SilentTempest
@SilentTempest
12 Years
Comments: 0 · Posts: 71 · Topics: 1
The truth about water signs (Page 8)
You are on page out of 9 | Reverse Order
I'm having fun reading through some of these. I guess it's true....we do like soap operas! :p
Now to whip out the porn....bow chicka wow! Gotta represent, yo!
Now to whip out the porn....bow chicka wow! Gotta represent, yo!
I don't like ACTUAL soap operas. Spare me the drivel and lame plot twists! But watching this train wreck and helping it on its way has been nothing short of top fodder fare of the deliciously amusing kind. Now to drag Squishy back out of his shell and his rock he's hiding under so we can have more fun.
And so you see, world, in the end, the water signs pulled down even the OP into the depths of the sea. THey didn't remain objective with him, they went personal to bring them down to their level. THey ignored his message, accused him of something he isn't, put labels and strongholds on him. THe OP refuted everything they did, was doing, and ever would do, but yet they persisted. More water flooded the thread until the thread drowned.
If you can read this message, at least you now know the truth about water signs.
THE END.
~Releases bubbles while drowning into the depths of the sea~
If you can read this message, at least you now know the truth about water signs.
THE END.
~Releases bubbles while drowning into the depths of the sea~
Posted by MoonArtist
I'm having fun reading through some of these. I guess it's true....we do like soap operas! :p
Now to whip out the porn....bow chicka wow! Gotta represent, yo!
Lol
the french style !
Posted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtist
I'm the party crasher, Squishy. Wasn't invited and am not playing by anyone's rules but my own. ~shoves Squishy in the pool~ HA!! So there!
Do you have issues with submitting to a man?
Yes, I do, as submitting suggests being less than equal. IF there is pure trust and open communication with the right person THEN there is submitting to each other. I won't settle for anything less than the very high bar I've set, and that's nothing less than a soulmate.
Now that you're out of the pool and all comfy....~push and splash~ That really shouldn't be as satisfying as it is.click to expand
Eeeennttt! Wrong. Submission shows that you have enough strength to bare under someone elses leadership. WHen you don't have that confidence and strength, you'll see submission as a matter of being less than. This is where a lot of women fail. Women are infact greater than men. They life longer, they endure child birth, they are less criminally active, they do more benevolent things. THats why its your job and your role (I know you don't like that) to prove your strength by submitting to the wild man. Otherwise, your "Strength" and "equalness" really doesn't serve much purpose otherwise, because wHen a man doesn't have a powerful woman submitting to him, all of his raw anamilistic energy becomes the very destruction you all so desperately try to aviod. Just look at moon man. Submission is necessary for the survival of a healthy society. Otherwise, your "divaness" is truly of no effect, and infact a cause to societal detriment.
But hey, I'm soupposed to be gone so. consider that a bonus side note.
~resumes drowning~
Posted by xMoonMan
Just a little snapshot of a few of SunScorpio's travels.....by the way, SunScorpio is actually a Cancerian.
Posted by SunScorpio
The only reason i'm "here" is because I have been conjured up here. I don't hang around this forum, I've only ever posted in this thread. WHen this thread was dead, I was gone. I have to actively not be here. Otherwise, my silence is taken as an acceptence to the labels you wonderful watersigns keep trying to place on me.
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/gemini/gemini-girls-3266910/#3267282<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/cancers-lets-just-try-this-here-3087804/#3087805<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/brag-about-wtf-ever-thread-3093826/#3093873<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/situational-emotional-expression-3252388/#3252389<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/cancer-men-who-should-dominate-in-bed-2524693/#2526409<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/the-dance-to-gaining-a-cancers-trust-2512289/?p=4#2526806<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/super-cancer-males-2481109/#2481324<BR>
this one's a classic, it where you admit to being a Cancer man...*chuckle*
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/taurus/cowardly-cancers-and-aggressive-bulls-2215906/?p=6#2347803<BR>
This is where you're posing as a Scorpio, who is a Cancer, who is posting as if a Scorpio, it's gold!
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/scorpio/what-scorpios-should-know-about-others-2008026/#2008027<BR>
But wait, there's more...
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/i-just-hooked-up-with-the-most-beautiful-cancer-w-2079632/#2079633<BR>
Here's SunScorpio, who's really a Cancer...but not a Cancer, educating the Scorpios on their own board.
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/scorpio/why-dont-scorp-help-other-scorp-open-heart-sesion-1990341/#1990342<BR><div class="bqfade">click to expand
Busted! Nice work.
Sorry, but SunScorpio relinquished his claims to being a Cancer long ago.
What a pathetic individual.
Why do I get a feeling you guys like this shit!
I'm starting to think Cancers love to start and keep drama going.
Carry on............
I'm starting to think Cancers love to start and keep drama going.
Carry on............
..as they kept trying to bring him down
Busted? Haha, you guys act like I'm putting effert to keep secrets from you. You all aren't hardly that important to me, but apparently I'm important enough to you guys that you have to do research on me. Awww. You've labeled me some of everything and every sign. I refute each one. I'm a solitary man among imaginary symbols. You're the one "BUSTED" for falling into the very cariacture I predicted you would as a water sign.
And now, you can thank me for making it very clear exactly who the "pathetic individual" is here. And you're welcome.
Any time.
Busted? Haha, you guys act like I'm putting effert to keep secrets from you. You all aren't hardly that important to me, but apparently I'm important enough to you guys that you have to do research on me. Awww. You've labeled me some of everything and every sign. I refute each one. I'm a solitary man among imaginary symbols. You're the one "BUSTED" for falling into the very cariacture I predicted you would as a water sign.
And now, you can thank me for making it very clear exactly who the "pathetic individual" is here. And you're welcome.
Any time.
Sun(NOT)Scorpio, SHUT THE FUCK UP!!
Posted by lisabethur8Posted by MoonArtist
I'm having fun reading through some of these. I guess it's true....we do like soap operas! :p
Now to whip out the porn....bow chicka wow! Gotta represent, yo!
Lol
the french style !
OMG, I love it! Too funny!
Posted by LunarMaiden
Sun(NOT)Scorpio, SHUT THE FUCK UP!!
you lead the way.
I'm waiting on you.
Show me how to do it.
Posted by SunScorpio
And so you see, world, in the end, the water signs pulled down even the OP into the depths of the sea. THey didn't remain objective with him, they went personal to bring them down to their level. THey ignored his message, accused him of something he isn't, put labels and strongholds on him. THe OP refuted everything they did, was doing, and ever would do, but yet they persisted. More water flooded the thread until the thread drowned.
If you can read this message, at least you now know the truth about water signs.
THE END.
~Releases bubbles while drowning into the depths of the sea~
You can't drown, Squishy! You're a water baby, Baby! Just go with the flow, yo! Find your jive and dive, man!
How are anyof you going to come in my thread to stop me. YOu don't see me in any of your sorry threads. Go on some where with that. I'm going to talk as much as I want. Its YOU who should shut up, and leave. I didn't accept nor invite any of you personally so get your personally unwarranted attitude and stay out my thread. All of the unwanted examples are the main ones posting in here. Don't you all understand by now, that this thread has already served its purpose, and by being here just futher fuels my point? This is a no win situation for you all, but yet you keep trying. This thread doesn't want you.
So since you're not going to talk about the topic.....
You shut up.
So since you're not going to talk about the topic.....
You shut up.
Oh and by the way, should this thread go the way of the grave. Thats ok. But if I hear my name used around this site, there I shall arise in the midst of you, stopping your trivial pursuit.
Posted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtist
I'm the party crasher, Squishy. Wasn't invited and am not playing by anyone's rules but my own. ~shoves Squishy in the pool~ HA!! So there!
Do you have issues with submitting to a man?
Yes, I do, as submitting suggests being less than equal. IF there is pure trust and open communication with the right person THEN there is submitting to each other. I won't settle for anything less than the very high bar I've set, and that's nothing less than a soulmate.
Now that you're out of the pool and all comfy....~push and splash~ That really shouldn't be as satisfying as it is.
Eeeennttt! Wrong. Submission shows that you have enough strength to bare under someone elses leadership. WHen you don't have that confidence and strength, you'll see submission as a matter of being less than. This is where a lot of women fail. Women are infact greater than men. They life longer, they endure child birth, they are less criminally active, they do more benevolent things. THats why its your job and your role (I know you don't like that) to prove your strength by submitting to the wild man. Otherwise, your "Strength" and "equalness" really doesn't serve much purpose otherwise, because wHen a man doesn't have a powerful woman submitting to him, all of his raw anamilistic energy becomes the very destruction you all so desperately try to aviod. Just look at moon man. Submission is necessary for the survival of a healthy society. Otherwise, your "divaness" is truly of no effect, and infact a cause to societal detriment.
But hey, I'm soupposed to be gone so. consider that a bonus side note.
~resumes drowning~click to expand
Here's the problem with that, and I should know, because I married someone I outclassed on every level and who never did evolve, and a damn Taurus at that! The problem is if one marries someone who hasn't learned to stand on their own and to control themselves then they can never be an equal part of a partnership. Misunderstandings, resentment, abuse follow. So, I will only submit and join in a partnership with someone able and willing to
Posted by SunScorpio
..as they kept trying to bring him down
Busted? Haha, you guys act like I'm putting effert to keep secrets from you. You all aren't hardly that important to me, but apparently I'm important enough to you guys that you have to do research on me. Awww. You've labeled me some of everything and every sign. I refute each one. I'm a solitary man among imaginary symbols. You're the one "BUSTED" for falling into the very cariacture I predicted you would as a water sign.
And now, you can thank me for making it very clear exactly who the "pathetic individual" is here. And you're welcome.
Any time.
Now now, Squishy! Be nice! We all love you. You just have to accept yourself and then you'll be fine. ~keeps swimming deeper with Squishy stuck in net~
No man is truly going to submit to a woman. Sure, he'll submit to the sex, but to the woman herself? Naaa. Moon man might though, there's no telling what he'll do.
Posted by SunScorpio
And so you see, world, in the end, the water signs pulled down even the OP into the depths of the sea. THey didn't remain objective with him, they went personal to bring them down to their level. THey ignored his message, accused him of something he isn't, put labels and strongholds on him. THe OP refuted everything they did, was doing, and ever would do, but yet they persisted. More water flooded the thread until the thread drowned.
If you can read this message, at least you now know the truth about water signs.
THE END.
~Releases bubbles while drowning into the depths of the sea~
We didn't ignore your message. We exposed the loopholes and inconsistencies in it. I say bravo and well done to us all! Not bad considering Scorpios are a little better than Cancers with that sort of sleuthing. And we didn't accuse you of anything we couldn't back up. HA! and TOUCHE!!
Posted by SunScorpio
No man is truly going to submit to a woman. Sure, he'll submit to the sex, but to the woman herself? Naaa. Moon man might though, there's no telling what he'll do.
I'll use your own logic on you: No man who is insecure in himself and his manliness will ever submit to a woman. When one is secure and has found the one he trusts his heart and soul to and vice versa....then they will submit, to each other.
You guys found loopholes as reasons to personally attack me. Just as I predicted you would. Thus allowing you to shift focus away from the message and its original intent..which was to improve the water signs. Instead, all of you drowned it. No surprise there. Of course you didn't ignore the message literally, you just used loopholes to use it to your advantage, freeing yourself from the actual implications of its content. And bravo to ME for figuring you all would.
Posted by SunScorpio
You guys found loopholes as reasons to personally attack me. Just as I predicted you would. Thus allowing you to shift focus away from the message and its original intent..which was to improve the water signs. Instead, all of you drowned it. No surprise there. Of course you didn't ignore the message literally, you just used loopholes to use it to your advantage, freeing yourself from the actual implications of its content. And bravo to ME for figuring you all would.
The problem with your loopholes is that you were less than honest. NEVER EVER LIE TO A WATER SIGN. You should know that, Squishy...come on, that's like water sign 101. 😉
If your real intention had been to better the water signs then you wouldn't have had to be less than honest. If you had remained honest you wouldn't have had loopholes and we could have had a more open discussion. When we tried being fair and having a discussion you twisted your tactics and went back to subterfuge methods. We just called you out on it all. It's ok. We still love you, Squishy.
Thats not my logic. Men won't submit to women because women cant lead a man. Women have no idea what men are up against second by second. We are constantly in danger. and women are our reflection, rest, and reward. If we truly submitted to you, we'd be killed of instantly. Thats why we submit long enough to take the sex and run.
Posted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpio
You guys found loopholes as reasons to personally attack me. Just as I predicted you would. Thus allowing you to shift focus away from the message and its original intent..which was to improve the water signs. Instead, all of you drowned it. No surprise there. Of course you didn't ignore the message literally, you just used loopholes to use it to your advantage, freeing yourself from the actual implications of its content. And bravo to ME for figuring you all would.
The problem with your loopholes is that you were less than honest. NEVER EVER LIE TO A WATER SIGN. You should know that, Squishy...come on, that's like water sign 101. 😉
If your real intention had been to better the water signs then you wouldn't have had to be less than honest. If you had remained honest you wouldn't have had loopholes and we could have had a more open discussion. When we tried being fair and having a discussion you twisted your tactics and went back to subterfuge methods. We just called you out on it all. It's ok. We still love you, Squishy.
click to expand
u've found a loophole in my post, exploited it to label me as "dishonest" and now can move on without any liability to the point i was really making
This process has been repeating for 600+ posts and 3 years.
SO what loop holses will you find in this particular post? And what subsequent label will you be able to place on me?
i think thats more like Watersign 101
Posted by SunScorpio
Thats not my logic. Men won't submit to women because women cant lead a man. Women have no idea what men are up against second by second. We are constantly in danger. and women are our reflection, rest, and reward. If we truly submitted to you, we'd be killed of instantly. Thats why we submit long enough to take the sex and run.
Oh good lord! Please tell me you didn't just go there....~shakes head and mumbles "and he wonders why he can't get a girl"~
It's not about submitting like that, like a dog rolling over onto his back. It's submitting to trust another person with your darkest self, with who you are and your hopes, desires, needs and trusting that they will be there for you when you most need them. That is the submitting. It has nothing to do with running around in some jungle full of wild wildabeasts and laying down your sword at the feet of a woman.
Posted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpio
You guys found loopholes as reasons to personally attack me. Just as I predicted you would. Thus allowing you to shift focus away from the message and its original intent..which was to improve the water signs. Instead, all of you drowned it. No surprise there. Of course you didn't ignore the message literally, you just used loopholes to use it to your advantage, freeing yourself from the actual implications of its content. And bravo to ME for figuring you all would.
The problem with your loopholes is that you were less than honest. NEVER EVER LIE TO A WATER SIGN. You should know that, Squishy...come on, that's like water sign 101. 😉
If your real intention had been to better the water signs then you wouldn't have had to be less than honest. If you had remained honest you wouldn't have had loopholes and we could have had a more open discussion. When we tried being fair and having a discussion you twisted your tactics and went back to subterfuge methods. We just called you out on it all. It's ok. We still love you, Squishy.
u've found a loophole in my post, exploited it to label me as "dishonest" and now can move on without any liability to the point i was really making
This process has been repeating for 600+ posts and 3 years.
SO what loop holses will you find in this particular post? And what subsequent label will you be able to place on me?
i think thats more like Watersign 101click to expand
No loopholes to be found in this post other than you are trying to avoid the blatant fact that you were dishonest and more than once. And we caught it and called you out on it. Hopefully you'll learn a lesson: dishonesty always bites the person in the ass. Or maybe the dick. Either way, it hurts.
Posted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpio
Thats not my logic. Men won't submit to women because women cant lead a man. Women have no idea what men are up against second by second. We are constantly in danger. and women are our reflection, rest, and reward. If we truly submitted to you, we'd be killed of instantly. Thats why we submit long enough to take the sex and run.
Oh good lord! Please tell me you didn't just go there....~shakes head and mumbles "and he wonders why he can't get a girl"~
It's not about submitting like that, like a dog rolling over onto his back. It's submitting to trust another person with your darkest self, with who you are and your hopes, desires, needs and trusting that they will be there for you when you most need them. That is the submitting. It has nothing to do with running around in some jungle full of wild wildabeasts and laying down your sword at the feet of a woman.click to expand
I'm glad you mumbled that so soft I couldn't hear you. Whatever it was I'm pretty sure it was another one of your labels that isn't true.
Let me ask it this way. do you have a problem with following a man's leadership? Do you expect a man to follow your leadership? If you've answered no to both, then were on the same page. What you're describing to me sounds more like sharing and honesty.
Yes I have a problem with following a man's leadership or a woman's. They have to prove their worth and a reason to trust them that much responsibility. I refuse to be so blind and stupid as to just throw my trust to just anyone for no other reason than "I want to submit". No, I don't expect a man or anyone else to follow my leadership unless they feel I'm worth of it and that they trust me.
Posted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpio
You guys found loopholes as reasons to personally attack me. Just as I predicted you would. Thus allowing you to shift focus away from the message and its original intent..which was to improve the water signs. Instead, all of you drowned it. No surprise there. Of course you didn't ignore the message literally, you just used loopholes to use it to your advantage, freeing yourself from the actual implications of its content. And bravo to ME for figuring you all would.
The problem with your loopholes is that you were less than honest. NEVER EVER LIE TO A WATER SIGN. You should know that, Squishy...come on, that's like water sign 101. 😉
If your real intention had been to better the water signs then you wouldn't have had to be less than honest. If you had remained honest you wouldn't have had loopholes and we could have had a more open discussion. When we tried being fair and having a discussion you twisted your tactics and went back to subterfuge methods. We just called you out on it all. It's ok. We still love you, Squishy.
u've found a loophole in my post, exploited it to label me as "dishonest" and now can move on without any liability to the point i was really making
This process has been repeating for 600+ posts and 3 years.
SO what loop holses will you find in this particular post? And what subsequent label will you be able to place on me?
i think thats more like Watersign 101
No loopholes to be found in this post other than you are trying to avoid the blatant fact that you were dishonest and more than once. And we caught it and called you out on it. Hopefully you'll learn a lesson: dishonesty always bites the person in the ass. Or maybe the dick. Either way, it hurts.click to expand
Ok, I'll give you an F+. We almost passed and came close to a genuine conversation. But it looks like this is going into an infinite loop of loopholes. , and personal labels. If it wasn't for that, you'd have a B. But here's your certificate, it says "Squisy is dishonest" frame that, you've earned it.
But after he's proven himself to you, you have no problem being the follower and him the leader?Would you be willing to follow him even if you didn't like his direction (assuming his leadership isnt grossly inappropriate, but rather something against your personal preference)? WOuld you just go with the flow, out of respect and submission, or do you have an issue with that.
Posted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpioPosted by MoonArtistPosted by SunScorpio
You guys found loopholes as reasons to personally attack me. Just as I predicted you would. Thus allowing you to shift focus away from the message and its original intent..which was to improve the water signs. Instead, all of you drowned it. No surprise there. Of course you didn't ignore the message literally, you just used loopholes to use it to your advantage, freeing yourself from the actual implications of its content. And bravo to ME for figuring you all would.
The problem with your loopholes is that you were less than honest. NEVER EVER LIE TO A WATER SIGN. You should know that, Squishy...come on, that's like water sign 101. 😉
Awwww, you made something for me! Thank you, Squishy! And I thought you didn't care.
u've found a loophole in my post, exploited it to label me as "dishonest" and now can move on without any liability to the point i was really making
This process has been repeating for 600+ posts and 3 years.
SO what loop holses will you find in this particular post? And what subsequent label will you be able to place on me?
i think thats more like Watersign 101
No loopholes to be found in this post other than you are trying to avoid the blatant fact that you were dishonest and more than once. And we caught it and called you out on it. Hopefully you'll learn a lesson: dishonesty always bites the person in the ass. Or maybe the dick. Either way, it hurts.click to expand
Ok, I'll give you an F+. We almost passed and came close to a genuine conversation. But it looks like this is going into an infinite loop of loopholes. , and person
oh good grief! Why isn't it allowing my comment after the quote? Ok, third times a charm......
Awwwww, you made me something! Thank you, Squishy, I thought you didn't care.
Awwwww, you made me something! Thank you, Squishy, I thought you didn't care.
Posted by SunScorpio
But after he's proven himself to you, you have no problem being the follower and him the leader?Would you be willing to follow him even if you didn't like his direction (assuming his leadership isnt grossly inappropriate, but rather something against your personal preference)? WOuld you just go with the flow, out of respect and submission, or do you have an issue with that.
That depends on what it is. Does it force anyone to do something they aren't comfortable doing? Does it go against my own ethics? If not and it's just a matter of preference then I"m fine with going along for the ride. Life and partnerships are about sharing. If he has an interest in something that is not my interest then I can either share it with him and learn to like it or try to or give him the freedom to pursue it at his leisure without me. It's only fair that I'd expect the same in return. Not everyone is going to want to do the same thing or go to the same places and there's nothing wrong with that, that's what makes us individuals.
You thought right, I don't care. that's why you have a certificate instead of me.
from now on, you can make all the labels you want and direct them to a lifeless sheet of paper. Saving me from being part of the endless loophole loop.
from now on, you can make all the labels you want and direct them to a lifeless sheet of paper. Saving me from being part of the endless loophole loop.
Ok, i think you'd make a good woman for some man. Just don't put labels on him, giving him the freedom to lead you, and I think you'll both be happy. Your loophole finding is fair and relatively precise but the labeling thing will likely drive him away.
Posted by xMoonMan
Just a little snapshot of a few of SunScorpio's travels.....by the way, SunScorpio is actually a Cancerian.
Posted by SunScorpio
The only reason i'm "here" is because I have been conjured up here. I don't hang around this forum, I've only ever posted in this thread. WHen this thread was dead, I was gone. I have to actively not be here. Otherwise, my silence is taken as an acceptence to the labels you wonderful watersigns keep trying to place on me.
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/gemini/gemini-girls-3266910/#3267282<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/cancers-lets-just-try-this-here-3087804/#3087805<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/brag-about-wtf-ever-thread-3093826/#3093873<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/situational-emotional-expression-3252388/#3252389<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/cancer-men-who-should-dominate-in-bed-2524693/#2526409<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/the-dance-to-gaining-a-cancers-trust-2512289/?p=4#2526806<BR>
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/super-cancer-males-2481109/#2481324<BR>
this one's a classic, it where you admit to being a Cancer man...*chuckle*
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/taurus/cowardly-cancers-and-aggressive-bulls-2215906/?p=6#2347803<BR>
This is where you're posing as a Scorpio, who is a Cancer, who is posting as if a Scorpio, it's gold!
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/scorpio/what-scorpios-should-know-about-others-2008026/#2008027<BR>
But wait, there's more...
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/cancer/i-just-hooked-up-with-the-most-beautiful-cancer-w-2079632/#2079633<BR>
Here's SunScorpio, who's really a Cancer...but not a Cancer, educating the Scorpios on their own board.
https://www.dxpnet.com/opinion/scorpio/why-dont-scorp-help-other-scorp-open-heart-sesion-1990341/#1990342<BR><div class="bqfade">click to expand
Profile of a pathetic troll.
You misunderstood and misconstrued my "labeling". I didn't ACTUALLY label you. I didn't say YOU ARE dishonest. I called you out on your dishonest behavior. Being dishonest and not being dishonest are behaviors you've shown both of on here. When you're not dishonest you get an open, fair discussion. When you're being dishonest you get caught and the discussion goes sour. Life is like that, too. Now, if you had a partner and your dealings with that person were consistently dishonest then it would be fair to label you as a dishonest person, or a liar, if you will. But catching you when you have been dishonest isn't labeling, that's just pointing out a truth. Change the behavior and the truth changes with it.
Oh dear more loop holes and more labeling.
Ok thats what i meant . so change it to "Squishy was showing dishonest behavior and he is going to learn his lesson"
Ok thats what i meant . so change it to "Squishy was showing dishonest behavior and he is going to learn his lesson"
Fair enough. Squishy was showing dishonesty and he is going to learn his lesson. Did you, Squishy?
Apparently, you'd be the judge of that.
But I can't be the judge of that. Only you can decide if you learned something or not. I think you need to go to even deeper waters, Squishy. Come on, you'll like it down there.
No no, no deeper waters for me. In that case, yes I learned not only that lesson but any other lesson I needed and will need to learn from you guys. Thank you all so much for the lesson. I don't know what I would have done had you guys not made this thread and invited me here. oops.
Squishy, sarcasm does not become you. Makes you sound like a sore loser. You started this game. Yes deeper waters for you!
There were 36 pages to read and I don't have enough energy to do it 🙂
I'm sure there was lots of manipulations, objections, defence etc..
But I like to read this : "if they make you feel good EVERYTIME you're with them or think about them, they are manipulating you"..
As a cancerian, I really hate this idea..When I like people, I try to keep them with me and for us it's manipulating..To make them think that they will be ok when they're with us..
Why we can't accept people as they are, we just try to manipulate them when they think they call us or they need us, it's actually us made them to contact us..It's like planting a seed, we give that thought to them by something we've done before..
And why we cancer is always innocent?
I'm sure there was lots of manipulations, objections, defence etc..
But I like to read this : "if they make you feel good EVERYTIME you're with them or think about them, they are manipulating you"..
As a cancerian, I really hate this idea..When I like people, I try to keep them with me and for us it's manipulating..To make them think that they will be ok when they're with us..
Why we can't accept people as they are, we just try to manipulate them when they think they call us or they need us, it's actually us made them to contact us..It's like planting a seed, we give that thought to them by something we've done before..
And why we cancer is always innocent?
Posted by cornfuzzled4everPosted by Funny
There were 36 pages to read and I don't have enough energy to do it 🙂
I'm sure there was lots of manipulations, objections, defence etc..
But I like to read this : "if they make you feel good EVERYTIME you're with them or think about them, they are manipulating you"..
As a cancerian, I really hate this idea..When I like people, I try to keep them with me and for us it's manipulating..To make them think that they will be ok when they're with us..
Why we can't accept people as they are, we just try to manipulate them when they think they call us or they need us, it's actually us made them to contact us..It's like planting a seed, we give that thought to them by something we've done before..
And why we cancer is always innocent?
I'm going to respectfully disagree with that. If I like someone, I want to make them feel good. It's as simple as that. It's not because I want to control them, its because I want to REWARD them for whatever they did that caused me to like them. If someone feels happy when they are with me, I generally also feel happy when they are with me. It's not hard to be happy or to make people happy either- it just requires not being douchey.
Am I manipulating a person if I don't act like a douche and therefore they feel good when they are with me?
click to expand
I agree with you! I don't like to manipulate or control because I hate it when people try doing that to me. I just genuinely like people if they're nice and decent. If they're jerks then they aren't worth my time and certainly won't be counted as friend. The reason I do anything nice for the people I'm close to is because I like spoiling them and seeing them happy. I hope the people I love want to be around me and enjoy my company but if they don't then maybe I need to figure out what I'm doing that turns them away. The only person who ever had a problem with who I am was my ex husband. I guess I didn't fit his idea of what he wanted in a wife and always wanted me to be other than me.
Moon artist, my nick name for you is "Lisa the Loophole Labeler"
The waters still discussing what is wrong with them? Hmmm....
Just trying to be helpful 😉
Just trying to be helpful 😉
Good question moon man. the sad reality is that I've already done that. I just came here in physical form for a spell to break some spells placed on me. I was done with that in my first two posts, but people started adding spells so i figured, since im here, why not break them now. After a few hours of quiet, i can assure you that i won't under any circumstances be back. Not in this form, not in any reincarnation, not even in lurking. If you all can give me some quiet, dying waves, something i can tap my feet in, then I'll give you more than what you're asking for.
Until then, surf's up i guess.
Until then, surf's up i guess.
I think Squishy has a crush on me! I have a new nick name. I'll have to kick him in the shins just to show my affection. But Lisa? Or LLL? REALLY?! Trouble Maker would be more fitting. 😉
i don't know about that kooky part. but youre right about the "little universe" part.`
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
I been talking to this guy cancer guy for about 3 months now. I really like him a lot and we have so much in common. He'
I was thinking maybe we can make a thread to swap some of our favorite recipes. :-) Afterall, we ARE the chefs of the zo
I read somewhere that it's very common for cancers to abuse drugs/alcohol/etc... the only bad thing about my cancer so
I Know, weird,.. but i came across my lsit of songs when me and my ex husband of 6 years split. What did you listen to??
Okay I've been reading these forums for quite a while now (6-7months)and I need ya'lls opinion. I have been playing the
My boyfriend reminded me today that tomorrow is our 1 month anniversary and I was kind of shocked that he was the one
Unfortunate title, but in my experience Cancer ladies seem to have the most casual sex partners in the Zodiac. Also, you
Madly in love with a cancer...just over a year now. So in love that it hurts sometimes. We were dating up until April wh
Does Facebook do your head in or is it just me? Seriously people I know are doing my head in on Facebook and I dunno if
How deep is their love?? (open forum, just want feedback)
I would like to know how Cancers reacts if their love one (assuming he/she is really in love)doesn't acknowledge their b
You know.. I have to say.Although u cancers go MIA on us and test our patience to a max.. When u do come back around and
~adele ~ rolling in the deep and ~ Katy perri ~ E.T , meaning??
I'm aries in love with a cancer man. Wow! He's the most romantic and caring and sweetest man I ever met. He's my cousi
So, I am just curious about Cancer and Capricorn. I personally don't always find it easy to feel them, but sometimes th
On a cancer man who was deeply wounded in his last relationship....how long would you wait around for love? My cancer wo
Its one thing this cancer won't commit......but why won't he leave me alone....=( its not about sex....sex to some comes
We deserve the Bear hug...emotional and all, we are great peeps and deserve some luv.
So cancer boys, how do you deal with a friendship (not FWB) with a girl that you are attracted to, but don't want a rela
Hey guys.. Ok so here's my story.. Ended my 4 month relationship with cancer on Monday.. I was needing more than what