Orbs and Natal Aspects

This topic was created in the Chart Interpretation forum by Icy_monsoon on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 and has 10 replies.

Understanding Orbs and Natal Aspects in Astrology

Orbs represent the distance between planets in an aspect. Typically, up to 8 degrees for oppositions and squares are considered valid, but wider orbs can still influence interpretation. Your orbs of over 14 degrees are wider than standard but may still affect your natal chart subtly.

Profile picture of Icy_monsoon
@Icy_monsoon
8 Years

Sun Opposition Uranus, orb 14°37’

Sun Opposition Neptune, orb 14°53’

Is the orb too wide to be considered an opposition? Or should I consider it anyway?

What's the max orb you use for oppositions and squares?

Profile picture of Icy_monsoon
@Icy_monsoon
8 Years

So the max orb would be 10 degrees or a bit less, not greater than that.

14°37' or 14°53’ is way above the limit so I can easily discard those two aspects. Quite relieved lol.

True, there are so many things to look at. It's crazy and lots of work.

Thank you guys.

Profile picture of Icy_monsoon
@Icy_monsoon
8 Years

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

Profile picture of AerialView
@AerialView
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

click to expand

If it's involving two luminaries (sun to moon aspects) the orb could be wider.

If they're bad aspects then forget it heheh only consider if they're good.

Profile picture of Icy_monsoon
@Icy_monsoon
8 Years

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

If it's involving two luminaries (sun to moon aspects) the orb could be wider.

If they're bad aspects then forget it heheh only consider if they're good.

click to expand

That's a very optimistic way of seeing things. You are right.

If it involves sun to moon, then what would be the widest orb for hard aspects?

Profile picture of AerialView
@AerialView
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

If it's involving two luminaries (sun to moon aspects) the orb could be wider.

If they're bad aspects then forget it heheh only consider if they're good.

That's a very optimistic way of seeing things. You are right.

If it involves sun to moon, then what would be the widest orb for hard aspects?

click to expand

That's depends on the aspects.

Conjunction is the widest then Opposition at 8 and 7 degrees

Then square and trine at 5 and 4 degrees

Quincunx and Sextile at 3 and 2 degrees

Then minor aspects at 1-2 degrees

But I work with tight orbs and it's tighter than most sites by 2-3 degrees.

Profile picture of Icy_monsoon
@Icy_monsoon
8 Years

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

If it's involving two luminaries (sun to moon aspects) the orb could be wider.

If they're bad aspects then forget it heheh only consider if they're good.

That's a very optimistic way of seeing things. You are right.

If it involves sun to moon, then what would be the widest orb for hard aspects?

That's depends on the aspects.

Conjunction is the widest then Opposition at 8 and 7 degrees

Then square and trine at 5 and 4 degrees

Quincunx and Sextile at 3 and 2 degrees

Then minor aspects at 1-2 degrees

But I work with tight orbs and it's tighter than most sites by 2-3 degrees.

click to expand

What orb would you give to the conjunction if it involves luminaries?

10 degrees max? Or it goes greater than 10.

Profile picture of AerialView
@AerialView
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

If it's involving two luminaries (sun to moon aspects) the orb could be wider.

If they're bad aspects then forget it heheh only consider if they're good.

That's a very optimistic way of seeing things. You are right.

If it involves sun to moon, then what would be the widest orb for hard aspects?

That's depends on the aspects.

Conjunction is the widest then Opposition at 8 and 7 degrees

Then square and trine at 5 and 4 degrees

Quincunx and Sextile at 3 and 2 degrees

Then minor aspects at 1-2 degrees

But I work with tight orbs and it's tighter than most sites by 2-3 degrees.

What orb would you give to the conjunction if it involves luminaries?

10 degrees max? Or it goes greater than 10.

click to expand

10° is max for me.

I have 11° degrees between Sun and Moon and never considered it as conjunction although few sites says it's a conjunction.

For conjunction the Sun has more negative effect to the planets nearby. Something called combustion.

Profile picture of Icy_monsoon
@Icy_monsoon
8 Years

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

Posted by Icy_monsoon

Posted by AerialView

They're too wide mate.

Yes, you are right. They are wide. I thought because it involved the Sun, the orb can be much larger. But I am glad I was wrong. I don't need to consider them. I can discard those messed up aspects now.

If it's involving two luminaries (sun to moon aspects) the orb could be wider.

If they're bad aspects then forget it heheh only consider if they're good.

That's a very optimistic way of seeing things. You are right.

If it involves sun to moon, then what would be the widest orb for hard aspects?

That's depends on the aspects.

Conjunction is the widest then Opposition at 8 and 7 degrees

Then square and trine at 5 and 4 degrees

Quincunx and Sextile at 3 and 2 degrees

Then minor aspects at 1-2 degrees

But I work with tight orbs and it's tighter than most sites by 2-3 degrees.

What orb would you give to the conjunction if it involves luminaries?

10 degrees max? Or it goes greater than 10.

10° is max for me.

I have 11° degrees between Sun and Moon and never considered it as conjunction although few sites says it's a conjunction.

For conjunction the Sun has more negative effect to the planets nearby. Something called combustion.

click to expand

I see. You are very strict concerning the orbs. It's better this way.

I heard about combustion.

So I got it then, 10 degrees is the max orb for luminaries.