Did the NY Times just admit — and defend — Obama’s spying on Trump? (USA)

Looks like a new attorney general and his promise to investigate the origins of the Trump/Russia probe has the Deep State actors spooked. And well they should be.

It's long been suspected that the New York Times and the Washington Post are the mouthpieces for the Deep State.

The NYT is being used to "get out in front" of what the bad actors know is about to come out:

https://nypost.com/2019/05/04/did-the-ny-times-just-admit-and-defend-obamas-spying-on-trump/

"In response, the Times essentially admitted it was true, but protected the operation with the ridiculous assertions that “No evidence has emerged that the informant acted improperly” and that the FBI used informants only because agents were “leery of disrupting the presidential campaign again” after the Hillary Clinton e-mail probe.

In other words, they sent a secret informant for Trump’s own good. This is the same FBI that wrote a letter clearing Clinton before she was interviewed."

So Trump was right about being spied upon, and the lying fuckers in the media and primarily Democrat politicians went happily along with "the narrative".

This also explains the caterwauling in the House by Nadler, Schiff, and the other scum re: the attorney general--they know what's coming.