suits

Since you are associated with a an organisationinterested with
liberty and free market some cases are being send toyou.
You might find them interesting to report afterinvestigating them
Please send your feedback to
ABC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE AT WASHINGTON
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONSuit No. of 2000(Two Thousand)
KAPIL KHANNA, of Bombay,

.............Plaintiffversus_________________, Intelligence officer
Mumbai, India

...............Defendant
THE PLAINTIFF ABOVENAMED STATES AS FOLLOWS:
3) That the plaintiff has reason to believe that the
Plaintiff had acquired U.S. Citizenship on or about in the year 1994.
4) That the Plaintiff has reason to believe that he
was appointed as a diplomat on or around March 1999
for which there is no evidence whatsoever at hisdisposal.
5) That on the same belief as mentioned in point (3)
and (4) above, the Plaintiff is filing this suit against unidentified
defendants. If any of the above beliefs
are true the suit may be admitted, otherwise thesuit may be dismissed
specifying the point wise reasons for thedismissal being true or erratic.
6) The Plaintiff alleges that the defendant is without
sufficient cause illegally generating sounds
resulting to hammering around the Plaintiff's vicinity
under the pretext of workmen working since the past
four years thus mentally harassing the Plaintiff. The
Plaintiff further alleges that this is criminal
conspiracy on the part of the defendant along with Dr.
S.L. Khanna to drive the Plaintiff insane. The
Plaintiff further alleges that such illegal hammering
continues during odd times of the day and night wherethere is no possibility
that any workmen are working. The Plaintiff
alleges that such hammering continues wherever the
Plaintiff moves in his residential house as mentioned
above such as living room, bedroom, bathroom and
toilet. The Plaintiff further alleges that such
hammering takes place when the Plaintiff makes any
statement or does anything within the bounds of
privileged communication and the Plaintiff's privacy
against the Indian Government and Indian People.
7) The Plaintiff would also like to bring to the
notice of this hon'ble court that
the defendants are also guilty of violating all
privacy laws and Federal eavesdropping law, therefore
criminal action should be initiated against thedefendants.
8) The Plaintiff further alleges that such hammering
continues everyday, therefore until the defendants
are identified and appropriate civil and criminal
proceedings initiated against the Defendants, the
Plaintiff has no choice but to file such a suit
everyday until the hammering of this nature
discontinues for the simple reason that there might be
as many defendants as there are days, in fact there
can be more than one defendant in a single day.
9)The Plaintiff prays that this and all other suits
filed may be treated as forma pauperis if necessary
and the costs of the courts recovered from theproceeds
of the attachments or other source.
10)For the purposes of court fees and jurisdiction the
Plaintiff values this suit at 1 Billion US Dollars
11) That the Plaintiff therefore prays:
1) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to order and
decree the defendants to pay to the Plaintiffa) costs for causing delay.
b) Exemplary damages 150 Million US Dollars.
c) General damages 200 Million US Dollars.
d) Special damages 200 Million US Dollars.
e) Consequential damages 200 Million US Dollars.
f) Damages due to emotional shock and