cancers, and Libras could take over the world and have world domination ! đ
From the fixed signs, letâs bring the Leos with us.
Fuck the rest.
Posted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.
click to expand
Go look at the clips posted in the Politicals thread recently. Then come back with your response.click to expand
I'm in this thread now. If you want to state your case stop being lazy. I'm not gonna chase your arguments for you
Furthermore idgaf what "they" said , it's some non argument you are driving that has nothing to do with anything at this point.
Case in point: every time a school shooting occurs you and everyone else (incl me) ASSUMES the shooter is a white incel and we're for most part right. So what sets this apart? Because it's the left that's in the hot seat "we shouldn't make assumptions before all the facts are out"
(and even when they are let's fish for straws and gaslight ourselves)
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.
click to expand
Go look at the clips posted in the Politicals thread recently. Then come back with your response.
click to expand
I'm in this thread now. If you want to state your case stop being lazy. I'm not gonna chase your arguments for you
Furthermore idgaf what "they" said , it's some non argument you are driving that has nothing to do with anything at this point.
Case in point: every time a school shooting occurs you and everyone else (incl me) ASSUMES the shooter is a white incel and we're for most part right. So what sets this apart? Because it's the left that's in the hot seat "we shouldn't make assumptions before all the facts are out"
(and even when they are let's fish for straws and gaslight ourselves)click to expand
LOL calling me lazy but I already provided evidence and you just won't go look. The difference is anyone can have their own personal opinion, POLITICIANS shouldn't be fucking claiming the other party owns the shooting and fucking saying that to the press when they don't know! How is this difficult for you?
Sidenote: Do you know about Groypers/Nick Fuentes?
Posted by Bluemoon86
@Canceronthecusp
The cardinal signs combining forces - namely the Aries, Cancers, and Libras could take over the world and have world domination ! đ
From the fixed signs, letâs bring the Leos with us.
Fuck the rest.
LOL. I have no interest in world domination. Just want to live life.
But if I indulge in a little astro fantasy...Charlie Kirk's death is a bit like unleashing Cardinal energy. AKA--someone ignores the warning of "don't push the big red candy button".
Posted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.
click to expand
Go look at the clips posted in the Politicals thread recently. Then come back with your response.
click to expand
I'm in this thread now. If you want to state your case stop being lazy. I'm not gonna chase your arguments for you
Furthermore idgaf what "they" said , it's some non argument you are driving that has nothing to do with anything at this point.
Case in point: every time a school shooting occurs you and everyone else (incl me) ASSUMES the shooter is a white incel and we're for most part right. So what sets this apart? Because it's the left that's in the hot seat "we shouldn't make assumptions before all the facts are out"
(and even when they are let's fish for straws and gaslight ourselves)
click to expand
LOL calling me lazy but I already provided evidence and you just won't go look. The difference is anyone can have their own personal opinion, POLITICIANS shouldn't be fucking claiming the other party owns the shooting and fucking saying that to the press when they don't know! How is this difficult for you?
Sidenote: Do you know about Groypers/Nick Fuentes?click to expand
I am assuming you are this outraged every time politicians assume it's an altrighter behind the trigger?
Bottom line is this is what lefties hae been doing in the mainstream media for well over a decade, incl politicians, and now's time to be outraged when it's perfectly normalized? We're beyond that
I am vaguely familiar with Groypers. You familiar with Antifa and their antics?
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.
click to expand
Go look at the clips posted in the Politicals thread recently. Then come back with your response.
click to expand
I'm in this thread now. If you want to state your case stop being lazy. I'm not gonna chase your arguments for you
Furthermore idgaf what "they" said , it's some non argument you are driving that has nothing to do with anything at this point.
Case in point: every time a school shooting occurs you and everyone else (incl me) ASSUMES the shooter is a white incel and we're for most part right. So what sets this apart? Because it's the left that's in the hot seat "we shouldn't make assumptions before all the facts are out"
(and even when they are let's fish for straws and gaslight ourselves)click to expand
Is that all it is? Lol. You just want the chance to say âgotchaâ because 9 times out of 10 itâs your side?
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by SoloPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by rotiPosted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Lol @ the left now desperately trying to make out the shooter to be a far right activist. Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls.
Also fun to see all the triggerhappy keyboard warriors on the left be cancelled. Let's have 10 or so more years of that which would correspond with the time frame of the libtard witch hunts.
But... but... "you did it to us, now we doing it to you", that's kindergarten rhetoric.
That's right, lefties. It is. You gonna play children's games let's play children's games. After 10 years let's resume civil discussions if you're ready for it. It's called restoring balance in the universe.
Werenât right wing grifters frothing at the prospect of the shooter being a Dem or even better, a minority so they could have their race war or at the very least capitalise off his martyrdom
But instead he got shot and killed in the whitest state in America, by a white guy from a Republican household?
His last two words were gang violence before being packed by a possible Mormon twink
click to expand
When you look up Deflection in the dictionary đ
click to expand
You canât gaslight me like your Asian mail order bride đ„°
click to expand
Ooh the libtard is starting with the personal attacks, the go-to tactic of someone who can't form arguments (the irony, considering the thread).
click to expand
So what do you think about republicans blaming democrats for it when they didn't even have a shooter? As long as you're willing to call them all the same stuff for that. "Kind of cements the idea that they have no principles, no shame and no balls."
click to expand
Could you rephrase the question, it doesn't make any sense. Are you talking about this shooting now or some other?
click to expand
This one. They immediately started saying that Democrats own this before the shooter was ever known.
click to expand
Divisive conservative rightwinger gets assassinated . Who do you think is the most likely candidate to hold that rifle?
If they were wrong, we could have an argument. But they weren't so what are we arguing here really?
click to expand
You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? You do also know that there's other right wing figures that didn't like Kirk or his movement, right?
click to expand
Wow we really grasping for straws here, aren't we? What other right-wing person is gonna conjure up enough hate to go through the inconvenience to assassinate a person who's just talking? Even a significant portion of the left respected Kirk , not for his stance but for his ability to inspire meaningful (rational) debates. Gimme a break
click to expand
You're not answering the questions. Gimme a break.
click to expand
Here goes gaslighting bc you have nothing to say. I did anwser your question (which was more a reflection than a question)
"You don't find it EXTREMELY inappropriate to just pin it on a side when you have no information? "
There was and is TONS of information already, if it smells tastes and looks like shit, it is shit?
Yeah maybe just MAYBE there's gonna be 1 piece of information that will OVERTURN everything they got on him so far. Talk about delusional.
What's next? Let me guess... he's really right-extremist who took one for the team in order to pin it on the left?
click to expand
As I said, they claimed that the Democrats owned the shooting BEFORE THEY HAD ANY REAL INFO ABOUT THE SHOOTER. And apparently you think that's responsible and reasonable when it's not in any way.
click to expand
Who is "they"? The news? Fox? NBC? The police? Trump? Keyboard warriors? Who?
Even the fucking left knew it was one of theirs.
click to expand
Go look at the clips posted in the Politicals thread recently. Then come back with your response.
click to expand
I'm in this thread now. If you want to state your case stop being lazy. I'm not gonna chase your arguments for you
Furthermore idgaf what "they" said , it's some non argument you are driving that has nothing to do with anything at this point.
Case in point: every time a school shooting occurs you and everyone else (incl me) ASSUMES the shooter is a white incel and we're for most part right. So what sets this apart? Because it's the left that's in the hot seat "we shouldn't make assumptions before all the facts are out"
(and even when they are let's fish for straws and gaslight ourselves)
click to expand
LOL calling me lazy but I already provided evidence and you just won't go look. The difference is anyone can have their own personal opinion, POLITICIANS shouldn't be fucking claiming the other party owns the shooting and fucking saying that to the press when they don't know! How is this difficult for you?
Sidenote: Do you know about Groypers/Nick Fuentes?
click to expand
I am assuming you are this outraged every time politicians assume it's an altrighter behind the trigger?
Bottom line is this is what lefties hae been doing in the mainstream media for well over a decade, incl politicians, and now's time to be outraged when it's perfectly normalized? We're beyond that
I am vaguely familiar with Groypers. You familiar with Antifa and their antics?click to expand
ANY TIME THAT POLITICIANS ASSUME THAT PUBLICLY WITHOUT ANY INFO IS BAD.
Now say the same AND prove your claim that they've been doing that. You should be able to find me one.
I remember hearing about antifa like a decade ago. Maybe look a little into the Groypers/Nick Fuentes and their relationship with Kirk (not saying they did it or didn't, but you seem to assume that other right wingers can't dislike other ones). Look into the memes that were written on the casings.
I havenât heard about antifa since BLM. I would take some current resources if anyone has some.
The democratic party is truly fucked after this one. It doesn't even matter who the shooter aligned with, if any. There are so many layers to this I would hate to publicy admit to having any left leaning opinions at this point. I've seen probably about a hundred videos on FB of people from the left not only leaving that side, but some actually aligning with the right based of a few things. First thing is how pathetic and disgusting the people who thought the situation was funny are. Yea, bad look guys. You really should have took control of your people and made them chill out. Second is Christianity. That aspect alone had practically killed the left in one hit. Lastly, a man was murdered in front of thousands for simply practicing our first amendment right. In front of his kids, wife, and thousands of other people. You think that is funny?
Not only did your social media trash create thousands of Charlie's over night, but you also lost the only morally sane people you had left on your side. Leaving only the lowest of the low. Now we know who the bad ones are. You played yourself you ignorant fucks. Its not going to silence anything. Its going to make people even louder, and even worse. Even if someone far left didnt kill him, you literally made a martyr out of someone you hate via social media, and thousands if not millions of people are going to now make everything 100 times worse for you, and you think that is funny? How retarded can a person get?
Lastly I want to say its kind of crazy conservatives aren't burning down cities, local family owned businesses, aren't burning cars, or attacking police and other innocent people, aren't starting riots, and aren't trying to close down busy roadways. I wonder why that is đ€
Not only did your social media trash create thousands of Charlie's over night, but you also lost the only morally sane people you had left on your side. Leaving only the lowest of the low. Now we know who the bad ones are. You played yourself you ignorant fucks. Its not going to silence anything. Its going to make people even louder, and even worse. Even if someone far left didnt kill him, you literally made a martyr out of someone you hate via social media, and thousands if not millions of people are going to now make everything 100 times worse for you, and you think that is funny? How retarded can a person get?
Lastly I want to say its kind of crazy conservatives aren't burning down cities, local family owned businesses, aren't burning cars, or attacking police and other innocent people, aren't starting riots, and aren't trying to close down busy roadways. I wonder why that is đ€
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account âRelated Topics
Assign one option to each person please: -tom brady -ryan reynolds -danny
@HereforTaurusAgain
Joined: Aug 11, 2025 · Topics: 23 · Posts: 209
D Smoke (winner of Rhythm & Flow)
The Weeknd
Which celebrity would you most like to be trapped alone with in an elevator for a few hours if you could choose? For me
don't know which forum to put this in, so i figure celebrities is ok. [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/2lnfs0n.jpg[/IMG]
Eliza Dushku Kelly Rowland Lexa Doig Kristen Kreuk Eva Mendes
UPDATE: A leader in the Iowa state legislature told me this morning that the state will impose a $ 1M/day fine on @JohnsonCountyIA
for not complying with the Governor's order to lower flags to half-staff for Charlie Kirk.