Its still pointless because the premises are false to begin with.
Most stable Air sun (Page 2)
You are on page out of 3 | Reverse Order
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomTrue, though sun does not rule Aqua either, so going back to sq. 1 about rulership, your argument is again invalid. Aqua has two rulers, no matter how you look at it. You can diss Uranus out all you like.Posted by RamOfPeaceAqua saturn doesnt make you an Aqua sun, its not even comparable, so your deduction is wrong.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomIn theory, indeed it is so. However, being an Aqua Saturn myself I haven't found a single Libra Saturn native who were any less at grips with themselves than me. If anything, I look up to exalted Saturn for guidance and it never fails to disappoint.Posted by RamOfPeaceIf you think exaltation is more powerful than rulership, then you need to start reading more on astrology.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomSaturn is exalted in Libra, which nullifies the argument.
Definitely not Gemini 😛
Aquas are the most stable, their true ruler is Saturn after all (not Uranus)
Exaltation means "too much of it", it doesnt necessarily mean that both energies are the most compatible. Rulership however, is where the energies find themselves at home, making the energy flux natural. A planet that finds itself in a sign of exaltation doesnt feel as comfortable as in its sign of rulership.click to expand
ops, no. 5 only on the above line, since the bottom line refers to economy.
but someone who is NOT wishy washy, pernament in their loyalty, their resistence to change.
but someone who is NOT wishy washy, pernament in their loyalty, their resistence to change.
I would not exactly label Virgo (mutable, mind you) "very very stable." Mercury gives Gemini and Virgo loads of nervous energy. Anyone really close to a Gem or Vir influenced individual can see/feel it. It's palpable.
Posted by RamOfPeacePosted by BoomShakalakaBoomTrue, though sun does not rule Aqua either, so going back to sq. 1 about rulership, your argument is again invalid. Aqua has two rulers, no matter how you look at it. You can diss Uranus out all you like.Posted by RamOfPeaceAqua saturn doesnt make you an Aqua sun, its not even comparable, so your deduction is wrong.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomIn theory, indeed it is so. However, being an Aqua Saturn myself I haven't found a single Libra Saturn native who were any less at grips with themselves than me. If anything, I look up to exalted Saturn for guidance and it never fails to disappoint.Posted by RamOfPeaceIf you think exaltation is more powerful than rulership, then you need to start reading more on astrology.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomSaturn is exalted in Libra, which nullifies the argument.
Definitely not Gemini 😛
Aquas are the most stable, their true ruler is Saturn after all (not Uranus)
Exaltation means "too much of it", it doesnt necessarily mean that both energies are the most compatible. Rulership however, is where the energies find themselves at home, making the energy flux natural. A planet that finds itself in a sign of exaltation doesnt feel as comfortable as in its sign of rulership.click to expand
then shouldnt you make a topic on Saturn signs?? not Sun signs then?
because you're arguing now on saturn and not the sun.
You all surely saw that this thread was meant to be half serious, half humorous. As a Gemini moon, I am quite amused at all these people overreacting. #winning
Posted by duchesslibroohhh it's VERY stable. if you know Virgos or double virgos personally it has a very strong stability.
I would not exactly label Virgo (mutable, mind you) "very very stable." Mercury gives Gemini and Virgo loads of nervous energy. Anyone really close to a Gem or Vir influenced individual can see/feel it. It's palpable.
you just don't see it, but in action its very very stable.
Virgo being a dualistic sign (half bird, half human) NEEDS to have a mutable quality. The whole mission of mutable signs is to try and unify what seem like opposing energies/ideas. This is where creativity comes from.
Posted by RamOfPeaceYour responses so far made you seem pretty emotionally invested in it, so Im not buying your half humorous, half serious claim, sorry
You all surely saw that this thread was meant to be half serious, half humorous. As a Gemini moon, I am quite amused at all these people overreacting. #winning
The element of Virgo makes it stable but it's ruling planet modifies that. So stable, yes. "Very very stable," no. Taurus is "very very stable." Virgo is just stable, without any emphasis.
Posted by RamOfPeaceyour gemini moon makes you seem "fickle"
You all surely saw that this thread was meant to be half serious, half humorous. As a Gemini moon, I am quite amused at all these people overreacting. #winning
and changeable.
it's not a bad thing though. Just changeable, when you want to "win" an argument (your aries) and maybe your mars.
why?because you argue based on sun, then go to saturn, then try to make it out that it's all about saturn which is strongly stable.
now if anyone wants to see who is really stable....go to the full definition online and look to your character traits and SEE if you are really stable.
now if anyone wants to see who is really stable....go to the full definition online and look to your character traits and SEE if you are really stable.
She reminds me of my Gemini moon dad...whenever he starts a discussion and his logic is repeteadly proved flawed he then does a 180 turn and accuses everyone of taking him too seriously 😛
then you say it's half joking.
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomheehee 😆
She reminds me of my Gemini moon dad...whenever he starts a discussion and his logic is repeteadly proved flawed he then does a 180 turn and accuses everyone of taking him too seriously 😛
I don't know many Aquas but I would say 1. Aqua, 2. Libra, then 3. Gemini but it also depends on the stage in life.
Posted by lisabethur870% of what I say is genuinely half joking.
then you say it's half joking.
I can't speak for other G Moons though..
personally i would say none, just based on sun alone. because air is never stable. it cant be. look at the air element out there.
air sitting still would make for stinky farts.
air sitting still would make for stinky farts.
good thing that earth is the most stable, and water refreshes earth so it doesn't remain dry and boring. 😆
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄
Yeah, I am also Gem asc, Gem mars, Aqua Mc, Aqua saturn, and everything in a bunch of mutable houses, dominated by 12th.
Come again 😄
Come again 😄
Posted by RamOfPeace/thread
In your opinion.
Trick question.
"Dominated by 12th"
No wonder you sound like you belong in a mental institution 😄 😄
Just kidding *smooches*
No wonder you sound like you belong in a mental institution 😄 😄
Just kidding *smooches*
Of course you see no issue with this, my Gem moon dad is an aqua sun, like yourself 😉
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄
Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomHaha so is every dxpnet member. Some shi tyou read here could be published as a stand alone prequel to 50 Harry Potters of Twilight
"Dominated by 12th"
No wonder you sound like you belong in a mental institution 😄 😄
Just kidding *smooches*
I think youre right, I would bet the most astrological trait in dxpers is a 12th house emphasis.
*most frequent*
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
I''m pretty glued to this chair right now. Eating a muffin and some ice-cream, I'd be very stable for a short while.
That sounds very Venusian 😛 youre betraying your roots
Posted by duchesslibroWell I mean, if you get to the bare essentials, arent we all here just speaking from subjective experience? Theres nothing wrong with it, theres just no way you can talk about astrology and be fully objective.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. There was a post about that a few weeks ago.. but some people have the cognitive ability to add a strong objective element to their thought process that can harmonize with or nearly override subjectivity. Mental dexterity.Posted by duchesslibroWell I mean, if you get to the bare essentials, arent we all here just speaking from subjective experience? Theres nothing wrong with it, theres just no way you can talk about astrology and be fully objective.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
Posted by duchesslibroWell I have doubts on the objectivity of that objective element. I would change the word objectivity here for "synthesis", indeed..there are people who have the ability to synthesize knowledge to the point it encompasses a whole bunch of (in theory) contradictory ideas. However this process is also objective. My point is, there is no real way of measuring objectivity because every human being is merely an observer of an experience, and as such will always have a filter through which experiences will be interpretedPosted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. There was a post about that a few weeks ago.. but some people have the cognitive ability to add a strong objective element to their thought process that can harmonize with or nearly override subjectivity. Mental dexterity.Posted by duchesslibroWell I mean, if you get to the bare essentials, arent we all here just speaking from subjective experience? Theres nothing wrong with it, theres just no way you can talk about astrology and be fully objective.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomI mean the process is *subjective* not objectivePosted by duchesslibroWell I have doubts on the objectivity of that objective element. I would change the word objectivity here for "synthesis", indeed..there are people who have the ability to synthesize knowledge to the point it encompasses a whole bunch of (in theory) contradictory ideas. However this process is also objective. My point is, there is no real way of measuring objectivity because every human being is merely an observer of an experience, and as such will always have a filter through which experiences will be interpretedPosted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. There was a post about that a few weeks ago.. but some people have the cognitive ability to add a strong objective element to their thought process that can harmonize with or nearly override subjectivity. Mental dexterity.Posted by duchesslibroWell I mean, if you get to the bare essentials, arent we all here just speaking from subjective experience? Theres nothing wrong with it, theres just no way you can talk about astrology and be fully objective.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomValid. Nevertheless, some people are significantly better at thinking from a *relatively* objective viewpoint than others. This is strictPosted by duchesslibroWell I have doubts on the objectivity of that objective element. I would change the word objectivity here for "synthesis", indeed..there are people who have the ability to synthesize knowledge to the point it encompasses a whole bunch of (in theory) contradictory ideas. However this process is also objective. My point is, there is no real way of measuring objectivity because every human being is merely an observer of an experience, and as such will always have a filter through which experiences will be interpretedPosted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. There was a post about that a few weeks ago.. but some people have the cognitive ability to add a strong objective element to their thought process that can harmonize with or nearly override subjectivity. Mental dexterity.Posted by duchesslibroWell I mean, if you get to the bare essentials, arent we all here just speaking from subjective experience? Theres nothing wrong with it, theres just no way you can talk about astrology and be fully objective.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
Posted by Rambunctious76Free trial lessons have expired..if you wanna know more you got to pay 😛Posted by febyPlease do tell us more, Boom. I am interested to understand air moons better.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomAhem libra moon here! But just please stop revealing our stuff ok? No one knows
Of course you see no issue with this, my Gem moon dad is an aqua sun, like yourself 😉click to expand
*strictly comparative.
Posted by duchesslibroPosted by BoomShakalakaBoomValid. Nevertheless, somePosted by duchesslibroWell I have doubts on the objectivity of that objective element. I would change the word objectivity here for "synthesis", indeed..there are people who have the ability to synthesize knowledge to the point it encompasses a whole bunch of (in theory) contradictory ideas. However this process is also objective. My point is, there is no real way of measuring objectivity because every human being is merely an observer of an experience, and as such will always have a filter through which experiences will be interpretedPosted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. There was a post about that a few weeks ago.. but some people have the cognitive ability to add a strong objective element to their thought process that can harmonize with or nearly override subjectivity. Mental dexterity.Posted by duchesslibroWell I mean, if you get to the bare essentials, arent we all here just speaking from subjective experience? Theres nothing wrong with it, theres just no way you can talk about astrology and be fully objective.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomYes. I'm just saying.. plenty on dxp can discuss objectively. It seemed like you were saying every poster only responds based on their own subjective experience.Posted by duchesslibroYes, but astrology isnt an exact science, it also relies purely on interpretation rather than numbers. Which is why there are so many different "astrology schools", there is no such thing as ONE astrological theory.Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomNot everyone bases their opinions solely on personal experience.. Many think in terms of astrological theory as well.
The point is, everytime that people on this thread make a claim about which air sign is the most stable, its not only going to be based on their own experiences with air sign people, it is also going to depend on the stabilizing factors of that air sign person's chart, and those stabilizing factors (besides upbringing, societal conditioning, etc) will be coming from non-air factors in their charts..
So really, everybody here is right, and wrong at the same time 😄click to expand
@ducchess: Definitely! I would say the most unemotional people are probably the best at this.
I hate when quoting gets that long. lol
Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomI'm starting to think air/water dominant people have mental superpowers.. We are not strangers to either realm. Intuition, logic, reasoning, emotions. It all comes together quite nicely. Easy to understand. Easy to switch gears.
@ducchess: Definitely! I would say the most unemotional people are probably the best at this.
Posted by duchesslibroYeah makes sense, though I think air dominated people would be the ones coming up with the ideas out of "thin air", they are the pioneers, whilst the water dominated arent as pioneering (the ideas that come from their rich emotional fantasy/imagination are most likely fueled by concepts that already exist, so their imaginations simply expand on them and their possibilities)Posted by BoomShakalakaBoomI'm starting to think air/water dominant people have mental superpowers.. We are not strangers to either realm. Intuition, logic, reasoning, emotions. It all comes together quite nicely. Easy to understand. Easy to switch gears.
@ducchess: Definitely! I would say the most unemotional people are probably the best at this.click to expand
Im just theorizing here, dont take me too seriously 😛
ge in my wannabe venusian ways 😢
Posted by duchesslibroFor me it's more likePosted by BoomShakalakaBoomI'm starting to think air/water dominant people have mental superpowers.. We are not strangers to either realm. Intuition, logic, reasoning, emotions. It all comes together quite nicely. Easy to understand. Easy to switch gears.
@ducchess: Definitely! I would say the most unemotional people are probably the best at this.click to expand
Brain (aqua) - hey dude like seriously get a grip.
Heart - but that puppy is so cute I'm just gonna cry
Reality - *cannot compute*
Yeah, you need the bridge there between air and water not to come across as a sociopath 😛
For me it's that my air planets live in water houses. It feels like an easy flow between the two elements. And no significant hard aspects with my mental/emotional planets.
Now, to be fair, I suck at expressing my emotions outwardly.. but I understand them internally just fine and empathizing with others is easy.
Now, to be fair, I suck at expressing my emotions outwardly.. but I understand them internally just fine and empathizing with others is easy.
Posted by aquasnozif you are a libra rising, doesn't that mean you are ruled, or rather chart ruler is venusian??
let me indulge in my wannabe venusian ways 😢
Posted by duchesslibroFor me it's more likePosted by BoomShakalakaBoomI'm starting to think air/water dominant people have mental superpowers.. We are not strangers to either realm. Intuition, logic, reasoning, emotions. It all comes together quite nicely. Easy to understand. Easy to switch gears.
@ducchess: Definitely! I would say the most unemotional people are probably the best at this.
Brain (aqua) - hey dude like seriously get a grip.
Heart - but that puppy is so cute I'm just gonna cry
Reality - *cannot compute*click to expand
Posted by lisabethur8I believe it's more likePosted by aquasnozif you are a libra rising, doesn't that mean you are ruled, or rather chart ruler is venusian??
let me indulge in my wannabe venusian ways 😢
Posted by duchesslibroFor me it's more likePosted by BoomShakalakaBoomI'm starting to think air/water dominant people have mental superpowers.. We are not strangers to either realm. Intuition, logic, reasoning, emotions. It all comes together quite nicely. Easy to understand. Easy to switch gears.
@ducchess: Definitely! I would say the most unemotional people are probably the best at this.
Brain (aqua) - hey dude like seriously get a grip.
Heart - but that puppy is so cute I'm just gonna cry
Reality - *cannot compute*
click to expand
sign in ascendant -> planet which rules it -> chart rulership. I could be wrong.
That would mean I need to take some drugs and drink a bit.... which by happenstance I do have a joint and a bottle of captain morgans right next to me.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Does anyone elee have this? Any truth to this article? http://mamabee.com/are-you-a-proud-owner-of-the-letter-m-on-your-palm-see-what-it-means/#arvlbdata
Is it my virgo mars? I mean, I was just thinking back and remembering all the times I "rejected" guys and the look I would give them when they tried to talk to me... something like this https://45.media.tumblr.com/30a808e839cb352c8605a81edf5c971d/tumb
Dear all I feel kinda stuck and need some advice please – this goes back to 2003 and I’m still stuck in the same shitty family drama. Our biological father 58yrs old: Pisces sun Cap moon Aqua venus Aqua merc Taurus mars Our mum 52yrs o
The guy I like has a lot more sex experience than me and I'm a little nervous so I'm trying to look at what he would be like, but they say different things in different places. Sun sign, moon sign, venus sign, mars sign, eros sign, rising sign. What is ri
What is your most prominent element? Can't be your sun sign. More rather your whole chart can tell you your most prominent element. I am an Aquarius sun with cap moon and rising. But this is my most prominent element. Which is earth. 30.4% Earth
The following users have made it a wonderful year on DXPnet for me personally, and I’m quite confident for others as well. Aries: @champranger @Arielle83 @RumiLove Taurus: @Nevermore Gemini: @exxtasyx Cancer: @MoonArtist @scuffles @kissmygrits Leo
How appealing do you find a person who's the following: -A Do-er, instigator, a person who starts things, protects, etc.. or A predictable, yet stable person who can be stubborn yet loyal.
...how are you guys doing? Are you feeling the Pluto in Capricorn affect you? ...do you feel like talking about it? :(
I'm wondering what are the giveaways? Are their specific traits that stand out for each ascendant? Not facial features, I'm being specific to the body. I read somewhere that Libra rising is known to be pear shaped and carry weight in their lower half,
What do you look for? There's an attractive guy who frequents the same cafe that I do. I'd like to be friendly say "hi" and see if anything happens. I wish I knew his sign but he's a complete stranger to me so I don't. He's very fit physically with well
I keep hearing that I have some dark forces that are messing up with my life and finances. And I am on the verge of making a decision that will change my life. But I have to make a right one. Please. may someone look into my chart or whatever and tel
And what kept you around? How did you learn everything? Tell me everything http://s1288.photobucket.com/user/LivTheGreat/media/Blake%20Lively%20gifs/tumblr_mk5a2yXlKn1ql7cg8o1_500_zpsfbd5a17a.gif.html
Then I would understand why I went through all those things, and I could learn and grow with them instead of them messing up many years of my life, the formative ones. I always thought there was something wrong with me, something against me and now I know
How are your relationships and business partnerships if any? How do you handle the relationship challenges of Saturn in the 7th house and all the negativity spread around about it. Like you'll never marry, you'll never have a happy relationship, if you ma
Look ar your Sun, Moon, Venus and Mars. Have you dated people with that sun sign or placements in those signs? For example: My sun is Virgo. Inconjuncts => Aries, Aqua Moon is Aries: Inconjuncts => Scorpio, Virgo Venus Cancer: Inconjuncts => Aqua,
How does a planet positioned in a certain house and in a certain sign affect another planet in a different(?) sign and house. Let's say that you have your moon in capricorn(7th) and that it's conjunct neptune(same sign and house) and square uranus(scorpio
How many square aspects do you have in your chart? Also feel free to post them and share how you're dealing with them, or struggling, or how you have overcome them.
Are you sure about any of it and do you have personal experience with creditable data? What part of astrology do you witness and feel willing to contest to?
unimpressed with the world?