
caligula
@caligula
15 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 1 · Posts: 4994 · Topics: 99
















Posted by Chance11
it means you have to play by 'tubby rules' of engagement or she get mad..or feigns mock outrage 🙂

Posted by Chance11
we were talking about jesus..not where you come from..you're not that important 😛
the huns can be cross referenced historically..so that's irrelevant
stonehenge and mesopotamia have physicality that's hard to deny
i didn't say dna evidence is needed..i didn't say what i believe. i stated a few facts on evidence of jesus. bits of nothing is what you do with irrelevant smokescreens on huns, dinosaurs, lucy, stonehenge..try to maintain some coherency instead of misdirecting and rambling..someone might be able to take you seriously 🙂(love ya tubbs)

Posted by caligula
who created stone henge?
blockquote>
stone henge is shit. drove past like a hundred times and had a few cheeky fags in between the stones.

Posted by caligulaPosted by AAPosted by caligula
who created stone henge?
stone henge is shit. drove past like a hundred times and had a few cheeky fags in between the stones.click to expand
HA! 🙂


Posted by Chance11
here's something tubby sent me of her..to educate me better on jesus..thanks tubby!



Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
I think some people read the Bible with the perception that the text is "other worldly." If I were to say to you, "King Tut," I think there's an inherent acceptance that a young man lived, ruled and was murdered with that name in Egypt at some point in history. In other words, he was real. But what do people picture when I say, "King David" or "Moses?" Do they consider these to be real people or fictional characters from what is supposed to be a factual account of human existence?
So that brings me to Jesus. Really Mary and Joseph. If you regard Jesus' "parents" as people, the whole story is bullshit. In normal people world it would go something like this...